Patient-reported outcomes following guided bone regeneration: Correlation with clinical parameters.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative oral health-related quality of life is procedure-dependent and may vary during early healing. There is scarce evidence on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after extraction and guided bone regeneration (GBR) or on the clinical parameters influencing PROMs. This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate PROMs during the first 2 weeks following extraction and GBR and correlate them with clinical parameters. METHODS: Patients undergoing extraction and GBR (bone graft and resorbable membrane) at a single tooth-bound site were recruited. PROMs (pain, swelling, difficulty of mouth opening, and OHIP-14) were recorded immediately preoperatively, and at 2, 7, and 14 days postoperatively. Flap advancement, gingival and mucosal thickness, duration of surgery, and wound opening were the clinical parameters assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included. All PROMs peaked on postoperative day 2, decreased subsequently and were significantly correlated with each other. Although 41-56% of patients reported moderate to severe pain, swelling, or mouth opening difficulty on day 2, most patients experienced mild or no symptoms throughout the postoperative period. Pain, swelling and difficulty of mouth opening were determinants of OHIP-14 and were correlated with all OHIP-14 domains during different time points. Wound opening peaked on day 7. Flap advancement, soft tissue thickness, wound opening, duration of surgery and preoperative PROMs affected postoperative PROMs. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, postoperative symptoms after guided bone regeneration are worst on day 2 and oral health-related quality of life is significantly impacted by pain, swelling, difficulty of mouth opening, surgery duration and flap advancement. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to report PROMs following extraction and GBR with particulate bone graft and resorbable membrane in preparation for implant placement. It will help guide both practitioners and patients on what should be the anticipated experiences following such a routinely performed surgery.

Intra-marrow penetrations and root coverage outcomes: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Intra-marrow penetrations (IMPs) have been performed during guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedures with reported clinical benefits. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the use and effect of IMPs during root coverage procedures. METHOD: A broad search for human and animal studies was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials and Web of Science, following a registered review protocol (PROSPERO). All prospective study designs, case series and case reports on gingival recession treatment (follow-up ≥ 6 months) that employed IMPs were included. Root coverage, complete root coverage prevalence, and adverse effects were recorded, and risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: Of 16,181 screened titles, 5 articles (all of them human studies) met inclusion criteria. All studies (including two randomized clinical trials) treated Miller class I and II recession defects, using coronally advanced flap with IMPs alone or in conjunction with GTR protocols. Therefore, all treated defects received IMPs and no studies compared protocols with and without IMPs. Outcomes were indirectly compared with existing root coverage literature. Mean root coverage was 2.7 mm and 68.5% at 6.8 months (median: 6 months, range 6-15 months) for sites treated with IMPs. CONCLUSION: IMPs are rarely used during root coverage procedures, have not been associated with intra-surgical or wound healing adverse effects and have not been investigated as independent factor. Future clinical studies are needed to directly compare treatment protocols with and without IMPs and investigate the potential benefits of IMPs for root coverage.

Post-surgical emergency after-hours calls: Prevalence, concerns, and management.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence, nature, and management of post-surgical emergency after-hours calls in a dental school setting with predoctoral students, graduate students/residents, and faculty providers. METHODS: A patient chart review (March 2018-February 2020) for post-surgical calls through the emergency after-hours pager system was conducted at the Marquette University School of Dentistry. The total number of surgical procedures, procedure type, the timing of call, operator experience, concern, and recommendation given during the call were documented. RESULTS: During the review period, 83 calls (from 75 patients) were recorded after 8,487 surgical procedures (1% of procedures). Patients called 5.4 ± 0.8 days postoperatively. Procedure type affected call prevalence (p = 0.04), with most calls made after extractions (69.9% of all calls; 1% of extractions; 58/5,725), implant placement (6%; 0.9% of implant placements; 5/530) and periodontal plastic surgery (6%; 3.1% of all plastic surgeries; 5/161). The most common concern was pain (72.3%), then swelling (36.1%), bleeding (12%), and infection (9.6%). Operator experience did not affect call prevalence. Recommendations given were next business day follow-up (79.5%), reinforcement of already given postoperative instructions (51.8%), prescription (15.7%), and hospital emergency department (ED) visit (7.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Post-surgical emergency after-hours calls in a dental school setting occur within the first postoperative week and are rare, unrelated to operator experience, typically prompted by pain, and rarely resulting in referral to hospital ED. The use of a pager system is adequate for the management of after-hours emergencies and may reduce self-referrals to the hospital ED.

Bone grafting history affects soft tissue healing following implant placement.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine and compare soft tissue healing outcomes following implant placement in grafted (GG) and non-grafted bone (NGG). METHODS: Patients receiving single implant in a tooth-bound maxillary non-molar site were recruited. Clinical healing was documented. Volume and content of wound fluid (WF; at 3, 6, and 9 days) were compared with adjacent gingival crevicular fluid (GCF; at baseline, 1, and 4 months). Buccal flap blood perfusion recovery and changes in bone thickness were recorded. Linear mixed model regression analysis and generalized estimating equations with Bonferroni adjustments were conducted for repeated measures. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (49 ± 4 years; 13 males; nine NGG) completed the study. Soft tissue closure was slower in GG (P < 0.01). Differential response in WF/GCF protein concentrations was detected for ACTH (increased in GG only) and insulin, leptin, osteocalcin (decreased in NGG only) at day 6 (P ≤0.04), with no inter-group differences at any time(P > 0.05). Blood perfusion rate decreased immediately postoperatively (P < 0.01, GG) followed by 3-day hyperemia (P > 0.05 both groups). The recovery to baseline values was almost complete for NGG whereas GG stayed ischemic even at 4 months (P = 0.05). Buccal bone thickness changes were significant in GG sites (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: History of bone grafting alters the clinical, physiological, and molecular healing response of overlying soft tissues after implant placement surgery.

Sublingual emphysema following alveoloplasty: A case report.

Various cases of introduction of air into soft tissues have been reported in the dental literature. Here, we report a rare case of localized sublingual emphysema after alveoloplasty. There was no facial involvement. The patient responded to treatment and recovered uneventfully.