The convulsant and anesthetic properties of cis-trans isomers of 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane and 1,2-dichloroethylene.

UNLABELLED: The differences in potencies of optical isomers of anesthetics support the hypothesis that anesthetics act by specific receptor interactions. Diastereoisomerism and geometrical isomerism offer further tests of this hypothesis but have not been explored. They are the subject of this report. We quantified the nonimmobilizing and convulsant properties of the cis and trans diastereomers of the nonimmobilizer 2N (1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane). Although the lipophilicity of the diastereomers predicts complete anesthesia at the partial pressures applied, neither diastereomer had anesthetic activity alone, and the cis form may have a small (10%) capacity to antagonize anesthesia, as defined by additive effects on the MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration required to suppress movement to a noxious stimulus in 50% of rats) of desflurane. Both diastereomers produced convulsions, the cis form being nearly twice as potent as the trans form: convulsant 50% effective dose (mean +/- SD) was 0.039 +/- 0.009 atmospheres (atm) for the purified cis and 0.064 +/- 0.009 atm for the purified trans isomer. The MAC value for cis-1,2-dichloroethylene equaled 0.0071 +/- 0.0006 atm, and MAC for trans-1,2-dichloroethylene equaled 0.0183 +/- 0.0031 atm. In qualitative accord with the Meyer-Overton hypothesis, the greater cis potency was associated with a greater lipophilicity. However, the product of MAC x solubility differed between the cis and trans isomers by 40%-50%. We conclude that neither the cis nor trans isomers of 2N have anesthetic properties, but isomerism does influence 2N's convulsant properties and the anesthetic properties of dichloroethylene. These isomeric effects may be as useful in defining receptor-anesthetic interactions as those found with optical isomers. IMPLICATIONS: Cis-trans isomerism can influence the convulsant properties of the nonimmobilizer 2N (1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane) and the anesthetic properties of dichloroethylene. Such isomeric effects may be as useful as those found with optical isomers in defining receptor-anesthetic interactions.

Hypothesis: volatile anesthetics produce immobility by acting on two sites approximately five carbon atoms apart.

UNLABELLED: All series of volatile and gaseous compounds contain members that can produce anesthesia, as defined by the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) required to produce immobility in response to a noxious stimulus. For unhalogenated n-alkanes, cycloalkanes, aromatic compounds, and n-alkanols, potency (1 MAC) increases by two-to threefold with each carbon addition in the series (e.g., ethanol is twice as potent as methanol). Total fluorination (perfluorination) of n-alkanes essentially eliminates anesthetic potency: only CF4 is anesthetic (MAC = 66.5 atm), which indicates that fluorine atoms do not directly influence sites of anesthetic action. Fluorine may enhance the anesthetic action of other moieties, such as the hydrogen atom in CHF3 (MAC = 1.60 atm), but, consistent with the notion that the fluorine atoms do not directly influence sites of anesthetic action, adding -(CF2)n moieties does not further increase potency (e.g., CHF2-CF3 MAC = 1.51 atm). Similarly, adding -(CF2)n moieties to perfluorinated alkanols (CH2OH-[CF2]nF) does not increase potency. However, adding a second terminal hydrogen atom (e.g., CHF2-CHF2 or CH2OH-CHF2) produces series in which the addition of each -CF2- "spacer" in the middle of the molecule increases potency two- to threefold, as in each unhalogenated series. This parallel stops at four or five carbon atom chain lengths. Further increases in chain length (i.e., to CHF2[CF2]4CHF2 or CHF2[CF2]5CH2OH) decrease or abolish potency (i.e., a discontinuity arises). This leads to our hypothesis that the anesthetic moieties (-CHF2 and -CH2OH) interact with two distinct, spatially separate, sites. Both sites must be influenced concurrently to produce a maximal anesthetic (immobility) effect. We propose that the maximal potency (i.e., for CHF2[CF2]2CHF2 and CHF2[CF2]3CH2OH) results when the spacing between the anesthetic moieties most closely matches the distance between the two sites of action. This reasoning suggests that a distance equivalent to a four or five carbon atom chain, approximately 5 A, separates the two sites. IMPLICATIONS: Volatile anesthetics may produce immobility by a concurrent action on two sites five carbon atom lengths apart.

