An Evaluation of the Repeatability of Visual Function Following Surgical Repair of Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of visual function assessments for patients with macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: This prospective study included patients with unilateral macula-off RRD of <10-day duration successfully treated with a single, uncomplicated surgery at least 1 year following repair. Visual function assessments were performed at time of enrollment and 1 month later. Testing included Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA), low-contrast visual acuity (VA) 2.5% and 5%, contrast sensitivity assessment with Mars and Gabor patches, reading speed (acuity, speed, and critical print size), color vision testing (protan, deutan, and tritan), and microperimetry. Spectral-domain ocular coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was performed. Paired t-statistics were used to compare values between visits and between the study and fellow eyes. Results: Fourteen patients (9 male, 5 female) with a mean age of 69 years at time of surgery were evaluated. Correlation coefficients across the two visits were highest for ETDRS BCVA (0.97), tritan color vision testing (0.96), and low-contrast VA 5% (0.96), while the average t-statistic was largest for low-luminance deficit (4.2), ETDRS BCVA (4.1), and reading speed critical print size (3.7). ETDRS BCVA did not correlate with SD-OCT findings. Conclusions: ETDRS BCVA can be considered a highly reliable and reproducible outcome measure. LLVA, protan color discrimination, contrast sensitivity, and reading speed may be useful secondary outcome measures. Translational Relevance: This study provides guidance on the selection of visual function outcome measures for clinical trials of patients with macula-off RRD.

Incidence of corneal adverse events in patients with multiple myeloma and their clinical and economic impact: A real-world retrospective cohort study.

AIMS: Ocular toxicities are common adverse events (AEs) associated with anticancer agents. There is a paucity of data documenting their impact on patient care. This study assessed the clinical and economic burden of corneal AEs and related symptoms (collectively termed corneal AEs) in patients receiving multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with a newly diagnosed MM (MM cohort) were identified from PharMetrics Plus, a US insurance claims database. Incidence, outpatient (OP) care, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and costs were assessed for corneal AEs of interest: keratopathy/keratitis, blurred vision/decreased acuity, dry eye, eye pain, and photophobia. Incidence of new corneal AEs, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), corneal AE-related HCRU, and costs were assessed and benchmarked against a hematology cohort of patients. RESULTS: The MM cohort included 2,120 patients with a median follow-up of 734.5 days. Overall, 11.7% of patients in the MM cohort and 7.4% in the hematology cohort had ≥1 corneal AE of interest. In the MM cohort, dry eye (6.1%), blurred vision/decreased acuity (3.4%), and keratopathy/keratitis (2.5%) were the most frequent. The overall median corneal AE-related per-patient-per-month (PPPM) cost was $27, predominantly contributed by OP care (median $19 PPPM). During follow-up, 4.8% of patients visited the ED, 3.6% were hospitalized, and 42.5% of patients visited an ophthalmologist/optometrist (∼1.69 visits/year). Costs of these visits were negligible (median PPPM $19) compared to total all-cause costs (median PPPM $17,286). LIMITATIONS: The results can only be generalized to commercially insured and Medicare Advantage patients. Claims-based diagnosis of corneal AEs may underestimate true incidences. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal AEs were observed in ∼12% of patients in the MM cohort, the most common were keratopathy/keratitis, dry eye, and blurred vision. Most of them required only OP care. The clinical and economic burden for treating corneal AEs was low when compared with total all-cause or MM-related PPPM costs.

Quantitative Comparison of Fundus Images by 2 Ultra-Widefield Fundus Cameras.

