Analgesia and Sedation Use During Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure.

OBJECTIVES: To describe U.S. practice regarding administration of sedation and analgesia to patients on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) and to determine the association of this practice with odds of intubation or death. DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. SETTING: A total of 1017 hospitals contributed data between January 2010 and September 2020 to the Premier Healthcare Database, a nationally representative healthcare database in the United States. PATIENTS: Adult (≥ 18 yr) patients admitted to U.S. hospitals requiring NIV for ARF. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 433,357 patients on NIV of whom (26.7% [95% CI] 26.3%-27.0%) received sedation or analgesia. A total of 50,589 patients (11.7%) received opioids only, 40,646 (9.4%) received benzodiazepines only, 20,146 (4.6%) received opioids and benzodiazepines, 1.573 (0.4%) received dexmedetomidine only, and 2,639 (0.6%) received dexmedetomidine in addition to opioid and/or benzodiazepine. Of 433,357 patients receiving NIV, 50,413 (11.6%; 95% CI, 11.5-11.7%) patients underwent invasive mechanical ventilation on hospital days 2-5 or died on hospital days 2-30. Intubation was used in 32,301 patients (7.4%; 95% CI, 7.3-7.6%). Further, death occurred in 24,140 (5.6%; 95% CI, 5.5-5.7%). In multivariable analysis adjusting for relevant covariates, receipt of any medication studied was associated with increased odds of intubation or death. In inverse probability weighting, receipt of any study medication was also associated with increased odds of intubation or death (average treatment effect odds ratio 1.38; 95% CI, 1.35-1.40). CONCLUSIONS: The use of sedation and analgesia during NIV is common. Medication exposure was associated with increased odds of intubation or death. Further investigation is needed to confirm this finding and determine whether any subpopulations are especially harmed by this practice.

Rapid and Effective Treatment of Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with Intravenous Dalbavancin.

BACKGROUND Peritonitis is a complication associated with peritoneal dialysis (PD), which carries a significant morbidity and mortality risk. Empiric therapy must include coverage of gram-positive organisms; vancomycin is a recommended treatment option, particularly when MRSA infection is a risk. Vancomycin is cumbersome for patients, requiring therapeutic drug monitoring and re-administration by a healthcare provider. Dalbavancin, administered as a one-time intravenous dose, is a convenient potential treatment option for PD patients to cover gram-positive organisms without the need for routine drug monitoring. CASE REPORT We present 2 patients effectively treated with dalbavancin for infectious peritonitis. The first patient, a 73-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on PD, presented to the hospital with fever, elevated white blood cells (WBCs), and cloudy peritoneal fluid with elevated nucleated cell counts (88% neutrophils). This patient was given 1 dose of 1500 mg IV dalbavancin. Within 3 days, her fever resolved, WBCs returned to normal, and peritoneal fluid results improved. The second patient was a 36-year-old woman presenting to an outpatient clinic with abdominal pain and cloudy peritoneal fluid with elevated nucleated cell counts (53% neutrophils) treated with dalbavancin 1500 mg IV once. Within 4 days, this patient's pain had resolved, and peritoneal fluid results returned to baseline. No adverse effects were noted for either patient. CONCLUSIONS These cases illustrate the potential of dalbavancin as a convenient option for patients with PD-associated peritonitis. Both patients demonstrated rapid and complete response to a single dose of dalbavancin without complications. Further prospective studies are needed to establish dalbavancin as an option for peritonitis.

