Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting.

PURPOSE: Evaluate concordance of provider practices with clinical guidelines for thrombectomy screening in an emergency department (ED) via computed tomography perfusion and angiogram (CT-P/A). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted for patients 18 years or older who received a CT-P/A of the head and neck in a US Midwestern ED between September 2019 through June 2021. Healthcare system records reviewed for patient information, CT-P/A findings, and treatment decisions. RESULTS: During study period, 68,403 patients presented to the ED with 718 (1.1%) receiving a CT-P/A. Of these patients, 105 (14.6%) were transferred to a regional facility for potential thrombectomy, with 74 (70.5%) receiving procedure, 28 (26.7%) not receiving procedure, and 3 (2.9%) with insufficient follow-up information. Of patients receiving CT-P/A, 23 met DAWN criteria for thrombectomy, with 21 (91.3%) transferred for potential thrombectomy and 20 (95.2%) receiving the procedure; in comparison, 81 patients (11.7%) did not meet all DAWN criteria and were transferred for potential thrombectomy, with 52 (64.2%) receiving procedure. Lastly, 55 patients met DEFUSE-3 criteria for thrombectomy with 49 (89.1%) being transferred for potential thrombectomy and 45 (91.8%) receiving procedure. In comparison, 53 patients who did not meet all DEFUSE-3 criteria were transferred for potential thrombectomy, with 27 (50.9%) receiving procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study helps to understand CT-P/A usage, especially in patients that fall outside of treatment criteria in the current thrombectomy literature. Results may have value to institutions interested in using CT-P/A as a diagnostic tool as well as institutions already incorporating it in stroke assessments.

Ethical issues in the access to emergency care for undocumented immigrants.

Patients who are undocumented immigrants (UIs) frequently present to emergency departments in the United States, especially in communities with large immigrant populations. Emergency physicians confront important ethical issues when providing care for these patients. This article examines those ethical issues and recommends best practices in emergency care for UIs. After a brief introduction and description of the UI population, the article proposes central principles of emergency medical ethics as a framework for emergency physician decisions and actions. It then considers the role of law and public policy in health care for UIs, including the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and current practices of the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. The article concludes with discussion of the scope of emergency physician practice and with recommendations regarding best practices in ED care for UIs.

Ethical issues and obligations with undocumented immigrants relying on emergency departments for dialysis.

Undocumented immigrants with end-stage renal disease in the United States are uniquely disadvantaged in their ability to access dialysis. This article examines the unique circumstances of the medical condition and healthcare system, including the relevant legal and regulatory influences that largely relegate undocumented immigrants to relying on emergency-only dialysis through a hospital's Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act obligations. We explore the ethical implications of this current state, emphasizing the adverse effects on patients and staff alike. We also review necessary actions that range from the actions an individual emergency physician to changes needed in federal policy.

Assessing psychiatric safety in suicidal emergency department patients.

We provide a review of the assessment of suicidal emergency department patients and includes a legal and ethical perspective. Screening tools and psychiatric consultation are important adjuncts to the ED evaluation of potentially suicidal patients. Suicide risk should be assessed, and if positive, an appropriate and safe disposition should be arranged. The aim of this article is to review these assessment tools and consider ethical issues, such as patient autonomy, accountability of the emergency physician, and consultant to Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) as well as confidentiality, privacy, and social issues.