Polyhalogenated methyl ethyl ethers: solubilities and anesthetic properties.

UNLABELLED: The several potent inhaled anesthetics released for clinical use in the past four decades have been halogenated ethers, and, with one exception, methyl ethyl ethers. In the present report, we detail some structural and physical properties associated with anesthetic potency in 27 polyhalogenated methyl ethyl ethers. We obtained new data for 22 compounds. We used response/nonresponse of rats to electrical stimulation of the tail as the anesthetic end point (i.e., we measured the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]). For compounds that did not produce anesthesia when given alone (they only produced excitation/convulsions), we studied MAC by additivity studies with desflurane. We obtained MAC values for 20 of 22 of the studied ethers, which gave products of MAC x oil/gas partition coefficient ranging from 1.27 to 18.8 atm, compared with a product of 1.82+/-0.56 atm for conventional inhaled anesthetics. Despite solubilities in olive oil and application of partial pressures predicted by the Meyer-Overton hypothesis to provide anesthesia, 2 of 22 ethers (CCIF2OCCIFCF3 and CCIF2OCF2CClF2) had no anesthetic (immobilizing) effect when given alone, did not decrease the anesthetic requirement for desflurane, and had excitatory properties when administered alone. As with other inhaled anesthetics, anesthetic potency seemed to correlate with both polar and nonpolar properties. These ethers, representing structural analogs of currently used clinical volatile anesthetics, may be useful in identifying and understanding the mechanisms by which inhaled anesthetics act. IMPLICATIONS: The several potent, inhaled, polyhalogenated methyl ethyl ether anesthetics released for clinical use in the past four decades seem to have specific useful characteristics that set them apart from other methyl ethyl ethers. Properties of this class of compounds have implications for the future development of anesthetics and the mechanisms by which they act.

Nonimmobilizers and transitional compounds may produce convulsions by two mechanisms.

UNLABELLED: Some inhaled compounds cause convulsions. To better appreciate the physical basis for this property, we correlated the partial pressures that produced convulsions in rats with the lipophilicity (nonpolarity) and hydrophilicity (polarity) of 45 compounds: 3 n-alkanes, 18 n-haloalkanes, 3 halogenated aromatic compounds, 3 cycloalkanes and 3 halocycloalkanes, 13 halogenated ethers, and 2 noble gases (He and Ne). In most cases, convulsions were quantified by averaging the alveolar partial pressures just below the pressures that caused and slightly higher pressures that did cause clonic convulsions (ED50). The ED50 did not correlate with hydrophilicity (the saline/gas partition coefficient), nor was there an obvious correlation with molecular structure. For 80% of compounds (36 of 45), the ED50 correlated closely (r2 = 0.99) with lipophilicity (the olive oil/gas partition coefficient). Perhaps because they block the effect of GABA on GABA(A) receptors, five compounds were more potent than would be predicted from their lipophilicity. Conversely, four compounds may have been less potent than would be predicted because they (like conventional inhaled anesthetics) enhance the effect of GABA on GABA(A) receptors. IMPLICATIONS: Nonimmobilizers and transitional compounds may produce convulsions by two mechanisms. One correlates with lipophilicity (nonpolarity), and the other correlates with an action on GABA(A) receptors.

A molecular description of how noble gases and nitrogen bind to a model site of anesthetic action.

