RESUMEN
The strength and rigidity of a new surgical technique for the stabilization of caudal lumbar fractures in dogs, using a Kirschner-Ehmer apparatus and a dorsal spinal plate (KE/DSP), were compared with 2 other methods of internal spinal fixation and with intact (control) spines, using a spinal test system that subjected the spines to 4-point bending. The fixation devices were applied to isolated canine lumbosacral spines (L1 to S3) from cadavers. A complete spinal separation was made in the spine implant specimens at L5-L6 by sharp dissection of all ligamentous structures connecting the two vertebrae. Bending moment vs L5-L6 angular deformation curves, and rigidity and load sustained at 10 degrees angular deformation (failure) were recorded for each fixation method and for the control spines. Values were compared by statistical analysis. The combined KE/DSP fixation and a combined vertebral body plate/dorsal spinal plate (VBP/DSP) fixation were stronger and more rigid than were the control spines and those fixed with a modified segmental-fixation method (P less than 0.05). There were no statistical differences in strength and rigidity between the 2 combined-fixation techniques. Although the VBP/DSP technique is not applicable to clinical caudal lumbar (L5-L6) fractures, it was compared in this study to the KE/DSP technique because a similar VBP/DSP technique was reported strongest in a similar study of L3-L4 simulated fractures, compared with 3 other spinal-fixation techniques that have been used in repair of caudal lumbar fractures. The technique has been used successfully in 6 dogs with caudal lumbar fractures.