RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study seeks to examine the relationship between anxiety-symptom severity and sleep behaviors in autistic children receiving cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). METHODS: We conducted a secondary-data analysis from a sample of 93 autistic youth, 4 to 14 years, participating in 24 weeks of CBT. Clinicians completed the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) and parents completed the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire, Abbreviated/Short Form (CSHQ-SF) at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment and 3 months post-treatment. Mediation analysis evaluated the role of anxiety symptoms in mediating the effect of time in treatment on sleep. RESULTS: There was a negative association between time in treatment and scores on the CSHQ-SF (b = - 3.23, SE = 0.493, t = - 6.553, p < 0.001). Increased time in treatment was associated with decreased anxiety (b = - 4.66, SE = 0.405, t = - 11.507, p < 0.001), and anxiety symptoms decreased with CSHQ-SF scores (b = 0.322, SE = 0.112, t = 2.869, p = 0.005). The indirect effect of time in treatment on CSHQ-SF scores through PARS reduction was negative, but not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Increased time in CBT was associated with decreased anxiety severity and improved sleep behaviors. Reductions in anxiety symptoms may mediate improvements in sleep problems, but larger sample sizes are necessary to explore this further.
RESUMEN
Parent-led cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficient, promising form of therapy that may be well suited for autistic youth with anxiety disorders, though to date it has been minimally tested. In this study, 87 autistic youth (7 to 13 years old) with anxiety disorders and their parents were randomized to two forms of parent-led CBT in which parents led their child through a guided CBT workbook across 12 weeks: one with low therapist contact (four 30-minute telehealth calls), and one with standard therapist contact (ten 60-minute telehealth calls). Anxiety, functional impairment, and autism features significantly declined across therapy, without differences between groups. High satisfaction was reported in both groups, though significantly higher satisfaction ratings were reported in standard-contact CBT. Responder rates were 69% of completers at posttreatment (70% in standard contact, 68% in low contact) and 86% at 3-month follow-up (86% in standard contact, 87% in low contact). Low-contact CBT was estimated to incur an average cost of $755.70 per family compared with $1,978.34 in standard-contact CBT. Parent-led CBT with minimal or standard therapist contact both appear to be effective CBT delivery formats for autistic youth with anxiety disorders, with significant cost savings for low-contact CBT.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Padres , Telemedicina , Humanos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Niño , Padres/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Telemedicina/métodos , Trastorno Autístico/terapia , Trastorno Autístico/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ansiedad/terapia , Ansiedad/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Teleterapia de Salud MentalRESUMEN
Family accommodation (e.g., reassurance, modifying routines, assisting avoidance) has not been explored among youth with misophonia but may have important clinical and intervention implications. We examined family accommodation in 102 children and adolescents with interview-confirmed misophonia and compared its frequency and content to family accommodation in 95 children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Findings showed that family accommodation was ubiquitous in pediatric misophonia and may be even more frequent than in youth with anxiety disorders. Assisting the child, participating in misophonia-related behaviors, and modifying family routines were endorsed by more than 70% of parents of children with misophonia. Further, compared to parents of children with anxiety disorders, parents of children with misophonia more frequently reported child distress and anger when they did not accommodate. Family accommodation was moderately to strongly associated with misophonia severity even when accounting for co-occurring internalizing and externalizing symptoms and sociodemographic factors. This first study of family accommodation in pediatric misophonia suggests accommodation may be an important clinical feature. A notable study limitation is that the measure of misophonia did not delineate between adaptive versus maladaptive accommodations. Excessive and maladaptive accommodation may be one potential candidate to target in interventions when considered within a broader treatment plan. Importantly, adaptive accommodations should also be considered in day-to-day management if they improve functioning and quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Familia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Niño , Familia/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Padres/psicología , Relaciones Familiares/psicología , Adaptación PsicológicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of the parent-led intervention Supportive Parenting for Anxious Childhood Emotions (SPACE) relative to a low-dose version of the protocol among children and adolescents with clinically significant anxiety and/or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). METHOD: 68 youth (7-17) with anxiety/OCD and their parents were randomized to receive 12 weekly telehealth SPACE sessions (SPACE-Standard) or bibliotherapy plus 4 telehealth sessions over 12 weeks (SPACE-light). After screening, assessments were conducted via videoconferencing at baseline, post-treatment, and one-month follow-up. Independent evaluators were blind to treatment condition. RESULTS: Treatment condition did not predict whether a participant responded to the intervention (SPACE-Standard = 70%; SPACE-Light = 68%), nor was treatment condition a predictor of anxiety severity, parent-reported anxiety, or parent-/child-reported functional impairment at post-treatment or one-month follow-up. Youth in SPACE-Light self-reported higher post-treatment anxiety than youth in SPACE-standard, though this was no longer significant at one-month follow-up. Parent-reported family accommodation total change scores were associated with anxiety severity at post-treatment across both arms. CONCLUSION: This is the second randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating SPACE and provides further support for the efficacy of this intervention both in standard and low-dose formats. This study provides support for parent-led anxiety treatment targeting family accommodation as a primary mechanism of change and extends evidence of efficacy to a more clinically diverse sample. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry: NCT04922502.https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT04922502.