PURPOSE: To compare the relative number of retinal pixels and retinal area imaged using the Optos P200DTx (Optos PLC) and Zeiss Clarus 500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) ultra-widefield (UWF) fundus cameras. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cross-sectional analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-eight eyes of 46 patients. METHODS: Eyes were imaged with Optos P200DTx, single-capture, and Zeiss Clarus 500, 2 capture montages when possible, UWF fundus cameras. Relative number of pixels encompassing all foveal-centered retinal quadrants were measured. Retinal area was measured with Zeiss Clarus 500 images that were registered to the Optos P200DTx images. Patients and technicians were asked for preferences between the machines. Imaging session times were recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative number of retinal pixels and retina area captured by each fundus camera. RESULTS: Optos P200DTx consistently captured more relative pixels compared with Zeiss Clarus 500: 510.4 versus 355.6 (P < 0.001) in total with a similarly statistically significant trend in all 4 quadrants (P < 0.001 for each). For area calculation, 70 of the 78 images achieved successful registration. Optos captured a larger total retinal area: 765.6 versus 566.5 mm2 (P < 0.001) with a similarly statistically significant trend in all 4 quadrants. In the subset of 52 of 70 registered and montaged Zeiss Clarus 500 images, similar results were found. For peripheral pathologic features, Optos P200DTx captured unique findings in 28 images, and Zeiss Clarus 500 captured unique findings 1 image (P < 0.001). Among the 48 imaging sessions in which technicians preferred Optos P200DTx for 28 sessions (58%) and Zeiss Clarus 500 for 20 (42%; P = 0.15). Among patients who responded with a preference, 24 preferred Optos P200DTx and 20 preferred Zeiss Clarus 500 (P = 0.52). Average imaging session time was 4.6 minutes (standard deviation, 3.0 minutes) for Optos P200DTx and 5.2 minutes (standard deviation, 3.0 minutes) for Zeiss Clarus 500 (P = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the Optos P200DTx captured statistically significantly more retinal area in all 4 quadrants compared with the Zeiss Clarus 500. No statistically significant difference was found in patient or technician preference or image acquisition time between devices.

Baseline Visual Acuity at Wet AMD Diagnosis Predicts Long-Term Vision Outcomes: An Analysis of the IRIS Registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) demonstrate that high visual acuity (VA) can be maintained, and low VA can be improved with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. Few real-world data investigating the relationship between baseline VA and long-term outcomes exist. This study compares VA at diagnosis and after treatment using data from a large patient registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of IRIS Registry patients diagnosed with nAMD in one or both eyes between January 2013 and June 2017. Patients received at least two anti-VEGF injections in the study eye(s) less than 45 days apart during the study period. Primary outcomes were the percentage of eyes with 20/40 VA or better at diagnosis and association of VA at diagnosis with longer-term visual outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 162,902 eyes. Among all included eyes, 34.3% presented with 20/40 VA or better at diagnosis. Patients with 20/40 vision or better at baseline maintained a mean VA of 20/40 or better for 2 years after treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline VA at nAMD diagnosis predicts long-term VA outcomes. Early diagnosis before VA is adversely affected is a key factor in preserving vision in patients with nAMD. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:633-639.].

A systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of acyclovir 3% ophthalmic ointment to idoxuridine in curing herpetic keratitis by Day 7 of treatment.

BACKGROUND: This objective of the review and analysis is to demonstrate that acyclovir (ACV) 3% ophthalmic ointment is superior to idoxuridine (IDU) in treating herpetic keratitis (HK) presenting as dendritic and geographic ulcer sub-types. DATA SOURCES: Publications in human subjects were identified by searching the Ovid MEDLINE database through April 2011, combining medical subject headings (MESH) "Keratitis, Herpetic/" AND "Acyclovir/" limiting by the key words "topical" OR "ointment" and also restricted to MESH "Administration, Topical/" OR "Ointments/". The results were cross checked with the references used in the Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1:1-134, 2009 and GlaxoSmithKline clinical documents related to acyclovir. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, double-masked studies in subjects diagnosed with HK with head to head comparator arms of ACV ophthalmic ointment and topical IDU that had actual or calculable healing rates at Day seven. DATA EXTRACTION: Data independently extracted from identified articles by two authors of this manuscript. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data from seven randomized, controlled trials (RCT) evaluating 432 subjects that met inclusion criteria (214 were treated with ACV and 218 were treated with IDU) and had Day seven healing rates calculable. All sub-classified lesions were identified as either dendritic ulcers (n = 185) or geographic ulcers (n = 35). The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method in Biometrics 10:417-51, 1954 and JNCI 22:719-48, 1959, controlling for study, was performed as the primary analysis using SAS v9. Homogeneity was assessed using Breslow-Day-Tarone (BDT) test in IARC 1:1-32, 1980 and Biometrika 72:91-5, 1985. The analysis was performed with outliers removed to assess their impact. RESULTS: ACV showed statistically significant greater odds of healing HK at Day seven in all subjects (Odds Ratio 3.95, 95% CI2.60, 6.00, p < 0.0001), in dendritic ulcers (Odds Ratio 4.22, 95% CI: 2.14, 8.32; p < 0.0001) and geographic ulcers (Odds Ratio 5.31, 95% CI: 1.09, 25.93; p = 0.0244). CONCLUSION: ACV 3% ophthalmic ointment is a valuable intervention for dendritic and geographic corneal ulcers. ACV and IDU were generally well tolerated in the studies reviewed.

