Impact of Factor Xa Inhibition on Coagulation, Platelet Reactivity, and Thrombosis in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: The role of thrombin in vascular pathology is a focus of investigation. The incorporation of direct Factor Xa inhibition into practice patterns is based on its theoretical dual-pathway attenuation of both thrombin generation and platelet aggregation. However, quantification of the effect of direct anti-Xa medications on platelet function is not established. Thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM) leverages dual-pathway metrics to provide comprehensive coagulation profiles. We evaluated the effects of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on coagulation and platelet function profiles and correlate these data with postoperative major adverse limb events (MALEs) in patients with PAD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization with serial perioperative TEG-PM analysis. Patients on DOACs were compared to those not on DOACs, and stratified by concurrent mono-antiplatelet or dual-antiplatelet regimens (MAPT/DAPT). Postoperative MALE was recorded and difference in antithrombotic regimens and TEG-PM analysis compared between groups. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-one samples from 141 patients were analyzed. Twenty-nine point five percent were reflective of circulating DOAC therapy. Compared to MAPT alone, patients on DOAC + MAPT exhibited longer time to clot formation (R-time) [7.4 (±2.4) vs. 6.7 (±2.7); P < 0.02], but less platelet inhibition. Patients on DAPT exhibited greater platelet inhibition compared to either group [23.7 (±26.9) vs. 31.0 (±28.3) vs. 42.2 (±31.2); P < 0.01]. Patients who experienced MALE were more likely to be on DOAC therapy [43.8% vs. 22.0% P = 0.02]. Thromboelastography with platelet mapping analysis from patients who experienced MALE also demonstrated longer R-time [8.6 (±3.9 vs. 7.3 (±3.0); P = 0.05] and increased maximum clot amplitude (MA) [66.7 (±4.2) vs. 61.8 (±8.2); P = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Direct oral anticoagulant therapy resulted in a prolonged R-time but had no impact on platelet inhibition. Patients who experienced MALE were more often on DOACs and demonstrated an increased R-time, but also showed greater platelet reactivity evident by increased MA, suggesting DOACs may not be effective at protecting against MALE. Further research comparing DOAC therapy to a DAPT approach may add clarity to emerging multimodal antithrombotic recommendations.

Use of Thromboelastography with Platelet Mapping to Identify Prothrombotic Coagulation Profiles in Patients with History of Cardiac Intervention Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Patients with concomitant coronary and peripheral artery disease (CAD and PAD) are at significant risk for major adverse limb events (MALEs). Prevention of thrombosis in this population is of paramount importance. Identifying prothrombotic coagulation profiles in this cohort may facilitate targeted thromboprophylaxis. We compared coagulation profiles of those with CAD and PAD to those with PAD alone during the perioperative period of lower extremity revascularization. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization underwent thromboelastography-platelet mapping (TEG-PM) analysis preoperatively and at serial intervals for up to 6 months. Coagulation profiles of patients with significant CAD (defined as history of coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention) and PAD were compared with those with PAD alone. MALE in the postoperative period was recorded. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-seven TEG-PM samples from 114 patients were analyzed; 28.1% had a history of significant CAD. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was higher in this group. The significant CAD group had lower ADP-platelet inhibition, higher ADP-platelet aggregation, and greater maximum clot strength compared with patients with PAD alone. Patients with significant CAD were more frequently on full-dose anticoagulation, but less frequently on dual antiplatelet therapy; 28.1% of patients with significant CAD developed postoperative MALE compared with 22.9% of patients with PAD alone (p = 0.40). For both groups, patients who developed postoperative MALE demonstrated greater ADP-platelet aggregation and lower ADP-platelet inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of significant CAD undergoing lower extremity revascularization demonstrated prothrombotic TEG-PM profiles, less frequent use of dual antiplatelet therapy, and greater rates of full-dose anticoagulation. Decreased platelet inhibition was also associated with postoperative MALE. This study underscores the potential utility of viscoelastic assays for coagulation profiling in complex cardiovascular patients.

Identifying Sex Dimorphism in Peripheral Artery Disease with Platelet Mapping.

