Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Blood ; 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691678

RESUMEN

Although NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carries a generally favorable prognosis, many patients still relapse and die. Previous studies identified several molecular and clinical features associated with poor outcome, however only FLT3-ITD mutation and adverse karyotype are currently used for risk stratification due to inconsistent results and uncertainty around how other factors should influence treatment, particularly given the strong prognostic impact of post-induction measurable residual disease (MRD). Here we analyzed a large group of patients with NPM1mut AML enrolled in prospective trials (NCRI AML17 and AML19, n=1357) to delineate the impact of baseline molecular and clinical features, post induction MRD status and treatment intensity on outcome. FLT3-ITD (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.01-1.63), DNMT3A (HR 1.65, 95%CI 1.32-2.05), WT1 (HR 1.74, 95%CI 1272-2.38) and non-ABD NPM1 mutations (HR 1.64, 95%CI 1.22-2.21) were independently associated with poorer overall survival (OS). These factors were also strongly associated with MRD positivity. For patients achieving MRD negativity, these mutations (except FLT3-ITD) were associated with an increased cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and poorer OS. However, apart from the few patients with adverse cytogenetics, we could not identify any group of MRD negative patients with a CIR >40% or with benefit from allograft in first remission. Intensified chemotherapy with the FLAG-Ida regimen was associated with improved outcomes in all subgroups, with greater benefits observed in the highest risk molecular subgroups.

2.
Blood Adv ; 7(16): 4539-4549, 2023 08 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37171402

RESUMEN

Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351) improved overall survival (OS) compared with 7+3 chemotherapy in older patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML); to date, there have been no randomized studies in younger patients. The high-risk cohort of the UK NCRI AML19 trial (ISRCTN78449203) compared CPX-351 with FLAG-Ida in younger adults with newly diagnosed adverse cytogenetic AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). A total of 189 patients were randomized (median age, 56 years). Per clinical criteria, 49% of patients had de novo AML, 20% had secondary AML, and 30% had high-risk MDS. MDS-related cytogenetics were present in 73% of the patients, with a complex karyotype in 49%. TP53 was the most common mutated gene, in 43%. Myelodysplasia-related gene mutations were present in 75 (44%) patients. The overall response rate (CR + CRi) after course 2 was 64% and 76% for CPX-351 and FLAG-Ida, respectively. There was no difference in OS (13.3 months vs 11.4 months) or event-free survival in multivariable analysis. However, relapse-free survival was significantly longer with CPX-351 (median 22.1 vs 8.35 months). There was no difference between the treatment arms in patients with clinically defined secondary AML or those with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities; however, an exploratory subgroup of patients with MDS-related gene mutations had significantly longer OS with CPX-351 (median 38.4 vs 16.3 months). In conclusion, the OS of younger patients with adverse risk AML/MDS was not significantly different between CPX-351 and FLAG-Ida.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Daunorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Citarabina/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/genética , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/complicaciones , Cariotipo , Reino Unido
3.
Sci Immunol ; 7(69): eabm9060, 2022 03 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35302862

RESUMEN

B cells generate antibodies that are essential for immune protection, but their subgroups are poorly defined. Here, we perform undirected deep profiling of B cells in matched human lymphoid tissues from deceased transplant organ donors and blood. In addition to identifying unanticipated features of tissue-based B cell differentiation, we resolve two subsets of marginal zone B (MZB) cells differing in cell surface and transcriptomic profiles, clonal relationships to other subsets, enrichment of genes in the NOTCH pathway, distribution bias within splenic marginal zone microenvironment, and immunoglobulin repertoire diversity and hypermutation frequency. Each subset is present in spleen, gut-associated lymphoid tissue, mesenteric lymph nodes, and blood. MZB cells and the lineage from which they are derived are depleted in lupus nephritis. Here, we show that this depletion is of only one MZB subset. The other remains unchanged as a proportion of total B cells compared with health. Thus, it is important to factor MZB cell heterogeneity into studies of human B cell responses and pathology.


Asunto(s)
Linfocitos B , Tejido Linfoide , Humanos , Activación de Linfocitos , Recuento de Linfocitos , Bazo
4.
J Exp Med ; 218(4)2021 04 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33538776

RESUMEN

B cells emerge from the bone marrow as transitional (TS) B cells that differentiate through T1, T2, and T3 stages to become naive B cells. We have identified a bifurcation of human B cell maturation from the T1 stage forming IgMhi and IgMlo developmental trajectories. IgMhi T2 cells have higher expression of α4ß7 integrin and lower expression of IL-4 receptor (IL4R) compared with the IgMlo branch and are selectively recruited into gut-associated lymphoid tissue. IgMhi T2 cells also share transcriptomic features with marginal zone B cells (MZBs). Lineage progression from T1 cells to MZBs via an IgMhi trajectory is identified by pseudotime analysis of scRNA-sequencing data. Reduced frequency of IgMhi gut-homing T2 cells is observed in severe SLE and is associated with reduction of MZBs and their putative IgMhi precursors. The collapse of the gut-associated MZB maturational axis in severe SLE affirms its existence in health.


