Comparison of novel approaches for expedited pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing against routine blood culture diagnostics.

Blood stream infections pose a major challenge for clinicians as the immediate application of an appropriate antibiotic treatment is the vital factor to safe the patients' lives. This preliminary study compares three different systems promising fast pathogen identification and susceptibility testing in comparison to conventional blood culture (BC): (i) the rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing protocol according to EUCAST in combination with the Sepsityper® kit (sRAST), (ii) the direct inoculation method on the VITEK® 2 system (dVIT) and (iii) testing with the Accelerate Pheno® system (AccPh). All methods were assessed in terms of accuracy, time to result and usability. Twenty-three BC samples obtained from patients suffering from proven sepsis were analysed in detail. Pathogen identification was successful in 95·6, 91·3 and 91·3% in sRAST, dVIT and AccPh, respectively. Categorical agreement in antimicrobial susceptibility testing was 89·5, 96 and 96·6%, respectively. Time to result from sample entry to reporting ranged from an average of 4·6 h for sRAST and 6·9 h for AccPh to 10·6 h for dVIT. These results imply a significant shortening of reporting times at considerably high agreement rates for these new diagnostic approaches.

Cluedo - Source identification in a case of septicemia fatality caused by Capnocytophaga canimorsus.

The Gram negative pathogen Capnocytophaga canimorsus is a frequent commensal in the oral cavity of cats and dogs. Although the bacterium is generally considered harmless, infections in humans can occur displaying a broad spectrum of clinical syndromes. This makes a clinical diagnosis difficult. The patient in the present case was 67 years old and presented to the emergency room (ER) with pain in the upper right abdomen and clinical signs of a feverish infection. The only noticeable record in the patient´s medical history was a splenectomy in childhood. The anamnesis revealed that the patient was the owner of two dogs. After a suspected diagnosis of sepsis the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU), where his medical condition deteriorated rapidly. Despite intensive care measures as well as the fast initialization of a broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, the patient died 37 h after his presentation in the ER. The search for the causative pathogen turned out to be challenging. Eventually, molecular biological methods assisted in solving the puzzle. It could be demonstrated that the pathogen, found in the patient´s blood, was also present in one of his dogs' oral cavity.

Comparison of the BD MAX® Enteric Bacterial Panel assay with conventional diagnostic procedures in diarrheal stool samples.

Although infectious diarrhea is one of the most predominant diseases around the world, the identification of the causative microorganism is still challenging. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the BD MAX® Enteric Bacterial Panel assay in comparison to conventional diagnostic procedures concerning the detection of the enteric pathogens Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Shigella spp., and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. For this purpose, 971 prospectively collected stool samples were evaluated. Utilization of the BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel elevated the overall detection rate from 5.26 % to 8.06 %. The positive percent agreement of the BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel assay and stool culture or enzyme immunoassay was 0.97 for Campylobacter spp., 0.75 for Salmonella spp., 1.00 for Shigella spp., and 0.88 for Shiga toxins. Furthermore, a negative percent agreement of 0.98 for Campylobacter spp., 0.99 for Salmonella spp., 0.99 for Shigella spp., and 0.99 for Shiga toxins has been demonstrated. This study highlighted the superior detection rate of molecular assays compared to conventional diagnostic procedures.

Urinary enzyme analysis in renal allograft transplantation.

The urinary excretion of four enzymes (fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, glutathione S-transferase, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase and pyruvate kinase) was assayed daily in 59 patients following renal cadaveric allografting. 51 patients were given cyclosporin A (CyA group) as an immunosuppressive, 8 patients were treated conventionally with azathioprine and prednisolone (CON-group). Urinary enzyme output was evaluated by two different mathematical models. Model A follows single enzyme excretion, whereas model B also analyzes enzyme patterns. The best results were obtained by a combined analysis of all four enzymes with model B. In the CON-group the sensitivity was 1.00, the specificity 0.85, the predictive values of positive test 0.45 and all 12 graft rejections were diagnosed correctly. In the CyA group the sensitivity was 0.40, the specificity 0.99, the predictive value of positive test 0.33, and 6 out of 9 rejections were recognized. The evaluation of the single enzymes did not produce similarly good results with either model.