Treatment Guideline Nonadherence Pretransport Associated With Need for Higher Level of Care in Children Transferred to a Pediatric Tertiary Care Center for Status Epilepticus.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the association between adherence to the American Epilepsy Society (AES) 2016 guidelines for management of convulsive status epilepticus (SE) and clinical outcomes among children requiring interhospital transport for SE. We hypothesized that pretransport guideline nonadherence would be associated with needing higher level of care posttransfer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of children aged 30 days to 18 years transferred to our pediatric tertiary center from 2017 to 2019 for management of SE. Their care episodes were classified as 2016 American Epilepsy Society guideline adherent or nonadherent. There were 40 referring hospitals represented in this cohort. RESULTS: Of 260 care episodes, 55 (21%) were guideline adherent, 184 (71%) were guideline nonadherent, and 21 (8%) had insufficient data to determine guideline adherence. Compared with the adherent group, patients in the nonadherent care group had longer hospitalizations (32 hours [17-68] vs 21 hours [7-48], P = 0.006), were more likely to require intensive care unit admission (47% vs 31%), and less likely to be discharged home from the emergency department (16% vs 35%; χ 2 test, P = 0.01). Intubation rates did not differ significantly between groups (25% vs 18%, P = 0.37). When we fit a multivariable model to adjust for confounding variables, guideline nonadherence was associated with need for higher level of care (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.99). Treatment guideline adherence did not improve over the 3-year study period (2017: 22%, 2018: 19%, 2019: 29% [χ 2 test for differences between any 2 years, P = 0.295]). CONCLUSIONS: Guideline nonadherence pretransport was associated with longer hospitalizations and need for higher level of care among children transferred for SE at our institution. These findings suggest a need to improve SE guideline adherence through multifaceted quality improvement efforts targeting both the prehospital and community hospital settings.

Impact of an Emergency Department Saturation Tool on a Pediatric Hospital's Capacity Management Policy.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe how the Emergency Department Work Index (EDWIN) saturation tool (1) correlates with PED overcrowding during a capacity management activation policy, known internally as Purple Alert and (2) compare overall hospital-wide capacity metrics on days in which the alert was instituted versus days it was not. METHODS: This study was conducted between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 in a 30-bed academic quaternary care, urban PED within a university hospital. The EDWIN tool was implemented in January 2019 and objectively measured the busyness of the PED. To determine correlation with overcrowding, EDWIN scores were calculated at alert initiation. Mean alert hours per month were plotted on a control chart before and after EDWIN implementation. We also compared daily numbers of PED visits, inpatient admissions, and patients left without being seen (LWBS) for days with and without alert initiation to assess whether or not Purple Alert correlated with high PED usage. RESULTS: During the study period, the alert was activated a total of 146 times; 43 times after EDWIN implementation. Mean EDWIN score was 2.5 (SD 0.5, min 1.5, max 3.8) at alert initiation. There were no alert occurrences for EDWIN scores less than 1.5 (not overcrowded). There was no statistically significant difference for mean alert hours per month before and after EDWIN was instituted (21.4 vs 20.2, P = 0.08). Mean numbers of PED visits, inpatient admissions, and patients left without being seen were higher on days with alert activation ( P < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The EDWIN score correlated with PED busyness and overcrowding during alert activation and correlated with high PED usage. Future studies could include implementing a real-time Web-based EDWIN score as a prediction tool to prevent overcrowding and verifying EDWIN generalizability at other PED sites.

Interhospital Transport of Children With Peripheral Venous Catheters by Private Vehicle: A Mixed Methods Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Many children seeking emergency care at community hospitals require transport to tertiary centers for definitive management. Interhospital transport via ambulance versus patient's own vehicle (POV) are 2 possible modes of transport; however, presence of a peripheral venous catheter (PIV) can determine transport by ambulance. Caregiver satisfaction, patient comfort, and PIV complications related to POV transport have not been described. OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to examine caregivers' satisfaction and perceptions of POV transport in children with/without PIVs and to assess PIV-related complications during transport. METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods, prospective cohort study of children who presented with low-acuity conditions to a community hospital and subsequently required transfer to a pediatric tertiary center. Caregivers of patients with/without PIVs were given the choice of transport by POV or ambulance. Surveys completed after transport used dichotomous, 5-point Likert scale, and open-ended responses to assess satisfaction, perceptions, and PIV-related complications. Responses were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed accordingly. The receiving hospital assessed PIV integrity. RESULTS: Sixty-nine of 78 eligible patients were enrolled; of those, 67 (97%) elected transport by POV and 55 (82%) completed surveys. Most caregivers had positive responses related to satisfaction, comfort, and safety. Results did not differ significantly between those with/without PIVs. The majority (96%) would choose POV transport again. There were no reported PIV complications; all PIVs were functional upon arrival. Qualitative analysis identified themes of comfort, convenience, and efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: In select scenarios, interfacility transport by POV is preferred by families and doing so with a saline-locked PIV does not result in complications.