UNLABELLED: How some noble and diatomic gases produce anesthesia remains unknown. Although these gases have apparently minimal capacities to interact with a putative anesthetic site, xenon is a clinical anesthetic, and argon, krypton, and nitrogen produce anesthesia at hyperbaric pressures. In contrast, neon, helium, and hydrogen do not cause anesthesia at partial pressures up to their convulsant thresholds. We propose that anesthetic sites influenced by noble or diatomic gases produce binding energies composed of London dispersion and charge-induced dipole energies that are sufficient to overcome the concurrent unfavorable decrease in entropy that occurs when a gas molecule occupies the site. To test this hypothesis, we used the x-ray diffraction model of the binding site for Xe in metmyoglobin. This site offers a positively charged moiety of histidine 93 that is 3.8 A from Xe. We simulated placement of He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe, H2, and N2 sequentially at this binding site and calculated the binding energies, as well as the repulsive entropy contribution. We used free energies obtained from tonometry experiments to validate the calculated binding energies. We used partial pressures of gases that prevent response to a noxious stimulus (minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]) as the anesthetic endpoint. The calculated binding energies correlated with binding energies derived from the in vivo (ln) data (RTln[MAC], where R is the gas constant and T is absolute temperature) with a slope near 1.0, indicating a parallel between the Xe binding site in metmyoglobin and the anesthetic site of action of noble and diatomic gases. Nonimmobilizing gases (Ne, He, and H2) could be distinguished by an unfavorable balance between binding energies and the repulsive entropy contribution. These gases also differed in their inability to displace water from the cavity. IMPLICATIONS: The Xe binding site in metmyoglobin is a good model for the anesthetic sites of action of noble and diatomic gases. The additional binding energy provided by induction of a dipole in the gas by a charge at the binding site enhanced binding.

Minimum alveolar concentrations of noble gases, nitrogen, and sulfur hexafluoride in rats: helium and neon as nonimmobilizers (nonanesthetics)

UNLABELLED: We assessed the anesthetic properties of helium and neon at hyperbaric pressures by testing their capacity to decrease anesthetic requirement for desflurane using electrical stimulation of the tail as the anesthetic endpoint (i.e., the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]) in rats. Partial pressures of helium or neon near those predicted to produce anesthesia by the Meyer-Overton hypothesis (approximately 80-90 atm), tended to increase desflurane MAC, and these partial pressures of helium and neon produced convulsions when administered alone. In contrast, the noble gases argon, krypton, and xenon were anesthetic with mean MAC values of (+/- SD) of 27.0 +/- 2.6, 7.31 +/- 0.54, and 1.61 +/- 0.17 atm, respectively. Because the lethal partial pressures of nitrogen and sulfur hexafluoride overlapped their anesthetic partial pressures, MAC values were determined for these gases by additivity studies with desflurane. Nitrogen and sulfur hexafluoride MAC values were estimated to be 110 and 14.6 atm, respectively. Of the gases with anesthetic properties, nitrogen deviated the most from the Meyer-Overton hypothesis. IMPLICATIONS: It has been thought that the high pressures of helium and neon that might be needed to produce anesthesia antagonize their anesthetic properties (pressure reversal of anesthesia). We propose an alternative explanation: like other compounds with a low affinity to water, helium and neon are intrinsically without anesthetic effect.

Oleamide potentiates benzodiazepine-sensitive gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor activity but does not alter minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration.

