Operative options for extracranial nasal dermoid cysts: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nasal dermoid cysts are surgically treated using external incision, open rhinoplasty, transnasal endoscopy, or combined approaches. It is unclear how these approaches differ with regard to the incidence of adverse events. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies on the surgical management of midline nasal dermoids. Following data abstraction, we carried out a series of single-arm meta-analyses to estimate summary risks of recurrence and combined adverse events (recurrence, revision, infection, or readmission) according to the surgical approach. RESULTS: Forty-three eligible studies published between 1958 and 2020 reported on 439 cases of nasal dermoid cysts. Treatment approaches included external incision (25 studies), rhinoplasty (15 studies), and transnasal endoscopy (5 studies). To our knowledge, no study has compared outcome incidence between the surgical approaches. External incision had the lowest summary incidence of both recurrence (1.78% [95% CI: 0.57%, 3.65%]) and combined adverse events (4.94% [95% CI: 2.72%, 7.77%]). Rhinoplasty had a higher incidence of recurrence (4.81% [95% CI: 0.91%, 11.6%]) and combined adverse events (8.32% [95% CI: 2.77%, 16.5%]), and transnasal endoscopy had the highest incidence of recurrence (the only reported adverse event; 7.89% [95% CI: 0%, 28.9%]). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the incidence of adverse events was lowest among patients who were subjected to external incision for nasal dermoid removal. Incidence was higher for patients who underwent rhinoplasty and the highest for patients who underwent transnasal endoscopy. Future work on this topic should include well-designed prospective studies that compare rates of adverse events and cosmetic outcomes between surgical approaches.

High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic (HIFEM) Energy With and Without Radiofrequency for Noninvasive Body Contouring: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Emsculpt Neo (EmSculpt NEO Device, BTL Industries, Inc.) is a FDA-cleared noninvasive body contouring treatment for increasing muscle tone and/or reducing fat. The device uses high-intensity electromagnetic energy to stimulate muscle contractions and to build muscle mass (Emsculpt) or a combination of electromagnetic energy with radiofrequency (Emsculpt NEO) to produce a synergistic effect of building muscle mass and reducing fat. In this study, we conduct a high-quality systematic review to evaluate outcomes for Emsculpt and Emsculpt NEO treatments for noninvasive body contouring. METHODS: An electronic search was performed of the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases using the key terms "High intensity focused electromagnetic therapy; HIFEM; Emsculpt; Emsculpt NEO; BTL Industries." The search included all articles published in English through January 2023. Inclusion criteria included articles noninvasive body contouring and reporting at least one outcome of interest (clinical or patient-reported outcomes). Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the GRADE criteria. Articles involving applications other than for body contouring, animal studies, and review articles were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 159 articles identified in the initial search strategy, 51 met relevance based on abstract screening. Fifteen clinical studies were identified, including Emsculpt (n=11) and Emsculpt NEO (n=2). The typical protocol involved four treatments given over a 2-4-week period (range 3-8 treatments) with increase to 100% intensity setting and 1-6-month follow-ups. No complications were reported. Abdominal measurements were obtained using imaging were reported in eight studies. Treated areas included the buttocks (n=4), thighs (n=3), arms or calves (n=1), and abdomen (n=11). For abdominal contouring, mean reductions of fat thickness were 5.5 mm, muscle thickness of 2 mm, and rectus diastasis improvement of 3.0 mm. No studies reported weight change before and after treatment. All studies with patient-reported outcomes report high patient satisfaction. Two studies report marginal or no benefit of treatment. Certain studies failed to report comorbidities or demographic characteristics other than age and sex, which precludes analysis of specific subgroups that may benefit from treatment. Furthermore, certain studies failed to address how missing data or the final study population was analyzed. CONCLUSION: This systematic review reports on currently published evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of Emsculpt and Emsculpt NEO for body contouring. High-quality level data reporting with patient-reported outcomes will optimize shared decision-making and informed consent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: Therapeutic study. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Emerging Role of Injectable Weight Loss Medications in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Obesity is a multifactorial disease that represents a substantial global health concern. As of 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that over 650 million adults were obese, and more than 1.9 billion were overweight. Surgical interventions or lifestyle changes are typically suggested to patients who experience comorbidities as a result of their weight; however, more recently, antidiabetic medications have been proposed, specifically sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). This is the first systematic review to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and future role of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs for weight loss in the world of aesthetic plastic surgery. Sixteen randomized controlled trials were identified that met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review and comprised data from 10,492 patients. All studies reported a decline in body weight following treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs, ranging from 1.5 to 5 kg. Although adverse events were reported in a large proportion of patients, primarily gastrointestinal manifestations, the literature reports that these were mild to moderate in severity and tended to subside following treatment adjustment. Future research is warranted to determine the ideal SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1RA for weight loss management, and additional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of potential combination therapies with SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs.

