Access to insulin delivery devices and glycated haemoglobin in lower-income countries.

BACKGROUND: Young people with type 1 diabetes in low-and-middle income countries face many challenges in accessing care, with various essential supplies needed for survival and long-term health. AIM: To study insulin delivery devices and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) testing. METHODS: A survey was conducted in 2019 of leading diabetes centres in 41 countries supported by the Life for a Child Program. The survey covered numerous aspects concerning availability and costs at all levels of the health system, local usage patterns and attitudes, obstacles, and other aspects. RESULTS: Thirty-seven countries returned the survey (90.2% response rate). Key findings included: Syringe use was most common (83.1%), followed by insulin pens (16.7%) and pumps (0.2%). 48.6% of public health systems did not provide syringes, even with a co-payment. Use of suboptimal syringe/needle combinations was common. Needles were generally reused in almost all countries (94.3%, n = 35). Aside from donated supplies, there was variable access to HbA1c testing within public health facilities, and, when available, patients often had to cover the cost. Provision was further compromised by numerous problems including stock-outs, and challenges with understanding the test, equipment maintenance, and refrigeration. CONCLUSION: Large gaps exist for adequate access to appropriate insulin delivery devices and HbA1c testing. Public health systems in low-and-middle income countries should increase affordable provision. There are also needs for specific health professional training and diabetes education; elimination of customs duties and taxes; development of inexpensive, robust HbA1c testing methods that do not require refrigeration of testing supplies; differential pricing schemes; and other solutions.

Documenting and visualising progress towards Universal Health Coverage of insulin and blood glucose test strips for people with diabetes.

AIMS: Global governments have committed to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), ensuring access to quality and affordable healthcare for all. This is fundamental for those with type 1 diabetes mellitus, who require daily access to both insulin and blood glucose test strips to survive. This group risks being left behind by global initiatives that fail to consider these particular needs. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to key informants in 37 less-resourced countries. Seven high-income countries were also included for comparison. We drew on a WHO framework developed to assess progress towards UHC to create scales on three dimensions: population covered, services provided and direct costs. A fourth dimension, availability, was added. Results were grouped into six patterns and visually displayed with radar graphs. RESULTS: 65% of the less-resourced national health systems provided insulin, with medians of 67% for service provision (equating to Human Regular and NPH), 55% direct costs covered, and 75% availability. Test strips were only provided in 14% of the less-resourced systems, with medians 42% (less than two strips per day), 76%, and 88% respectively. Six patterns of provision were identified. Progress correlated with income level, yet some low-income countries are achieving provision for insulin and test strips for those enrolled in health insurance schemes. CONCLUSION: No less-resourced country had even near-complete coverage for insulin, and coverage was worse for test strips. This study demonstrates the utility of this framework which could be developed as a means of tracking progress in meeting the needs of people with diabetes.

Blood glucose meters and test strips: global market and challenges to access in low-resource settings.

Blood glucose meters and test strips for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) are often inaccessible to, and infrequently used by, people with diabetes in countries with limited resources for health care. Supplies for measuring blood glucose can also be scarce in health facilities, despite being needed in a myriad of clinical settings at all levels of the health system. Numerous studies and international guidelines emphasise the value of SMBG in diabetes care, particularly in people with type 1 diabetes. In this Review, we assess global access to blood glucose meters and test strips, collating published information on cost, availability, system accuracy, competitive bidding, technological trends, and non-financial barriers. We also provide new information on global market share data and prices, taxes and tariffs, and product availability. Blood glucose meters and test strips should be viewed similarly to essential medicines, with issues of access prioritised by relevant international agencies. Efforts are needed to reduce tariffs and taxes and to create unified global system accuracy requirements and accountable post-marketing evaluations. Preferential pricing arrangements, pooled procurement, and best-purchasing practices could help to lower direct costs. SMBG supplies should also be included in national health insurance schemes. Enhanced diabetes education of health professionals and patients is crucial to ensure effective use of SMBG. Finally, as technology advances for people who can afford new interstitial fluid glucose monitoring systems, blood glucose meters and test strips must remain available and become more affordable in low-resource settings.