Diagnostic Discordance in Pediatric Critical Care Transport: A Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to describe diagnostic discordance rates at our pediatric tertiary care center between the reason for transfer of critically ill/injured children (determined by the referring institution) and the inpatient admission diagnosis (determined by our accepting institution), to identify potential factors associated with discordance, and to determine its impact on patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all critically ill/injured children transferred to the Johns Hopkins Children's Center between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2018. All patients whose initial inpatient disposition was the pediatric intensive care unit were included. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-three children (median age, 51 months) from 57 institutions (median pediatric capability level: 3) met inclusion criteria: 46.8% were transported during nighttime, 86.5% by ground, and 21.2% accompanied by a physician. Nearly half (43.4%) had respiratory admission diagnoses. The rest included surgical/neurosurgical (14.2%), neurologic (11.2%), cardiovascular/shock (8.7%), endocrine (8.2%), infectious disease (6.8%), poisoning (3.1%), hematology-oncology (2.2%), gastrointestinal/metabolic (1.9%), and renal (0.3%). Forty-six (7.2%) had referral-to-admission diagnostic discordance: 25 of 46 had discordance across different diagnostic groups and 21 of 46 had clinically significant discordance within the same diagnostic group. The discordant group had higher need for respiratory support titration in transport (43.9% vs 27.9%, p = 0.02); more invasive procedures and vasopressor needs during the day of admission (26.1% vs 11.6%, P = 0.008; 19.6% vs 7%, P = 0.006); and longer intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays (5 vs 2 days; 11 vs 3 days, P < 0.001). When compared with respiratory admission diagnoses, patients with cardiovascular/shock and neurologic diagnoses were more likely to have discordant diagnoses (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 13.24 [5.41-35.05]; 6.47 [2.48-17.75], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Seven percent of our critically ill/injured pediatric cohort had clinically significant referral-to-admission diagnostic discordance. Patients with cardiovascular/shock and neurologic diagnoses were particularly at risk. Those with discordant diagnoses had more in-transit events; a higher need for ICU interventions postadmission; and significantly longer ICU stays and hospitalizations, deserving further investigation.

A National Survey on Physician Trainee Participation in Pediatric Interfacility Transport.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the national experience regarding which physician trainees are allowed to participate in pediatric interfacility transports and what is considered adequate education and training for physician trainees prior to participating in the transport of children. DESIGN: Self-administered electronic survey. SETTING: Pediatric transport teams listed with the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Transport Medicine. SUBJECTS: Leaders of U.S. pediatric transport teams. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-four of the 90 U.S. teams surveyed (49%) responded. Thirty-nine (89%) were university hospital-affiliated. Most programs (26/43, 60%) allowed trainees to participate in pediatric transport in some capacity. Mandatory transport rotations were reported for pediatric critical care (PICU) fellows (9/42, 21%), neonatology (neonatal ICU) fellows (6/42, 14%), pediatric emergency medicine fellows (4/41, 10%), emergency medicine residents (3/43, 7%), and pediatric residents (2/43, 5%). Fellow participation was reported by 19 of 28 programs (68%) with PICU fellowships, 12 of 25 programs (48%) with pediatric emergency medicine fellowships, and 10 of 34 programs (29%) with neonatal ICU fellowships. Transport programs with greater than or equal to 1,000 annual incoming transports were more likely to include PICU and pediatric emergency medicine fellows as providers (p = 0.04; 95% CI, 1.04-25.71 and p = 0.02; 95% CI, 1.31-53.75). Most commonly, trainees functioned as medical control physicians (86%), provided minute-to-minute medical direction for critically ill patients (62%), performed intubations (52%), and were code leaders for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation during transport (52%). Most transport programs required pediatric residents, PICU, and pediatric emergency medicine fellows to complete a PICU rotation prior to participating in pediatric transports. The majority of transport programs did not use any metrics to determine airway proficiency of physician trainees. CONCLUSIONS: There is heterogeneity with regard to the types of physician trainees allowed to participate in pediatric interfacility transports, the roles played by physician trainees during pediatric transport, and the training (or lack thereof) provided to physician trainees prior to their participating in pediatric transports.

