Identification of Key Genes Associated with Tumor Microenvironment Infiltration and Survival in Gastric Adenocarcinoma via Bioinformatics Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Gastric carcinoma (GC) is the fifth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. The tumor microenvironment plays a significant role in the pathogenesis, prognosis, and response to immunotherapy. However, the immune-related molecular mechanisms underlying GC remain elusive. Bioinformatics analysis of the gene expression of GC and paracancerous healthy tissues from the same patient was performed to identify the key genes and signaling pathways, as well as their correlation to the infiltration of the tumor microenvironment (TME) by various immune cells related to GC development. METHODS: We employed GSE19826, a gene expression profile from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), for our analysis. Functional enrichment analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) was conducted using the Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database. RESULTS: Cytoscape software facilitated the identification of nine hub DEGs, namely, FN1, COL1A1, COL1A2, THBS2, COL3A1, COL5A1, APOE, SPP1, and BGN. Various network analysis algorithms were applied to determine their high connectivity. Among these hub genes, FN1, COL1A2, THBS2, COL3A1, COL5A1, and BGN were found to be associated with a poor prognosis for GC patients. Subsequent analysis using the TIMER database revealed the infiltration status of the TME concerning the overexpression of these six genes. Specifically, the abovementioned genes demonstrated direct correlations with cancer-associated fibroblasts, M1 and M2 macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and activated dendritic cells. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the identified hub genes, particularly BGN, FN1, COL1A2, THBS2, COL3A1, and COL5A1, play crucial roles in GC prognosis and TME cell infiltration. This comprehensive analysis enhances our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying GC development and may contribute to the identification of potential therapeutic targets and prognostic markers for GC patients.

Efficacy of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Acute on Chronic Liver Failure: A Systematic Review and Survival Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) mostly occurs when there is an acute insult to the liver in patients with pre-existing liver disease, and it is characterized by a high mortality rate. Various therapeutic approaches have been used thus far, with orthotopic liver transplantation being the only definitive cure. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have investigated the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize bone marrow-derived stem cells. Some studies have suggested that G-CSF may have a significant role in the management and survival of patients with ACLF. However, the results are conflicting, and the efficacy of G-CSF still needs to be confirmed. AIM: The aim was to assess the efficacy of G-CSF in patients with ACLF. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched until May 2023 for randomized controlled trials investigating the use of G-CSF in adult patients with ACLF. Outcome measures were the effects of G-CSF on overall survival, changes in liver disease severity scores, complications of cirrhosis, other G-CSF-related adverse effects, and all-cause mortality. The study's protocol has been registered with Prospero (CRD42023420273). RESULTS: Five double-blind randomized controlled trials involving a total of 421 participants met the inclusion criteria. The use of G-CSF demonstrated a significant effect on overall survival (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.95, and I2 48%), leading to a decreased mortality (LogOR-0.97, 95% CI -1.57 to -0.37, and I2 37.6%) and improved Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (SMD -0.87, 95% CI -1.62 to -0.13, and I2 87.3%). There was no correlation between the improvement of the Child-Pugh score and the use of G-CSF(SMD -2.47, 95% CI -5.78 to 0.83, and I2 98.1%). The incidence of complications of cirrhosis did not decrease significantly with G-CSF treatment (rate ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.01, and I2 90%). A qualitative synthesis showed that the use of G-CSF is safe. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of G-CSF has demonstrated a positive impact on overall survival, liver function, and the MELD score. The presence of heterogeneity in the included studies prohibits conclusive recommendations.

The Immunomodulatory Effect of Various Anaesthetic Practices in Patients Undergoing Gastric or Colon Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Gastric and colorectal carcinomas are associated with increased mortality and an increasing incidence worldwide, while surgical resection remains the primary approach for managing these conditions. Emerging evidence suggests that the immunosuppression induced by the chosen anaesthesia approach, during the perioperative period, can have a significant impact on the immune system and consequently the prognosis of these patients. AIM: This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarize the existing literature on the effects of different anaesthesia techniques on immune system responses, focusing on cellular immunity in patients undergoing the surgical removal of gastric or colorectal carcinomas. There is no meta-analysis investigating anaesthesia's impact on immune responses in gastric and colorectal cancer surgery. Anaesthesia is a key perioperative factor, yet its significance in this area has not been thoroughly investigated. The clinical question of how the anaesthetic technique choice affects the immune system and prognosis remains unresolved. METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched up to February 2023 to May 2023 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The study protocol has been registered with Prospero (CRD42023441383). RESULTS: Six RCTs met the selection criteria. Among these, three RCTs investigated the effects of volatile-based anaesthesia versus total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA), while the other three RCTs compared general anaesthesia alone to the combination of general anaesthesia with epidural anaesthesia. According to our analysis, there were no significant differences between TIVA and volatile-based anaesthesia, in terms of primary and secondary endpoints. The combination of general anaesthesia with epidural analgesia had a positive impact on NK cell counts (SMD 0.61, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.94, I2 0.0% at 24 and 72 h after the operation), as well as on CD4+ cells (SMD 0.59, CI 95% 0.26 to 0.93, I2 0.0%). However, the CD3+ cell count, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), IL-6 and TNF-α levels remained unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of epidural analgesia and general anaesthesia can potentially improve, postoperatively, the NK cell count and CD4+ cell levels in gastric or colon surgery patients. However, the specific impact of TIVA or volatile-based anaesthesia remains uncertain. To gain a better understanding of the immunomodulatory effects of anaesthesia, in this particular group of cancer patients, further well-designed trials are required.

