Efficacy and safety of zapnometinib in hospitalised adult patients with COVID-19 (RESPIRE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial.

Background: Zapnometinib is an oral, non-ATP-competitive, small-molecule inhibitor of MEK1/MEK2 with immunomodulatory and antiviral properties. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of zapnometinib in patients with COVID-19. Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial, we recruited hospitalised adults with moderate or severe COVID-19 from 18 hospitals in Germany, India, Romania, South Africa, and Spain. Those requiring ICU admission or ventilator support at screening or randomisation were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral zapnometinib (900 mg on Day 1; 600 mg on Days 2-6) or matching placebo, on top of standard of care. Randomisation, stratified by baseline clinical severity status (CSS 3 or 4, measured on a 7-point ordinal scale), was done using Interactive Response Technology. Patients, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was CSS at Day 15 and was conducted on the full analysis set (FAS: all patients who were randomised to the study, received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-dose assessment of CSS, as randomised). Safety analyses were conducted on the safety analysis set (all study participants who received at least one dose of study medication, as treated). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04776044) and EudraCT (2020-004206-59). Findings: The trial was terminated early as the emergence of the Omicron variant impacted recruitment. Between 12th April 2021 and 9th August 2022, 104 of the planned 220 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, 103 were treated, and 101 were included in the FAS (zapnometinib: n = 50; placebo: n = 51). The primary outcome was not significantly different between the two groups, but patients on zapnometinib had higher odds of improved CSS versus placebo (odds ratio [OR] 1.54 [95% CI 0.72-3.33]; p = 0.26). Predefined subgroup analyses identified trends for improved CSS in patients with severe disease at baseline (OR 2.57 [0.76-8.88]; p = 0.13) and non-Omicron variants (OR 2.36 [0.85-6.71]; p = 0.10); the p value of the CSS subgroup by Treatment interaction term in the model was p = 0.28. The frequency and intensity of adverse events was low and similar between arms. Twenty (39.2%) patients treated with zapnometinib experienced adverse events compared with eighteen (34.6%) patients treated with placebo. One patient receiving zapnometinib and two patients receiving placebo died during the study. None of the deaths were considered related to study medication. Interpretation: These results provide proof-of-concept for the innovative approach of targeting the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in patients with hospitalised moderate/severe COVID-19. Further clinical studies will be required to evaluate the clinical benefit of zapnometinib in this and other indications. Funding: Atriva Therapeutics GmbH and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany.

Modeling and Bioinformatics Identify Responders to G-CSF in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Objective: Developing an integrative approach to early treatment response classification using survival modeling and bioinformatics with various biomarkers for early assessment of filgrastim (granulocyte colony stimulating factor) treatment effects in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. Filgrastim, a hematopoietic growth factor with excellent safety, routinely applied in oncology and stem cell mobilization, had shown preliminary efficacy in ALS. Methods: We conducted individualized long-term filgrastim treatment in 36 ALS patients. The PRO-ACT database, with outcome data from 23 international clinical ALS trials, served as historical control and mathematical reference for survival modeling. Imaging data as well as cytokine and cellular data from stem cell analysis were processed as biomarkers in a non-linear principal component analysis (NLPCA) to identify individual response. Results: Cox proportional hazard and matched-pair analyses revealed a significant survival benefit for filgrastim-treated patients over PRO-ACT comparators. We generated a model for survival estimation based on patients in the PRO-ACT database and then applied the model to filgrastim-treated patients. Model-identified filgrastim responders displayed less functional decline and impressively longer survival than non-responders. Multimodal biomarkers were then analyzed by PCA in the context of model-defined treatment response, allowing identification of subsequent treatment response as early as within 3 months of therapy. Strong treatment response with a median survival of 3.8 years after start of therapy was associated with younger age, increased hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, less aggressive inflammatory cytokine plasma profiles, and preserved pattern of fractional anisotropy as determined by magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI-MRI). Conclusion: Long-term filgrastim is safe, is well-tolerated, and has significant positive effects on disease progression and survival in a small cohort of ALS patients. Developing and applying a model-based biomarker response classification allows use of multimodal biomarker patterns in full potential. This can identify strong individual treatment responders (here: filgrastim) at a very early stage of therapy and may pave the way to an effective individualized treatment option.

Statistical modelling of HER2-positivity in breast cancer: Final analyses from two large, multicentre, non-interventional studies in Germany.

