The critical cutoff point of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score indicating locomotive syndrome in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Locomotive syndrome (LS) is a condition of decreased mobility caused by disorders of the locomotive organs. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a LS disorder. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA score) and the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) are international evaluation tools for LSS. However, the relationship between LS and JOA score or ZCQ is unknown. This study aimed to clarify the correlations between LS progression and the values/parameters of the JOA score or ZCQ and to determine the critical cutoff point of the JOA score or ZCQ that indicates LS progression. METHODS: We recruited preoperative LSS patients (n = 82). Patients' mean age was 73.4 years. The study participants were evaluated using the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS), JOA score, and ZCQ (which consists of symptom severity and physical function), and the patients' health-related quality of life was assessed using EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) utility values and the EuroQoL-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). We investigated the correlations between the 25-question GLFS and each clinical variable and evaluated the critical cutoff point of each international evaluation tool to detect LS. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between 25-question GLFS and each clinical evaluation tool. LSS patients with LS showed significantly worse scores in the evaluation tools than LSS patients without LS. Moreover, we found that critical cutoff points of 17.5 on JOA score, 3.1 on ZCQ-symptom, and 2.3 on ZCQ-function could detect LS. CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant correlation exists between the 25-question GLFS and the JOA score or ZCQ. It might be important to perform decompression surgery for LSS patients before they reach the cutoff values of the several clinical evaluation tools to avoid LS progression. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical prospective case-control study.

Do Individual Differences in Physical Therapists' Skills Affect Postoperative Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty?

We investigated variations in postoperative outcomes of total knee arthroplasty which were dependent on the physical therapist (PT) who performed rehabilitation while keeping other parameters as uniform as possible. Seventy-nine among 690 knees were selected based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were randomly assigned to five PTs, who had from 2 to 21 years of experience. Range of motion (ROM) on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 7, and 14 and at postoperative months 3, 6, and 12, results of timed up and go (TUG) test on POD 14, time to walking with a single cane, and time to climbing stairs, were evaluated. There were significant differences until POD 3, and no significant differences afterward in flexion. There was a significant difference on POD 1 only in extension. The TUG test showed no significant difference, but there were significant differences at the time of walking with a single cane and climbing stairs. The time taken to achieve rehabilitation, which was determined subjectively by each PT, differed among therapists, but differences in ROM were present in early period. Therefore, ROM after surgery is not affected by differences between PTs.