Asunto(s)
Diferenciación Celular/inmunología , Tracto Gastrointestinal/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina M/metabolismo , Nefritis Lúpica/inmunología , Tejido Linfoide/inmunología , Células Precursoras de Linfocitos B/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Donantes de Sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Linaje de la Célula/genética , Linaje de la Célula/inmunología , Células Cultivadas , Femenino , Humanos , Cadenas beta de Integrinas/metabolismo , Subunidad alfa del Receptor de Interleucina-4/metabolismo , Nefritis Lúpica/sangre , Nefritis Lúpica/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenotipo , Análisis de Secuencia de ARN/métodos , Análisis de la Célula Individual/métodos , Transcriptoma , Adulto Joven
5.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 30(4): 661-668, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33514604

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening is rapidly replacing cytology as the cervical screening modality of choice. In addition to being more sensitive than cytology, it can be done on self-collected vaginal or urine samples. This study will compare the high-risk HPV positivity rates and sensitivity of self-collected vaginal samples using four different collection devices and a urine sample. METHODS: A total of 620 women referred for colposcopy were invited to provide an initial stream urine sample collected with the Colli-Pee device and take two vaginal self-samples, using either a dry flocked swab (DF) and a wet dacron swab (WD), or a HerSwab (HS) and Qvintip (QT) device. HPV testing was performed by the BD Onclarity HPV Assay. RESULTS: A total of 600 vaginal sample pairs were suitable for analysis, and 505 were accompanied by a urine sample. Similar positivity rates and sensitivities for CIN2+ and CIN3+ were seen for DF, WD, and urine, but lower values were seen for QT and HS. No clear user preferences were seen between devices, but women found urine easiest to collect, and were more confident they had taken the sample correctly. The lowest confidence in collection was reported for HS. CONCLUSIONS: Urine, a DF swab, and WD swab all performed well and were well received by the women, whereas the Qvintip and HerSwab devices were less satisfactory. IMPACT: This is the first study to compare five self-sampling methods in the same women taken at the same time. It supports wider use of urine or vaginal self-sampling for cervical screening.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Autocuidado , Orina/virología , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/virología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Vagina/virología , Adulto , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/orina , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Frotis Vaginal
6.
mSphere ; 3(3)2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29743199

RESUMEN

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination elicits high-titer genotype-specific antibody responses that are associated with a reduced risk of cervical disease caused by vaccine-incorporated genotypes. Our objective was to evaluate dried blood spots (DBSs) and oral mucosal transudate (OMT) as alternative samples to serum to confirm HPV vaccine antibody status. A study was carried out to evaluate the feasibility of detecting HPV16 and HPV18 antibodies in OMT, DBSs, and sera among women who self-reported being unvaccinated or fully vaccinated with the HPV vaccine. Serum had the highest sensitivity (100%) for detection of antibodies against both HPV16 and HPV18 but the lowest specificity, due to the detection of natural infection antibodies in 16% of unvaccinated women. Conversely, DBSs and OMT had lower sensitivity (96% and 82%, respectively) but high specificity (98%). We confirmed that these antibodies were functional (i.e., neutralizing) and that their detection was quantitatively reproducible and well correlated between sample types when normalized to IgG content. DBSs and OMT are appropriate alternative sample types for HPV vaccine surveillance. These alternative sample types warrant consideration for the purposes of cervical screening, diagnosis, and management, but more work will be needed to establish the stringent parameters required for such application.IMPORTANCE Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the causative agent of cervical and other anogenital cancers. HPV vaccination, primarily targeted at young girls before the age of sexual debut, is starting to demonstrate population-level declines in HPV infection and early disease associated with vaccine-incorporated genotypes. Monitoring young women for vaccine-specific antibody is important for vaccine surveillance and may be useful as an adjunct test within a cervical screening context. We evaluated serum, dried blood spots, and oral fluid as potential samples for such applications and report robust measures of diagnostic accuracy. This is the first time a direct comparison of alternative sample types has been made between vaccinated and unvaccinated women for the detection and quantitation of HPV antibodies.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/análisis , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Desecación , Mucosa Bucal/inmunología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
7.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 26(7): 1053-1059, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28223432

RESUMEN

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing from clinician-collected cervical and self-collected cervico-vaginal samples is more sensitive for detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ than cytology-based screening, stimulating interest in HPV testing from urine. The objective was to determine the performance of the Trovagene HPV test for the detection of CIN2+ from urine and PreservCyt cervical samples.Methods: Women referred for colposcopy at St Mary's Hospital (London, United Kingdom), following abnormal cytology, were recruited to this diagnostic accuracy study by convenience sampling (September 2011 to April 2013). A total of 501 paired urine and cervical samples were collected. Primary outcomes were sensitivity for CIN2+/CIN3+ and specificity for

Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/orina , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/orina , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/orina , Adulto , Anciano , Cuello del Útero/patología , Colposcopía , ADN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/patología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Estudios Prospectivos , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Derivación y Consulta , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Manejo de Especímenes , Reino Unido , Urinálisis/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Frotis Vaginal , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/patología , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/virología
8.
J Clin Virol ; 82: 145-151, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27498250

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Two transport media, PreservCyt and SurePath, are widely used for cervical cytology screening. There are concerns that they may perform differently for HPV testing. OBJECTIVES: A comparison of the performance of six different HPV tests in SurePath and PreservCyt in a referral population using two samples from each woman. The primary goal was to compare the performance of each test in the two media. Comparisons between assays and viral load comparisons between media were secondary aims. STUDY DESIGN: Two cervical samples were collected in random order at the same visit in women with abnormal cytology. One sample was placed in 20ml of PreservCyt and the other in 10ml of SurePath. Aliquots were taken for 4 DNA based tests: digene HC2 High-Risk HPV DNA Test, Abbott Realtime, BD Onclarity and Genera PapType, an RNA based test-: Hologic Aptima and a protein test: OncoHealth. RESULTS: 630 sample pairs were included in the analyses. For all tests except the protein test sensitivities were in excess of 90% for CIN2+ and 95% for CIN3+ for both media and with no significant differences except for a lower sensitivity for CIN2+ of Aptima in SurePath (93% vs 98%, P=0.005). Specificity for

Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Papillomaviridae/clasificación , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Adulto , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Papillomaviridae/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Carga Viral/métodos
9.
J Med Screen ; 22(1): 28-37, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25403717

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Non-attenders for cervical screening are at increased risk of cervical cancer. Studies offering self-sampling for high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HrHPV) testing have shown greater uptake than sending another invitation for cytology. OBJECTIVES: To explore whether uptake would increase in a less diverse, more stable population than the previous English study, which demonstrated a lower response rate than other studies. The primary objective was whether non-attenders were more likely to respond to a postal invitation, including kit, to collect a self-sample compared with a further invitation for cytology screening. The secondary objective was whether women with an abnormal result would attend for follow-up. METHODS: 6000 non-attenders for screening in this pragmatic, randomized (1:1) controlled trial in Newcastle-upon-Tyne were sent an HPV self-sample kit (intervention) or a further invitation for cytology screening (comparator). RESULTS: 411(13%) responded to the intervention, returning a self-sample (247(8%)) or attending for cytology (164(5%)), compared with 183(6%) attending for cytology, relative risk 2.25 (95% CI 1.90-2.65) (comparator arm). Of those testing hrHPV positive (32(13%)), 19(59%) subsequently attended cytology screening. Of those in the intervention group who attended for cytology screening without returning an hrHPV self-sample (n = 164), 5% (n = 8) were referred for colposcopy - all attended. In the comparator group eight of the nine referred for colposcopy attended. CONCLUSION: Persistent non-responders to invitations for cervical screening are significantly more likely to respond to a postal invitation to return a self-collected sample for HPV testing than a further invitation for cytology screening. However, just over half followed up on this positive HPV result.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Cooperación del Paciente , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Alphapapillomavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Manejo de Especímenes , Frotis Vaginal/métodos , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/virología
10.
J Clin Virol ; 60(1): 44-9, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24630483

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: HR HPV genotypes when assayed collectively, achieve high sensitivity but low specificity for the prediction of CIN2+. Knowledge of the specific genotypes in an infection may facilitate the use of HR HPV detection in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To compare the rate of HR HPV detection and the accuracy of CIN2+ prediction between PapType test (Genera Biosystems) and other commercially available HR HPV assays, and to examine the value of full HPV genotyping. STUDY DESIGN: PreservCyt samples from 1099 women referred for abnormal cervical cytology were used. CIN2+ was chosen as the primary end-point but CIN3+ was also evaluated. A hierarchy of HR HPV genotypes was created using PPV and this was used to create 3 groups of genotypes with potentially different management. RESULTS: The PapType assay has a specificity of 22.4% and a sensitivity of 94.6% for CIN2+ prediction. Classification into Groups A (HPV33 and HPV16, very highly predictive), B (HPV31, 18, 52, 35, 58, 51 highly predictive) and C (HPV68, 45, 39, 66, 56, 59, intermediate predictive) could double the specificity (44.5%) but only slightly reduce the sensitivity for CIN2+ (91.5%) and CIN3+ (94.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The PapType assay is a simple, reproducible and effective test for HR HPV detection and genotyping. HPV 33 was found to have a very high PPV and should therefore be managed as for HPV16.


Asunto(s)
Cuello del Útero/virología , Técnicas de Genotipaje/métodos , Papillomaviridae/clasificación , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/virología , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Prueba de Papanicolaou , Papillomaviridae/genética , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...