Radiofrequency Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplant: An Analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in waitlist mortality and dropout in liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo radiofrequency (RF) ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2004 to 2013, 11,824 patients with HCC in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients who underwent RF ablation or TACE were included and followed until December 31, 2019, or 5 years, whichever came first, and were stratified by the Milan criteria. Competing risk and Cox regression analyses to compare waitlist mortality and dropout were performed using adjusted hazard ratios (asHRs, with RF ablation group as reference). Regression models were adjusted for age, race, sex, calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, tumor size, and number. RESULTS: There was no difference in waitlist mortality and dropout for patients outside the Milan criteria (n = 1,226) who underwent TACE (19.2%) or RF ablation (19.0%) (asHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.03). There was also no difference for patients inside the Milan criteria (n = 10,598) in waitlist mortality/dropout (TACE 13.4% vs RF ablation 12.9%) (asHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.79-2.09). A subgroup analysis within the Milan criteria demonstrated no difference between TACE and RF ablation treatments in patients with a single tumor of ≤3 cm (asHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77-1.10), with a single tumor of >3 cm (asHR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.79-1.34), or with >1 tumor (asHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Using the national registry data, no difference was found in waitlist mortality and dropout for transplant candidates with HCC who received TACE versus RF ablation.

Interventional and surgical management of internal jugular venous stenosis: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND: A small subset of patients with presumed idiopathic intracranial hypertension are found to have isolated internal jugular vein stenosis (IJVS). OBJECTIVE: To review the current interventions used in patients who present with intracranial hypertension secondary to IJVS. METHODS: In December 2020, we performed a literature search on Pubmed/Medline and Scopus databases for original articles studying surgical and endovascular interventions used for intracranial hypertension in the setting of internal jugular vein stenosis. No date, patient population, or study type was excluded. RESULTS: All studies that included at least one case in which a surgical or endovascular intervention was used to treat IJVS were included. Selection criteria for patients varied, most commonly defined by identification of compression of the internal jugular vein. The 17 studies included in this review ranged from case reports to large single-center cohort studies. The most used surgical intervention was styloidectomy. Styloidectomy had an overall better outcome success rate (79%) than angioplasty/stenting (66%). No complications were recorded in any of the surgical cases analyzed. Outcome measures varied, but all studies recorded clinical symptoms of the patients. CONCLUSION: Few current large cohort studies analyze surgical and endovascular interventions for patients with IJVS. Notably, the most common intervention is styloidectomy, followed by internal jugular vein stenting. By understanding the trends and experience of interventionalists and surgeons, more focused and larger studies can be performed to determine effective strategies with the best clinical outcomes.

Imaging Manifestations and Interventional Treatments for Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia.

Hemorrhagic hereditary telangiectasia (HHT) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder that causes multisystem vascular malformations including mucocutaneous telangiectasias and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Clinical and genetic screening of patients with signs, symptoms, or a family history suggestive of HHT is recommended to confirm the diagnosis on the basis of the Curaçao criteria and prevent associated complications. Patients with HHT frequently have epistaxis and gastrointestinal bleeding from telangiectasias. Pulmonary AVMs are common right-to-left shunts between pulmonary arteries and veins that can result in dyspnea and exercise intolerance, heart failure, migraine headaches, stroke or transient ischemic attacks, brain abscesses, or in rare cases, pulmonary hemorrhage. Primary neurologic complications from cerebral AVMs, which can take on many forms, are less common but particularly severe complications of HHT. Multimodality imaging, including transthoracic echocardiography, Doppler US, CT, and MRI, is used in the screening and initial characterization of vascular lesions in patients with HHT. Diagnostic angiography is an important tool in characterization of and interventional treatments for HHT, particularly those in the lungs and central nervous system. A multidisciplinary approach to early diagnosis, treatment, imaging, and surveillance at high-volume HHT Centers of Excellence is recommended. Although a variety of idiopathic, traumatic, or genetic conditions can result in similar clinical and imaging features, the Curaçao criteria are particularly useful for the proper diagnosis of HHT. Imaging and treatment options are reviewed, with a focus on screening, diagnosis, and posttreatment findings, with the use of updated international guidelines. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.

