Safety and effectiveness of evicel® fibrin sealant as an adjunct to sutured dural repair in children undergoing cranial neurosurgery.

PURPOSE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a challenging complication of intradural cranial surgery, and children are particularly at risk. The use of dural sealants confers protection in adults, but pediatric studies are scarce. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of Evicel® fibrin sealant as an adjunct to primary dural suturing in children undergoing cranial surgery. METHODS: A multicenter trial prospectively enrolled pediatric subjects (< 18 years) undergoing cranial neurosurgery who, upon completion of primary sutured dural repair, experienced CSF leakage. As agreed by the EMA Evicel® Pediatric Investigation Plan, 40 subjects were intra-operatively randomized 2:1 to Evicel® or additional sutures ('Sutures'). Data analysis was descriptive. The efficacy endpoint was treatment success rate, with success defined as intra-operative watertight closure after provocative Valsalva maneuver (primary endpoint). Safety endpoints were postoperative CSF leakage (incisional CSF leakage, pseudomeningocele or both) and surgical site complications (secondary endpoints). RESULTS: Forty subjects (0.6-17 years) were randomized to Evicel® (N = 25) or Sutures (N = 15) (intention-to-treat). Intracranial tumor was the most common indication and procedures were mostly supratentorial craniotomies. Success rates were 92.0% for Evicel® and 33.3% for Sutures, with a 2.76 estimated ratio of success rates (Farrington-Manning 95% CI [1.53, 6.16]). Sensitivity analyses in per-protocol and safety sets showed similar results. Despite a higher rescue treatment rate, the frequencies of postoperative CSF leakage and wound complications were higher for Sutures than for Evicel®. CONCLUSION: This small-scale prospective study shows Evicel® treatment to be safe and effective as an adjunct to primary sutured dura mater closure in a pediatric population. Compared to additional sutures, Evicel® was associated with reduced postoperative CSF leakage and surgical site complications. (Trial registration: The trial was registered as NCT02309645 and EudraCT 2013-003558-26).

A Study of Safety and Effectiveness of Evicel Fibrin Sealant as an Adjunctive Hemostat in Pediatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Data on the use of fibrin sealants to control intraoperative bleeding in children are scarce. Evicel Fibrin Sealant (Ethicon Inc., Raritan, New Jersey, United States) was found safe and effective in clinical trials of adults undergoing various surgery types. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of Evicel versus Surgicel Absorbable Hemostat (Ethicon Inc.) as adjunctive topical hemostats for mild/moderate raw-surface bleeding in pediatric surgery. METHODS: A phase III randomized clinical trial was designed as required by the European Medicines Agency's Evicel Pediatric Investigation Plan: 40 pediatric subjects undergoing abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, or thoracic surgery were randomized to Evicel or Surgicel, to treat intraoperative mild-to-moderate bleeding. Descriptive analyses included time-to-hemostasis and rates of treatment success (4, 7, 10 minutes), intraoperative treatment failure, rebleeding, and thromboembolic events. RESULTS: Forty of 130 screened subjects aged 0.9 to 17 years were randomized 1:1 to Evicel or Surgicel. Surgeries were predominantly open abdominal procedures. The median bleeding area was 4.0 cm2 for Evicel and 1.0 cm2 for Surgicel. The median time-to-hemostasis was 4.0 minutes for both groups. The 4-, 7-, and 10-minute treatment success rates were 80.0% versus 65.0%, 100.0% versus 80.0%, and 95.0% versus 90.0%, whereas treatment failure rates were 5.0% versus 25.0%, for Evicel and Surgicel, respectively. No deaths or thrombotic events occurred. Re-bleeding occurred in 5.0% of Evicel and 10.0% of Surgicel subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with adult clinical trials, this randomized study supports the safety and efficacy of Evicel for controlling mild-to-moderate surgical bleeding in a broad range of pediatric surgical procedures.

Safety and Hemostatic Effectiveness of SURGICEL® Powder in Mild and Moderate Intraoperative Bleeding.