UNLABELLED: A naturally occurring brain lipid, cis-9,10-octadeceamide--oleamide (OA), is found in increased concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid of sleep-deprived cats, which suggests that it may be an endogenous sleep-inducing substance. We studied the effects of this fatty-acid derivative on the function of cloned gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Oocytes were injected with cRNA synthesized in vitro to express simple GABA(A) receptors (alpha1beta1, alpha3beta1, alpha5beta1, and alpha1beta2 subunit combinations) and receptors in which the GABA-induced chloride currents were potentiated in the presence of benzodiazepines (alpha1beta1gamma2s and alpha1beta2gamma2s subunit combinations). OA only produced significant potentiation of the peak Cl- current when applied with GABA to benzodiazepine-sensitive GABA(A) receptors. The peak currents of the simple GABA(A) receptors in the presence of OA were either unaffected or slightly inhibited by OA, but the overall mean currents were not significantly altered. Oleic acid was also capable of potentiating benzodiazepine-sensitive GABA(A) receptor function. The function of other ligand-gated ion channels, such as the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NR1 + NR2A or 2C) and the 5-HT3 receptor expressed in Xenopus oocytes, were unaffected by OA. Sprague-Dawley rats receiving intraperitoneal injections of oleamide (10, 20, or 100 mg/kg) showed no change in the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of desflurane required to abolish movement in response to noxious (tail clamp) stimulation (control MAC 6.48% +/- 1.28% atm; 100 mg/kg OA MAC 7.05% +/- 0.42% atm). These results reinforce the view that oleyl compounds may be natural modulators of inhibitory ion channel function, but that these effects contribute little to the central nervous system depression produced by volatile anesthetics as measured by MAC. IMPLICATIONS: The putative sleep-inducing substance, oleamide, potentiates benzodiazepine-sensitive gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor function but does not alter desflurane minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration in rats.

The effect of anesthetic duration on kinetic and recovery characteristics of desflurane versus sevoflurane, and on the kinetic characteristics of compound A, in volunteers.

UNLABELLED: This study documents the differences in kinetics of 2 h (n = 7) and 4 h (n = 9) of 1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of desflurane (9.0%) versus (on a separate occasion) sevoflurane (3.0%), both administered in a fresh gas inflow of 2 L/min. These data are extensions of our previous 8-h (n = 7) studies of these anesthetics. By 10 min of anesthetic administration, average inspired (F(I)) and end-tidal concentration (F(A)) (F(I)/F(A); the inverse of the more commonly used F(A)/F(I)) decreased to less than 1.15 for both anesthetics, with the difference from 1.0 nearly twice as great for sevoflurane as for desflurane. During all sevoflurane administrations, F(A)/F(I) for Compound A [CH2F-O-C(=CF2) (CF3); a vinyl ether resulting from the degradation of sevoflurane by Baralyme] equaled approximately 0.8, and the average inspired concentration equaled approximately 40 ppm. Compound A is of interest because at approximately 150 ppm-h, it can induce biochemical and histological evidence of glomerular and tubular injury in rats and humans. During elimination, F(A)/F(A0) for Compound A (F(A0) is the last end-tidal concentration during anesthetic administration) decreased abruptly to 0 after 2 h and 4 h of anesthesia and to approximately 0.1 (F(A) approximately 3 ppm) after 8 h of anesthesia. In contrast, F(A)/F(A0) for desflurane and sevoflurane decreased in a conventional, multiexponential manner, the decrease being increasingly delayed with increasing duration of anesthetic administration. F(A)/F(A0) for sevoflurane exceeded that for desflurane for any given duration of anesthesia, and objective and subjective measures indicated a faster recovery with desflurane. Times (mean +/- SD) to initial response to command (2 h 10.9 +/- 1.2 vs 17.8 +/- 5.1 min, 4 h 11.3 +/- 2.1 vs 20.8 +/- 4.8 min, 8 h 14 +/- 4 vs 28 +/- 8 min) and orientation (2 h 12.7 +/- 1.6 vs 21.2 +/- 4.6 min, 4 h 14.8 +/- 3.1 vs 25.3 +/- 6.5 min, 8 h 19 +/- 4 vs 33 +/- 9 min) were shorter with desflurane. Recovery as defined by the digit symbol substitution test, P-deletion test, and Trieger test results was more rapid with desflurane. The incidence of vomiting was greater with sevoflurane after 8 h of anesthesia but not after shorter durations. We conclude that for each anesthetic duration, F(I) more closely approximates F(A) with desflurane during anesthetic administration, F(A)/F(A0) decreases more rapidly after anesthesia with desflurane, and objective measures indicate more rapid recovery with desflurane. Finally, it seems that after 2-h and 4-h administrations, all Compound A taken up is bound within the body. IMPLICATIONS: Regardless of the duration of anesthesia, elimination is faster and recovery is quicker for the inhaled anesthetic desflurane than for the inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane. The toxic degradation product of sevoflurane, Compound A, seems to bind irreversibly to proteins in the body.

