RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cryotherapy in elderly patients with rib fractures due to blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, geriatric patients were assigned to groups to receive either coolant spray (n=51) or placebo spray (n=50). The visual analog scale scores of all patients were recorded before starting spray application (V0), as well as at 10th (V1), 20th (V2), 30th (V3), 60th (V4), 120th (V5), and 360th (V6) minute. The mean decreases in the visual analog scale scores were calculated. RESULTS: The differences between V0 and V1, V0 and V2, V0 and V3, and V0 and V4 mean visual analog scale scores measured in the coolant spray group were found to be significantly higher (p<0.001). In V1, V2, V3, and V4 measurements, the incidence of "clinical effectiveness" in the coolant spray group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coolant spray therapy can be used as a component of multimodal therapy to provide adequate analgesia due to rib fractures in geriatric patients.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia , Fracturas de las Costillas , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Manejo del Dolor , DolorRESUMEN
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cryotherapy in elderly patients with rib fractures due to blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, geriatric patients were assigned to groups to receive either coolant spray (n=51) or placebo spray (n=50). The visual analog scale scores of all patients were recorded before starting spray application (V0), as well as at 10th (V1), 20th (V2), 30th (V3), 60th (V4), 120th (V5), and 360th (V6) minute. The mean decreases in the visual analog scale scores were calculated. RESULTS: The differences between V0 and V1, V0 and V2, V0 and V3, and V0 and V4 mean visual analog scale scores measured in the coolant spray group were found to be significantly higher (p<0.001). In V1, V2, V3, and V4 measurements, the incidence of "clinical effectiveness" in the coolant spray group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coolant spray therapy can be used as a component of multimodal therapy to provide adequate analgesia due to rib fractures in geriatric patients.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: While the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is an ongoing issue across the world, understanding the course of the disease is important for early diagnosis and treatment. We aimed, with this study, to determine the differences between laboratory parameters in different clinical pictures of coronavirus disease 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 443 patients who presented to Atatürk University Medical Faculty Hospital between March 15, 2020, and June 15, 2020, and were diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 upon a positive Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) result. The hospitalized patients were divided into 4 groups based on their clinical status. The roles of these markers in determining the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 443 patients with RT-PCR confirmation were included in the study. The mean age was 46.0 ± 19.1 years and 54.4% of the patients were male. According to the clinical classification, 16.3% of the cases were asymptomatic, 25.7% uncomplicated, 35.7% mild/moderate, and 22.3% severe. The first 3 most frequent symptoms were cough (21.3%), fever (17.7%), and fatigue (15.5%). Hypertension (36.1%) was the major comorbidity among the patients. During the follow-up of severe cases, 39.4% developed the need for intensive care. The overall mortality rate, on the other hand, was 4.7%. Regarding laboratory parameters, procalcitonin (PCT), serum ferritin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, neutrophil count, D-dimer, troponin, and lactate dehydrogenase were at the highest level in the severe patient group while albumin, platelet, and lymphocyte count were found to be at the lowest level in the same group. A statistically significant difference was detected between the groups (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The increase in C-reactive protein, PCT, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ferritin, troponin, D-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase, and neutrophil count and the decrease in albumin, platelet, and lymphocyte count are significant in the severe patient group; it has been concluded that they can be used to determine the severity of coronavirus disease 2019.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary embolism (PE) often occurs secondary to deep vein thrombosis and is an important cause of mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between YKL-40 level and clinical risk score in patients with PE. METHODS: The study included a total of 100 patients, 80 patients diagnosed with PE in the emergency department and 20 healthy controls. Patients with PE were divided into four groups: high-risk patients (n = 20), high-intermediate-risk patients (n = 20), low-intermediate-risk patients (n = 20), and low-risk patients (n = 20). Serum YKL-40 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Pulmonary artery obstruction index (PAOI) was calculated from computed tomography angiography images. RESULTS: PAOI increased in correlation with PE risk and differed significantly between all patient