Pediatric Transport Triage: Development and Assessment of an Objective Tool to Guide Transport Planning.

OBJECTIVES: We developed a Pediatric Transport Triage Tool (PT3) to objectively guide selection of team composition and transport mode, thereby standardizing transport planning. Previously, modified Pediatric Early Warning Score for transport has been used to assess illness severity but not to guide transport decision making. METHODS: The PT3 was created for pediatric transport by combining objective evaluations of neurologic, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems with a systems-based medical condition list to identify diagnoses requiring expedited transport and/or advanced team composition not captured by neurologic, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems alone. A scoring algorithm was developed to guide transport planning. Transport data (mode, team composition, time to dispatch, patient disposition, and complications) were collected before and after PT3 implementation at a single tertiary care center over an 18-month period. RESULTS: We reviewed 2237 inbound pediatric transports. Transport mode, patient disposition, and dispatch time were unchanged over the study period. Fewer calls using a transport nurse were noted after PT3 implementation (33.9% vs 30%, P = 0.05), with a trend toward fewer rotor-wing transports and transports requiring physicians. The majority of users, regardless of experience level, reported improved transport standardization with the tool. Need to upgrade team composition or mode during transport was not different during the study period. No adverse patient safety events occurred with PT3 use. CONCLUSIONS: The PT3 represents an objective triage tool to reduce variability in transport planning. The PT3 decreased resource utilization and was not associated with adverse outcomes. Teams with dynamic staffing models, various experience levels, and multiple transport modes may benefit from this standardized assessment tool.

Assessment of a quality improvement intervention to improve the consistency of total body surface area burn estimates between referring facilities and a pediatric burn center.

BACKGROUND: Burns are a significant source of pediatric morbidity and frequently result in transfer of care to a pediatric burn center. Data suggest that referring facilities often overestimate the total body surface area (%TBSA) of burns in comparison to the subsequent assessment at the pediatric burn center. Such discrepancies may trigger inappropriately aggressive interventions with potential for patient harm. Our baseline assessment of data from 106 patients transferred to our pediatric burn center over a one-year period showed that 59/106 (56%) patients had a %TBSA recorded at the time of transfer and 18/59 (31%) had clinically significant differences (>5% difference) in estimates between the referring facility and the pediatric burn center. METHODS: Informed by this clinical audit and a root cause analysis, we implemented practices to enhance consistency of clinical assessments between referring facilities and our pediatric burn center. These practices included the use of a common clinical assessment instrument (a standardized Lund and Browder form) that was integrated into the interfacility transfer process as well as educational outreach at referring facilities for providers who treat children with burns, prioritizing facilities with the highest number of discrepancies. RESULTS: Follow up data was reviewed 16-23 months after initiating the intervention. Cumulatively, we found significant improvement in the proportion of patients with %TBSA recorded (94% vs 56%, p < 0.001) that achieved our goal to exceed 90% and a reduction in clinically significant discrepancies that exceeded our goal of 15% (10% vs 31%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Referring facilities often overestimate the %TBSA in comparison to the subsequent assessment at the pediatric burn center. The consistency of the %TBSA estimates can be improved by interventions that utilize the sharing of a common clinical assessment instrument and standardization of the transfer intake process.