Enhanced choline acetyltransferase activity does not explain the action of inhaled convulsants.

Enhancement of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity and increased intraneuronal acetylcholine (ACh) may explain the convulsant activity of some inhaled compounds. Enflurane, for example, enhances such activity. Accordingly, we measured choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity in rat cortical synaptosomes in the presence of two inhaled convulsants, flurothyl (CF3CH2OCH2CF3) and 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane at partial pressures below and greatly exceeding those which produce convulsions in vivo. Neither agent changed the kinetic parameters, maximum velocity (vmax) or Michaelis constant (Km). The vmax for controls in the flurothyl series was 016 (0.06) nmol mg-1 min-1 and the Km was 0.23 (0.11) mmol litre-1. For the 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane series of experiments the results for the controls were vmax 0.23 (0.10) nmol mg-1 min-1 and Km 0.20 (0.08) mmol litre-1. Modification of ChAT activity did not contribute to the excitatory effects of these agents.

Effects of inhaled nonimmobilizer, proconvulsant compounds on desflurane minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration in rats.

UNLABELLED: Anesthetics depress the central nervous system, whereas nonimmobilizers (previously called nonanesthetics) and transitional compounds having the same physical properties (e.g., solubility in lipid) do not produce anesthesia (nonimmobilizers) or are less potent anesthetics than might be predicted from their lipophilicity (transitional compounds). Potential explanations for the absent or decreased anesthetic effect of nonimmobilizer and transitional compounds include the theories that the nonimmobilizers are devoid of anesthetic effect and that transitional compounds have a decreased capacity to produce anesthesia; that the effects of these compounds are not apparent because the concentrations examined are too low; or that anesthesia, or lack thereof, results from a balance between depression and excitation (all nonimmobilizer and transitional compounds produce convulsions). To examine these issues further, we tested the effect of various multiples of the convulsive 50% effective dose (ED50) of three nonimmobilizers and one transitional compound on the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of desflurane in rats. The nonimmobilizer 2,3-dichlorooctafluorobutane (NI-1), from 0.7 to 1.1 times its convulsive ED50, increased the MAC of desflurane by 14%-27%, but at 1.6 times its convulsive ED50 caused no change in MAC; the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (NI-2) did not change MAC at concentrations up to its convulsant ED50, but it increased MAC by 25% and 36% at 1.3 and 1.7 times its convulsant ED50, respectively. The nonimmobilizer flurothyl (NI-3) decreased the MAC of desflurane by 20% +/- 6% (mean +/- SD) at 0.5 times its convulsant ED50, but it caused no change at higher partial pressures (up to 7.8 times its convulsant ED50), and the transitional compound CF3CCl2-O-CF2Cl (T-1) significantly decreased MAC by 16% +/- 7% at 0.8 times its convulsant ED50, but the 6%-8% decreases in MAC at 0.4 and 1.6 times its convulsant ED50 were not significant. Thus, neither nonimmobilizer nor transitional compounds produced a consistent dose-related effect on the MAC of desflurane, and any changes were small. These results suggest that the excitation produced by transitional compounds or nonimmobilizers does not explain their limited ability or inability to produce anesthesia. The data are consistent with a decreased anesthetic efficacy of transitional compounds and the lack of efficacy of nonimmobilizers. IMPLICATIONS: Inhaled compounds that do not cause anesthesia (nonimmobilizers) are used to test theories of anesthetic action. Their use presumes that a trivial explanation, such as cancelling stimulatory and depressant effects, does not explain the absence of anesthesia. The present results argue against such an explanation.