This postmarket clinical study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the novel adjunctive topical hemostat SURGICEL® Powder (SURGICEL®-P), a powdered form of oxidized regenerated cellulose. In a prospective, open-label, single-arm multicenter trial, adult surgical subjects with mild-to-moderate bleeding for which conventional hemostatic methods were impractical/ineffective were treated with SURGICEL®-P. Descriptive analyses included hemostatic success rate at 3, 5, and 10 min, rebleeding and thromboembolic events, SURGICEL®-P-related serious adverse events requiring surgical intervention, and SURGICEL®-P ease of use (questionnaire). In 8 centers, 103 subjects were enrolled with a median (range) age of 64.0 (33.0-88.0) years. Surgeries were open (53.4%) or laparoscopic/thoracoscopic (46.6%) and mostly urological (37.9%) and abdominal (32.0%) procedures. Bleeding sites included various tissue types, with a median (range) surface area of 4 (0.02-72.0) cm2. Hemostatic success rates were 77.7%, 87.4%, and 92.2% at 3, 5, and 10 min, respectively. In 7 subjects (6.8%), investigators reverted to standard of care. No safety signals were identified. Two deaths occurred with causes unrelated to SURGICEL®-P. Investigators favorably evaluated the ease of use of the SURGICEL®-P device. SURGICEL®-P is safe and effective in controlling mild-to-moderate bleeding in a broad range of surgical procedures. The trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03762200.

Hemostatic efficacy of two topical adjunctive hemostats in a porcine spleen biopsy punch model of moderate bleeding.

Topical hemostatic agents have become essential tools to aid in preventing excessive bleeding in surgical or emergency settings and to mitigate the associated risks of serious complications. In the present study, we compared the hemostatic efficacy of SURGIFLO® Hemostatic Matrix Kit with Thrombin (Surgiflo-flowable gelatin matrix plus human thrombin) to HEMOBLAST™ Bellows Hemostatic Agent (Hemoblast-a combination product consisting of collagen, chondroitin sulfate, and human thrombin). Surgiflo and Hemoblast were randomly tested in experimentally induced bleeding lesions on the spleens of four pigs. Primary endpoints included hemostatic efficacy measured by absolute time to hemostasis (TTH) within 5 min. Secondary endpoints included the number of product applications and the percent of product needed from each device to achieve hemostasis. Surgiflo demonstrated significantly higher hemostatic efficacy and lower TTH (p < 0.01) than Hemoblast. Surgiflo-treated lesion sites achieved hemostasis in 77.4% of cases following a single product application vs. 3.3% of Hemoblast-treated sites. On average, Surgiflo-treated sites required 63% less product applications than Hemoblast-treated sites (1.26 ± 0.0.51 vs. 3.37 ± 1.16). Surgiflo provided more effective and faster hemostasis than Hemoblast. Since both products contain thrombin to activate endogenous fibrinogen and accelerate clot formation, the superior hemostatic efficacy of Surgiflo in the porcine spleen punch biopsy model seems to be due to Surgiflo's property as a malleable barrier able to adjust to defect topography and to provide an environment for platelets to adhere and aggregate. Surgiflo combines a flowable gelatin matrix and a delivery system well-suited for precise application to bleeding sites where other methods of hemostasis may be impractical or ineffective.

Evaluation of the Hemostatic Efficacy of Two Powdered Topical Absorbable Hemostats Using a Porcine Liver Abrasion Model of Mild to Moderate Bleeding.