BACKGROUND: The German NIU HER2 model was developed based on five variables found to have statistically significant influences on HER2-positivity, to allow exploration of deviations between model-predicted and actual HER2-positivity rates as a measure of testing quality. The prospective, non-interventional EPI HER2 BC study (NCT02666261) compared NIU and EPI data, aiming to validate the NIU model. METHODS: HER2 status and patient-/tumour-related information were collected from eligible patients with invasive breast cancer. The influence of variables on HER2-positivity was compared between studies and the NIU model validated using EPI data with cut-off and variable coefficients from the NIU study. The influences of additional variables, centre effects and laboratory-specific parameters were also explored. RESULTS: The study included 14,729 EPI and 15,281 NIU samples; HER2-positivity rates were comparable (13.5% versus 14.2%). The five covariates from NIU were shown to significantly affect HER2-positivity using EPI data. The Youden Index for the NIU model refitted to EPI data (0.3632) and the NIU model for prediction of HER2-positivity in EPI (0.3552) was close to that for the NIU model fitted to NIU data (0.3888), validating the NIU model. Replacing hormone receptor status with progesterone and oestrogen receptor expression, and adding method of sample extraction as a variable improved the model's predictive strength (ROC AUC 0.7402; Youden Index 0.3935). CONCLUSIONS: Reliable, high-quality HER2-testing methods are essential for selection of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer for HER2-tageted treatment. Integration of our model into a locally used software or website may improve its viability for use in clinical practice.

Evaluation of EGFR inhibitor-mediated acneiform skin toxicity within the double-blind randomized EVITA trial: A thorough gender-specific analysis using the WoMo score.

Acne-like skin reactions frequently occur in patients undergoing treatment with drugs inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor. Recently, the effects of vitamin K1 containing cream (Reconval K1) as prophylactic skin treatment in addition to doxycycline were explored in a double-blind randomized phase II trial (EVITA) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab. EVITA demonstrated a trend towards less severe skin rash in Reconval K1-treated patients using the tripartite WoMo skin reaction grading score as a thorough tool for quantification of drug related skin reactions. This gender-specific analysis of the EVITA trial evaluated the application of the WoMo score for assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related skin toxicities according to treatment arm and gender. To show the robustness of results parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses were conducted. All three parts of the WoMo score independently demonstrated the superiority of the treatment arm (Reconval K1) regarding a significant reduction in acneiform skin reactions in women. Men did not benefit from Reconval K1 cream at any time point in none of the WoMo score analyses. The treatment effect in women was confirmed by the use of skin rash categories based on the final WoMo overall score and mixed effect longitudinal multiple linear regression analysis. The WoMo score represents a sensitive tool for studies exploiting treatments against EGFR mediated acne-like skin rash. Part C of the WoMo score seems to be sufficient for quantification of drug related skin toxicities in further studies. Standard WoMo skin reaction score values for future studies are provided.

HER2 testing in gastric cancer diagnosis: insights on variables influencing HER2-positivity from a large, multicenter, observational study in Germany.

HER2 testing in metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/mGEJC) is standard practice. Variations in HER2-positivity rates suggest factors affecting test quality; however, the influence of patient-, tumor-, and laboratory-related factors on HER2-positivity rates remains unknown. This observational, prospective study collected routine HER2 testing data from 50 pathology centers in Germany (January 2013-December 2015). For each sample, HER2 status, primary tumor location, method of sample retrieval, and other patient- and tumor-related parameters were recorded. A model for predicting the probability of HER2-positivity was developed using stepwise multiple logistic regression to identify influencing factors. Documented positivity rates and corresponding predicted HER2-positivity probabilities were compared to identify institutes with deviations in HER2-positivity. Data from 2761 mGC/mGEJC routine diagnostic specimens included 2033 with HER2 test results (1554 mGC, 479 mGEJC); overall HER2-positivity rates across centers were 19.8% and 30.5%, respectively. HER2-positivity correlated most with Lauren classification, then HER2 testing rate, primary tumor location, sample type, and testing method (all p < 0.05). Three institutes had model-predicted HER2-positivity rates outside the 95% confidence interval of their documented rate, which could not be explained by sample and center characteristics. Results demonstrated the high quality of routine HER2 testing in the mGC/mGEJC cohort analyzed. This is the first study investigating parameters impacting on HER2-positivity rates in mGC/mGEJC in routine practice and suggests that assessment of HER2 testing quality should consider primary tumor location, testing method and rate, and tumor characteristics. Accurate identification of patients with HER2-positive mGC/mGEJC is essential for appropriate use of HER2-targeted therapies.