Dose-related biochemical markers of renal injury after sevoflurane versus desflurane anesthesia in volunteers.

UNLABELLED: Sevoflurane (CH2F-O-CH[CF3]2) reacts with carbon dioxide absorbents to produce Compound A (CH2F-O-C[=CF2][CF3]). Because of concern about the potential nephrotoxicity of Compound A, the United States package label (but not that of several other countries) for sevoflurane recommends the use of fresh gas flow rates of 2 L/min or more. We previously demonstrated in humans that a 2-L/min flow rate delivery of 1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) sevoflurane for 8 h can injure glomeruli (i.e., produce albuminuria) and proximal tubules (i.e., produce glucosuria and urinary excretion of alpha-glutathione-S-transferase [alpha-GST]). The present report extends this investigation to fasting volunteers given 4 h (n = 9) or 2 h (n = 7) of 1.25 MAC sevoflurane versus desflurane at 2 L/min via a standard circle absorber anesthetic system (all subjects given both anesthetics). Markers of renal injury (urinary creatinine, albumin, glucose, alpha-GST, and blood urea nitrogen) did not reveal significant injury after anesthesia with desflurane. Sevoflurane degradation with a 2-L/min fresh gas inflow rate produced average inspired concentrations of Compound A of 40 +/- 4 ppm (mean +/- SD, 8-h exposure [data from previous study]), 42 +/- 2 ppm (4 h), and 40 +/- 5 ppm (2 h). Relative to desflurane, sevoflurane given for 4 h caused statistically significant transient injury to glomeruli (slightly increased urinary albumin and serum creatinine) and to proximal tubules (increased urinary alpha-GST). Other measures of injury did not differ significantly between anesthetics. Neither anesthetic given for 2 h at 1.25 MAC produced injury. We conclude that 1.25 MAC sevoflurane plus Compound A produces dose-related glomerular and tubular injury with a threshold between 80 and 168 ppm/h of exposure to Compound A. This threshold for renal injury in normal humans approximates that found previously in normal rats. IMPLICATIONS: Human (and rat) kidneys are injured by a reactive compound (Compound A) produced by degradation of the clinical inhaled anesthetic, sevoflurane. Injury increases with increasing duration of exposure to a given concentration of Compound A. The response to Compound A has several implications, as discussed in the article.

Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration values for the enantiomers of isoflurane differ minimally.

Results of in vivo and in vitro studies of the anesthetic potencies of the enantiomers (optical isomers) of isoflurane provide various results ranging from no difference to differences of nearly two fold. A finding of a difference in anesthetic requirement in the whole animal has particular relevance to theories of anesthetic mechanisms of action because it suggests that anesthesia may result from a specific anesthetic-receptor interaction. This led to our decision to redetermine the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of (+)-S and (-)-R enantiomers of isoflurane in 12 Sprague-Dawley rats (six per group). The (+)-S enantiomer gave a MAC of 0.0144 +/- 0.0012 atm (i.e., 1.44% +/- 0.12% at 1 atm pressure; mean +/- SD) and the (-)-R enantiomer gave a MAC of 0.0169 +/- 0.0020 atm. Although the 17% greater value for the (-)-R enantiomer is qualitatively consistent with previous results the difference is not significant (P = 0.06), and the absolute difference is smaller than that found by a previous study. However, given the small sample size, our power to define a small significant difference is limited. Regardless of statistical significance, our results do not confirm the conclusion that interaction with a specific receptor is important to the mechanism of action of inhaled anesthetics.

Convulsant activity of nonanesthetic gas combinations.

