Long-Term Oral Appliance Therapy Improves Daytime Function and Mood in Upper Airway Resistance Syndrome Patients.

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term effects of an oral appliance on clinical symptoms, respiratory sleep parameters, sleep quality, and sustained attention in patients with upper airway resistance syndrome (UARS) were compared with placebo. Methods: This study was a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Thirty UARS patients were randomized in two groups: placebo and mandibular advancement device (MAD) groups. UARS criteria were presence of sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale ≥ 10) and/or fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale ≥ 38) associated with an apnea/hypopnea index ≤ 5 and a respiratory disturbance index (RDI) > 5 events/hour of sleep, and/or flow limitation in more than 30% of total sleep time. All patients completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, the Beck Anxiety and Depression Inventories, underwent full-night polysomnography, multiple sleep latency test, and Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT). Evaluations were performed before and after 1.5 years of treatment. Results: RDI, number of respiratory effort-related arousal, percentage of total sleep time with flow limitation, and arousal index significantly decreased after 1.5 years of MAD treatment. PSQI total score improved, severity of depression symptoms decreased, and mean reaction time in the PVT, based on the first measurement taken at 8:00 am, significantly decreased (p = .03) at the end of the protocol. Conclusions: The MAD was effective in decreasing respiratory events in UARS patients. For UARS, 1.5 years of oral appliance therapy also improved sleep quality and sustained attention, and decreased the severity of depression symptoms. Clinical Trial: Efficacy of Oral Appliance for Upper Airway Resistance Syndrome: Randomized, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study, NCT02636621.

New insights on the pathophysiology of inspiratory flow limitation during sleep.

INTRODUCTION: Inspiratory flow limitation (IFL) is defined as a "flattened shape" of inspiratory airflow contour detected by nasal cannula pressure during sleep and can indicate increased upper airway resistance especially in mild sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBD). The objective of this study was to investigate the association between upper airway abnormalities and IFL in patients with mild SRBD. METHODS: This study was derived from a general population study consisting of selected individuals with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) below 5 events/h of sleep, ("no obstructive sleep apnea" group) and individuals with AHI between 5 and 15 events/h ("mild obstructive sleep apnea" group). A total of 754 individuals were divided into four groups: group 1: AHI <5/h and <30 % of total sleep time (TST) with IFL (515 individuals), group 2: AHI <5/h and >30 % of TST with IFL (46 individuals), group 3: AHI: 5-15/h and <30 % of TST with IFL (168 individuals), and group 4: AHI: 5-15/h and >30 % of TST with IFL (25 individuals). RESULTS: Individuals with complains of oral breathing demonstrated a risk 2.7-fold larger of being group 4 compared with group 3. Abnormal nasal structure increased the chances of being in group 4 3.2-fold in comparison to group 1. Individuals with voluminous lateral wall demonstrated a risk 4.2-fold larger of being group 4 compared with group 3. CONCLUSION: More than 30 % of TST with IFL detected in sleep studies was associated with nasal and palatal anatomical abnormalities in mild SRBD patients.