Efficacy of pentosan polysulfate for the treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: results of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Among the numerous therapeutic approaches used in the treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) few have been assessed with a sufficient level of evidence. The safety and efficacy of pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) has been shown in several open-label and comparative clinical trials with different populations including two meta-analyses. In the context of the approval procedure of PPS for the treatment of IC/BPS by the European Medicines Agency we updated the findings of the previous analyses by incorporating the results of the latest studies.Method: Relevant studies based on a systematic review of PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library in June 2018 were identified. For completeness control, clinical trial registries were also searched. Only randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials providing sufficient information to estimate at least one relevant effect size measure to compare the efficacy of PPS versus placebo were included in the analysis.Results: Of the studies identified in the literature search, six randomized placebo-controlled studies met the pre-defined eligibility criteria. Analyses showed no indication of heterogeneity or publication bias. Treatment with PPS led to a statistically significant improvement in the patient's overall response assessment (p < .001), pain (p = .009) and urgency (p = .005).Conclusions: Our meta-analyses confirmed the results of preceding meta-analyses showing that PPS is efficacious compared to placebo in the treatment of bladder pain, urinary urgency and frequency of micturition and thus an evident option for the treatment of IC/BPS symptoms.

BRAF mutation testing in melanoma: results from a German observational multicenter study.

Quality control of BRAF mutation testing methods used in routine practice is crucial for optimal treatment selection. In this prospective study, we assessed the impact of patient/sample characteristics on BRAF mutation testing results in patients with melanoma, during clinical practice. Data were collected on routine testing practices and documented mutation status in patients with melanoma stages IIIB, IIIC, or IV across 28 diagnostic pathology centers in Germany. Patient/sample data collected included: patient age, location of primary melanoma and metastases, origin of sample, melanoma subtype, and quality of tissue. Statistical influence of patient/sample characteristics on BRAF mutation rate was assessed using multiple logistic regression analyses and statistical models developed to predict the probability of BRAF mutations for individual patient cohorts. Data/samples from 642 patients with melanoma were analyzed. BRAF mutations were documented in 241/642 patients (37.5%). The primary statistical model to predict BRAF mutation rates included: age (continuous), origin of sample, method of mutation analysis, and quality of tissue. Analyses of post hoc collected data identified major deviations between documented mutation rates included in this study vs. routinely recorded mutation rates for three centers. When samples from these centers were excluded, the influence of testing method was no longer statistically significant. The final model included patient age, origin of sample (including metastasis location), and quality of tissue. Once validated in an independent population, this type of model could allow pathology centers to compare the performance of their testing methods with what would be expected based on patient, tumor, and sample characteristics.

Variables that influence BRAF mutation probability: A next-generation sequencing, non-interventional investigation of BRAFV600 mutation status in melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of melanoma, particularly in older patients, has steadily increased over the past few decades. Activating mutations of BRAF, the majority occurring in BRAFV600, are frequently detected in melanoma; however, the prognostic significance remains unclear. This study aimed to define the probability and distribution of BRAFV600 mutations, and the clinico-pathological factors that may affect BRAF mutation status, in patients with advanced melanoma using next-generation sequencing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a non-interventional, retrospective study of BRAF mutation testing at two German centers, in Heidelberg and Tübingen. Archival tumor samples from patients with histologically confirmed melanoma (stage IIIB, IIIC, IV) were analyzed using PCR amplification and deep sequencing. Clinical, histological, and mutation data were collected. The statistical influence of patient- and tumor-related characteristics on BRAFV600 mutation status was assessed using multiple logistic regression (MLR) and a prediction profiler. RESULTS: BRAFV600 mutation status was assessed in 453 samples. Mutations were detected in 57.6% of patients (n = 261), with 48.1% (n = 102) at the Heidelberg site and 66.0% (n = 159) at the Tübingen site. The decreasing influence of increasing age on mutation probability was quantified. A main effects MLR model identified age (p = 0.0001), center (p = 0.0004), and melanoma subtype (p = 0.014) as significantly influencing BRAFV600 mutation probability; ultraviolet (UV) exposure showed a statistical trend (p = 0.1419). An interaction model of age versus other variables showed that center (p<0.0001) and melanoma subtype (p = 0.0038) significantly influenced BRAF mutation probability; age had a statistically significant effect only as part of an interaction with both UV exposure (p = 0.0110) and melanoma subtype (p = 0.0134). CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study highlights that testing center, melanoma subtype, and age in combination with UV exposure and melanoma subtype significantly influence BRAFV600 mutation probability in patients with melanoma. Further validation of this model, in terms of reproducibility and broader relevance, is required.

Assessing HER2 testing quality in breast cancer: variables that influence HER2 positivity rate from a large, multicenter, observational study in Germany.