Efficacy and safety of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials using ROME IV criteria.

BACKGROUND: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder which affects a great number of patients globally. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have evaluated different therapies for IBS. Some of them have shown that probiotics play a significant role in the management of IBS-patients. Nevertheless, results are controversial, and the efficacy of the administration of probiotics remains to be confirmed, especially in regard to which type of probiotic-strains are beneficial. AIM: The aim of the present meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of the administration of probiotics to IBS-patients with a diagnosis based on Rome IV criteria, which is performed for the first time. METHODS: Electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane) were searched until 26.01.2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the administration of probiotics in adult IBS-patients, who were categorized according to the Rome IV criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB) 2.0. Weighted and standardized mean difference with the 95% confidence intervals were used for the synthesis of the results. Primary outcomes were the decrease of IBS-Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and decrease of abdominal pain. The secondary outcomes were the improvement in quality of life (QoL) and the decrease of bloating. Lastly, the adverse effects of probiotics were evaluated. The protocol of the study has been registered at protocols.io (DOI dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.14egn218yg5d/v1). RESULTS: Six double-blind (N = 970) placebo-control RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria and overall, nine different strains of probiotics were examined. No significant reduction in IBS-SSS (WMD -43.2, 95% CI -87.5 to 1.0, I2 = 82.9%) was demonstrated, whereas a significant decrease regarding abdominal pain (SMD -0.94, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.35, I2 = 92,2) was shown. Furthermore, no correlation between improvement of QoL and the use of probiotics (SMD -0.64, 95% CI -1.27 to 0.00, I2 = 93,9%) was shown. However, probiotics were associated with a significant reduction in bloating (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.09, I2 = 36,0%). A qualitative synthesis was conducted about adverse events and showed that the use of probiotics' is safe without severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of probiotics to IBS-patients demonstrated a positive effect on pain and bloating, but due to significant heterogeneity and confounding factors, that were not examined in the included studies, a definitive statement cannot be made. Moreover, probiotics did not lead to an improvement in other parameters. There is a need for larger RCTs in IBS-patients diagnosed according to Rome IV (not III) criteria and especially it is essential to be conducted RCTs which examine the administration of specific strains and have similar methodological characteristics.

Efficacy of branched chain amino acids supplementation in liver cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Branched chain amino acids' (BCAAs) beneficial role in the management of hepatic encephalopathy is already well established, whereas a number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have showed promising results examining BCAA supplementation in the management of other aspects of liver cirrhosis. Current results in the light of BCAAs' biochemical properties make them an attractive supplementation option, in addition to standard pharmaceutical treatment of cirrhosis. AIM: The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature and assess the efficacy of BCAA supplementation in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: Major electronic databases and grey literature sources were searched up to October 4th, 2021 for RCTs assessing the supplementation of BCAA against an active comparator, diet or placebo in patients with liver cirrhosis. RESULTS: Twenty RCTs fulfilled selection criteria. Relative to other interventions BCAAs showed beneficial effect regarding muscle mass (SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.4, I2 0%), but no effect regarding fat mass. Furthermore, BCAAs were associated with significant increase in plasma albumin concentration (SMD 0.52, CI 95% 0.18 to 0.86, I2 84.99%), reduction in occurrence of serious cirrhotic complications (logOR -046, CI 95% -0.78 to -0.13, I2 0%) and increase in body mass index (WMD 0.24, CI 95% 0.08 to 0.40, I2 0%). On the other hand, no significant effect was noted concerning the incidence of mortality. CONCLUSION: Supplementation with BCAA seems to improve significant prognostic factors for patients with cirrhosis, with potential positive impact in mortality. Heterogeneity of study findings attributed to many factors limit overall conclusion and results require further assessment.

Early menopause is associated with increased risk of arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Menopausal transition has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), mainly attributed to atherogenic dyslipidaemia, central obesity and insulin resistance. Whether arterial hypertension (AH) also contributes to menopause-associated CVD is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to systematically investigate and meta-analyze the best available evidence regarding the association between early menopause (EM) and AH risk. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL and Scopus databases, up to January 20th, 2020. Data were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). The I2 index was employed for heterogeneity. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the quantitative analysis (273,994 postmenopausal women, 76853 cases with AH). Women with EM (age at menopause <45 years) were at higher AH risk compared with those of normal age at menopause (>45 years) (OR 1.10, 95 % CI 1.01-1.19, p = 0.03; I2 79 %). The direction or the magnitude of this association remained significant when the analysis was restricted to studies including groups matched for potential confounders, such as age, BMI, smoking or the use of menopausal hormone therapy or oral contraceptives. CONCLUSIONS: Women with EM have an increased risk for AH compared with those of normal age at menopause.