No Detectable Coagulation Activation After Vitamin K (MK-7) Supplementation in Patients on Dialysis With Functional Vitamin K Deficiency: A One-Year Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients on dialysis treatment have poor functional vitamin K status, and this may increase the risk of vascular calcification. Vitamin K supplementation may therefore be relevant in patients on dialysis, but the procoagulant effects have not been studied. We evaluated effects of menaquinone-7 (MK-7) supplementation on biomarkers of coagulation in patients on dialysis. METHODS: Double-blinded, placebo-controlled study in 123 patients on dialysis randomized to 52 weeks of vitamin K (MK-7, 360 µg/daily, n = 61) or placebo (n = 62). Measurements at baseline and after 52 weeks of intervention included thrombin generation (endogenous thrombin potential, peak thrombin concentration, time to peak, and lag time); clot activities of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors (F) II, VII, IX, and X; prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1+2); and proteins induced by vitamin K absence II (PIVKA-II). Between-group differences (vitamin K vs. placebo) at 52 weeks were determined with an analysis of covariance. Within-group changes in vitamin K and placebo groups were analyzed with a paired t-test. Vascular adverse events and serious adverse events were registered based on hospital records, laboratory data, and participant interviews and compared between groups using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's Chi-Squared test. RESULTS: A between-group difference at 52 weeks was observed for PIVKA-II (P < .001). PIVKA-II decreased significantly from baseline to 52 weeks in the vitamin K group, but not in the placebo group. We observed no between-group differences or within-group changes for biomarkers of coagulation, except for FVII clot activity which was reduced in the placebo group (P = .04), and no between-group differences in adverse events and serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: One year of vitamin K supplementation in patients on dialysis has no detectable effects on biomarkers of coagulation activation, clot activities of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors, and vascular events or death, indicating no procoagulant effects of this treatment.

Vitamin K supplementation and bone mineral density in dialysis: results of the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled RenaKvit trial.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin K deficiency is highly prevalent in patients on dialysis and may contribute to their low bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fracture. This study investigated the effect of menaquinone-7 (MK-7) supplementation on BMD in patients on chronic dialysis. METHODS: In a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention trial, 123 patients on chronic dialysis were randomised to a daily oral supplement of either MK-7 360 µg or placebo for 2 years. BMD of the distal radius (1/3, mid, ultradistal and total), femoral neck, lumbar spine (L1-L4) and whole body was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Serum levels of vitamin K1 and MK-7 and plasma levels of total osteocalcin, dephosphorylated-uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein and protein induced by vitamin K absence II were measured to assess vitamin K status. RESULTS: After 2 years, an accelerated BMD loss of the 1/3 distal radius was found with MK-7 supplementation {mean difference of changes relative to placebo -0.023 g/cm2 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.039 to -0.008]}, whereas the decrease in lumbar spine BMD seen in the placebo group was prevented [mean difference of changes between groups 0.050 g/cm2 (95% CI 0.015-0.085)]. No significant effects were observed at the remaining skeletal sites. Vitamin K status strongly improved in MK-7-supplemented participants. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, an accelerated BMD loss of the 1/3 distal radius was found after 2 years of MK-7 supplementation, whereas a decline in lumbar spine BMD was prevented. As such, MK-7 supplementation might modify BMD site-specifically in patients on dialysis. In aggregate, our findings do not support MK-7 supplementation to preserve bone in patients on dialysis.

High-sensitivity Troponin T in hemodialysis patients: a randomized placebo-controlled sub-study investigating angiotensin-II-blockade, variation over time and associations with clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Troponin T (TnT) is a well-known risk factor for negative outcome in hemodialysis (HD) patients, but little is known about variation over time, and the impact of clinical and dialysis specific factors. This study investigated the effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade (ARB), short and long-term variation in TnT and associations with clinical parameters. METHODS: In this analysis based on the SAFIR-cohort (Clinical Trials ID: NCT00791830) 81 HD patients were randomized double-blind for placebo (n = 40) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) treatment (n = 41) with irbesartan (150-300 mg) and followed for 12 months with six serial measurements of TnT using a high-sensitivity assay. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (67%) completed follow-up. Baseline TnT-medians (min-max) were (placebo/ARB): 45(14-295)/46(10-343) ng/L. ARB-treatment did not significantly affect mean TnT-levels over the 12-month study period. Median week-to-week and one-year TnT-variation (5th-95th-percentile range) using all samples regardless of intervention were: 0(- 14-10) ng/L (week-to-week) and 3(- 40-71) ng/L (12 months). Median TnT-amplitude, capturing the change from the lowest to the highest TnT-value observed during the one-year study period was 38% or 20.5 ng/L. Median ratios with 95% limits of agreement were: 1.00(0.73-1.37); P = 0.92 (1 week/baseline; n = 77) and 1.07(0.52-2.25); P = 0.19 (12 months/baseline; n = 54). Baseline TnT was positively correlated with diabetes, ultrafiltration volume, arterial stiffness, change in intradialytic total peripheral resistance and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and negatively correlated with hematocrit, residual renal function and change in intradialytic cardiac output. High baseline TnT was associated with a higher risk of admission and cardiovascular (CV) events during follow-up. Increase in TnT over time (ΔTnT = 12-months-baseline) was significantly associated with increase in left ventricular (LV) mass and NT-proBNP and decrease in LV ejection fraction and late intradialytic stroke volume. ΔTnT was not significantly associated with admissions, CV or intradialytic hypotensive events during follow-up. Admissions were significantly more likely with a high (TnT-amplitude> 20.5 ng/L) than a low TnT-amplitude. Peaks in TnT were less frequent in aspirin-treated patients. CONCLUSION: ARB-treatment had no significant effect on TnT-levels. Week-to-week variation was generally low, yet over 12 months individual patients had considerable TnT fluctuations. Rise in TnT over time was significantly correlated with markers of cardiac deterioration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00791830 . Date of registration: November 17, 2008. EudraCT no: 2008-001267-11.

