Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital ; 38(2): 131-137, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29967558

RESUMEN

SUMMARY: Accumulating evidence seems to support an association between tinnitus and medial olivocochlear bundle (MOCB) dysfunction. Most studies use patient/control comparisons to support this correlation. The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis in a substantially different way and evaluate the roles of gender, age, frequency and tinnitus bilaterality as possible confounding factors. The population consisted of 78 normal hearing patients with chronic tinnitus, 28 normal hearing controls, 19 presbycousic tinnitus patients and 13 presbycousic controls (n = 276 ears). Mean suppression amplitudes of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs) by contralateral white noise (50 dB SPL) were computed. Mean suppression values < 1 dB SPL or < 2 dB SPL were validated as positive test results. Overall suppression (OS) values < 1 dB SPL were qualified as a diagnostic test of moderate positive predictive value for both DPOAEs and TEOAEs, while OS values < 2 dB SPL were found to be of large negative predictive value for DPOAEs and moderate for TEOAEs. Mean suppression values (for all frequencies, OS) are of higher diagnostic value than suppression values corresponding to either lower (1-2 kHz) or higher frequencies (2.8-4 kHz for TEOAEs and 2.8-6 kHz for DPOAEs). After excluding patients with unilateral tinnitus from the analysis, correlations were found to be stronger. Useful correlations were also attributed for all age groups < 61 years. In females, OAE suppression seems to have a stronger positive predictive value, while in males it seems to have a stronger negative predictive value. OAE-based assays of MOCB function as an objective diagnostic tool for subjective tinnitus might deserve further investigation. Tinnitus uni- or bi-laterality is a confounding factor, which probably confirms the observation that defective function of the MOCB usually applies to the contralateral ear as well. Gender is an additional confounding factor, while correlations can be verified for all age groups < 61 years old.


Asunto(s)
Emisiones Otoacústicas Espontáneas , Acúfeno/diagnóstico , Acúfeno/fisiopatología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido , Factores Sexuales , Adulto Joven
2.
Int J Audiol ; 55(12): 775-781, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27598848

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Normative otoacoustic emission (OAE) suppression values are currently lacking and the role of cochlear efferent innervation in tinnitus is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between tinnitus and medial olivocochlear bundle (MOCB) malfunction. Potential suppression amplitude cut-off criteria that could differentiate participants with tinnitus from those without were sought. DESIGN: Mean suppression amplitudes of transient evoked OAEs and distortion product OAEs by contralateral white noise (50 dBSL) were recorded. Six mean suppression amplitudes criteria were validated as possible cut-off points. STUDY SAMPLE: The population consisted of normal hearing (n = 78) or presbycusic adults (n = 19) with tinnitus or without (n = 28 and 13, respectively) chronic tinnitus (in total, n = 138 78 females/60males, aged 49 ± 14 years). RESULTS: Participants with mean suppression values lower than 0.5-1 dBSPL seem to present a high probability to report tinnitus (specificity 88-97%). On the other hand, participants with mean suppression values larger than 2-2.5dBSPL seem to present a high probability of the absence of tinnitus (sensitivity 87-99%). Correlations were stronger among participants with bilateral presence or absence of tinnitus. CONCLUSIONS: This study seem to confirm an association between tinnitus and low suppression amplitudes (<1 dBSPL), which might evolve into an objective examination tool, supplementary to conventional audiological testing.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Cóclea/fisiopatología , Pruebas Auditivas/estadística & datos numéricos , Emisiones Otoacústicas Espontáneas/fisiología , Enmascaramiento Perceptual , Acúfeno/diagnóstico , Adulto , Femenino , Pruebas Auditivas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido , Probabilidad , Valores de Referencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Acúfeno/fisiopatología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA