RESUMEN
Thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) is an important clinical problem, and risk-stratified management is essential. To identify the clinical characteristics of thrombosis in patients with MPNs, a nationwide multi-institutional retrospective analysis (JSH-MPN-R18) was conducted. The aim of the present study was to perform a sub-analysis of JSH-MPN-R18 findings to clarify the predictive parameters for thrombosis among complete blood count (CBC) results. Among the patients enrolled in JSH-MPN-R18, those with essential thrombocythemia (ET; n = 1152) and polycythemia vera (PV; n = 456) were investigated. We analyzed and compared CBC parameters between patients with and those without any thrombotic events using Welch's T-test. Statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical software. Thrombotic events were observed in 74 patients with ET. In multivariate analysis, only the neutrophil ratio was slightly but significantly higher for ET patients with thrombosis than for those without (p < 0.05). Of note, the absolute neutrophil count (aNeu) was considered a useful predictive tool for thrombosis among patients classified as low-risk according to the revised International Prognostic Score of Thrombosis for Essential Thrombocythemia. Among PV patients, those with thrombosis showed significantly higher hematocrit and aNeu than did those without thrombosis. As a thrombosis-associated factor, the neutrophil ratio was slightly but significantly elevated in patients with ET. This myeloid skew might reflect a higher value of JAK2 V617F allelic frequency in patients with ET with thrombosis; this was not clarified in JSH-MPN-R18. Further accumulation of evidence, including genetic information for JAK2 and other passenger mutations, is warranted.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are at higher risk of developing secondary malignancies. In this study, we focused on patients with MPNs that complicated lymphoid neoplasms. To analyze the real-world status of lymphoid neoplasm treatment in patients with pre-existing MPNs in Japan, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to collect the data on patients who were first diagnosed with either polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia or myelofibrosis and who later were complicated with lymphoid neoplasms defined as malignant lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small cell lymphoma. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with MPNs complicated by lymphoid neoplasms were enrolled (polycythemia vera, n = 8; essential thrombocythemia, n = 14; and primary myelofibrosis, n = 2). Among these, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most frequently observed (n = 13, 54.1%). Twelve (92.3%) of the patients with DLBCL received conventional chemotherapy. Among these 12 patients, regarding cytoreductive therapy for MPNs, 8 patients stopped treatment, one continued treatment, and two received a reduced dose. Consequently, most patients were able to receive conventional chemotherapy for DLBCL with a slightly higher dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support than usual without worse outcomes. All 3 patients with multiple myeloma received a standard dose of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that if aggressive lymphoid neoplasms develop during the course of treatment in patients with MPNs, it is acceptable to prioritize chemotherapy for lymphoma.