Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 16(3): e57016, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38681421

RESUMEN

Peritonitis caused by dematiaceous molds is uncommon but poses a significant threat to patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD), leading to high mortality and morbidity. This report highlights three cases of peritonitis caused by three distinct species of Diaporthe (D. amygdali, D. eucalyptorum, and D. phaseolorum), initially unidentified through conventional culture methods. The nucleotide sequences of internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS), 18S nuclear ribosomal small subunit (SSU), and 28S nuclear ribosomal large subunit (LSU) of the ribosomal DNA gene correctly identified the isolates. Despite early catheter removal and administration of appropriate antifungal medications, all patients experienced fatal outcomes. DNA barcoding emerges as a valuable tool for accurately diagnosing species within the genus of pathogenic microbes, aiding in identifying the root causes of infections. It emphasizes the importance of strict adherence to aseptic techniques during PD exchanges to prevent peritonitis caused by plant-borne pathogens.

2.
Ther Apher Dial ; 25(3): 341-349, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32666667

RESUMEN

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the association between the plasma volume treated by double filtration plasmapheresis and allograft outcomes for the treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1, plasma volume treated between 1 and <1.3 total plasma volume and group 2, plasma volume treated ≥1.3 total plasma volume. Primary outcome was ≥50% reduction of serum creatinine rising from baseline value at 1 month. A total of 32 courses (146 sessions) of double filtration plasmapheresis were performed; 17 and 15 courses in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Primary outcome occurred in 41% of group 1 and 40% of group 2 (adjusted risk ratio 1.15 [95%CI, 0.48-2.76]). Graft loss at 1 year did not differ between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65 [95%CI, 0.23-1.87]). Infection tendency seemed to be higher in group 2 (40% vs 18%, P = .243).


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón , Volumen Plasmático/fisiología , Plasmaféresis/métodos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...