Despite >10 years of routine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer, testing quality is still an issue. Guidelines recommend assessing HER2 positivity rates as a quality indicator; however, the extent to which patient- or tumor-related factors influence HER2 positivity is still unknown. The present study analyzed these influences to identify pathology centers with HER2 positivity rates unexplained by patient- or tumor-related factors. This observational, prospective study monitored routine HER2 testing at 57 institutes of pathology in Germany (January 2013-August 2014). Data collected included HER2 test result, patient- and tumor-related factors, sample source, and method of sample retrieval. Factors influencing HER2 positivity rates were identified by multiple logistic regression. Individual center effects were assessed in an extended multiple logistic regression model by their statistical significance after adjusting for the combined effect of patient- or tumor-related covariates and multiple testing. Analyses included 15 332 invasive breast cancer samples. Histologic grade showed the strongest influence on HER2 positivity, followed by hormone receptor status, histologic subtype, age, and nodal status (all P<0.0001). The overall HER2 positivity rate across centers was 14.4% (range 7.1-27.3%). A statistically significant center effect on the HER2 positivity rate was identified for three centers (P<0.05), with a trend toward a center effect for a further three (P<0.2). This study, the first of its kind, highlights that assessing HER2 testing quality with HER2 positivity rates should include standardized assessment of patient- or tumor-related characteristics to identify centers with HER2 testing quality issues more effectively. As treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer continue to evolve, identifying the right patients is key.

Efficacy of olmesartan/amlodipine combination therapy in reducing ambulatory blood pressure in moderate-to-severe hypertensive patients not controlled by amlodipine alone.

This previously unpublished, preplanned analysis investigated the efficacy of the olmesartan/amlodipine combination at different doses on 24-h blood pressure (BP) control, as well as assessed trough estimation of trough-to-peak ratio (TPR) and smoothness index (SI). Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension whose BP was inadequately controlled after 8 weeks' treatment with amlodipine 5 mg. Patients were randomized to continue with amlodipine 5 mg or to receive olmesartan/amlodipine 10/5, 20/5 or 40/5 mg for 8 weeks (Period II). Patients not achieving BP control were uptitrated to a more powerful regimen for another 8 weeks (Period III). During Period II, each olmesartan/amlodipine combination reduced 24-h systolic and diastolic BP (SBP/DBP), as well as morning and early morning SBP/DBP, significantly more than amlodipine 5 mg (P<0.001 for all). TPRs were higher in each olmesartan/amlodipine group than with amlodipine 5 mg, and SI values showed dose-related increases; olmesartan/amlodipine 40/5 mg produced a significantly higher SI for SBP and DBP (1.55 and 1.33, respectively) than amlodipine 5 mg (0.96 and 0.77, respectively, P<0.0001 for each). During Period III, uptitrated patients showed further BP reductions, which were largest in those on olmesartan/amlodipine 40/10 mg. SI values increased in uptitrated patients and were highest with olmesartan/amlodipine 40/10 mg (SBP 1.62/DBP 1.41). The olmesartan/amlodipine combination effectively reduces BP over 24 h, including the morning hours, in a dose-related manner. Compared with amlodipine alone, the olmesartan/amlodipine combination has a better 24-h coverage (TPR) and a dose-related improvement in BP lowering homogeneity (SI).

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide predict mortality in stable coronary artery disease: results from the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study.

BACKGROUND: The simultaneous assessment of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hscTnT) and NT-proBNP for predicting death in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) has yet not been examined. We investigated the additional contribution of hscTnT to the risk of mortality prediction of NT-proBNP in patients with stable CAD. METHODS: We studied 1469 patients with stable CAD enrolled in the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study (LURIC). hscTnT and NT-proBNP were measured in baseline samples using immunoassays (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). RESULTS: Thirty-five percent (n=525) of the patients died during a median follow-up of 7 and a half years. In total 59.0% of the non-survivors and 25.2% of the survivors exhibited concentrations of hscTnT≥14 ng/L. Logistic regression analysis identified hscTnT and NT-proBNP as independent risk markers for short-term (1-year follow-up) and long-term (9-years follow-up) mortality. ROC curve analysis determined optimal univariate cut-offs at 14 ng/L and 443 µg/L for hscTnT (AUC 0.725, p<0.0001) and NT-proBNP (AUC 0.742, p<0.0001), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on optimized cut-offs for the simultaneous determination of both biomarkers confirmed the usefulness of additive hscTnT especially in prediction of short-term mortality. The prognostic benefit of the combined assessment of hscTnT and NT-proBNP could be confirmed by a significantly increased reclassification index (NRI) of 24.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of non-survivors exhibited increased hscTnT concentrations above 14 ng/L. The simultaneous determination of NT-proBNP and hscTnT was superior for risk stratification compared to determining either marker alone. Especially the prediction of the clinically important 1-year mortality was significantly improved by addition of hscTnT to NT-proBNP.