INTRODUCTION: Topical hemostatic agents, used alone or in combination, have become common adjuncts to manage tissue and organ bleeding resulting from trauma and surgical procedures. Oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) is one of the most commonly used adjunctive hemostatic agents. The aim of the present study was to compare the hemostatic efficacy of a novel ORC-based product, SURGICEL® Powder Absorbable Hemostat (Surgicel-P) to that of HEMOBLAST™ Bellows (Hemoblast-B), a collagen-based combination powder. METHODS: Using an established porcine liver abrasion model, we randomly tested Surgicel-P and Hemoblast-B in 60 experimental lesion sites (30 per product tested). Primary endpoints included hemostatic efficacy measured by absolute time to hemostasis (TTH) within 5 minutes. We also examined number of applications required to achieve hemostasis, and sustained hemostasis following saline irrigation of test sites that achieved hemostasis. RESULTS: Surgicel-P demonstrated significantly higher hemostatic efficacy and lower TTH (p < 0.01) than Hemoblast-B. Surgicel-P-treated lesion sites achieved hemostasis in 73.3% of cases following one product application vs. 3.3% of Hemoblast-B-treated sites. Of all sites that were assessed, hemostasis was achieved and sustained following irrigation at 93.3% of Surgicel-P-treated sites vs. 50.0% of Hemoblast-B-treated sites. The average number of Surgicel-P applications per site was 51% lower than the average number of applications used for Hemoblast-B. CONCLUSION: Surgicel-P provided more effective and sustained hemostasis and faster TTH than Hemoblast-B. Surgicel-P represents a novel clinical alternative to provide adjunctive control of diffuse mild and moderate bleeding. Surgicel-P combines an ORC powder formulation and a delivery system in a device that is particularly useful for application on large surfaces and difficult-to-access anatomical locations where application of other forms of topical hemostats may be impractical.

An in vivo comparison of the efficacy of hemostatic powders, using two porcine bleeding models.

BACKGROUND: Usage of topical hemostatic agents in surgery is increasing, including use during minimally invasive procedures, and even for surgeries that have a low risk of bleeding complications. A novel product, Surgicel® Powder - Absorbable Hemostatic Powder (SP), made from oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) fabric, has been developed for adjunctive use in surgical procedures to assist in control of oozing bleeding over broad areas and where access could be difficult with a fabric ORC product. This study compares the new SP to other commercially available hemostatic powder products in two in vivo models. METHODS: Hemostatic efficacy of SP was compared to two polysaccharide-based hemostats in a porcine liver punch biopsy model and to three polysaccharide-based hemostats and one non-regenerated oxidized cellulose hemostat in a porcine liver abrasion model. Primary outcomes measured were hemostatic efficacy, defined as hemostasis within 10 minutes of application, and time-to-hemostasis (TTH). RESULTS: In the punch biopsy model, SP displayed significantly higher effective hemostasis rates than one of the polysaccharide hemostats (p=0.047) and faster TTH than both (p<0.001). In the liver abrasion model, SP had significantly higher effective hemostasis rates (p≤0.002) and faster TTH (p<0.001) than the other four hemostatic agents. The amount of powder applied within the ranges used did not appear to affect hemostatic efficacy. CONCLUSION: In both the liver punch biopsy model of mild to moderate bleeding and the liver abrasion model of mild but diffuse oozing, SP provided more effective hemostasis and faster TTH than other marketed hemostatic powders. The results from this in vivo study suggest that Surgicel Powder may be useful in clinical applications where control of oozing capillary, mild venous, and small arterial hemorrhage is required including bleeding in difficult-to-access locations.

Bleeding-Related Complications and Readmission Rates Associated With Fibrin Sealant Use in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and economic outcomes of EVICEL (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ) and TISSEEL (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Westlake Village, CA) use in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. SETTING: Premier prospective hospital database (June 2009 through March 2014) covering approximately 20% of hospital discharges in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing primary CABG surgery who received either EVICEL or TISSEEL on the day of surgery (index date). INTERVENTIONS: Two intervention groups were formed, EVICEL and TISSEEL. Clinical outcomes compared included postoperative bleeding complications (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code: 998.1) and number of blood transfusions received on the index day. Economic outcomes compared included hospital length of stay, hospital costs, and 30-day readmission rates. Propensity-score matching was used to control for patient and hospital characteristics. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 129,014 primary CABG surgery patients were identified; 986 patients (mean age: 64 years, 73% male) received EVICEL and 6,340 patients (mean age: 65 years, 75% male) received TISSEEL on the index day. After propensity-score matching, patients who received EVICEL compared with TISSEEL had significantly fewer postoperative bleeding complications (3.0% v 5.0%, p = 0.0197), index-day blood transfusion rates (19% v 34%, p<0.0001), readmission rates (18% v 32%, p<0.0001), and costs ($40,736 [standard deviation $19,465] v $46,005 [standard deviation $24,049], p<0.0001). Results from a sensitivity analysis using a generalized linear model to control for other hemostatic agent use also favored EVICEL over TISSEEL. CONCLUSION: Results from this real-world retrospective database analysis showed fewer bleeding complications and lower costs in patients undergoing primary CABG surgery who received EVICEL compared with TISSEEL.

