Comparative Outcomes of a Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy Cohort Versus Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Enrolled in the TOPCAT Trial.

Background Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM), found in 6% to 15% of cohorts with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, has long been considered a rare disease with poor prognosis. New treatments have made it one of the few directly treatable causes of heart failure. This study sought to determine whether patients with ATTR-CM, particularly those treated with tafamidis, have comparable survival to an unselected cohort with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Methods and Results We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes between a single-center cohort of patients with ATTR-CM (n=114) and patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction enrolled in the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial (n=1761, excluding Russia and Georgia). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Subgroup analysis of patients with ATTR-CM treated with tafamidis was also performed. Patients with ATTR-CM had higher rates of the primary composite outcome compared with patients enrolled in the TOPCAT trial (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44 [95% CI, 1.09-1.91]; P=0.01), with similar rates of all-cause death (HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 0.99-2.06]; P=0.06) but higher rates of heart failure hospitalizations (HR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.15-2.28]; P<0.01). Compared with patients enrolled in TOPCAT, patients with ATTR-CM treated with tafamidis had similar rates of the primary composite outcome (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.86-1.96]; P=0.21) and all-cause death (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.57-2.14]; P=0.78) but higher rates of heart failure hospitalizations (HR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.27-3.02]; P<0.01). Conclusions Patients with ATTR-CM treated with tafamidis have similar rates of all-cause death compared with patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, with higher rates of heart failure hospitalizations.

Risk of Cardiovascular Events After COVID-19.

We aimed to determine absolute and relative risks of either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection for late cardiovascular (CV) events and all-cause mortality. We conducted a retrospective double cohort study of patients with either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19+ cohort) and its documented absence (COVID-19- cohort). The study investigators drew a simple random sample of records from all patients under the Oregon Health & Science University Healthcare (n = 65,585), with available COVID-19 test results, performed March 1, 2020 to September 13, 2020. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years and no established Oregon Health & Science University care. The primary outcome was a composite of CV morbidity and mortality. All-cause mortality was the secondary outcome. The study population included 1,355 patients (mean age 48.7 ± 20.5 years; 770 women [57%], 977 White non-Hispanic [72%]; 1,072 ensured [79%]; 563 with CV disease history [42%]). During a median 6 months at risk, the primary composite outcome was observed in 38 of 319 patients who were COVID-19+ (12%) and 65 of 1,036 patients who were COVID-19- (6%). In the Cox regression, adjusted for demographics, health insurance, and reason for COVID-19 testing, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with the risk for primary composite outcome (hazard ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.78, p = 0.029). Inverse probability-weighted estimation, conditioned for 31 covariates, showed that for every patient who was COVID-19+, the average time to all-cause death was 65.5 days less than when all these patients were COVID-19-: average treatment effect on the treated -65.5 (95% confidence interval -125.4 to -5.61) days, p = 0.032. In conclusion, either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk for late CV outcomes and has a causal effect on all-cause mortality in a late post-COVID-19 period.

Clinical management of amyloid cardiomyopathy.

Clinical heart failure, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmias are hallmark features of amyloid cardiomyopathy. In contrast to the advancements in targeted therapies, there is a general lack of evidence-based practice guidelines for clinical management of amyloid cardiomyopathy. In this review, we review the role of routine medical therapy in amyloid cardiomyopathy, from heart failure management to orthostatic hypotension, atrial arrhythmias, thromboembolic complications, and prevention of sudden death. We conclude by discussing approaches to patients with end-stage disease.

Ocular, Orbital, and Adnexal Toxicity With High-dose Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiation Therapy for Orbital Malignancies.

PURPOSE: Conventional modalities of external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are associated with high incidences of severe vision-threatening ocular and orbital toxicities when used to treat orbital malignancies. We investigate toxicities associated with high-dose volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a commonly used contemporary treatment modality for these tumors. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of malignant orbital tumors managed with adjuvant high-dose VMAT preceded by globe-salvaging surgical therapy (GST) or exenteration. Dosimetric quantitation of target volumes and critical structures was performed. Incidence and severity of ocular, orbital, and adnexal toxicities were evaluated and assessed with regard to conventional EBRT toxicities for orbital malignancies described in the literature. RESULTS: Eighty-four subjects (mean age = 65.9 ± 9.7 years) were included (N = 48 and N = 36 in GST and exenteration subgroups, respectively). Mean dose was 64.8 ± 2.1 Gy to the planning target volume. Dosing to critical structures typically did not surpass known tissue tolerance limits. Median follow up was 18.3 months. Visual acuity in the GST subgroup was not significantly different after VMAT (0.25 ± 0.06) compared with baseline (0.23 ± 0.02; P = 0.302). Whereas severe toxicities reported by major systematic analyses in the literature with older EBRT modalities were relatively common-for example, retinopathy (16-40%), optic neuropathy (16%), and corneal perforation (13%)-toxicities with VMAT were typically mild and less common. The most common toxicities with VMAT were mild dry eye (81.3%; 39/48), cataract (21.1%; 8/38 phakic eyes), and periocular dermatitis (15.5%; 13/84). Vision-threatening toxicities, including severe corneal pathologies, retinopathy, or optic neuropathy, were rare. There were no contralateral ocular or adnexal toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose VMAT for orbital malignancies demonstrated low incidence and severity of eye-related toxicity, in contradistinction to adverse events reported from conventional forms of radiotherapy.