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in stroke patients with concomitant vascular disease--a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: G-CSF has been shown in animal models of stroke to promote functional and structural regeneration of the central nervous system. It thus might present a therapy to promote recovery in the chronic stage after stroke. METHODS: Here, we assessed the safety and tolerability of G-CSF in chronic stroke patients with concomitant vascular disease, and explored efficacy data. 41 patients were studied in a double-blind, randomized approach to either receive 10 days of G-CSF (10 µg/kg body weight/day), or placebo. Main inclusion criteria were an ischemic infarct >4 months prior to inclusion, and white matter hyperintensities on MRI. Primary endpoint was number of adverse events. We also explored changes in hand motor function for activities of daily living, motor and verbal learning, and finger tapping speed, over the course of the study. RESULTS: Adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the G-CSF group, but were generally graded mild or moderate and from the known side-effect spectrum of G-CSF. Leukocyte count rose after day 2 of G-CSF dosing, reached a maximum on day 8 (mean 42/nl), and returned to baseline 1 week after treatment cessation. No significant effect of treatment was detected for the primary efficacy endpoint, the test of hand motor function. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the feasibility, safety and reasonable tolerability of subcutaneous G-CSF in chronic stroke patients. This study thus provides the basis to explore the efficacy of G-CSF in improving chronic stroke-related deficits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00298597.

AXIS: a trial of intravenous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a promising stroke drug candidate. The present phase IIa study assessed safety and tolerability over a broad dose range of G-CSF doses in acute ischemic stroke patients and explored outcome data. METHODS: Four intravenous dose regimens (total cumulative doses of 30-180 µg/kg over the course of 3 days) of G-CSF were tested in 44 patients in a national, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled dose escalation study (NCT00132470; www.clinicaltrial.gov). Main inclusion criteria were a 12-hour time window after stroke onset, infarct localization to the middle cerebral artery territory, a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale range of 4 to 22, and presence of diffusion-weighted imaging/perfusion-weighted imaging mismatch. RESULTS: Concerning the primary safety end points, we observed no increase of thromboembolic events in the active treatment groups, and no increase in related serious adverse events. G-CSF led to expected increases in neutrophils and monocytes that resolved rapidly after end of treatment. We observed a clinically insignificant drug-related decrease of platelets. As expected from the low number of patients, we did not observe significant differences in clinical outcome in treatment vs. placebo. In exploratory analyses, we observed an interesting dose-dependent beneficial effect of treatment in patients with DWI lesions > 14-17 cm³. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that G-CSF was well-tolerated even at high dosages in patients with acute ischemic stroke, and that a substantial increase in leukocytes appears not problematic in stroke patients. In addition, exploratory analyses suggest treatment effects in patients with larger baseline diffusion-weighted imaging lesions. The obtained data provide the basis for a second trial aimed to demonstrate safety and efficacy of G-CSF on clinical end points.

Lycopene inhibits disease progression in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia.

Lycopene is a promising nutritional component for chemoprevention of prostate cancer (PCa). A possibly beneficial role of lycopene in patients diagnosed with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), who are at increased risk of developing PCa, has been suggested, although clinical data are lacking. Therefore, this pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of lycopene supplementation in elderly men diagnosed with BPH. A total of 40 patients with histologically proven BPH free of PCa were randomized to receive either lycopene at a dose of 15 mg/d or placebo for 6 mo. The effects of the intervention on carotenoid status, clinical diagnostic markers of prostate proliferation, and symptoms of the disease were assessed. The primary endpoint of the study was the inhibition or reduction of increased serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. The 6-mo lycopene supplementation decreased PSA levels in men (P < 0.05), whereas there was no change in the placebo group. The plasma lycopene concentration increased in the group taking lycopene (P < 0.0001) but other plasma carotenoids were not affected. Whereas progression of prostate enlargement occurred in the placebo group as assessed by trans-rectal ultrasonography (P < 0.05) and digital rectal examination (P < 0.01), the prostate did not enlarge in the lycopene group. Symptoms of the disease, as assessed via the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire, were improved in both groups with a significantly greater effect in men taking lycopene supplements. In conclusion, lycopene inhibited progression of BPH.