RESUMEN
Long-term monitoring data from agricultural watersheds are needed to determine if efforts to reduce nutrient transport from crop and pasture land have been effective. Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW), located in northeastern Missouri, is a high-runoff-potential watershed dominated by claypan soils. The objectives of this study were to: (i) summarize dissolved NH-N, NO-N, and PO-P flow-weighted concentrations (FWC), daily loads, and yields (unit area loads) in GCEW from 1992 to 2010; (ii) assess time trends and relationships between precipitation, land use, and fertilizer inputs and nutrient transport; and (iii) provide context to the GCEW data by comparisons with other Corn Belt watersheds. Significant declines in annual and quarterly FWCs and yields occurred for all three nutrient species during the study, and the decreases were most evident for NO-N. Substantial decreases in first- and fourth-quarter NO-N FWCs and daily loads and modest decreases in first-quarter PO-P daily loads were observed. Declines in NO-N and PO-P transport were attributed to decreased winter wheat ( L.) and increased corn ( L.) production that shifted fertilizer application from fall to spring as well as to improved management, such as increased use of incorporation. Regression models and correlation analyses indicated that precipitation, land use, and fertilizer inputs were critical factors controlling transport. Within the Mississippi River Basin, NO-N yields in GCEW were much lower than in tile-drained areas, but PO-P yields were among the highest in the basin. Overall, results demonstrated that reductions in fall-applied fertilizer and improved fertilizer management reduced N and P transport in GCEW.
RESUMEN
We document the 20-yr-long research effort to study the transport of N and P to surface and groundwater in Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed. We also document related efforts in nearby claypan watersheds and watersheds with contrasting soil and hydrologic conditions across the northern Missouri-southern Iowa region. Details of the analytical methods, instrumentation, method detection limits, and quality assurance program used to generate the data are described along with a brief overview of significant findings. Nutrient concentrations in streams were in the range associated with nuisance algal growth and presumed loss of aquatic invertebrate diversity. Incorporation of fertilizers was shown to be the most effective practice for reducing nutrient transport in runoff. Despite the claypan soils, NO leaching was a major fate for fertilizer N, and significant contamination of the glacial till aquifer has occurred when long-term fertilizer and manure N inputs exceeded crop N requirements. A key finding of these studies was that field areas with the poorest crop growth were also the most vulnerable to nutrient as well as sediment and herbicide transport.
RESUMEN
Cotton farmers in Missouri commonly apply a single rate of aldicarb throughout the field at planting to protect their crop from Meloidogyne incognita, even though these nematodes are spatially aggregated. Our purpose was to determine the effect of site-specific application of aldicarb on cotton production in a field infested with these nematodes in 1997 and 1998. Cotton yields were collected from sites not treated with aldicarb (control), sites receiving aldicarb at the standard recommended rate of 0.58 kg a.i./ha, and sites receiving specific aldicarb rates based on the soil population densities of second-stage infective juveniles of root-knot nematode. Yields for the standard rate and site-specific rate treatments were similar and greater (P ≤ 0.05) than the control treatment. Less aldicarb was used for the site-specific than the uniform-rate treatment each year-46% less in 1997 and 61% less in 1998. Costs associated with the site-specific treatment were very high compared with the uniform-rate treatment due to a greater number of soil samples analyzed for nematodes. Site-specific application of aldicarb for root-knot nematode management in cotton may pose fewer environmental risks than the uniform-rate application of aldicarb.