The Real-World Utilization Pattern of Increased Utilization of Advanced Topical Adjunctive Hemostats in a Vertically Integrated Healthcare System.

Hemostasis products, such as SURGICEL®, have been increasingly used across a wide variety of surgical procedures to mitigate bleeding-related risks and complications. This retrospective observational study described the utilization pattern of the SURGICEL® family of oxidized regenerated cellulose products (SURGICEL® ORIGINAL, SURGICEL® FIBRILLAR™, SURGICEL SNoW®) in a large, vertically integrated healthcare system, by utilizing electronic medical records (EMR) extracted from August 2013 through June 2015 at Henry Ford Health System (HFHS). Descriptive measurements were compared between SURGICEL® ORIGINAL and advanced SURGICEL® products (SURGICEL® FIBRILLAR™ and SURGICEL SNoW®) for pooled common surgical procedures. Among 1471 patients, 450 received SURGICEL® ORIGINAL, and 1021 received advanced SURGICEL® products. A significantly greater proportion of patients given advanced SURGICEL® products had comorbidities (91.0% vs 85.6%, p=.0024), prior bleeding conditions (49.9% vs 30.9%, p<.0001), and prior use of anticoagulants (27.7% vs 5.3%, p<.0001). Advanced SURGICEL® products were more likely to be used in coronary artery bypass grafting (13.7% vs 1.6%, p<.0001). Among a sub-set of 1420 patients with complete package size information (988 Advanced and 432 ORIGINAL), significantly fewer mean normalized units of Advanced SURGICEL® were used per patient case (3.9 vs 5.5, p<.0001). Despite Advanced SURGICEL® products being utilized in higher risk bleeding situations compared to cases where SURGICEL® ORIGINAL was utilized, fewer overall normalized units of Advanced SURGICEL® were required per patient case. Further research is needed to investigate the implications of topical hemostat use in continuous oozing bleeding situations on outcomes, hospital costs, and resources.

Absorbable Hemostatic Aggregates.

Topical absorbable hemostats are routinely utilized in surgical procedures to assist in controlling intraoperative bleeding. SURGICEL Original Absorbable Hemostat, one of the most frequently used adjunctive hemostats, is composed of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC). We report here that a novel powdered form of ORC, composed of aggregates of ORC fine fibers, provides additional valuable hemostatic performance characteristics and retains the biochemical and bactericidal profile of the parent ORC fabric. The ORC aggregates are more effective in promoting coagulation than their constituent ORC fine fibers because of more favorable surface energetics and surface area. Aggregates with similar particle size distributions that have higher sphericity values exhibit better coagulation efficacy. Finally, ORC aggregates more effectively promote clot formation than starch-based hemostatic particles. The results of this investigation indicate that the efficacy of this novel powdered hemostat is based on its chemical composition, morphology, and particle surface energetics.