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes in women with peripheral artery disease (PAD) after revascularization procedures are worse compared to men, yet there is little in the existing literature as why this may be the case. Platelet Mapping is an emerging point-of-care viscoelastic technology that measures the comprehensive properties of a blood clot, including fibrin-platelet interactions. This prospective observational study aimed to characterize the clinical and Platelet Mapping profiles of female and male patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization, and to correlate Platelet Mapping distribution to thrombotic potential. METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of PAD undergoing named vessel open or endovascular revascularization to re-establish inflow, outflow, or both, during December 2020 and January 2022 were prospectively included. Patients were followed clinically for thrombosis for up to 1 year. Platelet Mapping assays were performed in 3 clinical phases: preoperative, postoperative inpatient, and postoperative outpatient. Inferential analysis between female and male patient was performed. The quartile distribution of Platelet Mapping metrics associated with thrombosis was used to infer to thrombotic potential. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients were enrolled, of which 37 (34.6%) were female. Female patients had significantly lower rates of uncontrolled diabetes (2.7% vs. 18.6%), hypertension requiring combination therapy (37.8% vs. 58.6%), chronic kidney disease (27.0% vs. 51.4%), coronary artery disease (29.7% vs. 57.1%), and myocardial infarction (16.2% vs. 35.7%) (all P < 0.05). Platelet reactivity was significantly higher in female patients with greater platelet aggregation (75.9 ± 23.3 vs. 63.5 ± 28.8) and lower platelet inhibition (23.8 ± 23.4 vs. 36.8 ± 28.9) (all P < 0.01). This trend was consistent over time when stratified by the postoperative inpatient and postoperative outpatient clinical phases. There was no statistically discernible difference in the use of antiplatelet therapy between groups, yet female patients continued to exhibit greater platelet reactivity when analyzed by the type of pharmacologic regimen (platelet aggregation on mono-antiplatelet therapy: 80.6 ± 21.0 in women versus 69.4 ± 25.0 in men; platelet aggregation on dual antiplatelet therapy: 67.9 ± 23.8 in women versus 44.8 ± 31.8 in men) (all P < 0.01). Twenty-one patients experienced postoperative graft/stent thrombosis within the study period. In relation to the overall study population, patients with thrombosis had Platelet Mapping metrics above the 50th percentile of overall platelet aggregation distribution. CONCLUSIONS: There is a growing appreciation for the differences in etiology, disease progression, and outcomes of cardiovascular conditions as they relate to sex. In this cohort, traditional cardiovascular risk factors were in lower prevalence in female patients. Platelet reactivity was found to be higher across clinical phases and antiplatelet regimens. High platelet reactivity was also associated with an increased incidence of thrombosis after lower extremity revascularization. These hypothesis-generating findings provide the basis for further exploration of sex-specific coagulation profiling in PAD patients.

Predicting Arterial Thrombotic Events Following Peripheral Revascularization Using Objective Viscoelastic Data.

Background Peripheral artery disease is endemic in our globally aging population, with >200 million affected worldwide. Graft/stent thrombosis after revascularization is common and frequently results in amputation, major adverse cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular mortality. Optimizing medications to decrease thrombosis is of paramount importance; however, limited guidance exists on how to use and monitor antithrombotic therapy in this heterogeneous population. Thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM) provides comprehensive coagulation metrics and may be integral to the next stage of patient-centered thrombophrophylaxis. This prospective study aimed to determine if TEG-PM could predict subacute graft/stent thrombosis following lower extremity revascularization, and if objective cut point values could be established to identify those high-risk patients. Methods and Results We conducted a single-center prospective observational study of patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization. Patients were followed up for the composite end point postoperative graft/stent thrombosis at 1 year. TEG-PM analysis of the time point before thrombosis in the event group was compared with the last postoperative visit in the nonevent group. Cox proportional hazards analysis examined the association of TEG-PM metrics to thrombosis. Cut point analysis explored the predictive capacity of TEG-PM metrics for those at high risk. A total of 162 patients were analyzed, of whom 30 (18.5%) experienced graft/stent thrombosis. Patients with thrombosis had significantly greater platelet aggregation (79.7±15.7 versus 58.5±26.4) and lower platelet inhibition (20.7±15.6% versus 41.1±26.6%) (all P<0.01). Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that for every 1% increase in platelet aggregation, the hazard of experiencing an event during the study period increased by 5% (hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02-1.07]; P<0.01). An optimal cut point of >70.8% platelet aggregation and/or <29.2% platelet inhibition identifies those at high risk of thrombosis with 87% sensitivity and 70% to 71% specificity. Conclusions Among patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization, increased platelet reactivity was predictive of subacute postoperative graft/stent thrombosis. On the basis of the cut points of >70.8% platelet aggregation and <29.2% platelet inhibition, consideration of an alternative or augmented antithrombotic regimen for high-risk patients may decrease the risk of postoperative thrombotic events.

Variability of antiplatelet response in patients with peripheral artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: Antiplatelet therapy has been a pillar of management for peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, a significant subset of patients with PAD will be resistant to certain antiplatelet medications and, therefore, have an increased risk of graft and/or stent thrombosis unknown to the surgeon. At present, no point-of-care testing to identity which patients will experience benefit from these medications has been incorporated into the treatment guidelines. Thromboelastography with platelet mapping affords an opportunity to evaluate real-time coagulation dynamics and platelet function. In the present prospective, observational study, we aimed to delineate the variation in response to antiplatelet therapy in patients with PAD undergoing revascularization. METHODS: All patients who were undergoing named vessel revascularization during December 2020 through April 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Platelet mapping assays were performed in three clinical phases: preoperative, postoperative inpatient, and postoperative outpatient. The distribution of platelet reactivity within patients receiving mono- vs dual antiplatelet therapy was assessed, and a between-group inferential analysis was performed. The effect of comorbidities and intervention subtype on platelet inhibition was also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 521 platelet mapping samples from 143 individual patients were analyzed using thromboelastography with platelet mapping. We found wide variability in the distribution of platelet inhibition, with a range of 0 to 100 and an interquartile range of 37.6. Although platelet inhibition with clopidogrel 75 mg was higher on average (44.8 ± 30.2) than that with aspirin 81 mg (24.6 ± 23.7) or aspirin 325 mg (27.1 ± 26.4; P = .001), clopidogrel at 75 mg demonstrated the highest variability in response. CONCLUSIONS: These data have demonstrated significant variability in the response to both mono- and dual antiplatelet therapy in PAD patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization. Future research on the effect of this variability in response on the clinical outcomes could provide invaluable understanding of the perioperative thrombotic risk.

