RESUMEN
Neurofibromatosis type 2 is a neurogenetic disorder with an incidence of about 1:33.000. Hallmarks are bilateral benign vestibular schwannomas, which can lead to deafness or brainstem compression. Volumetric tumor measurements are essential to assess the efficacy of new therapies. We present a statistical and methodical comparison of three volumetric image analysis tools. We performed volumetric measurements on phantoms with predefined volumes (0.1 to 8.0 ml) and tumors seen on 32 head MRI scans from eight NF2 patients with BrainLab, ITK-Snap, or OsiriX. The software was compared with regard to accuracy and reproducibility of the measurements and time required for analysis. The mean volume estimated by all three software programs differed significantly from the true volume of the phantoms, but OsiriX and BrainLab gave estimates that were not significantly different from each other. For the actual tumors, the estimated volumes with all three software tools showed a low coefficient of variability, but the mean volume estimates differed among the tools. OsiriX showed the shortest analysis time. Volumetric assessment of MRI images is associated to an intrinsic risk of miscalculation. For precise volumes it is mandatory to use the same volumetric tools for all measurements.
Asunto(s)
Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neurofibromatosis 2/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuroma Acústico/diagnóstico por imagen , Programas Informáticos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Fantasmas de Imagen , RiesgoRESUMEN
Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a tumor suppressor syndrome associated with vestibular schwannomas and other benign tumors of the central nervous system. Bevacizumab is used for treatment of progressive vestibular schwannomas, with the intent to reduce tumor size or preserve/improve hearing. Prolonged treatment can cause side effects such as hypertension and proteinuria, which can be cause for discontinuation of therapy. We report on 3 patients who were treated with bevacizumab for 66-76 months, with dose reductions that minimized side effects while sustaining the clinical effect of the antiangiogenic therapy. After dose reduction from 5 mg/kg bi- or tri-weekly to 2.5 mg bi- or tri-weekly, all patients appeared clinically stable and radiographic and audiologic follow-up showed sustained response. In conclusion, in some NF2 patients, dose reduction of bevacizumab seems to be an effective option for managing side effects.