A hospital cost analysis of a fibrin sealant patch in soft tissue and hepatic surgical bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Despite hemostat use, uncontrolled surgical bleeding is prevalent. Drawbacks of current hemostats include limitations with efficacy on first attempt and suboptimal ease-of-use. Evarrest® is a novel fibrin sealant patch that has demonstrated high hemostatic efficacy compared with standard of care across bleeding severities. The objective of this study was to conduct a hospital cost analysis of the fibrin sealant patch versus standard of care in soft tissue and hepatic surgical bleeding. METHODS: The analysis quantified the 30-day costs of each comparator from a hospital perspective. Published US unit costs were applied to resource use (ie, initial treatment, retreatment, operating time, hospitalization, transfusion, and ventilator) reported in four trials. A "surgical" analysis included resources clinically related to the hemostatic benefit of the fibrin sealant patch, whereas a "hospital" analysis included all resources reported in the trials. An exploratory subgroup analysis focused solely on coagulopathic patients defined by abnormal blood test results. RESULTS: The surgical analysis predicted cost savings of $54 per patient with the fibrin sealant patch compared with standard of care (net cost impact: -$54 per patient; sensitivity range: -$1,320 to $1,213). The hospital analysis predicted further cost savings with the fibrin sealant patch (net cost impact of -$2,846 per patient; sensitivity range: -$1,483 to -$5,575). Subgroup analyses suggest that the fibrin sealant patch may provide dramatic cost savings in the coagulopathic subgroup of $3,233 (surgical) and $9,287 (hospital) per patient. Results were most sensitive to operating time and product units. CONCLUSION: In soft tissue and hepatic problematic surgical bleeding, the fibrin sealant patch may result in important hospital cost savings.

A multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing EVARREST™ fibrin sealant patch to standard of care in controlling bleeding following elective hepatectomy: anatomic versus non-anatomic resection.

BACKGROUND: This multicentre, randomized clinical trial assessed the safety and effectiveness of the EVARREST™ Fibrin Sealant Patch (FP) in treating parenchymal bleeding following anatomic and non-anatomic liver resections. METHODS: One hundred and two patients were stratified according to the type of hepatic resection (anatomic/non-anatomic), and randomized (1:1) after identification of an appropriate bleeding site, to FP vs Standard of Care (SoC, manual compression ± topical haemostat). The primary endpoint was haemostasis at 4 min from bleeding site identification with no re-bleeding requiring re-treatment. RESULTS: The FP was superior in achieving haemostasis at 4 min (96%, 48/50) to SoC (46%, 24/52; p < 0.001). Stratification for resection type showed treatment differences for primary endpoint for anatomic (24/25 FP vs 13/23 SoC; p = 0.001) and non-anatomic liver resections (24/25FP vs 11/29 SoC; p < 0.001). Adverse events related to the study procedure were reported in 40/50 patients (80%) in the FP group and 43/52 patients (83%) in the SoC group. One (2%) adverse event (infected intra-abdominal fluid collection) was possibly related to study treatment. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial confirms that the FP is safe and highly effective in controlling parenchymal bleeding following hepatectomy regardless of the type of resection. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01993888.

Needle-to-suture ratio, as well as suture material, impacts needle-hole bleeding in vascular anastomoses.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of material variables on needle-hole bleeding in vascular anastomoses. Material variables include suture size, needle-tip geometry and diameter, needle coating, suture material and coating and swage area. We attempted to determine whether particular suture material and a reduced needle-to-suture ratio (N:S ratio) could reduce the vessel wall defect and reduce needle-hole bleeding, without changing the suture diameter used for the anastomosis. METHODS: A comparative analysis was made of the needle-hole leak rate in end-to-end anastomoses of an ePTFE®-ePTFE® vascular graft with a PROLENE® polypropylene suture with HEMO-SEAL™ technology (HS, 1.84:1 N:S ratio), standard PROLENE® polypropylene suture (polypropylene 1, 2.41:1 N:S ratio), an alternate standard PROLENE® polypropylene suture (polypropylene 2, 2.06:1 N:S ratio) and a GORE-TEX™ ePTFE® suture (ePTFE® suture, 1.4:1 N:S ratio) in an ex vivo cardiopulmonary bypass pulsatile flow loop model using heparinized porcine blood. Testing was completed within the model with an activated clotting time between 250 and 500 s, at near normothermia (33-35°C) and at normotensive pressure levels (120/80 mmHg). A sample size of n = 20 was completed for each group. RESULTS: The average total sample leak rate was 19.8 ± 4.5 ml/min for the HS suture, 57.2 ± 7.2 ml/min for polypropylene 1, 33.8 ± 4.1 ml/min for polypropylene 2 and 46.5 ± 10.3 ml/min for the ePTFE suture. The average needle-hole leak rates were 0.63 ± 0.13 ml/min for the HS suture, 1.94 ± 0.23 ml/min for polypropylene 1, 1.14 ± 0.14 ml/min for polypropylene 2 and 1.56 ± 0.34 ml/min for the ePTFE® suture. A two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference in leak rates showed that there were significant differences (44-67% reduction) in favour of the HS suture when compared with the alternative needles with the same suture material and different N:S ratios, and also a reduction (59%) compared with the sample with smaller N:S ratios but different suture material. CONCLUSIONS: The N:S ratio as well as the physical characteristics of the suture material are important factors in reducing needle-hole bleeding in vascular anastomoses.