Debilitating Gentamicin Ototoxicity: Case Report and Recommendations Against Routine Use in Surgical Prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Aminoglycoside antibiotics such as gentamicin are bactericidal and effective against gram negative organisms and act synergistically against gram positive organisms, including Staphylococcus aureus. However, they have serious adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Gentamicin ototoxicity may occur after a single dose and results in decreased vestibular function, which is frequently debilitating and often permanent. OBJECTIVE: To emphasize the risk of gentamicin ototoxicity and suggest alternative antibiotics in penicillin-allergic patients undergoing surgery. CASE SUMMARY: We present a case of a woman with preexisting Meniere's Disease who received gentamicin 400 mg perioperatively for a sigmoidectomy due to a penicillin allergy listed in the patient's medical record. The patient developed severe ototoxicity preventing her from working or driving. Physical examination was remarkable for a broad-based gait requiring assistance to walk and bilateral corrective saccades. Vestibular testing revealed high-grade bilateral vestibular loss associated with all semicircular canals, a considerable decline compared to her function 3 years prior. DISCUSSION: Gentamicin is indicated for surgical prophylaxis when a patient has a true allergy to penicillins and cannot receive cephalosporins, though alternatives exist. True allergies include IgE-mediated illness (anaphylaxis, bronchospasm, or urticaria 30-60 minutes after administration) or exfoliative reactions (Stevens-Johnson Syndrome or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis). The authors encourage more prudent use of gentamicin, especially in patients susceptible for debilitating otologic insults, and offer recommendations for alternative agents prior to using gentamicin.

Extended Stability of Isoproterenol Hydrochloride Injection in Polyvinyl Chloride Bags Stored in Amber Ultraviolet Light Blocking Bags.

Purpose:Evaluate the stability of isoproterenol hydrochloride injection in 0.9% sodium chloride in polyvinyl chloride bags for up to 90 days. Methods: Dilutions of isoproterenol hydrochloride injection to a concentration of 4 µg/mL were performed under aseptic conditions. The bags were stored in amber ultraviolet light blocking bags at room temperature (23°C-25°C) or under refrigeration (3°C-5°C). Three samples of each preparation and storage environment were analyzed on days 0, 2, 14, 30, 45, 60, and 90. Physical stability was performed by visual examination. The pH was assessed at baseline, each analysis day, and upon final degradation evaluation. Sterility of the samples was not assessed. Chemical stability of isoproterenol hydrochloride was evaluated using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Samples were considered stable if there was <10% degradation of the initial concentration. Results: Isoproterenol hydrochloride diluted to 4 µg/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection was physically stable throughout the study. No precipitation was observed. At days 2, 14, 30, 45, 60, and 90 all bags diluted to 4 µg/mL had <10% degradation when stored under refrigeration (3°C-5°C) or stored at room temperature (23°C-25°C). Conclusion: Isoproterenol hydrochloride diluted to a concentration of 4 µg/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride for injection in ultraviolet light blocking bags was stable for 90 days at room temperature and under refrigeration.

Extended Stability of Vasopressin Injection in Polyvinyl Chloride Bags and Polypropylene Syringes and Its Impact on Critically Ill Patient Care and Medication Waste.

Background. Vasopressin is frequently utilized for a variety of shock states in critically ill patients. Short stability (≤24 hours) after intravenous admixture with current manufacturer labeling requires just in time preparation and may lead to delays in therapy and increased medication waste. We aimed to evaluate vasopressin stability in 0.9% sodium chloride stored in polyvinyl chloride bags and polypropylene syringes for up to 90 days. Additionally, we evaluated the impact of extended stability on the time to administration and cost savings from reduced medical waste at an academic medical center. Methods. Dilutions of vasopressin to concentrations of 0.4 and 1.0 unit/mL were performed under aseptic conditions. The bags and syringes were stored at room temperature (23°C-25°C) or under refrigeration (3°C-5°C). Three samples of each preparation and storage environment were analyzed on days 0, 2, 14, 30, 45, 60, and 90. Physical stability was performed by visual examination. The pH was assessed at each point and upon final degradation evaluation. Sterility of the samples was not assessed. Chemical stability of vasopressin was evaluated using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Samples were considered stable if there was <10% degradation of the initial concentration. Results. Vasopressin diluted to 0.4 and 1.0 unit/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection was physically stable throughout the study. No precipitation was observed. At days 2, 14, 30, 45, 60, and 90 all bags and syringes diluted to 0.4 units/mL had <10% degradation. Vasopressin diluted to 1 unit/mL and stored under refrigeration had <10% degradation at all measured days, but when stored under room temperature was found to have >10% degradation at day 30. Implementation of a batching process resulted in reduced waste ($185 300) and improved time to administration (26 vs 4 minutes). Conclusion. Vasopressin diluted to a concentration of 0.4 units/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection is stable for 90 days at room temperature and under refrigeration. When diluted to 1.0 unit/mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection it is stable for 90 days under refrigeration. Use of extended stability and sterility testing to batch prepare infusions may lead to improved time to administration and cost savings from reduced medication waste.

