Locating the Instant Center of Rotation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine with Biplanar Fluoroscopy during In Vivo Dynamic Flexion-Extension.

BACKGROUND: Recently, biplanar fluoroscopy is used to evaluate the cervical kinematics, especially to locate the instant center of rotation (ICR) during in vivo motion. This study aims to ascertain the ICR at each cervical segment in the sagittal plane during dynamic motion and assess the differences from previous studies. METHODS: While three healthy subjects were performing full flexion-extension, two oblique views aligned horizontally and angled at approximately 55° were obtained by biplanar fluoroscopy. The minimum degree to detect significant movement in a helical axis model was set at 2°, and anterior-posterior and superior-inferior locations of each ICR were defined. To evaluate the possible distribution area and overlapping area of the ICR with disc space, we drew a circle by using the calculated distance between each coordination and the mean coordination of ICR as the radius. RESULTS: During flexion-extension motion, the mean superior-inferior location of the ICR became progressively more superior, except the C5-6 segment (p = 0.015), and the mean anterior-posterior location of the ICR became progressively more anterior without exception from C2-3 to C6-7 segments, but anterior-posterior ICR locations were not significantly different among segments. The overlapping area with the distribution circle of ICR was mainly located in the posterior half in the C3-4 segment, but the overlapping area was about 80% of the total disc space in C4-5 and C6-7 segments. The overlapping was more noticeable in the lower cervical segments after exclusion of the outlier data of the C5-6 segment in subject 1. CONCLUSIONS: The ICR in the cervical spine showed a trend of moving progressively more superiorly and anteriorly and the disc space overlapping the distribution circle of ICR increased along the lower motion segments except the C5-6 segment. These findings could provide a good basis for level-specific cervical arthroplasty designs.

Anatomical predisposition of the ankle joint for lateral sprain or lateral malleolar fracture evaluated by radiographic measurements.

BACKGROUND: Injury mechanism and the amount of force are important factors determining whether a fracture or sprain occurs at the time of an ankle inversion injury. However, the anatomical differences between the ankle fracture and sprain have not been investigated sufficiently. This study was performed to investigate whether an anatomical predisposition of the ankle joint results in a lateral malleolar fracture or lateral ankle sprain. METHODS: Two groups of consecutive patients, one with lateral malleolar fracture (274 patients, mean age 49.0 years) and the other with lateral ankle sprain (400 patients, mean age 38.4 years), were evaluated. Ankle radiographs were examined for 7 measures: distal tibial articular surface (DTAS) angle, bimalleolar tilt (BT), medial malleolar relative length (MMRL), lateral malleolar relative length (LMRL), medial malleolar slip angle (MMSA), anterior inclination of tibia (AI), and fibular position (FP). After an interobserver reliability test, the radiographic measurements were compared between the 2 groups. Linear regression analysis was performed to correct for age and sex effects between the groups. RESULTS: The fracture group and the sprain group showed significant differences in BT (P = .001), MMSA (P < .001), AI (P = .023), and FP (P < .001). In multiple regression analysis, after adjusting for age and sex effects, fracture and sprain groups showed a significant difference in BT (P = .001), MMRL (P < .001), MMSA (P < .001), and FP (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The lateral malleolar fracture group tended to show more bony constraint than that of the lateral ankle sprain group. Further 3-dimensional assessment of the bony structure and subsequent biomechanical studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism of injury according to the various types of ankle fractures and ankle sprain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.