Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Heart ; 2024 Apr 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580433

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for the prevention and management of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) provide similar recommendations for the use of statins in both women and men. In this study, we assessed sex differences in the intensity of statin prescriptions at initiation and in the achievement of treatment targets, among individuals without and with CVD, in a primary care setting. METHODS: Electronic health record data from statin users were extracted from the PHARMO Data Network. Poisson regressions were used to investigate sex differences in statin intensity and in the achievement of treatment targets. Analyses were stratified by age group, disease status and/or CVD risk category. RESULTS: We included 82 714 individuals (46% women) aged 40-99 years old. In both sexes, the proportion of individuals with a dispensed prescription for high-intensity statin at initiation increased between 2011 and 2020. Women were less likely to be prescribed high-intensity statins as compared with men, both in the subgroups without a history of CVD (risk ratio (RR) 0.69 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.75)) and with CVD (RR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74 to 0.81)). Women were less likely than men to achieve target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol following statin initiation in the subgroup without CVD (RR 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97 to 1.00)) and with a history of CVD (RR 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89 to 0.98)). CONCLUSION: Compared with men, women were less likely to be prescribed high-intensity statins at initiation and to achieve treatment targets, both in people without and with a history of CVD, and independent of differences in other individual and clinical characteristics.

2.
Glob Heart ; 19(1): 6, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38250702

RESUMEN

Background: Sex differences in the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have been shown, but the evidence is mixed and fragmented. In this study, we assessed sex differences in cardiovascular risk factors assessment, risk factor levels, treatment, and meeting of treatment targets, within a Dutch primary care setting. Methods: Data were obtained from individuals aged 40 to 70 years old, without prior CVD, registered during the entire year in 2018 at one of the 51 general practices participating in the Julius General Practitioner's Network (JGPN). History of CVD was defined based on the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC). Linear and Poisson regressions were used to investigate sex differences in risk factor assessment, risk factor levels, treatment, and meeting of treatment targets. Results: We included 83,903 individuals (50% women). With the exception of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), all risk factors for CVD were more often measured in women than in men. Lipid measurements and body mass index values were higher in women, while blood pressure (BP) and HbA1c levels were higher in men, along with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. Among individuals with elevated BP or cholesterol levels, no sex difference was observed in the prescription of antihypertensive medications (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.94-1.06) but women were less likely than men to receive lipid-lowering medications (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95). Among treated individuals, women were more likely than men to meet adequate levels of blood pressure (RR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.09-1.25) and less likely to meet target levels of cholesterol (RR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98). Conclusion: While women were more likely to have their CVD risk factors measured, they were less likely to be prescribed lipid-lowering medications and to meet target levels. When treated, men were less likely to achieve adequate blood pressure control.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Caracteres Sexuales , Hemoglobina Glucada , Colesterol , Prevención Primaria , Atención Primaria de Salud , Lípidos
3.
Environ Res ; 219: 115134, 2023 02 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563981

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in the impact of air pollution from livestock farming on respiratory health. Studies in adults suggest adverse effects of livestock farm emissions on lung function, but so far, studies involving children and adolescents are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To study the association of residential proximity to livestock farms and modelled particulate matter ≤10 µm (PM10) from livestock farms with lung function in adolescence. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study among 715 participants of the Dutch prospective PIAMA (Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy) birth cohort study. Relationships of different indicators of residential livestock farming exposure (distance to farms, distance-weighted number of farms, cattle, pigs, poultry, horses and goats within 3 km; modelled atmospheric PM10 concentrations from livestock farms) with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) at age 16 were assessed by linear regression taking into account potential confounders. Associations were expressed per interquartile range increase in exposure. RESULTS: Higher exposure to livestock farming was consistently associated with a lower FEV1, but not with FVC among participants living in less urbanized municipalities (<1500 addresses/km2, N = 402). Shorter distances of homes to livestock farms were associated with a 1.4% (0.2%; 2.7%) lower FEV1. Larger numbers of farms within 3 km and higher concentrations of PM10 from livestock farming were associated with a 1.8% (0.8%, 2.9%) and 0.9% (0.4%,1.5%) lower FEV1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that higher exposure to livestock farming is associated with a lower FEV1 in adolescents. Replication and more research on the etiologic agents involved in these associations and the underlying mechanisms is needed.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Contaminación del Aire , Animales , Porcinos , Bovinos , Caballos , Granjas , Ganado , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Material Particulado/análisis , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Pulmón , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis
4.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 7(1): 18-27, 2021 01 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33151274

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare services around the world, which may have serious implications for the prognosis of patients with acute cardiovascular disease. We conducted a systematic review to assess the extent to which health services related to the care and management of acute cardiovascular events have been impacted during the COVID-19 pandemic. PubMed, MedRxiv, and Google Scholar were searched for observational studies published up to 12 August 2020 for studies that assessed the impact of the pandemic on the care and management of people with acute cardiovascular disease (CVD). In total, 27 articles were included. Of these, 16 examined the impact on acute coronary syndromes (ACS), eight on strokes, one on ACS and strokes, and two on other types of CVD. When comparing the COVID-19 period to non-COVID-19 periods, 11 studies observed a decrease in ACS admissions ranging between 40% and 50% and 5 studies showed a decrease in stroke admissions of between 12% and 40%. Four studies showed a larger reduction in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions compared to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions. A decrease in the number of reperfusion procedures, a shortening in the lengths of stay at the hospital, and longer symptom-to-door times were also observed. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a substantial decrease in the rate of admissions for acute CVD, reductions in the number of procedures, shortened lengths of stay at the hospital, and longer delays between the onset of the symptoms and hospital treatment. The impact on patient's prognosis needs to be quantified in future studies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Tardío , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Pandemias , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Pronóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Tiempo de Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...