Most nonanesthetics (inhaled compounds that neither cause anesthesia when given alone nor decrease the partial pressure of a known inhaled anesthetic required to produce anesthesia) and transitional compounds (inhaled compounds that are less potent than would be predicted by the Meyer-Overton hypothesis) cause convulsions. A possible exception is the perfluoroalkane series of nonanesthetics. The present study tested whether perfluoroalkanes do provide an exception. Further, we tested whether the convulsant effects of nonanesthetic and transitional compounds were additive. The nonanesthetic perfluoropropane caused convulsions at 7.5 +/- 0.7 atm (mean +/- SD). Convulsions also were produced by perfluorocyclobutane (0.976 +/- 0.002 atm), 1,2-dichlorotetrafluoroethane (0.358 +/- 0.011 atm), 2,3-dichlorooctafluorobutane (0.085 +/- 0.007 atm), 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (0.055 +/- 0.007 atm), and flurothyl (0.00156 +/- 0.00039 atm). Of these, 1,2-dichlorotetrafluoroethane is a transitional compound, the remainder being nonanesthetics. The combination of flurothyl plus 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane gave evidence of antagonism (a 17% +/- 21% deviation from additivity; P < 0.05), whereas the combination of 1,2-dichlorotetrafluoroethane plus 2,3-dichlorooctafluorobutane gave evidence of synergy (a -13% +/- 8% deviation from additivity; P < 0.05). The combinations of perfluoropropane plus perfluorocyclobutane (-4% +/- 15%), and perfluoropropane plus 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (-1% +/- 26%) did not produce results that deviated significantly from additivity. We conclude that pairs of these compounds either produce convulsions in an additive manner, a finding consistent with (but not proving) a common mode of action; or deviate modestly from additivity, a finding suggesting that at least a portion of the mechanistic basis for convulsions might differ, particularly for flurothyl plus other nonanesthetics, or for the combination of non-anesthetics and transitional compounds.

Nephrotoxicity of sevoflurane versus desflurane anesthesia in volunteers.

Present package labeling for sevoflurane recommends the use of fresh gas flow rates of 2 L/min or more when delivering anesthesia with sevoflurane. This recommendation resulted from a concern about the potential nephrotoxicity of a degradation product of sevoflurane, "Compound A," produced by the action of carbon dioxide absorbents on sevoflurane. To assess the adequacy of this recommendation, we compared the nephrotoxicity of 8 h of 1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) sevoflurane (n = 10) versus desflurane (n = 9) in fluid-restricted (i.e., nothing by mouth overnight) volunteers when the anesthetic was given in a standard circle absorber anesthetic system at 2 L/min. Subjects were tested for markers of renal injury (urinary albumin, glucose, alpha-glutathione-S-transferase [GST], and pi-GST; and serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen [BUN]) before and 1, 2, 3, and/or 5-7 days after anesthesia. Desflurane did not produce renal injury. Rebreathing of sevoflurane produced average inspired concentrations of Compound A of 41 +/- 3 ppm (mean +/- SD). Sevoflurane was associated with transient injury to: 1) the glomerulus, as revealed by postanesthetic albuminuria; 2) the proximal tubule, as revealed by postanesthetic glucosuria and increased urinary alpha-GST; and 3) the distal tubule, as revealed by postanesthetic increased urinary pi-GST. These effects varied greatly (e.g., on postanesthesia Day 3, the 24-h albumin excretion was < 0.03 g (normal) for one volunteer; 0.03-1 g for five others; 1-2 g for two others; 2.1 g for one volunteer; and 4.4 g for another volunteer). Neither anesthetic affected serum creatinine or BUN, nor changed the ability of the kidney to concentrate urine in response to vasopressin, 5 U/70 kg subcutaneously (i.e., these measures failed to reveal the injury produced). In addition, sevoflurane, but not desflurane, caused small postanesthetic increases in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), suggesting mild, transient hepatic injury.

Anesthetic and convulsant properties of aromatic compounds and cycloalkanes: implications for mechanisms of narcosis.