groups (p < 0.001). Troponin-I levels were significantly higher in the high-risk and high-intermediate-risk groups compared to the other groups (p < 0.001), but did not differ significantly between high-risk and high-intermediate-risk patients (p = 0.09). YKL-40 level was significantly higher in the high-risk PE group than the high-intermediate-risk group (p < 0.001). In receiving operator characteristic curve analysis assessing the discriminatory value of YKL-40 for high-risk PE patients, a cut-off value of 227.2 ng/mL had sensitivity of 85 % and specificity of 70 %. DISCUSSION: YKL-40 may be an important biomarker in decisions regarding early thrombolytic treatment in patients with high-intermediate-risk PE. In addition, medical treatments targeting YKL-40 may also reduce thrombotic tendency in high-risk patient groups.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas , Embolia Pulmonar , Enfermedad Aguda , Biomarcadores , Proteína 1 Similar a Quitinasa-3 , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Troponina IRESUMEN
BACKGROUNDS: Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE), one of the outcomes of acute heart failure (AHF), is a common reason in a critical condition with respiratory distress. Non-invasive synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation(nSIMV) mode, which includes inspiratory pressure in addition to positive end expiratory pressure with/without pressure support provided in the non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure plus/pressure support(nCPAP/PS) mode can be effective in hypercarbia and the associated changes in consciousness. This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of nSIMV in ACPE. METHODS: Patients who presented with clinical acute respiratory failure and were admitted to the critical care unit of the emergency department with the diagnosis of ACPE were included. Patients were placed on non-invasive mechanical ventilators with an oronasal mask under the nCPAP/PS and nSIMV modes. Pulse and respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and Glasgow Coma Scores(GCS), HACOR(heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation and respiratory rate) scores, pH, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2 and lactate at the time of admission and at 30 and 60 min were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were recruited, nCPAP/PS mode was 10 and nSIMV mode was 12. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the change in the relevant parameters from admission to 60 min, the decreases in PaCO2 and lactate levels (31.4% vs. 21.2%, p = 0.383; 68.8% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.224; respectively) and the increase in PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 values (34% vs. 14.2%, p = 0.710 and 132.1% vs. 52.7%, p = 0.073; respectively) were higher in the nSIMV group. CONCLUSION: The nSIMV mode is as effective as the nCPAP/PS mode in the treatment of patients with ACPE. We believe that the nSIMV mode can be preferable, particularly in patients with hypercarbia who have relatively lower GCS and oxygenation.
Asunto(s)
Ventilación no Invasiva , Edema Pulmonar , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Humanos , Hipercapnia , Ventilación con Presión Positiva Intermitente , Lactatos , Edema Pulmonar/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Sodium valproate and ibuprofen are drugs with known efficacy in the treatment of headache associated with acute migraine attacks. In this study, our aim was to compare the efficacy of these two drugs in the treatment of acute migraine attacks when administered as a single intravenous (IV) dose in the emergency department. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This study was designed as a prospective, randomized controlled, double-blinded study and included patients aged 18 to 65 years who presented to the emergency department with acute headache and met the criteria of 'migraine without aura' according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders. The patients were randomized into two groups and given a single dose of 800 mg sodium valproate or 800 mg ibuprofen in 150 mL of normal saline by IV infusion over five minutes. Changes in pain levels were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain over a two-hour period. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (49 patients in the sodium valproate group and 50 in the ibuprofen group) completed the trial, and their data were included in the statistical analysis. The mean decrease in the post-treatment delta NRS values was statistically significantly higher in the sodium valproate group than in the ibuprofen group. The mean differences were 1.69 [confidence interval (CI): 1.02-2.37, p<0.001], the mean difference between N0 and N2 was 3.61 (CI: 2.96-4.26, p < 0.001), the mean difference between N0 and N3 was 4.11 (CI: 3.54-4.67, p < 0.001), and the mean difference between N0 and N4 was 3.92 (CI: 3.67-4.46, p < 0.001). The number of patients who achieved the primary endpoint of pain relief was significantly higher in the sodium valproate group than in the ibuprofen group (p < 0.001). According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis showing the rates of reaching the targeted endpoint, there was a significant difference in the efficacy of the two-treatment group (χ2 = 79.98, CI: 80.35-99.65; p = 0.000).