Novel formulation of glycerin 1% artificial tears extends tear film break-up time compared with Systane lubricant eye drops.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of glycerin 1% formulated with the novel and proprietary ophthalmic excipient poly(l-lysine)-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) (PLL-g-PEG) (Eyeon Particle Sciences LLC) in extending tear film break-up time (TFBUT) compared with a market-leading artificial tear formulation of propylene glycol (0.3%) and polyethylene glycol (0.4%) (Systane(®) Lubricant Eye Drops; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX). METHODS: This prospective single-center, single visit, randomized, double-masked exploratory trial compared the new formulation and Systane using TFBUT. Noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT) was measured in subjects with asymptomatic to mild (n=5), mild to moderate (n=5), and moderate to severe (n=6) dry eye disease using the TearscopePlus™ at pre-instillation and again at 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after instillation. Fluorescein break-up time (FBUT) was measured at 120 min after instillation. RESULTS: At 15 min (N=16), the new formulation extended mean NIBUT by 14.67 s (P=0.05) compared with 7.40 s (P=0.34) by Systane. The new formulation had a mean FBUT of 4.92 s longer than Systane at 120 min (P=0.12). With outliers removed (N=13), the difference between the mean NIBUT change from baseline for the new formulation and Systane at 120 min was statistically significant (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that PLL-g-PEG as a polymer excipient in artificial tears is effective in improving the performance of demulcents to significantly prolong NIBUT at 15 min, and that protective activity from this artificial tear product for 2 or more hours after eye drop instillation is possible.

Infectious endophthalmitis in adult eyes receiving Boston type I keratoprosthesis.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical characteristics of infectious endophthalmitis after Boston type I keratoprosthesis (K-Pro) implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-one adult eyes receiving a K-Pro at a single institution from May 2004 through July 2008. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all adult eyes receiving a K-Pro at the University of Rochester from May 2004 through July 2008. Those patients identified as having been treated for exogenous bacterial endophthalmitis were reviewed for demographic data, indication for K-Pro, bandage contact lens use, prophylactic antibiotic use, timing and clinical presentation of endophthalmitis, gram stain and culture results of intraocular fluid, timing and presentation of any subsequent episodes of endophthalmitis (recurrent endophthalmitis), and preoperative and postoperative visual acuity through August 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of endophthalmitis, time to occurrence, recurrence rates, visual outcomes, and risk factors associated with K-Pro endophthalmitis. RESULTS: Ten (7.1%) of 141 eyes of 130 adult patients were diagnosed and treated for bacterial endophthalmitis. Average time to endophthalmitis developing after K-Pro was 9.8 months (standard deviation [SD], 6.2 months; range, 2-25 months). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were identified in 7 eyes. In 7 of the 10 eyes, recurrent endophthalmitis developed that occurred at a mean of 4 months (SD, 3.9 months; range, 1-13 months) after resolution of the initial episode. At each episode of endophthalmitis, no eye was receiving vancomycin ophthalmic drops and most eyes were receiving only fluoroquinolone ophthalmic drops for prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Infectious endophthalmitis after K-Pro implantation has a higher incidence, delayed onset, and high risk for recurrence compared with postoperative endophthalmitis associated with more common intraocular procedures such as cataract surgery. The concurrent use of topical vancomycin is recommended because it seems to be important in reducing the incidence and recurrence of endophthalmitis and because fluoroquinolone ophthalmic drops do not seem to be sufficient prophylaxis in these eyes.

