Self-care and hand function in preschool children with unilateral or bilateral cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional study.

AIMS: To describe self-care capabilities among children with cerebral palsy (CP) and explore associations between self-care and hand function for children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) and children with bilateral cerebral palsy (BCP) separately. METHOD: Cross-sectional data on self-care capabilities (Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, PEDI), manual abilities (Manual Ability Classification System, MACS) and hand use during bimanual performance (Assisting Hand Assessment, AHA; Both Hands Assessment, BoHA) were retrieved from the Norwegian Quality and Surveillance Registry for Cerebral Palsy (NorCP). Eighty-seven children with CP (UCP, n = 61, mean age 4 years 1 month, SD 1 year 3 months, range 56) or BCP (n = 26, mean age 4 years 4 months, SD 1 year, range 41), classified at MACS level I (n = 26), II (n = 40) or III (n = 21), were included. RESULTS: No significant differences in self-care capabilities were found between children with UCP and children with BCP. Analysis of variance showed significant differences in self-care between MACS levels for the whole group. No significant differences in self-care between MACS levels were observed for children with UCP (p = 0.36), but significant differences were found for those with BCP (p < 0.001). Whereas a small correlation (r = 0.3) between PEDI and AHA scores was found for children with UCP, a large correlation (r = 0.6) was found for those with BCP. Children with BCP with symmetric hand use during bimanual performance (BoHA) had higher PEDI scores than children with asymmetric hand use. CONCLUSION: Though children with UCP and children with BCP who were classified at MACS I-III exhibited similar self-care capabilities, the limited hand use seems to contribute differently between the two groups. The two different measures of hand use exhibit different associations with self-care capabilities for young children with UCP and BCP, respectively, and illustrate the need to treat UCP and BCP as two distinct groups, each requiring tailored interventions according to their specific needs.

Provision of augmentative and alternative communication interventions to Norwegian preschool children with cerebral palsy: are the right children receiving interventions?

Preschool children with cerebral palsy (CP) with no or unintelligible speech need augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), but not all children needing AAC have access to it. This study describes the use and perceived benefit of AAC and explores factors associated with receiving AAC interventions. Using a cross-sectional design, we combined parent-reported data with data from the Norwegian Quality and Surveillance Registry for Cerebral Palsy (NorCP). Communication, speech and hand function was classified according to the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS), Viking Speech Scale (VSS), and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), accordingly. The need for AAC was defined as Levels III-V on the CFCS, without simultaneous classification at VSS Level I, and/or Levels III-IV on VSS. Parents reported on child- and family-directed AAC interventions using the Habilitation Services Questionnaire. Of the 95 children (42 females) with CP (M = 39.4 months, SD = 10.3), 14 had communication aids. Of the 35 children (31.4%) defined as needing AAC, 11 had been provided with communication aids. Parents of children with a communication aid reported satisfaction with and frequent use of the aid. Children at MACS Level III-V (OR = 3.4, p = .02) or with epilepsy (OR = 8.9, p < .01) were most likely to have received an AAC intervention. The low proportion of children receiving communication aids indicates an unmet need for AAC interventions among preschool children with CP.

Hand Function in Young Children with Cerebral Palsy: Current Practice and Parent-Reported Benefits.

AIMS: To (1) describe characteristics of current interventions to improve hand function in young children with Cerebral Palsy (CP), and explore factors associated with (2) increased likelihood of hand and ADL training and (3) child benefits of training. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used with parent-reported data and data from the Norwegian CP Follow-up Program (CPOP). A total of 102 children (53% of the cohort of newly recruited children in the CPOP, mean age: 30.3 months, SD: 12.1) were included. Hand function was classified according to the Mini-Manual Ability Classification System (Mini-MACS). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, cross-tables and direct multiple logistic regressions. RESULTS: The majority of the children performed training of hand skills and ADL. Parents reported high amounts of training, and training was commonly integrated in everyday activities. Both parents (OR = 5.6, p < .011) and OTs (OR = 6.2, p < .002) reported more hand training for children at Mini-MACS levels II-III compared to level I. Parents reported larger child benefits when training was organized as a combination of training sessions and practice within everyday activities (OR = 7.090, p = .011). CONCLUSIONS: Parents reported that the children's everyday activities were utilized as opportunities for training, hence describing the intensity of therapy merely by counting minutes or number of sessions seems insufficient.