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Ácido Valproico , Método Doble Ciego , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Cefalea/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Identify the deficiencies in the forensic reports prepared by the emergency physicians and to identify the frequent mistakes in these reports by comparing the forensic reports issued by the emergency physicians in the context of offences against physical integrity and the forensic reports issued by the Second Forensic Medicine Specialization Board for the same forensic cases. METHODS: Existence of the information that should be included in the standard forensic report (name, surname, address, event date, etc.) of 241 cases prepared by emergency physicians who were sent to the Forensic Medicine Second Forensic Medicine Second Specialization Board due to various reasons between February 1, 2019, and May 1, 2019, were reviewed retrospectively. Besides, whether the trauma causing the forensic event stated in these reports is life threatening or not and whether it can be eliminated with simple medical intervention or not were compared with the reports prepared by the Council of Forensic Medicine Forensic Medicine Second Specialization Board for the same events and certain mistakes were determined. RESULTS: Address, examination time, and incident date were not specified in forensic reports issued by emergency physicians with a ratio of 95.5%, 63.9%, and 75.9%, respectively. About 23.2% of forensic reports written by hand were not legible. When the reports prepared by the Council of Forensic Medicine and the emergency physicians for the same forensic events were compared in terms of the presence of life threat and treatment with simple medical intervention, it was shown that the emergency physicians were insufficient in determining the life hazard and the simple medical intervention to resolve the trauma causing the forensic event. It was found that the forensic reports issued in tertiary hospitals (education and research hospitals and university hospitals) were more accurate in determining the life hazard and treatment with simple medical intervention status of trauma which caused the forensic event when compared with forensic reports which were issued in primary and secondary line hospitals. CONCLUSION: Regardless of whether the physicians working in the emergency departments are general practitioners or emergency specialists, their sensitivity and knowledge level regarding the preparation of a forensic report was found to be insufficient. We believe that with the increase of coordinated planned multidisciplinary trainings that include emergency medicine and forensic medicine, the forensic reports that are arranged incorrectly will decrease and the awareness of physicians about the results of forensic reports will increase.
Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Médicos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Medicina Legal , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although different forms of lidocaine are used for migraine attack headaches, the effect of intravenous lidocaine is still limited. This study aimed to investigate the effects of intravenous lidocaine infusion for the treatment of migraine attack headaches. METHODS: A hundred patients with migraine attacks, aged between 18 and 65, were randomly divided into two groups. The lidocaine group (n = 50) received a 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine bolus and a 1 mg/kg infusion (first 30 min), followed by a 0.5 mg/kg infusion for a further 30 min intravenously. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) group (n = 50) received 50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol and saline at the same volume as the lidocaine at the same time intervals intravenously. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, additional analgesia requirement, side effects, and revisits to the emergency department were recorded. RESULTS: The VAS score was significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the NSAID group for the first 20th and 30th minutes (p = 0.014 and p = 0.024, respectively). There was no difference between the VAS scores for the remaining evaluation times (p > 0.05). In terms of secondary outcomes, rescue medication requirement was not different between the two groups at both the 60th and 90th minutes (p > 0.05). However, the number of patients revisiting ED within 48-72 h was statistically less in the lidocaine group than in the NSAID group (1/50 vs. 8/50; p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Intravenous lidocaine may be an alternative treatment method for patients with migraine attack headaches in the emergency department.