Long-term effects of angiotensin II blockade with irbesartan on inflammatory markers in hemodialysis patients: A randomized double blind placebo controlled trial (SAFIR study).

INTRODUCTION: Low-grade chronic inflammation is common in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Previous studies suggest an anti-inflammatory effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of ARB vs. placebo on plasma concentrations of inflammatory markers in HD patients. METHODS: Adult HD patients were randomized for double-blind treatment with the ARB irbesartan 150-300 mg/day or placebo. At baseline, 1 week, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months plasma high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, and transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) were measured using Luminex and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technology. FINDINGS: Eighty-two patients were randomized (placebo/ARB: 41/41). The groups did not differ in initial levels of any of the inflammatory markers (placebo/ARB median(range)): hsCRP 3.3(0.2-23.4)/2.7(0.2-29.6) µg/mL; IL-1ß 1.1(0.0-45.9)/1.1(0.0-7.2) pg/mL; IL-6 10(1-90)/12(1-84) pg/mL; IL-8 31(9-134)/34(5-192) pg/mL; IL-18 364(188-1343)/377(213-832) pg/mL; TGF-ß 3.2(0.8-13.9)/3.6(1.3-3.8) ng/mL. Overall, there was no significant difference in hsCRP, IL-6, IL-8, and TGF-ß between placebo and ARB-treated patients during the study period, and hsCRP, IL-6, IL-8, and TGF-ß were relatively stable during the study period (P ≥ 0.18 in all tests for parallel curves, equal levels, and constant levels). The IL-1ß level was slightly different in the two groups over time, but not significantly (P = 0.09 in test for parallel curves) and it was also relatively stable during the study period (P ≥ 0.49 in tests for equal levels and constant level). IL-18 was the only inflammatory marker which was not constant during the study period (P = 0.001 in test for constant level), but there was no significant difference between placebo and ARB-treated (P ≥ 0.51 in tests for parallel curves and equal levels). DISCUSSION: Inflammatory biomarkers were neither acutely, nor in the long-term significantly affected by the ARB irbesartan. Our findings suggest that ARB treatment in HD patients does not offer protective anti-inflammatory effects.

Quality of life development during initial hemodialysis therapy and association with loss of residual renal function.

INTRODUCTION: Health related quality of life (HRQOL) is markedly reduced in hemodialysis patients compared to the general population. We investigated the course of self-reported HRQOL over time and the association with selected factors, focusing on changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). METHODS: Eighty-two newly started hemodialysis patients from the SAFIR cohort filled out the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form Version 1.3 (KDQOL-SFTM ) questionnaire at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The SAFIR study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind intervention study, examining the effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan. HRQOL was a secondary outcome measure. Main inclusion criteria: Dialysis vintage <1 year, left ventricular ejection fraction >30% and urinary output >300 mL/day. GFR was measured with mean creatinine and urea clearance from 24-hour urine collections at baseline, 6 and 12 months. FINDINGS: Irbesartan treatment did not affect HRQOL. Patients were pooled into one group for further analyses. Decline in GFR correlated significantly with decreasing HRQOL over time. HRQOL was stable over time, with a slight nonsignificant tendency toward improved HRQOL. The largest HRQOL-differences (positive values equal improved HRQOL) observed during the 12 month study period were (mean[95% confidence interval]): Burden of kidney disease:6.4[-2.2;15.0], Role limitations-physical:12.7[-2.1;27.5], and Role limitations-emotional:9.7[-5.2;24.6]. Comorbidity, especially diabetes, hospital admissions, female gender, and age were strongly associated with lower HRQOL in cross sectional analysis. DISCUSSION: Preservation of residual renal function seems to be important for HRQOL. In newly started HD patients, HRQOL showed little change after 12 months. HRQOL was negatively affected by comorbidity, especially diabetes, hospital admissions, female gender, and age.

No significant effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade on intermediate cardiovascular end points in hemodialysis patients.