Management of noncytotoxic extravasation injuries: A focused update on medications, treatment strategies, and peripheral administration of vasopressors and hypertonic saline.

Extravasation is the leakage of intravenous solutions into surrounding tissues, which can be influenced by drug properties, infusion techniques, and patient-related risk factors. Although peripheral administration of vesicants may increase the risk of extravasation injuries, the time and resources required for central venous catheter placement may delay administration of time-sensitive therapies. Recent literature gathered from the growing use of peripheral vasopressors and hypertonic sodium suggests low risk of harm for initiating these emergent therapies peripherally, which may prevent delays and improve patient outcomes. Physiochemical causes of tissue injury include vasoconstriction, pH-mediated, osmolar-mediated, and cytotoxic mechanisms of extravasation injuries. Acidic agents, such as promethazine, amiodarone, and vancomycin, may cause edema, sloughing, and necrosis secondary to cellular desiccation. Alternatively, basic agents, such as phenytoin and acyclovir, may be more caustic due to deeper tissue penetration of the dissociated hydroxide ions. Osmotically active agents cause cellular damage as a result of osmotic shifts across cellular membranes in addition to agent-specific toxicities, such as calcium-induced vasoconstriction and calcifications or arginine-induced leakage of potassium causing apoptosis. A new category has been proposed to identify absorption-refractory mechanisms of injury in which agents such as propofol and lipids may persist in the extravasated space and cause necrosis or compartment syndrome. Pharmacological antidotes may be useful in select extravasations but requires prompt recognition and frequently complex administration strategies. Historically, intradermal phentolamine has been the preferred agent for vasopressor extravasations, but frequent supply shortages have led to the emergence of terbutaline, a ß2 -agonist, as an acceptable alternative treatment option. For hyperosmolar and pH-related mechanisms of injuries, hyaluronidase is most commonly used to facilitate absorption and dispersion of injected agents. However, extravasation management is largely supportive and requires a protocolized multidisciplinary approach for early detection, treatment, and timely surgical referral when required to minimize adverse events.

Association between Substance Misuse and Outcomes in Critically III Patients with Pneumonia.

Rationale: In patients with pneumonia requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, alcohol misuse is associated with increased mortality, but the relationship between other commonly misused substances and mortality is unknown. Objectives: We sought to establish whether alcohol misuse, cannabis misuse, opioid misuse, stimulant misuse, or misuse of more than one of these substances was associated with differences in mortality among ICU patients with pneumonia. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitals participating in the Premier Healthcare Database between 2010 and 2017. Patients were included if they had a primary or secondary diagnosis of pneumonia and received antibiotics or antivirals within 1 day of admission. Substance misuse related to alcohol, cannabis, stimulants, and opioids, or more than one substance, were identified from the International Classification of Diseases (Ninth and Tenth Editions). The associations between substance misuse and in-hospital mortality were the primary outcomes of interest. Secondary outcomes included the measured associations between substance misuse disorders and mechanical ventilation, as well as vasopressor and continuous paralytic administration. Analyses were conducted with multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression modeling adjusting for age, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Results: A total of 167,095 ICU patients met inclusion criteria for pneumonia. Misuse of alcohol was present in 5.0%, cannabis misuse in 0.6%, opioid misuse in 1.5%, stimulant misuse in 0.6%, and misuse of more than one substance in 1.2%. No evidence of substance misuse was found in 91.1% of patients. In unadjusted analyses, alcohol misuse was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.19), whereas opioid misuse was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.39-0.53) compared with no substance misuse. These findings persisted in adjusted analyses. Although cannabis, stimulant, and more than one substance misuse (a majority of which were alcohol in combination with another substance) were associated with lower odds for in-hospital mortality in unadjusted analyses, these relationships were not consistently present after adjustment. Conclusions: In this study of ICU patients hospitalized with severe pneumonia, substance misuse subtypes were associated with different effects on mortality. Although administrative data can provide epidemiologic insight regarding substance misuse and pneumonia outcomes, biases inherent to these data should be considered when interpreting results.