Increasing Consulting Fee Payments to Interventional Radiologists in the United States From Industry, 2014 to 2018: Analysis of the Open Payments Database.

PURPOSE: To evaluate trends in consulting fees from industry to US-based interventional radiologists from 2014 to 2018. METHODS: Payments to interventional radiologists from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, were analyzed from the CMS Open Payments Database. Payment type, total consulting fee payments per year and total payment per physician, and aggregate payments per company were analyzed before and after adjustment for outliers. RESULTS: Over the 5-year period, a total of $79.8 million was paid from industry to interventional radiologists, of which $17.6 million (22.1%) represented consulting fees. Per physician, the median total yearly amount paid as consulting fees was $5,050. Consulting fees increased from a total of $2.8 million per year in 2014 to $4.6 million per year in 2018 (+65%). After adjustment for outliers, consulting fee payments rose from $1.8 million to $3.5 million (+94%). The number of physicians paid each year increased from 156 to 219 physicians and the median payment increased from $4,327 to $5,419. Before ($5,118,966) and after adjustment, Sirtex Medical Inc paid the highest total aggregate consulting fee payments per year to self-identified interventional radiologists. After expansion to include both interventional and diagnostic radiologists by specialty type, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp ($21,505,861) and Pfizer Inc ($11,798,255) followed by Sirtex Medical Inc ($8,276,818) paid the highest total aggregate in consulting fees. CONCLUSION: Total consulting fees to interventional radiologists increased between 2014 and 2018 by 65%, driven by both the increased number of physicians paid consulting fees and the increased average payment amount.

Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Intra-atrial Tumor Extension: Imaging Response and Oncologic Outcomes.

To evaluate outcomes in patients with right atrial (RA) hepatocellular carcinoma extension treated with transarterial chemoembolization. Eight patients were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up visits occurred at 4-6 weeks; transarterial chemoembolization was repeated if residual tumor persisted. After transarterial chemoembolization, RA tumor volume reduction was 86% ± 19; α-fetoprotein level showed a reduction of 95%. From RA tumor diagnosis, 3-, 6-, and 12-month overall survival was 100% ± 0, 100% ± 0, and 67% ± 29, respectively. In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading the right atrium, transarterial chemoembolization alone or in combination with systemic therapy yields an improved imaging response and may be associated with improved survival.

Risk Factors for Complications Requiring Interventional Radiological Treatment After Hepatectomy.

PURPOSE: To identify perioperative factors that are significantly associated with complications requiring interventional radiology (IR) treatment after hepatectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 11,243 patients in the USA who underwent hepatectomy from 2014 to 2016 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Data on the following IR procedures were extracted: abscess drain placement, endovascular treatment for bleeding, and postoperative percutaneous biliary drain (PBD) placement up to 30 days postoperatively. Patients' clinical and intraoperative factors were examined. Population, univariate, and multivariable analyses were performed. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 704 patients (6%) required IR treatment postoperatively, and 10,539 patients (94%) did not. On multivariable analysis, biliary reconstruction was a significant predictor of postoperative abscess drain placement (hazard ratio (HR), 3.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8, 6.5; P < .001), endovascular treatment for bleeding (HR, 3.3; 95% CI 1.4, 7.8 P = .006), and postoperative PBD placement (HR, 2.9; 95% CI 1.9, 4.2; P < .001). Compared with hepatectomy without biliary reconstruction, hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction was associated with significantly higher rates of complications treated with IR procedures (26% vs. 4.9%) and death within 30 days (6.0% vs. 1.2%) (both, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Biliary reconstruction is a strong predictor of the need for postoperative IR treatment after hepatectomy. One in four patients who underwent biliary reconstruction required IR treatment of a complication during the first 30 days after hepatectomy.