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Cetoprofeno/análogos & derivados , Lidocaína/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trometamina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Cetoprofeno/administración & dosificación , Cetoprofeno/efectos adversos , Cetoprofeno/uso terapéutico , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Lidocaína/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Trometamina/administración & dosificación , Trometamina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: SARS-CoV-2 has caused nearly 4 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide in the approximately 4 months since it emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Comorbidities increase morbidity and mortality in COVID-19, and many laboratory parameters have been associated with mortality. The aim of the present study was to identify the relationship between endogenous carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) level and the clinical course and prognosis of COVID-19. METHODS: The study included 48 non-smokers or ex-smokers aged 18 years or older who presented to the emergency department, were diagnosed with COVID-19 by real-time PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal swab sample and were treated in the pulmonary diseases ward of the Atatürk University hospital after 24 March 2020 and 15 April 2020. The patients' laboratory parameters and demographic data were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Prothrombin time and C-reactive protein (CRP), troponin-I, and D-dimer levels decreased in COVID-19 patients during follow-up (P = .024, P = .001, P = .001, P = .001), while PaO2 /FiO2 ratio and COHb increased (P = .002, P = .001). COHb level at admission was significantly lower in patients who developed macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and those who died compared with the other patients (P = .002, P = .001). COHb level on day 5 of treatment was significantly higher in patients with ARDS and patients who died (P = .001, P = .001). Significant correlations were detected between COHb level and CRP (r=-0.425, P = .001), ferritin (r = -.395, P = .001) and PaO2 /FiO2 ratio (r = .431, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: COHb level may be an easily accessible biomarker that guides early follow-up and treatment planning to avoid ARDS, MAS and mortality in COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Carboxihemoglobina , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent disabling primary headache disorder that is classified into two major types: migraine without aura and migraine with aura. New therapeutic methods to reduce migraine headaches in the emergency department (ED) include intradermal mesotherapy. OBJECTIVE: Compare the efficacy of intradermal mesotherapy versus a systemic therapy in pain control in patients with headache related to migraine without aura. DESIGN: Prospective parallel-group randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital in Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients 18 years of age and older who were admitted to the ED over a 15-month period with headache related to migraine without aura were eligible for inclusion if they had a VAS score of 4 or above. Patients were randomly allocated to one session of mesotherapy or intravenous dexketoprofen. Changes in pain intensity were measured by the score on a visual analog scale (VAS) at 30, 60, and 120 minutes and 24 hours after treatment. Efficacy was also assessed by the need for use of an analgesic drug within 24 hours, by readmission with the same complaint to the ED within 72 hours, and by adverse effect rates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pain intensity on the VAS scale. SAMPLE SIZE: 148 patients (154 enrolled and treated; 1 patient in the mesotherapy and 5 patients in the systemic therapy group lost to follow up). RESULTS: Pain intensity on the VAS scale decreased from a median score of 8 to 4 in the mesotherapy group and from 8 to 5 in the systemic therapy group. These differences were statistically significant from baseline for all time intervals (P=.001 to 30 minutes, P=.004 to 60 minutes, P=.005 to 120 minutes, and P=.002 to 24 hours). The need to use analgesics and the rate of readmission to the ED were higher in the systemic therapy group (P=.013 and P=.030, respectively). Adverse effect rates were minimal and similar in the study groups during the one-week follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Mesotherapy is more efficacious than intravenous dexketoprofen in the management of acute attack of migraine without aura in the ED. LIMITATIONS: Unblinded. Valid for assessing short-term pain relief, but not sufficient to predict long-term efficacy. Not generalizable because single center and small sample size. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04519346).