A National Survey on Interhospital Transport of Children in Cardiac Arrest.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the U.S. experience with interhospital transport of children in cardiac arrest undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. DESIGN: Self-administered electronic survey. SETTING: Pediatric transport teams listed with the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Transport Medicine. SUBJECTS: Leaders of U.S. pediatric transport teams. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty of the 88 teams surveyed (68%) responded. Nineteen teams (32%) from 13 states transport children undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation between hospitals. The most common reasons for transfer of children in cardiac arrest are higher level-of-care (70%), extracorporeal life support (60%), and advanced trauma resuscitation (35%). Eligibility is typically decided on a case-by-case basis (85%) and sometimes involves a short interhospital distance (35%), or prompt institution of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (20%). Of the 19 teams that transport with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 42% report no special staff safety features, 42% have guidelines or protocols, 37% train staff on resuscitation during transport, 11% brace with another provider, and 5% use mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices for patients less than 18 years. In the past 5 years, 18 teams report having done such cardiopulmonary resuscitation transports: 22% did greater than five transports, 44% did two to five transports, 6% did one transport, and the remaining 28% did not recall the number of transports. Seventy-eight percent recall having transported by ambulance, 44% by helicopter, and 22% by fixed-wing. Although patient outcomes were varied, eight teams (44%) reported survivors to ICU and/or hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of U.S. teams perform interhospital transport of children in cardiac arrest undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Eligibility criteria, transport logistics, and patient outcomes are heterogeneous. Importantly, there is a paucity of established safety protocols for the staff performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in transport.

Repeat radiographic imaging in patients with long bone fractures transferred to a pediatric trauma center.

This study sought to determine the proportion of children with long bone fractures who undergo duplicate radiographic imaging after transfer to a pediatric trauma center (PTC) for further management. The secondary objective was to explore provider rationale and diagnostic yield of repeat X-rays. This was a single-site, retrospective cohort study conducted at a PTC. All patients, aged 0-21 years, who were transferred to the PTC for management of a long bone fracture were included. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine the proportion of children who had repeat radiographic imaging and the provider rationale for obtaining this. T-test and Χ2 analyses were used to compare patients who had repeat X-rays with those who did not. During the study period, 309 patients (63% male, mean age 7.2±4.3 years) were transferred from 30 referring hospitals. Of these, 43% (n=133) underwent repeat radiographs. Patient age (p=0.9), gender (p=0.7), fracture location (p=0.19), and type of referring emergency department (pediatric vs general, p=0.3) were not significantly associated with repeat imaging. Rationale for repeat imaging could be ascertained in 31% of cases (n=41); the most common reasons were request by orthopedist (17%, n=23) and suboptimal original imaging (10%, n=13). Repeat imaging at the PTC did not reveal new or additional diagnoses in any case. Nearly half of the children in our study population undergo repeat and likely unnecessary imaging. Strategies to reduce repeat radiographs should be developed, as redundant imaging exposes patients to additional radiation and increases medical expense.

Retrospective Evaluation of Risk Factors for Pediatric Secondary Transport.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency medical services (EMS) typically transports patients to the nearest emergency department (ED). After initial presentation, children who require specialized care must undergo secondary transport, exposing them to additional risks and delaying definitive treatment. EMS direct transport protocols exist for major trauma and certain adult medical conditions, however the same cannot be said for pediatric medical conditions or injuries that do not meet trauma center criteria ('minor trauma'). To explore the utility of such future protocols, we sought to first describe the pediatric secondary transport population and examine prehospital risk factors for secondary transport. METHODS: Pediatric secondary transport patients aged 0-18 years were identified. Patients meeting state EMS trauma protocol criteria or who were clinically unstable were excluded. Data were abstracted by chart review of EMS, community hospital ED, and specialty hospital records. Patients were compared to control patients with similar conditions who did not require secondary transport. RESULTS: This study identified 211 medical or minor trauma pediatric secondary transport patients between 2013 and 2014. The three most prevalent conditions were seizure (n = 52), isolated orthopedic injury (n = 49), and asthma/respiratory distress (n = 27). Increased odds of secondary transport for seizure patients were associated with administration of supplemental oxygen, glucose measurement, and online medical direction; for isolated orthopedic injuries, online medical direction; and for asthma/respiratory distress, administration of supplemental oxygen, and online medical direction. Decreased odds of secondary transport for seizure patients were associated with a higher GCS; for isolated orthopedic injuries, increased age and oxygen saturation; and for asthma/respiratory distress, administration of albuterol only. CONCLUSIONS: Children with seizures, isolated orthopedic injuries, and asthma/respiratory distress comprised the majority of the medical or minor trauma pediatric secondary transport population. Each of those conditions had specific risk factors for secondary transport. This study's results provide information to guide future prospective studies and the development of direct transport protocols for those populations.

Interhospital Transport of Children Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Practical and Ethical Dilemma.