Correlation Between and Nursing Satisfaction With CIWA-Ar, mMINDS, and SEWS Scoring Tools for the Assessment of Severe Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in ICU Patients.

BACKGROUND: Management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) requires bedside assessments of symptom severity to guide therapies. Commonly used assessment tools are the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA-Ar), the modified Minnesota Detoxification Scale (mMINDS) and the Severity of Ethanol Withdrawal Scale (SEWS). OBJECTIVE: To determine strength of correlation between the CIWA-Ar, mMINDS, and SEWS for bedside assessment of severe AWS and to survey nurses regarding ease of use of each tool. METHODS: A single-center prospective correlation study of the three assessment tools performed by bedside nurses on patients with AWS followed by a questionnaire assessing ease of use of each tool (1 being the easiest and 9 being the hardest). RESULTS: A total of 66 correlation assessments were performed by 49 nurses in 21 patients with AWS. Bedside CIWA-Ar, mMINDS, and SEWS were 14 ± 8.3, 13.9 ± 6.5, and 10.1 ± 4.5, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.814 (95% CI, 0.714-0.881) between CIWA-Ar and mMINDS; 0.722 (95% CI, 0.585-0.820) between CIWA-Ar and SEWS; and 0.658 (95% CI, 0.498-0.775) between SEWS and mMINDS. Nurse ratings for ease of use were 4 ± 2.3 for CIWA-Ar, 2.9 ± 2 for mMINDS (p=0.0044 vs. CIWA-Ar), and 4.8 ± 2.1 for SEWS (p=0.036 vs. CIWA-Ar, p<0.0001 vs. mMINDS). Forty-six (69.7%) respondents preferred mMINDS versus 14 (21.2%) and 6 (9.1%) respondents favored CIWA-Ar and SEWS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Correlations between the three scoring tools in severe AWS are robust. Only mMINDS was considered easy to use by nurses. It was the preferred tool.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Refractory Asthma Exacerbations With Respiratory Failure.

BACKGROUND: Asthma exacerbations with respiratory failure (AERF) are associated with hospital mortality of 7% to 15%. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used as a salvage therapy for refractory AERF, but controlled studies showing its association with mortality have not been performed. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is treatment with ECMO associated with lower mortality in refractory AERF compared with standard care? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, epidemiologic, observational cohort study using a national, administrative data set from 2010 to 2020 that includes 25% of US hospitalizations. People were included if they were admitted to an ECMO-capable hospital with an asthma exacerbation, and were treated with short-acting bronchodilators, systemic corticosteroids, and invasive ventilation. People were excluded for age < 18 years, no ICU stay, nonasthma chronic lung disease, COVID-19, or multiple admissions. The main exposure was ECMO vs No ECMO. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Key secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, time receiving invasive ventilation, and total hospital costs. RESULTS: The study analyzed 13,714 patients with AERF, including 127 with ECMO and 13,587 with No ECMO. ECMO was associated with reduced mortality in the covariate-adjusted (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.64; P = .001), propensity score-adjusted (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.81; P = .01), and propensity score-matched models (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.98; P = .04) vs No ECMO. Sensitivity analyses showed that mortality reduction related to ECMO ranged from OR 0.34 to 0.61. ECMO was also associated with increased hospital costs in all three models (P < .0001 for all) vs No ECMO, but not with decreased ICU LOS, hospital LOS, or time receiving invasive ventilation. INTERPRETATION: ECMO was associated with lower mortality and higher hospital costs, suggesting that it may be an important salvage therapy for refractory AERF following confirmatory clinical trials.

Why So Salty? Transient Diabetes Insipidus After Discontinuation of Vasopressin.

In recent years, vasopressin has been increasingly used as an early treatment of vasopressor-refractory septic shock. In this article, we describe 2 episodes of transient diabetes insipidus after vasopressin for the treatment of septic shock was discontinued, which adds to a modest number of case studies reporting the same phenomenon. With the anticipated continued use of vasopressin in intensive care units, it can be expected that this adverse effect will occur with some frequency. Awareness and early recognition of this phenomenon can lead to prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Evaluation of safety and efficacy outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in normal and extreme body weights for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.