We examined the anesthetic and convulsant properties of 16 unfluorinated to completely fluorinated aromatic compounds, having six to nine carbon atoms (e.g., benzene to 1,3,5-tris(trifluoromethyl)benzene), and four cycloalkanes (cyclopentane to cyclooctane). Benzene, fluorobenzene, toluene, p-xylene, ethylbenzene, and cyclopentane caused excitation (twitching, jerking, and hyperactivity), and three aromatic compounds (perfluorotoluene, p-difluorotoluene and 1,3,5-tris(trifluoromethyl)benzene) and three cycloalkanes (cyclohexane, cycloheptane, and cyclooctane) produced convulsions. Cyclooctane and 1,3,5-tris(trifluoromethyl)benzene were nonanesthetics. Except for nonanesthetics and perfluorotoluene (too toxic to test for anesthetic potency), all compounds produced anesthesia or decreased the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of desflurane. Aromatic compounds were more potent and lipid-soluble than n-alkanes (data from previous report) and cycloalkanes. All three series increasingly disobeyed the Meyer-Overton hypothesis as molecular size increased. For a particular number of carbons (e.g., cyclohexane, n-hexane, and benzene), the deviation was cycloalkanes > or = normal alkanes > aromatic compounds. These results suggest that molecular shape (including "bulkiness") and size provide limited clues to the structure of the anesthetic site of action.

Compound A: solubility in saline and olive oil; destruction by blood.

Compound A is a degradation product of sevoflurane. Knowledge of the solubility of Compound A, CH2F-O-C(=CF2)(CF3), in blood and other solvents would aid in the definition of its kinetics. Accordingly, we determined solvent/gas partition coefficients of Compound A for saline (0.166 +/- 0.002 [mean +/- SD; n = 4]) and olive oil (20.1 +/- 1.1 [n = 4]). Measurement of solubility in blood was confounded by degradation of Compound A in blood and blood components. If a mixture of 99.3% saline and 0.7% oil provides the solubility equivalent to that possessed by blood (as it does for the parent compound, sevoflurane), then blood solubility and solubility in plasma, albumin, red blood cells, or pure hemoglobin is approximately 0.31. The order of Compound A degradation was human plasma = rat blood > whole human blood >5% human serum albumin = washed human red blood cells (hematocrit 50%) = 5% pure hemoglobin. Presuming a solvent/gas partition coefficient of 0.31, respective approximate times for 50% degradation equaled 2.7, 2.8, 4.6, 9.9, 11.0, and 12 min. The accuracy of these approximations was limited by the need to estimate, rather than determine, the solubility of Compound A in such solvents. Pasteurization (heating to 60 degrees C for 12 h) or pretreatment with N-ethylmaleimide (a compound that reversibly binds to sulfhydryl groups) decreased the degradation rate in plasma. These results suggest that degradation arises, at least in part, from reaction of Compound A with proteins in blood, possibly from covalent reaction of Compound A with protein and/or from an enzymatically mediated reaction. The products of degradation, the binding sites, and the clinical implications of such binding and degradation remain to be determined.

Effects of halothane on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica.

To determine whether the binding of anesthetics to key membrane receptors is a plausible mode of action, we modeled the effect of the general anesthetic halothane in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor membrane system isolated from Torpedo californica. Our results demonstrated that halothane inhibits the binding of [3H]phencyclidine ([3H]PCP) to the acetylcholine receptor. The inhibition was reversible, concentration dependent, and had an equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) of 2.2% atm halothane at 25 degrees. Double-reciprocal plots of the halothane effects at various phencyclidine (PCP) concentrations imply that, under equilibrium conditions, halothane inhibits [3H]PCP binding competitively. In contrast, results from kinetic studies showed that the rate of PCP dissociation is highly sensitive to halothane with EC50 = 0.8% atm halothane in nitrogen. Several possible interpretations are discussed; however, the basic observation was that the kinetics of [3H]PCP binding to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor was affected by halothane at low concentrations in this model system.