Access to Reconstructive Hand Surgery in the United States-Investigating the Obstacles: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms that affect access to surgical hand care appear to be complex and multifaceted. This scoping review aims to investigate the available literature describing such mechanisms and provide direction for future investigation. METHODS: The methodological framework outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews was used to guide this review. In November 2021, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched. A narrative summary of the characteristics and key findings of each paper is used to present the data to facilitate the integration of diverse evidence. RESULTS: Of 471 initial studies, 49 were included in our final analysis. Of these, 33% were cohort studies; 27% reported that underinsured patients are less likely to get an appointment with a hand specialist or to receive treatment. Overburdened emergency departments accounted for the second-most reported reason (16%) for diminished access to surgical hand care. Elective procedure financial incentives, poor emergency surgical hand coverage, distance to treatment, race, and policy were also notably reported across the literature. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the vast mechanisms that hinder access to surgical hand care and highlights their complexity. Possible solutions and policy changes that may help improve access have been described.

Perioperative Topical Antisepsis and Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Upper Aerodigestive Tract Reconstruction.

Importance: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after vascularized reconstruction of the upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) are associated with considerable morbidity. The association between perioperative prophylaxis practices, particularly topical antisepsis, and SSIs remains uncertain. Objective: To assess the association between perioperative topical antisepsis and SSIs in patients undergoing vascularized reconstruction of the UADT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients from 12 academic tertiary care centers over an 11-month period, from July 1, 2020, to June 1, 2021. Patients undergoing open surgical procedures requiring a communication between the UADT and cervical skin with a planned regional pedicled flap, free flap, or both were included. Patients with an active infection at the time of surgical procedure were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was an SSI within 30 days of surgery. The association of demographic characteristics, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical technique, and postoperative care with SSIs was assessed using univariable and multivariable analyses. The relative risk ratio and 95% CIs for developing SSI were calculated for each of the variables based on predetermined categories. Variables for which the relative risk 95% CI did not include the value of zero effect (relative risk = 1.00) were included in the multivariable model. Results: A total of 554 patients (median age, 64 years; range, 21-95 years; 367 men [66.2%]) were included. Cancer ablation was the most frequent reason for surgery (n = 480 [86.6%]). Overall, the SSI rate was 20.9% (n = 116), with most infections involving the head and neck surgical site only (91 [78.4%]). The median time to SSI diagnosis was 11 days (range, 1-28 days). Topical antisepsis mucosal preparation was performed preoperatively in 35.2% (195) and postoperatively in 52.2% (289) of cases. Ampicillin and sulbactam was the most common systemic antibiotic prophylaxis agent used (n = 367 [66.2%]), with 24 hours being the most common duration (n = 363 [65.5%]). On multivariable analysis, preoperative topical antisepsis mucosal preparation (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.77) and systemic prophylaxis with piperacillin and tazobactam (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.84) were associated with a decreased risk of a postoperative SSI. The use of an osseous vascularized flap was associated with an increased risk of postoperative SSI (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.13-2.75). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this study suggest that preoperative topical antisepsis mucosal preparation was independently associated with a decreased risk of SSIs in a 12-center multi-institutional cohort. Further investigation of the association between individual perioperative practices and the incidence of postoperative SSIs is necessary to develop evidence-based protocols to reduce SSIs after UADT reconstruction.