OBJECTIVES: To discuss risks and benefits of interhospital transport of children in cardiac arrest undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. DESIGN: Narrative review. RESULTS: Not applicable. CONCLUSIONS: Transporting children in cardiac arrest with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation between hospitals is potentially lifesaving if it enables access to resources such as extracorporeal support, but may risk transport personnel safety. Research is needed to optimize outcomes of patients transported with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and reduce risks to the staff caring for them.

Pediatric Critical Care Transport as a Conduit to Terminal Extubation at Home: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVES: To present our single-center's experience with three palliative critical care transports home from the PICU for terminal extubation. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients transported between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014. SETTING: All cases were identified from our institutional pediatric transport database. PATIENTS: Patients were terminally ill children unable to separate from mechanical ventilation in the PICU, who were transported home for terminal extubation and end-of-life care according to their families' wishes. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent palliative care transport home for terminal extubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The rate of palliative care transports home for terminal extubation during the study period was 2.6 per 100 deaths. The patients were 7 months, 6 years, and 18 years old and had complex chronic conditions. The transfer process was protocolized. The families were approached by the PICU staff during multidisciplinary goals-of-care meetings. Parental expectations were clarified, and home hospice care was arranged pretransfer. All transports were performed by our pediatric critical care transport team, and all terminal extubations were performed by physicians. All patients had unstable medical conditions and urgent needs for transport to comply with the families' wishes for withdrawal of life support and death at home. As such, all three cases presented similar logistic challenges, including establishing do-not-resuscitate status pretransport, having limited time to organize the transport, and coordinating home palliative care services with available community resources. CONCLUSIONS: Although a relatively infrequent practice in pediatric critical care, transport home for terminal extubation represents a feasible alternative for families seeking out-of-hospital end-of-life care for their critically ill technology-dependent children. Our single-center experience supports the need for development of formal programs for end-of-life critical care transports to include patient screening tools, palliative care home discharge algorithms, transport protocols, and resource utilization and cost analyses.

Factors associated with emergency department discharge after pediatric interhospital transport: a role for outreach education?

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the disposition of children transported from an outside emergency department (ED) to a children's hospital ED and examine associations between patient and referring ED factors with discharge from the receiving ED. METHODS: We collected data from existing electronic data sources and telephone interviews of referring ED directors. We included all pediatric patients who were transported from an outside ED to the Children's National Medical Center ED between July 2009 and June 2010. We examined patient factors of age, diagnosis, and illness severity and referring ED factors of annual pediatric volume and staffing for associations with ED discharge. RESULTS: Of 3288 transported patients, 2230 (68%) were admitted, 1025 (31%) were discharged, and less than 1% died. In univariate analyses, discharge from the receiving ED was associated with trauma diagnoses (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-2.4), transports from low pediatric volume EDs (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.7-2.4), and from EDs without pediatric physician staffing (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.8-2.6). In multivariate analyses, discharge was associated with trauma and gastrointestinal diagnoses (adjusted OR 1.6 [95% CI, 1.2-2.2] and 1.9 [95% CI, 1.4-2.6], respectively) as well as low referring ED pediatric volume and nonpediatric physician staffing (adjusted OR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.4-2.1] and 1.9 [95% CI, 1.5-2.5], respectively) when controlling for all other factors. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-site study, children referred from outside EDs with lower pediatric volumes and staffed by nonpediatricians were more likely to be discharged from a children's hospital ED after transport. These transports may represent unnecessary resource use. Outreach education, shared staffing models, and telemedicine are potential methods to address unnecessary transfers.

Recognition and management of pediatric food allergy in the emergency department.

Recently, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases sought to establish consistency in definitions, diagnostic criteria, and management practices concerning food allergies (FAs). This review aimed to summarize and highlight the relevant findings of these guidelines for the emergency department provider, as pediatric patients often present to the emergency department with FAs or other disorders mimicking FAs.

Improving pretransport care of pediatric emergency patients: an assessment of referring hospital care.