Despite evolving evidence, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with extremes of body weight remains controversial. This study aimed to measure the impact of DOACs compared to warfarin on safety and efficacy outcomes in extreme body weight patients. This multi-center, health system, retrospective study examined the outcomes of patients with all body weights and extreme body weights prescribed a DOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) or warfarin for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism over a 9-year period. The primary outcome was a composite of thromboembolism, symptomatic recurrent VTE, or severe bleeding; analyzed by pre-determined BMI cutoffs. A total of 19,697 patients were included in the study: 11,604 in the DOAC group and in the 8093 in the warfarin group. 295 patients were underweight and 9108 patients were pre-obese to obese class 3. After adjusting for potential confounders, warfarin patients had higher odds of experiencing the composite outcome compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.337, 95% CI 1.212-1.475). Additionally, obese patients were 24.6% more likely to experience the outcome compared to normal BMI patients. Adjusted modeling showed that warfarin patients experienced higher bleed rates compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.432, 95% CI 1.266-1.620). Obese patients were less likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 0.749, 95% CI 0.658-0.854), and underweight patients were more likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 1.522, 95% CI 1.095-2.115) compared to normal BMI patients. In conclusion, DOACs for atrial fibrillation or VTE in patients with extreme body weights appear safe and effective when compared to warfarin.

Evaluation of Insulin Infusion Rates for the Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in the Emergency Department.

Introduction: There is minimal literature to support the appropriate dosing for the initiation of IV regular insulin therapy in DKA patients. A 0.1 unit/kg bolus followed by 0.1 units/kg/hour or 0.14 units/kg/hour is commonly utilized and recommended in guidelines. Objective: We sought to assess clinical and safety outcomes associated with various insulin infusion starting doses in patients diagnosed with DKA in the emergency department in an effort to help guide prescribing. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted within an academic emergency department and included patients who received continuous infusion regular insulin with an ICD-10 code for DKA between January 2016 and January 2019. A predictive regression model was applied to test if predefined lab values influenced the starting insulin infusion rates. Clinical and safety outcomes were evaluated by starting insulin infusion rate. Data was analyzed based on starting insulin infusion rates. Results: 347 patients met inclusion criteria with 92 (26.5%) patients receiving <0.07 units/kg/hr, 123 (35.4%) patients receiving 0.07 to 0.099 units/kg/hr, 123 (35.4%) patients receiving 0.10 to 0.139 units/kg/hr, and 9 (2.6%) patients receiving ≥0.14 units/kg/hr. After adjusting for baseline labs, glucose was the only significant predictor of the initial infusion rate (p < 0.001). For every 100 mg/dL increase in the baseline glucose value, the initial infusion rate increased by 0.005 units/kg/hr. There was no difference between insulin starting infusion rates and length of stay, rates of hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, or dysrhythmias. Conclusion: Glucose levels significantly influenced the insulin starting infusion rate, with no identified differences in adverse effects or clinical outcomes.