Percutaneous Cryoablation for Stage 1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: Outcomes from a 10-year Prospective Study and Comparison with Matched Cohorts from the National Cancer Database.

Background Percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) is an increasingly utilized treatment for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC), albeit without supportive level I evidence. Purpose Primary objective was to determine the 10-year oncologic outcomes of PCA for stage I RCC in a prospective manner. Secondary objectives were to compare outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), to determine long-term renal function, and to determine the risk of metachronous disease. Materials and Methods In this institutional review board-approved prospective observational study (2006-2013), study participants with single, sporadic, biopsy-proven RCC were included to calculate the 10-year overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and disease-specific survival after PCA. Results were compared with matched PN and RN NCDB cohorts. Overall and recurrence-free survival probabilities were estimated by using nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator. Disease-specific survival was estimated by using the redistribution-to-right method. Age at diagnosis was stratified as a risk for survival. The effect on estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine level, and the risk for hemodialysis and metachronous disease were calculated. Results One hundred thirty-four patients (46% men) with single, sporadic, biopsy-proven RCC (median size ± standard deviation, 2.8 cm ± 1.4) were included. Overall survival was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80%, 93%) and 72% (95% CI: 62%, 83%), recurrence-free survival was 85% (95% CI: 79%, 91%) and 69% (95% CI: 59%, 79%) (improved over surgery), and disease-specific survival was 94% (95% CI: 90%, 98%) at both 5 years and 10 years (similar to surgery), respectively. The 10-year risk of hemodialysis was 2.3%. Risk of metachronous RCC was 6%. Charlson/Deyo Combined Comorbidity score analysis showed decreasing overall survival with increasing comorbidity index. The PCA cohort outperformed both RN- and PN-matched subgroups in all Charlson/Deyo Combined Comorbidity score categories. Conclusion Percutaneous cryoablation yielded a 10-year disease-specific survival of 94%, equivalent to that reported after radical or partial nephrectomy. Overall survival probability after percutaneous cryoablation at 5 years and 10 years was longer than for radical or partial nephrectomy, especially for patients at higher risk (Charlson/Deyo Combined Comorbidity score ≥2). © RSNA, 2020.

Surgical Residents as Certified Bilingual Speakers: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this quality improvement initiative was to identify general surgery residents proficient in a non-English language and have each attempt the Clinician Cultural and Linguistic Assessment (CCLA) to become qualified bilingual staff speakers. METHODS: General surgery house staff were asked to self-identify as proficient in a language other than English. Fees for the certification examination were waived, and each resident was excused from clinical duties to complete the exam. McNemar's test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: All residents responded to the initial survey, with 18/65 reporting a non-English language proficiency. Of the 12 residents who sat for the CCLA exam, 9 (75.0%) passed, with 5 certifying in the most commonly spoken non-English languages at this institution. The number of certified residents increased from 1 to 10 (1.5 % to 15.4%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Language barriers result in health care disparities for patients with limited English proficiency. This reproducible quality improvement initiative significantly increased the number of qualified bilingual speakers, while 25.0% of self-described proficient speakers did not demonstrate adequate language proficiency. These newly certified providers allow for increased language concordant care, which may be associated with improved outcomes.

A case of sinus pause induced by swallowing in the setting of olanzapine and guanfacine overdose.

Olanzapine, a second-generation antipsychotic, is used in both adult and pediatric populations for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression and has been associated with autonomic dysregulation in the setting of overdose. Guanfacine is a sympatholytic drug used in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and has also been associated with autonomic dysfunction. We present a unique case of a 17-year-old male who overdosed on 340 mg of olanzapine and 189 mg of extended-release guanfacine with a previously unreported adverse event. Specifically, five days after ingestion, he developed a 5-8 s sinus pause every time he forcefully swallowed any beverage, suggestive of a vagal hypersensitivity reaction. The report will review the autonomic dysfunction of olanzapine and guanfacine and management of asymptomatic sinus pause in the critical care setting.