An In Vivo Comparison of Hemostatic Gelatin Matrix Products in a Porcine Spleen Biopsy-punch Model.

Flowable gelatin matrix products have established themselves as effective, easy-to-use hemostatic agents useful in a variety of surgical situations. A recently reformulated gelatin matrix, Surgiflo® (Ethicon Inc., Somerville, NJ), can be prepared quickly and provides consistent flow over an 8-hr. period. No in vivo studies have yet been reported comparing hemostasis with the new Surgiflo to other currently marketed flowable gelatin matrix products. This study was conducted to determine whether Surgiflo in actual use has hemostatic qualities different from another commercial gelatin matrix. An in vivo model based on porcine spleen biopsy punch-induced bleeding was used to compare Surgiflo and Floseal™ (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Hayward, CA), both with thrombin. Time required to achieve hemostasis and proportion of sites achieving hemostasis within 30 s were determined for both hemostatic agents and a control of saline-soaked gauze. Results were stratified by the degree of initial bleeding (mild, moderate, severe). Hemostasis was achieved within 3 minutes at all sites for both test products regardless of level of initial bleeding, and control sites continued bleeding past 10 minutes. There were no statistically significant differences between Surgiflo and Floseal for either mean time to hemostasis or proportion of sites hemostatic within 30 s. In this realistic in vivo model both gelatin matrix products were effective, and there were no significant differences observed in hemostatic efficacy between Surgiflo and Floseal. Other factors, such as ease of preparation and application, in-use stability, and economic considerations may affect a surgeon's decision in selection of a desirable hemostatic product.

Variation in hospital resource use and cost among surgical procedures using topical absorbable hemostats.

BACKGROUND: Adjunctive hemostats are used to assist with the control of intraoperative bleeding. The most common types are flowables, gelatins, thrombins, and oxidized regenerated celluloses (ORCs). In the US, Surgicel(®) products are the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved ORCs. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with using ORCs compared to other adjunctive hemostats (OAHs are defined as flowables, gelatins, and topical thrombins) for surgical procedures in the US inpatient setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, US-based cohort study was conducted using hospital inpatient discharges from the 2011-2012 calendar years in the Premier Healthcare Database. Patients with either an ORC or an OAH who underwent a cardiovascular procedure (valve surgery and/or coronary artery bypass graft surgery), carotid endarterectomy, cholecystectomy, or hysterectomy were included. Propensity score matching was used to create comparable groups of ORC and OAH patients. Clinical, economic, and HRU outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The propensity score matching created balanced patient cohorts for cardiovascular procedure (22,718 patients), carotid endarterectomy (10,890 patients), cholecystectomy (6,090 patients), and hysterectomy (9,348 patients). In all procedures, hemostatic agent costs were 28%-56% lower for ORCs, and mean hemostat units per discharge were 16%-41% lower for ORCs compared to OAHs. Length of stay and total procedure costs for patients treated with ORCs were lower for carotid endarterectomy patients (0.3 days and US$700) and for cholecystectomy patients (1 day and US$3,350) (all P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Costs and HRU for patients treated with ORCs were lower than or similar to patients treated with OAHs. Proper selection of the appropriate hemostatic agents has the potential to influence clinical outcomes and treatment costs.

Hemostasis during urologic surgery: fibrin sealant compared with absorbable hemostat.