Impact of socioeconomic disparities on major lower extremity revascularization complications.

INTRODUCTION: Low socioeconomic status (SES), distance lived from hospital, and insurance status are well documented in the literature to increase the risk of post-operative morbidity and mortality for some disease processes however there is a paucity of data regarding how this association impacts patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). This study aimed to evaluate if SES, distance lived from hospital, and insurance status increased the risk of developing major graft failure in patients undergoing revascularization procedures for symptomatic PAD in a prospective, observation study. METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, all patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization (endovascular or open) were included from December 2020 to February 2022. Demographic factors, insurance status, operative details, and median income and distance from hospital were documented through chart review. Complications were defined as thrombosis/occlusion of the revascularized vessel or bypass graft or infection of the distal wound or surgical incision wound. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed comparing patients that developed complications and those that did not. This project was undertaken at the Massachusetts General Hospital and was governed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB: 2020P000263) all patients agreed to participation via informed written consent prior to enrollment in the study. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were enrolled in the study of which 94 underwent successful revascularization procedures. Of those 94 patients, 38 (40.4%) underwent open bypass, 39 (41.5%) underwent endovascular revascularization, and 17 (18.1%) underwent a hybrid approach. There were no significant differences in post-operative outcomes between operative approaches. Twenty-five patients (28.7%) experienced major revascularization complications as defined as re-occlusion of the treated vessel/thrombosis of the bypass graft (n = 13) or development of post-operative infection (n = 12). There was no significant difference in median income ($75,295 vs $87,757, p = NS), distance lived from hospital, (27.4 miles vs. 29.7 miles, p = NS), or type of insurance (private 24% vs 26%, government 76% vs 73%, p = NS between patients that experienced complications versus those that did not have complications. These findings suggest the risk of major graft failure is independent of a patient's socioeconomic status, distance lived from hospital, or insurance type in patients undergoing revascularization procedures for PAD. CONCLUSION: While socioeconomic factors impact access to and have a known association with negative outcomes, complications in patients with PAD appear to be independent of these factors. To mitigate the negative outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease, a focus should be on patient risk factors and modifiable medical factors that contribute to adverse outcomes.

Utilization of Thromboelastography with Platelet Mapping to Predict Infection and Poor Wound Healing in Postoperative Vascular Patients.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative infection and wound dehiscence rates are higher than expected in peripheral artery disease and contribute significantly to limb loss and mortality. Microvascular pathology characterized by microthrombi and increased platelet aggregation have been cited as contributing factors to poor wound healing and infection. The emergence of viscoelastic assays, such as thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM), have been utilized to identify prothrombotic states and may provide insight into a patient's microvascular coagulation profile. This prospective, observational study aimed to determine if TEG-PM could predict poor wound healing or infection following lower extremity revascularization. METHODS: All patients undergoing revascularization between December 2020 and January 2022 were prospectively included and followed for wound complications or non-surgical site infections of the index limb. TEG-PM metrics at the first postoperative follow-up in the nonevent group was compared to the TEG-PM sample preceding the diagnosis of infection/dehiscence in the event group. Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression was used to model the predictive value of viscoelastic parameters. Cut-point analysis to determine high-risk groups was determined by performing receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Of the 102 patients, 18.6% experienced infection/dehiscence. The TEG-PM sample analyzed in the event group was, on average, 19.5 days prior to the diagnosis of an event. The event group had significantly higher maximum clot amplitude (MA) (47.3 mm ± 16.0 vs. 30.6 mm ± 15.3, P < 0.01), higher platelet aggregation (71.3% ± 27.7 vs. 31.2% ± 24.0, P < 0.01), and lower platelet inhibition (28.7% ± 27.7 vs. 68.7% ± 24.1, P < 0.01). Cox PH analysis identified platelet aggregation as an independent and consistent predictor of infection (hazard ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.06, P < 0.01). An optimal cut-point of > 33.2 mm MA, > 46.6% platelet aggregation, or < 55.8% platelet inhibition identifies those with infection/dehiscence with 79.0-89.5% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first data to provide a quantitative link between prothrombotic viscoelastic coagulation profiles with the development of infection/dehiscence. Based on the cut-points of > 33.2 mm MA, > 46.6% platelet aggregation, or < 55.8% platelet inhibition, we recommend consideration of an enhanced antimicrobial or antithrombotic approach for these high risk groups.