Thermal ablation versus wedge or segmental resection in patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a population survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective review was to evaluate the long-term survival benefits of thermal ablation versus wedge or segmental resection in solitary HCC lesions using tumor size and clinical factors. METHODS: Survival analysis was performed on 43,601 patients from 2004 to 2015 in the National Cancer Database with solitary HCC lesions ≤5 cm with further stratification by tumor size, fibrosis score, and type of resection. RESULTS: In patients with moderate fibrosis or less, survival benefit was seen with one-segment resection over ablation in tumors 1.1-3 cm (HR 0.54, p = 0.03) while tumors of 3.1-5 cm received survival benefit from wedge (HR 0.44, p = 0.04), one (HR 0.28, p = 0.001) and two-segment (HR 0.20, p = 0.001) resections over ablation. In patients with severe fibrosis to cirrhosis, wedge resection demonstrated survival benefit over ablation in patients with tumors 1.1-3 cm (HR 0.48, p = 0.01) with no survival benefit of any resection type in patients with tumors of 3.1-5 cm. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the decision to utilize thermal ablation versus resection to extend survival in solitary HCC lesions should include tumor size, fibrosis score, and type of resection.

Rectal cancer patients younger than 50 years lack a survival benefit from NCCN guideline-directed treatment for stage II and III disease.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of rectal cancer in patients younger than 50 years is increasing. To test the hypothesis that the biology in this younger cohort may differ, this study compared survival patterns, stratifying patients according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-driven care and age. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients treated with curative-intent transabdominal resections with negative surgical margins for stage I to III rectal cancer between 2004 and 2014. Outcomes and overall survival for patients younger than 50 years and patients 50 years old or older were compared by subgroups based on NCCN guideline-driven care. RESULTS: A total of 43,106 patients were analyzed. Younger patients were more likely to be female and minorities, to be diagnosed at a higher stage, and to have travelled further to be treated at academic/integrated centers. Short- and long-term outcomes were significantly better for patients younger than 50 years, with age-specific survival rates calculated. Younger patients were more likely to receive radiation treatment outside NCCN guidelines for stage I disease. In younger patients, the administration of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for stage II and III disease was not associated with an overall survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Age-specific survival data for patients with rectal cancer treated with curative intent do not support an overall survival benefit from NCCN guideline-driven therapy for stage II and III patients younger than 50 years. These data suggest that early-onset disease may differ biologically and in its response to multimodality therapy.

Non-surgical management of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States, 2004-2015: an NCDB analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the standard of care for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but only a minority of patients are managed surgically. Other modalities, including external beam radiation (XRT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and radioactive implants (RIs) have been employed with significant heterogeneity of prognosis reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographics of patients with ICC managed non-surgically and compare prognosis in patients managed surgically to those that underwent XRT, RFA, or RI. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with ICC from 2004 to 2015 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were reviewed. Patient demographics, treatments, and survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 6,140 patients with ICC, 4,374 (71%) did not undergo surgery. Patients managed non-surgically were typically older, treated at community centers, more likely to have severe fibrosis or cirrhosis, and present with higher stage disease. The strongest association to receipt of XRT, RI, or RFA modalities was treatment at an academic center. Increased clinical stage was associated with decreased use of RFA; a significantly higher proportion of patients with stage IV disease were given no local therapy. RFA associated with a statistically significant survival benefit over no local therapy only in stage I disease (2.1 vs. 0.7 years, P=0.012) as well as XRT over no local therapy (1.7 vs. 0.7 years, P=0.009). No survival benefit was realized for any treatment in stage II disease. Patients with stage III disease had a survival benefit from XRT versus no local therapy (0.9 vs. 0.6 years, P=0.029) and RI over no local therapy (1.2 vs. 0.6 years, P=0.013). Patients with stage IV disease only demonstrated survival benefit from RI over no local therapy (0.9 vs. 0.3 years, P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with ICC in the United States continue to be managed non-surgically. RFA was associated with improved survival only in stage I disease. XRT was associated with improved survival in stage I & III disease, while RI was associated with improved survival in stage III and IV disease.