A randomized, dose-escalation study of subconjunctival and intravitreal injections of sirolimus in patients with diabetic macular edema.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of a single subconjunctival (SCJ) or intravitreal (IVT) injection of an ophthalmic sirolimus formulation in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, dose-escalating phase I study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty eyes among 50 patients with DME, retinal thickness ≥ 300 microns and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 20/40 to 20/200. METHODS: A single dose of sirolimus administered SCJ (220, 440, 880, 1320, or 1760 µg) or IVT (44, 110, 176, 264, or 352 µg) on day 0; observation through day 90. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end points were the frequency and severity of ocular and systemic adverse events. Secondary end points were changes in BCVA and retinal thickness. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were observed and ocular adverse events were mostly mild and transient. Conjunctival hyperemia, hemorrhage, and edema were common after the SCJ injection procedure and conjunctival hemorrhage was common after the IVT injection procedure. Three patients experienced ocular adverse events considered possibly related to study drug: Conjunctival edema and reduced visual acuity were reported in 1 SCJ patient each and iritis was reported in 1 IVT patient. No serious ocular adverse events were reported. No nonocular adverse events were considered related to study drug. Systemic exposure to sirolimus was low, with blood concentrations below levels necessary for systemic immunosuppression. For the SCJ group (n = 25), a median increase in BCVA started at day 7 (5.0 letters) and was 3.0, 4.0, and 4.0 letters at days 14, 45 and 90, respectively. At day 45, median decrease in retinal thickness was -23.7 µm. For the IVT group (n = 25), the median increase in BCVA was 2.0 letters at day 7; at days 14, 45, and 90, the median increase was maintained (4.0 letters); the median decrease in retinal thickness was -52.0 µm at day 45. CONCLUSIONS: Locally administered sirolimus was well-tolerated with minimal systemic exposure at all doses tested in this small phase I population. These findings support advancing the present sirolimus formulation into phase II studies. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Rapamycin inhibits VEGF-induced microvascular hyperpermeability in vivo.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that rapamycin inhibits induced microvascular hyperpermeability directly in vivo. METHODS: Male golden Syrian hamsters (80-120 g) were treated with either rapamycin (at 0.1, 0.5, 2, and 10 mg/kg i.p.) or vehicle at 24 hours and at 1 hour prior to preparation of the cheek pouch. Caveolin-1 scaffolding (1 mg/kg; positive inhibitory control) was injected i.p. 24 hours prior to the experiment. 10(-8) M vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or 10(-7) M platelet-activating factor (PAF) were topically applied to the cheek pouch. Microvascular permeability and arteriolar diameter were assessed using integrated optical intensity (IOI) and vascular wall imaging, respectively. RESULTS: Rapamycin at 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg significantly reduced VEGF-stimulated mean IOI from 63.0 +/- 4.2 to 9.7 +/- 5.0 (85% reduction, P < 0.001) and 3.6 +/- 2.7 (95% reduction, P < 0.001), respectively. Rapamycin at 2 mg/kg also lowered VEGF-stimulated hyperpermeability (40% reduction, P < 0.05). However, 10 mg/kg rapamycin increased VEGF-induced microvascular hyperpermeability. Rapamycin at 0.5 mg/kg attenuated VEGF-induced vasodilation and PAF-induced hyperpermeability, but did not inhibit PAF-induced vasoconstriction. CONCLUSIONS: At therapeutically relevant concentrations, rapamycin inhibits VEGF- and PAF-induced microvascular permeability. This inhibition is (i) a direct effect on the endothelial barrier, and (ii) independent of arteriolar vasodilation. Rapamycin at 10 mg/kg stimulates effectors that increase microvascular permeability.

Retinopathy in sickle cell trait: does it exist?

BACKGROUND: Patients with sickle cell trait and concomitant systemic disease are known to be at risk for proliferative retinopathy. However, there are reports of retinopathy in patients with sickle cell trait without systemic disease. There are no population-based studies addressing the risk of sickle cell retinopathy in this group. We performed a study to clarify the relation between sickle cell trait and retinopathy in healthy subjects. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 100 children with sickle cell disease who attended the Sickle Cell Clinic at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto. We then contacted 200 parents with sickle cell trait, of whom 32 agreed to participate in the study. All participants were proven to have hemoglobin AS status with prior hemoglobin electrophoresis. An ophthalmologic history was obtained, and a complete ophthalmologic examination was performed. We defined sickle cell retinopathy as any salmon patch hemorrhages, iridescent spots, black sunbursts, retinal neovascularization or retinal detachment. The evaluation also included attempts to identify the more subtle signs of sickle cell retinopathy, such as optic nerve head vascular changes, vascular tortuosity, macular changes (e.g., microaneurysms and vascular loops) and peripheral arteriovenous anastamoses. Blood samples were obtained for complete blood count, reticulocyte count and smear. RESULTS: We found no cases of sickle cell retinopathy among the 32 subjects. Ten of 30 subjects had a high reticulocyte count (greater than 120 x 10(9)/L); however, there were no associated eye findings in this subgroup. INTERPRETATION: Our results indicate that there is no increased risk of retinopathy in healthy people with sickle cell trait.