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Mesoterapia , Trastornos Migrañosos , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Cetoprofeno/análogos & derivados , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , TrometaminaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common lung disease characterized by airflow restriction and systemic inflammation. Netrin-1 is a protein mainly produced in the central nervous system and has proven anti-inflammatory activity. The aim of this study was to determine netrin-1 level and its relationship with comorbidities in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 232 patients aged over 40 years who were divided into 3 groups: Group 1: ex-smokers (≥ 20 pack-years) with COPD hospitalized for COPD exacerbation (n= 142), Group 2: current-smokers (≥ 20 pack-years) without COPD (n= 30), Group 3: a control group comprising healthy non-smokers (n= 60). Plasma netrin-1 levels were measured using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. RESULT: There were significant differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, C-reactive protein (CRP), and plasma netrin-1 levels between patients with acute exacerbation of COPD and current smokers without COPD, healthy controls (p= 0.001 for all). Netrin-1 levels at discharge were lower in COPD patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) compared to nondiabetic COPD patients (p= 0.01). Weak correlation was observed between netrin-1 level at admission and FEV1, FVC, partial pressure of oxygen, and CRP levels (r= 0.394, p= 0.01; r= -0.366, p= 0.01; r= -0.19, p= 0.05; r= 0.306, p= 0.01). Netrin-1 level at admission was also moderately correlated with smoking history (pack-years) (r= 0.579, p= 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Netrin-1 was elevated in acute exacerbation of COPD and may be an important element in inflammatory balance. Patients with both COPD and DM were found to have lower netrin-1 levels at discharge after resolution of the acute exacerbation.
Asunto(s)
Inflamación/inmunología , Inflamación/fisiopatología , Netrina-1/metabolismo , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/inmunología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Plasma/inmunología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Fumar/inmunología , Capacidad VitalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The most important problem for emergency physicians in patients presenting with chest pain is deciding whether to discharge the patient or not. Therefore, many scoring systems have been developed to help with this decision making process. We aim to achieve a modified HEART value by combining the VAS value with the HEART score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected on age, sex, duration of the symptoms, pain severity using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), and the presence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE). The HEART score was calculated and modified (mHEART) by adding 1 point to the total HEART score for a VAS score of ≥7. RESULTS: During the study period, 4781 patients were admitted, and 293 participants were analyzed. Of the patients, 34(11.6%) experienced MACE within a month after the encounter. The mean VAS scores were 5.65±1.44. However, 77(26.3%) patients had VAS scores ≥7. Taking 3 as the threshold, 42(14.3%) patients had HEART scores of 4 and above, where 47(16.0%) had mHEART scores ≥4. The mHEART scoring demonstrated better test indicators than the HEART score. According to the HEART score, 6(2.3%) of the 251 patients predicted as negative would develop MACE, but this number decreased to 1(0.4%) in 246 using the mHEART score. CONCLUSION: Although the HEART score performs reasonably well in discriminating patients who are MACE negative, it is possible to further improve the score by adding the VAS item. After validation by other studies, we would suggest modifying the HEART score by including the VAS item.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), which emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019, infected more than six million people in a short time. In COVID-19, the relationship of many laboratory parameters to morbidity and mortality has been defined. In our study, we aimed to determine the relationship of serum vitamin D level to clinical course and prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 108 patients; 88 patients who stayed in Ataturk University and Erzurum City Hospital between March 24, 2020 and May 15, 2020, who were identified as COVID-19 by real-time PCR method from the nasopharyngeal swab and 20 asymptomatic voluntary medical personnel who tested negative for real-time PCR after routine check-up in our hospital. RESULT: In statistical analysis conducted between healthy control group and vitamin D levels of patients admitted due to COVID-19, it was observed that patients infected with COVID-19 had a lower level (p= 0.004). In 20 patients developing MAS, a lower level of vitamin D was observed (p= 0.004) compared to 68 patients who did not develop. In the comparison of vitamin D levels of the patients (n= 8) who developed exitus in their follow up due to COVID-19, it was observed that vitamin D levels were statistically significantly lower compared to the living (p= 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Due to COVID-19, pandemic, long-running quarantines caused insufficient use of sunlight and worsening of vitamin D deficiency. We wanted to draw attention again with our study to vitamin D which can be responsible for the heavy clinical course of COVID-19 and whose replacement is easy to apply.