Agents blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system are frequently used in patients with end-stage renal disease, but whether they exert beneficial cardiovascular effects is unclear. Here the long-term effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker, irbesartan, were studied in hemodialysis patients in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled 1-year intervention trial using a predefined systolic blood pressure target of 140 mm Hg (SAFIR study). Each group of 41 patients did not differ in terms of age, blood pressure, comorbidity, antihypertensive treatment, dialysis parameters, and residual renal function. Brachial blood pressure decreased significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between placebo and irbesartan. Use of additional antihypertensive medication, ultrafiltration volume, and dialysis dosage were not different. Intermediate cardiovascular end points such as central aortic blood pressure, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, left ventricular mass index, N-terminal brain natriuretic prohormone, heart rate variability, and plasma catecholamines were not significantly affected by irbesartan treatment. Changes in systolic blood pressure during the study period significantly correlated with changes in both left ventricular mass and arterial stiffness. Thus, significant effects of irbesartan on intermediate cardiovascular end points beyond blood pressure reduction were absent in hemodialysis patients.

Reliability of endogenous markers for estimation of residual renal function in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Residual renal function in haemodialysis patients is of increasing interest. However, reproducibility and agreement between methods to measure and estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) require further elucidation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of GFR estimates based on endogenous markers in haemodialysis patients. METHODS: Twelve patients were examined twice. GFR was estimated by (i) urine clearances of creatinine, urea and the average of creatinine and urea clearance [U-Cl(crea-urea)]; (ii) an equation based on serum concentration of cystatin C [eGFR(CysC)]. These were compared to (51) Cr-EDTA clearance in plasma [P-Cl(EDTA)] and urine [U-Cl(EDTA)]. RESULTS: U-Cl(crea-urea) produced results similar to U-Cl(EDTA). eGFR(CysC) had a low week-to-week variability. Visually, eGFR(CysC) differed from y = x when compared to the other methods indicating bias, probably due to extrarenal elimination of cystatin C. Coefficients of variation were significantly different, P<0·001: P-Cl(EDTA), 10%; U-Cl(EDTA), 13%; and U-Cl(crea-urea), 13%. P-Cl(EDTA) was 2·1 ml min(-1) 1·73 m(-2) higher than U-Cl(EDTA) (mean). CONCLUSIONS: Glomerular filtration rate in haemodialysis patients can be estimated from U-Cl(crea-urea) when complete urine collection is performed. The available eGFR(CysC) in haemodialysis patients seemed to be biased, and further development and validation is desirable. P-Cl(EDTA) was the most reproducible method and might be useful in special situations.

Aortic pulse wave velocity results depend on which carotid artery is used for the measurements.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) is a gold standard noninvasive marker of arterial stiffness. aPWV is usually obtained as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity by measurements on the common carotid artery and the femoral artery. The carotid arteries branch slightly differently from the aorta towards the right and left side of the neck. Theoretically, using the right or left carotid artery could influence aPWV results and there are no clear guidelines to support the choice of side. The aim of this study was to investigate whether aPWV results depend on right or left side carotid artery measurements in a group of healthy individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two different observers examined 50 individuals without known cardiovascular disease between 23 and 66 years of age. The measurements were performed with the SphygmoCor equipment using both right and left carotid arteries. We found that use of the right carotid artery provided significantly higher aPWV values compared with the left carotid artery, also when using different methods to estimate the travel length of the pulse wave (pooled data, subtracted distance: 0.2 ±â€Š0.4 m/s, P = 0.003; direct distance: 0.2 ±â€Š0.5 m/s, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Using right or left carotid artery affects aPWV, as right-side measurements provided higher values. Attention to this side difference and use of the same carotid artery will increase the strength of intervention studies using aPWV as a surrogate endpoint.

Reliability of 5¹Cr-EDTA plasma and urinary clearance as a measure of residual renal function in dialysis patients.

PURPOSE: In dialysis patients, longer survival is associated with a higher residual renal function. Randomized controlled trials are conducted to clarify how residual renal function can be preserved. However, existing methods for measuring residual renal function are uncertain and there is a need for establishing a standard for measurements of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in dialysis patients. METHODS: 5¹Cr-EDTA clearances in plasma, urine, and dialysate were evaluated in a sample of 12 hemodialysis and 12 peritoneal dialysis patients. The patients' condition was generally stable, and all patients were investigated twice within 4-10 days. RESULTS: Plasma clearances of 5¹Cr-EDTA for all patients ranged between 2.1 and 30.8 mL/min/1.73 m², whereas urinary 5¹Cr-EDTA clearances ranged from 0.7-20.0 mL/min/1.73 m². This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Week-to-week reproducibility expressed as coefficients of variation were below or equal to 10% for plasma clearances and 13% for urinary clearances in hemodialysis patients and 14% in peritoneal dialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a difference between 5¹Cr-EDTA plasma and urinary clearances in dialysis patients. Plasma clearance of 5¹Cr-EDTA had the best reproducibility. For repeated measurements as in clinical prospective trials, we recommend 5¹Cr-EDTA plasma clearance based on blood sampling at 5 + 24 hours with subtraction of 5¹Cr-EDTA dialysate clearance in peritoneal dialysis patients. Further studies are needed to corroborate our findings.