In the United States, fibrin sealants have been used to achieve hemostasis for nearly two decades. Although their clinical utility was first demonstrated in cardiac surgery, their effectiveness and safety have since been demonstrated to extend to a wide array of procedures. Fibrin sealants typically contain two components-fibrinogen and thrombin-that are combined and delivered simultaneously to a target bleeding site in order to achieve hemostasis. However, many commercial formulations contain other additional components, such as antifibrinolytic agents, that have been associated with adverse outcomes. This subanalysis compares the safety and effectiveness of a fibrin sealant versus an absorbable hemostat for achieving hemostasis during urologic procedures with mild to moderate bleeding.

Similar patient outcomes yet different hospital costs between flowable hemostatic agents.

INTRODUCTION: SURGIFLO and FLOSEAL are absorbable gelatin-based products that form hemostatic matrices. These products are indicated as adjuncts to hemostasis when control of bleeding by conventional surgical techniques (such as suture, ligature or cautery) is ineffective or impractical. This study analyzed the effect of surgery time and the choice of product on cost to the hospital and patient outcomes. METHODS: The data source was the Premier Hospital database from January 1, 2010-June 30, 2012. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with a spinal fusion or refusion surgery with either SURGIFLO (Ethicon Inc.) or FLOSEAL (Baxter International Inc.). The hospital Charge Master was used to identify the amount of flowable product, whether it included Thrombin, and the cost. Multivariable models were performed on overall cost and likelihood of surgical complications. All models were adjusted for patient demographics and severity as well as hospital, and surgical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 24,882 patient records from 121 hospitals were analysed, which included 15,088 FLOSEAL records and 9794 SURGIFLO records, with 1498 SURGIFLO with Thrombin patients. Little or no differences in surgical complications were found between surgeries with SURGIFLO vs. surgery with FLOSEAL. Regression models showed a reduction in cost of $65 associated with use of SURGIFLO with Thrombin and an additional $21 reduction in hospital cost for each additional hour of surgery. Modeling which accounts for hospital fixed effects suggest that, in addition to a gap of ∼$300 favoring SURGIFLO with Thrombin, every additional hour of surgery was associated with an additional reduction in hospital costs of ∼$26. CONCLUSIONS: While the choice of flowable product had no effect on clinical outcomes, use of SURGIFLO was associated with hospital cost savings for flowable product. These savings increased with the length of surgery, even when controlling for the amount of flowable product (mL) used.

Reduction in hospital costs and resource consumption associated with the use of advanced topical hemostats during inpatient procedures.

OBJECTIVE: The use of hemostatic agents has increased over time for all surgical procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the newer topical absorbable hemostat products Surgicel * Fibrillar † and Surgicel SNoW ‡ (Surgicel advanced products, abbreviated as SAPs) compared to the older product Surgicel Original (SO) with respect to healthcare resource use and costs in procedures where these hemostats are most commonly used. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Premier hospital database was used to identify adults who underwent brain/cerebral (BC), cardiovascular (CV: valve surgery and coronary artery bypass graft) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) between January 2011-December 2012. Among these patients, those treated with SAPs were compared to those treated with SO. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create comparable groups to evaluate differences between SAPs and SO. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end-points for this study were length of stay (LOS), all-cause total cost, number of intensive care unit (ICU) days, ICU cost, transfusion costs and units, and SO/SAP product units per discharge. RESULTS: Matched PSM created patient cohorts for SO and SAPs were created for BC (n = 758 for both groups), CV (n = 3388 for both groups), and CEA (n = 2041 for both groups) procedures. Patients that received SAPs had a 14-16% lower mean LOS for each procedure compared to SO, as well as 12-18% lower total mean cost per discharge for each procedure (p < 0.02 for all results). Mean ICU costs for SAPs were also lower, with a reduction of 20% for BC and 19% for CV compared to SO (p < 0.01). However, for CEA, there was no statistically significant difference in ICU costs for SAPs compared to SO. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective hospital database analysis, the use of SAPs were associated with lower healthcare resource utilization and costs compared to SO.