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Cuarentena/estadística & datos numéricos , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/diagnóstico , Vitamina D/sangre , Prueba de COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of topical ibuprofen and topical piroxicam for acute musculoskeletal injuries. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study, geriatric patients were assigned to groups to receive either topical ibuprofen (n = 70) or topical piroxicam (n = 69). The first dose of gel was applied in the emergency department and the remaining doses were self-administered at home by the patients thrice daily for 72 h. For each patient, the initial baseline visual analog scale (VAS) score (V 0) was compared with the VAS scores at the 60 min (V1), 120 min (V2), 24 h (V3) and 72 h (V4) time points. The decreases in VAS scores, clinical effectiveness of the treatments, and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: In the topical ibuprofen group, the VAS scores were significantly lower at each measurement time point compared to baseline (p < .001). The results were as follows: V0 -V: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.56-1.61; V0 -V2: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.49-1.69; V0 -V3: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.81-2.07; V0 -V4: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.91-2.26. The mean percentage decrease in the VAS scores in the topical ibuprofen group was significantly higher than that in the topical piroxicam group (p < .001). The clinical effect of treatment was found to be significantly higher for the ibuprofen gel group (p < .001). There was no substantial difference in treatment-related adverse events between the groups (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Ibuprofen gel, which is a safe treatment option for geriatric patients, is more clinically effective than piroxicam gel. Response to Reviewers.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/normas , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Heridas y Lesiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Tópica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Geriatría/instrumentación , Geriatría/métodos , Geriatría/normas , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/administración & dosificación , Ibuprofeno/normas , Ibuprofeno/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Piroxicam/administración & dosificación , Piroxicam/normas , Piroxicam/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Heridas y Lesiones/complicacionesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has infected more than 7 million people worldwide in the short time since it emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) and surfactant protein D (SP-D) levels and the clinical course and prognosis of COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included a total of 108 individuals: 88 patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 by real-time PCR of nasopharyngeal swab samples and admitted to the Atatürk University Pulmonary Diseases and the Erzurum City Hospital Infectious Diseases department between March 24 and April 15, and 20 asymptomatic healthcare workers who had negative real-time PCR results during routine COVID-19 screening in our hospital. RESULTS: Patients who developed macrophage activation syndrome had significantly higher IL-6 and SP-D levels at the time of admission and on day 5 of treatment compared to the other patients (IL-6: p = 0.001 for both; SP-D: p = 0.02, p = 0.04). Patients who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome had significantly higher IL-6 and SP-D levels at both time points compared to those who did not (p = 0.001 for all). Both parameters at the time of admission were also significantly higher among nonsurvivors compared to survivors (IL-6: p = 0.001, SP-D: p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In addition to IL-6, which has an important role in predicting course and planning treatment in COVID-19, SP-D may be a novel pneumoprotein that can be used in the clinical course, follow-up, and possibly in future treatments.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Interleucina-6/sangre , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Proteína D Asociada a Surfactante Pulmonar/sangre , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Turquía/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of topical capsaicin and topical piroxicam in acute musculoskeletal injuries. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. The data for the 67 patients in the piroxicam group and the 69 in the capsaicin group were examined. The initial visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared with the 60th and 120th minute as well as the 24th and 72nd hour values. Differences between the VAS scores, clinical effectiveness of the treatment and side effects were evaluated. RESULTS: In the capsaicin group, the mean difference in the delta VAS scores was significantly higher at each measurement time. The mean of the percentage of reduction in the VAS scores of the topical capsaicin group was significantly higher than that in the topical piroxicam group. The highest difference in terms of both outcomes was determined at the 72nd hour VAS change. Mean differences were 1.53 (95% CI: 0.85-2.221) and 19.7 (95% CI: 12.4-27.2) respectively (pâ¯<â¯0.001). In the capsaicin group, the clinical effect of the treatment was found significantly higher (pâ¯<â¯0.01). The difference between the clinical effectiveness of the groups regarding the treatment outcomes was also statistically significant (pâ¯<â¯0.001). There was no significant difference between the patient groups regarding the presence of side effects. CONCLUSION: Topical capsaicin can be used as an alternative to topical piroxicam initially and at follow-up in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute pain as there were no observable differences in side-effects between the two groups.