OBJECTIVES: Before effective educational interventions can be implemented to improve health care, a needs assessment is essential to determine areas best targeted for improvement. The purpose of this study was to assess the educational needs of referring community hospitals with regard to the pretransport care of pediatric patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective survey of physicians accepting referrals from community hospitals in the emergency department of a large, urban, academic, pediatric hospital. Based on the routine pretransport telephone consultation, we asked the accepting physician to document the appropriateness of the referring hospital's management of the patient before the request for transport. We reviewed the corresponding transport records of all children for whom pretransport care was categorized as suboptimal. We report frequencies and relative frequencies for suboptimal care, reasons for suboptimal care, and the pretransport diagnoses of these patients. RESULTS: There were 817 pediatric patients transported from 54 different hospitals during the 3-month study period, for which we received 477 surveys (58% response rate). The accepting physician rated the pretransport care as suboptimal for 105 (22%) of 477 patients. The most common diagnoses of referrals were respiratory distress, asthma, and seizures. Care was more likely to be reported suboptimal for patients with fever (P = 0.001) and asthma (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Using a simple survey, we identified opportunities for improvement in the management of pediatric emergency patients by referring hospitals in 22% of cases.

The use of high-dose epinephrine for patients with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest refractory to prehospital interventions.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if high-dose epinephrine (HDE) used during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest refractory to prehospital interventions improves return of spontaneous circulation, 24-hour survival, discharge survival, and neurological outcomes. METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted between May 1991 and October 1996 to compare the effectiveness of HDE versus standard-dose epinephrine (SDE) in patients having out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest refractory to prehospital resuscitation efforts. Cardiopulmonary arrest was classified as "medical" or "traumatic." Two hundred thirty patients were enrolled in 7 pediatric emergency departments. Ages ranged from newborn to 22 years. Seventeen patients met exclusion criteria. Patients were assigned to receive HDE (0.1 mg/kg for the initial dose and 0.2 mg/kg for subsequent doses) or SDE (0.01 mg/kg). The main end points evaluated were return of spontaneous circulation, 24-hour survival, discharge survival, and neurological outcome. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients received HDE (32 trauma patients), and 86 patients received SDE (27 trauma patients). Among medical patients, 24 (25%) of 95 experienced return of spontaneous circulation in the HDE group as compared with 9 (15%) of 59 in the SDE group (P = 0.14, chi2 = 2.17, relative risk = 1.66 [0.83-3.31]). Sixteen (17%) of 95 HDE patients and 5 (8%) of 59 SDE patients survived at least 24 hours (P = 0.14, chi2 = 2.16, relative risk = 1.99 [0.77-5.14]). Nine survivors to discharge received HDE, and 2 received SDE (P = 0.21, Fisher exact test, relative risk = 2.75 [0.61-12.28]). There were no long-term survivors among the trauma patients. Eight of 11 long-term survivors had severe neurological outcomes defined by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (2/2 SDE, 6/9 HDE; P = 0.51, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: HDE does not improve or diminish return of spontaneous circulation, 24-hour survival, long-term survival, or neurological outcome compared with SDE in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.

Admission predictor modeling in pediatric interhospital transport.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to determine if an existing general severity of illness measure describing pediatric emergency patients, calculated at referring hospitals, predicts the need for hospital admission and intensive care unit (ICU) admission at receiving hospitals. METHODS: A consecutive series of interhospital transports to an urban pediatric tertiary care hospital from other emergency departments (EDs) during a 1-year period were studied. The pediatric risk of admission score, a validated emergency department measure of severity of illness, was calculated by the transport team leader on arrival at the referring hospital using data available at that time. Outcomes examined in a logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic curves included the need for hospital admission and ICU admission. RESULTS: From 52 referring emergency departments, 1920 consecutive interhospital transport records were analyzed. Of these, 1557 (81.1%) patients were ultimately admitted to the receiving hospital, including 131 (6.8%) to the ICU. Logistic regression for hospital admission demonstrated a significant independent association with higher age, higher pediatric risk of admission, trauma diagnosis, and the lack of a pediatric inpatient service. The receiver operating characteristic curve for hospital admission [area under the curve = 0.612 (0.576, 0.647)] was not useful to determine a suitable cut point below which hospital admission was unlikely to occur. Pediatric risk of admission score performance as a predictor of ICU admission by receiver operating characteristic curve was only slightly better (area under the curve = 0.721 [0.653, 0.788]). CONCLUSIONS: This form of the pediatric risk of admission score is not practical as a predictor of hospital and ICU admission among pediatric interhospital transport. Specific calibration could increase its utility for the transport population. This in turn may contribute to more effective interhospital transport triage and more efficient allocation of transport resources.