Correlation of antimicrobial fraction unbound and sieving coefficient in critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Fraction unbound has been used as a surrogate for antimicrobial sieving coefficient (SC) to predict extracorporeal clearance in critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), but this is based largely on expert opinion. OBJECTIVES: To examine relationships between package insert-derived fraction unbound (Fu-P), study-specific fraction unbound (Fu-S), and SC in critically ill patients receiving CRRT. METHODS: English-language studies containing patient-specific in vivo pharmacokinetic parameters for antimicrobials in critically ill patients requiring CRRT were included. The primary outcome included correlations between Fu-S, Fu-P, and SC. Secondary outcomes included correlations across protein binding quartiles, serum albumin, and predicted in-hospital mortality, and identification of predictors for SC through multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-nine studies including 32 antimicrobials were included for analysis. SC was moderately correlated to Fu-S (R2 = 0.55, P < 0.001) and Fu-P (R2 = 0.41, P < 0.001). SC was best correlated to Fu-S in first (<69%) and fourth (>92%) quartiles of fraction unbound and above median albumin concentrations of 24.5 g/L (R2 = 0.71, P = 0.07). Conversely, correlation was weaker in patients with mortality estimates greater than the median of 55% (R2 = 0.06, P = 0.84). SC and Fu-P were also best correlated in the first quartile of antimicrobial fraction unbound (R2 = 0.66, P < 0.001). Increasing Fu-P, flow rate, membrane surface area, and serum albumin, and decreasing physiologic charge significantly predicted increasing SC. CONCLUSIONS: Fu-S and Fu-P were both reasonably correlated to SC. Caution should be taken when using Fu-S to calculate extracorporeal clearance in antimicrobials with 69%-92% fraction unbound or with >55% estimated in-hospital patient mortality. Fu-P may serve as a rudimentary surrogate for SC when Fu-S is unavailable.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Cefazolin in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: The relative distribution of cefazolin into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) remains debated. Determining the distribution of cefazolin into the CSF in noninfected adults may allow for further treatment applications of cefazolin. This prospective pharmacokinetic study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of cefazolin in serum and CSF from external ventricular drains (EVDs) in neurologically injured adults. METHODS: Blood and CSF were collected, using a biologic waste protocol, for cefazolin quantification and trapezoidal rule-based pharmacokinetic analysis in a total of 15 critically ill adults receiving 2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours or the renal dose equivalent for EVD prophylaxis. RESULTS: A median (range) of 3 (2-4) blood and 3 (2-5) CSF samples were collected for each patient. The most common admitting diagnosis was subarachnoid hemorrhage (66.7%). The median calculated cefazolin CSF Cmax and Cmin values (interquartile range [IQR]) were 2.97 (1.76-8.56) mg/L and 1.59 (0.77-2.17) mg/L, respectively. The median (IQR) CSF to serum area under the curve ratio was 6.7% (3.7%-10.6%), with time-matched estimates providing a similar estimate (8.4%). Of those receiving cefazolin every 8 hours, the median and minimum directly measured CSF cefazolin concentration ≥4 hours following administration were 1.87 and 0.78 mg/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cefazolin dosed for EVD prophylaxis achieved CSF concentrations suggesting viability as a therapeutic option for patients with meningitis or ventriculitis due to susceptible bacteria such as methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Further clinical trials are required to confirm a role in therapy for cefazolin. Population-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling may suggest an optimal cefazolin regimen for the treatment of central nervous system infections.

Association Between Vasopressin Rebranding and Utilization in Patients With Septic Shock.

OBJECTIVES: Vasopressin is suggested as an adjunct to norepinephrine in patients with septic shock. However, after vasopressin was rebranded in November 2014, its cost exponentially increased. Utilization patterns of vasopressin after its rebranding are unclear. The objective of this study was to determine if there is an association between the rebranding of vasopressin in November 2014 and its utilization in vasopressor-dependent patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter, database study between January 2010 and March 2017. SETTING: Premier Healthcare Database hospitals. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted to an ICU with severe sepsis or septic shock, who received at least one vasoactive agent for two or more calendar days were included. INTERVENTIONS: The proportion of patients who received vasopressin and vasopressin cost was assessed before and after rebranding, and evaluated with segmented regression. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 294,733 patients (mean age, 66 ± 15 yr), 27.8% received vasopressin, and ICU mortality was 26.5%. The proportion of patients receiving vasopressin was higher after rebranding (31.2% postrebranding vs 25.8% prerebranding). Before vasopressin rebranding, the quarterly proportion of patients who received vasopressin had an increasing slope (prerebranding slope 0.41% [95% CI, 0.35-0.46%]), with no difference in slope detected after vasopressin rebranding (postrebranding slope, 0.47% [95% CI, 0.29-0.64%]). After vasopressin rebranding, mean vasopressin cost per patient was higher ($527 ± 1,130 vs $77 ± 160), and the quarterly slope of vasopressin cost was higher (change in slope $77.18 [95% CI, $75.73-78.61]). Total vasopressin billed cost postrebranding continually increased by ~$294,276 per quarter from less than $500,000 in Q4 2014 to over $3,000,000 in Q1 2017. CONCLUSIONS: After vasopressin rebranding, utilization continued to increase quarterly despite a significant increase in vasopressin cost. Vasopressin appeared to have price inelastic demand in septic shock.