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Capsaicina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa/administración & dosificación , Piroxicam/administración & dosificación , Fármacos del Sistema Sensorial/administración & dosificación , Administración Tópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Hiccup is a condition caused by involuntary contraction of inspiratory muscles, especially the diaphragm. Although it is generally considered as a physiological. response, if hiccup persists for a long time, it can lead to many undesirable conditions such as depression, weight loss, insomnia, and fatigue. A 35-year-old male patient was admitted to our emergency department with hiccup lasting for 15 h. He had a history of several hiccup attacks. Classical non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapies were used to treat the condition without any response. As an alternative method, an intradermal injection was applied. A mixture of thiocolchicoside and lidocaine was administered intradermally to a depth of 1-3 mm at the epigastric region and adjacent to the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The patient's hiccup ended after the intradermal injection procedure. During 48 h of follow-up the hiccup attack did not develop again. No complications related to the process were detected. This is the first case in the literature demonstrating the use of intradermal injection to terminate hiccups. The intradermal injection approach can be administered in cases of hiccups that do not respond to medical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/análogos & derivados , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hipo/tratamiento farmacológico , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/uso terapéutico , Diafragma , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intradérmicas , Lidocaína/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Coolant spray application in musculoskeletal injuries is an effective and harmless method to treat pain and reduce functional limitation. This study assessed the clinical value of coolant spray application on patient comfort before and during the radiographic imaging process along with its early analgesic and anti-edema effects. METHODS: A total of 155 patients, admitted to the emergency department between April 1, 2019, and June 31, 2019, were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to either a coolant spray or a saline spray (placebo) group. To the coolant spray group patients, Cryos ®Spray (Phyto Performance, Italy) was applied. To the placebo group patients, a normal saline solution in a bottle covered with white opaque paper and refrigerated at 4 °C was sprayed. Radiographic images of the patients were scored for appropriateness of the standard imaging characteristics. RESULTS: The mean scores were 8.13 ± 1.8 and 6.58 ± 2.2 for the coolant spray and normal saline spray groups, respectively; the differences were statistically significant between the two groups (mean difference: -1.56, 95% CI:-2.20 to -0.92; p = .000). Patients with fractures on their radiographs and treated with coolant spray received higher scores than similar patients treated with normal saline spray (mean difference:-1.92, 95% CI:-3.28 to -0.55; p = .009). The proportion of patients requesting analgesic treatment before discharge was statistically lower in the coolant spray group compared to the normal saline group (p = .025). CONCLUSIONS: The radiographic images taken after coolant spray intervention in patients with acute ankle trauma were more successful in showing the target structures.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Tobillo/terapia , Crioterapia , Administración Tópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Aerosoles , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de Tobillo/terapia , Traumatismos del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Método Doble Ciego , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Musculoskeletal pain such as low back pain (LBP) are routinely encountered in the ED and contribute to ED overcrowding. The aim of our study was to compare the efficiency of mesotherapy with systemic therapy in pain control in patients with lumbar disk herniation. METHODS: We conducted this prospective parallel randomized controlled trial with the patients admitted to the emergency department with low back pain related to herniated lumbar disk. Mesotherapy was performed to one group, while intravenous dexketoprofen was administered to the control group. Changes in pain intensity at 15th minute, 30th minute, 60th minute and 24th hours after treatment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), need to use analgesic drug within 24 h after treatment, and adverse effect of the treatment methods were compared between groups. RESULTS: The decreases in pain intensity were statistically significantly higher in mesotherapy group for all time intervals. The need to use analgesics was statistically significantly three fold higher in the systemic therapy group. There was no statistically significant difference in having any adverse effect between study groups during one-week follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in medical practices, from the systemic administration of NSAIDs to the minimally invasive techniques such as mesotherapy with potent efficacy and minimal side effects, may enhance the ability of EDs to meet the waiting time targets and improve patient's satisfaction.