RESUMEN
Background: Endothelial dysfunction is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Currently available noninvasive methods of measuring endothelial function have limitations. We tested a novel device that provides an automated measurement of the difference between baseline and post-ischemic, hyperemia-induced, brachial arterial compliance, a phenomenon known to be endothelium-dependent. The association between the calculated index, Flow-mediated Compliance Response (FCR), and established CVD risk indices was determined. Methods: Adults with CVD risk factors or known coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled. Framingham Risk Score (FRS) was calculated and presence of metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) was assessed. Carotid artery plaques were identified by ultrasound. Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed by 6-minute walk test (6MWT). FCR was measured using the device. Results: Among 135 participants, mean age 49.3 +/- 17.9 years, characteristics included: 48% female, 7% smokers, 7% CAD, 10% type 2 diabetes, 34% MetSyn, and 38% with carotid plaque. Those with MetSyn had 24% lower FCR than those without (p < 0.001). Lower FCR was associated with higher FRS percentile (r = -0.29, p < 0.001), more MetSyn factors (r = -0.30, p < 0.001), more carotid plaques (r = -0.22, p = 0.01), and lower 6MWT (r = 0.34, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: FCR, an index of arterial reactivity obtained automatically using a novel, operator-independent device, was inversely associated with established CVD risk indices, increased number of carotid plaques, and lower cardiorespiratory fitness. Whether measuring FCR could play a role in screening for CVD risk and assessing whether endothelial function changes in response to treatments aimed at CVD risk reduction, warrants further study.
RESUMEN
Background Caregivers provide critical support for patients with chronic diseases, including heart disease, but often experience caregiver stress that negatively impacts their health, quality of life, and patient outcomes. We aimed to inform health care teams on an evidence-based approach to supporting the caregivers of patients with heart disease. Methods and Results We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials written in English that evaluated interventions to support caregivers of patients with heart disease. We identified 15,561 articles as of April 2, 2020 from 6 databases; of which 20 unique randomized controlled trials were evaluated, representing a total of 1570 patients and 1776 caregivers. Most interventions focused on improving quality of life, and reducing burden, depression, and anxiety; 85% (17 of 20) of the randomized controlled trials provided psychoeducation for caregivers. Interventions had mixed results, with moderate non-significant effects observed for depression (Hedges' g=-0.64; 95% CI, -1.34 to 0.06) and burden (Hedges' g=-0.51; 95% CI, -2.71 to 1.70) at 2 to 4 months postintervention and small non-significant effects observed for quality of life and anxiety. These results were limited by the heterogeneity of outcome measures and intervention delivery methods. A qualitative synthesis of major themes of the interventions resulted in clinical recommendations represented with the acronym "CARE" (Caregiver-Centered, Active engagement, Reinforcement, Education). Conclusions This systematic review highlights the need for greater understanding of the challenges faced by caregivers and the development of guidelines to help clinicians address those challenges. More research is necessary to develop clinical interventions that consistently improve caregiver outcomes.