Evaluation of a patient specific, targeted-intensity pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis protocol in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Patients with COVID-19 are at higher risk of thrombosis due to the inflammatory nature of their disease. A higher-intensity approach to pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis may be warranted. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to determine if a patient specific, targeted-intensity pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis protocol incorporating severity of illness, weight, and biomarkers decreased incidence of thrombosis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Included patients were hospitalized with COVID-19 and received thromboprophylaxis within 48 h of admission. Exclusion criteria included receipt of therapeutic anticoagulation prior to or within 24 h of admission, history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, pregnancy, or incarceration. Per-protocol patients received thromboprophylaxis according to institutional protocol involving escalated doses of anticoagulants based upon severity of illness, total body weight, and biomarker thresholds. The primary outcome was thrombosis. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, mortality, and identification of risk factors for thrombosis. Of 1189 patients screened, 803 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 54 (42-65) and 446 (55.5%) were male. Patients in the per-protocol group experienced significantly fewer thrombotic events (4.4% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.002), less major bleeding (3.1% vs. 9.6%, p < 0.001), and lower mortality (6.3% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.02) when compared to patients treated off-protocol. Significant predictors of thrombosis included mechanical ventilation and male sex. Post-hoc regression analysis identified mechanical ventilation, major bleeding, and D-dimer ≥ 1500 ng/mL FEU as significant predictors of mortality. A targeted pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis protocol incorporating severity of illness, body weight, and biomarkers appears effective and safe for preventing thrombosis in patients with COVID-19.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dalbavancin.

Dalbavancin is a synthetic lipoglycopeptide that exerts its antimicrobial activity through two distinct modes of action, inhibition of cell wall synthesis and an anchoring mechanism. Compared with previous glycopeptide antibiotics, dalbavancin demonstrates improved antibacterial potency against Gram-positive organisms and a long half-life of approximately 1 week, which is longer in tissues (e.g., skin, bone) than plasma. These factors facilitated the development of single-dose or once-weekly dosing regimens to treat acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Dalbavancin exhibits dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and is highly protein bound (93%). Despite being highly protein bound, it has a steady-state volume of distribution >10 L and distributes widely into the skin, bone, peritoneal space, and epithelial lining fluid, but not cerebrospinal fluid. Dalbavancin elimination occurs via a combination of renal (approximately 45%) and non-renal clearance, with dose adjustments recommended only in patients with a creatinine clearance <30 mL/min not receiving any form of dialysis. The established pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index associated with bacterial kill is free area under the concentration-time curve over the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC/MIC), with a goal 24-h fAUC/MIC of at least 27.1 for Staphylococcus aureus infections. Recent data suggest usefulness in the treatment of infections beyond ABSSSI, with convenient dosing and redosing strategies for complicated infections requiring extended treatment durations. Additional studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Impact of a pharmacist-inclusive post-discharge clinic on outcomes in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction: Rates of hospital readmission, emergency department visits, or death.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure hospitalization is a hallmark of disease progression associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Benefits of multidisciplinary clinics have been established in the care of heart failure patients and can be particularly impactful post-hospital discharge. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of a clinical pharmacist-integrated model of care within a Heart Failure Bridge Clinic (HFBC) at a large tertiary care referral center. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% discharged from Mission Hospital (Asheville, North Carolina) between August 2018 and July 2019 were screened. Patients in the HFBC arm had a clinic visit inclusive of a clinical pharmacist within 30 days of hospital discharge and were compared with a control group of patients with a usual care provider clinic visit. The HFBC provided clinical assessment, detailed heart failure education, and medication reconciliation and adjustment with an emphasis on optimization of Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT). Patients were followed for 90 days for the primary end point of hospitalization, emergency department (ED) visit, or death. RESULTS: A total of 1463 patients (HFBC, n = 307; control, n = 1156) comprised our final cohort. After accounting for baseline variables, 90-day cumulative probability of hospitalization, ED visit, or death favored HFBC patients (26% vs 32%, P = .0275). Comprehensive review of medications prior to and after HFBC appointment demonstrated significant alterations to therapies (30% GDMT addition, 27% GDMT titration, 7.2% discontinuation of medications associated with worsening heart failure, and 28% loop diuretic adjustment). CONCLUSION: Clinical pharmacist-integrated HFBC allows for focused medication review and optimization and is associated with a 19% relative risk reduction in hospitalization, ED visit, or death at 90 days.