Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Laryngol Otol ; 136(11): 1014-1022, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35012693

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety characteristics of endoscopic and microscopic stapes surgery based on current evidence. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted of three medical databases, focusing on randomised, controlled studies or observational studies. Data related to the efficacy and safety of each technique were extracted. Outcome data were summarised using the pooled mean differences or pooled odds ratios, along with their 95 per cent confidence intervals. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Success rate was evaluated by estimating air-bone gap improvement; this revealed comparable outcomes for the two techniques (mean difference = -0.20; 95 per cent confidence interval = -0.53, 0.14). No statistically significant difference was detected concerning post-operative complications, except for dysgeusia (odds ratio = -1.12; 95 per cent confidence interval = -1.97, -0.28) and pain (odds ratio = -2.00; 95 per cent confidence interval = -2.97, -1.04), which favoured the endoscopic approach. CONCLUSION: Though both techniques result in commensurate outcomes concerning success rate, post-operative pain and dysgeusia favour the endoscopic approach. Further high-quality studies are needed to adequately compare the two methods.


Asunto(s)
Prótesis Osicular , Cirugía del Estribo , Humanos , Disgeusia , Cirugía del Estribo/métodos , Estribo , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/métodos
2.
Hippokratia ; 26(1): 25-31, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37124281

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to estimate the fine needle aspiration cytology's (FNAC) diagnostic accuracy in differentiating neoplastic from inflammatory lesions (Q1) and malignant from their benign counterparts (Q2). METHODS: We present a retrospective case series covering a single University Hospital and six attending head and neck surgeons over eight years (January 2011 to July 2017). We concentrated on adults with clinically suspected parotid gland lesions. We offered all patients FNAC biopsy preoperatively, and the final diagnosis was established based on the findings of the final histology. The FNAC and histology results were cross-tabulated in a 2 x 2 contingency table, from which we calculated the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS: From 212 consecutive patients reviewed, and after excluding thirteen cases (8 %) of valid but non-diagnostic FNAC, 161 cases (50 females and 111 males) fulfilled set eligibility criteria. The most common diagnosis was Warthin tumors (53 patients, 34 %), followed by pleomorphic adenomas (52 patients, 33.5 %). The sensitivity and specificity of FNAC in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions and in segregating malignant from benign conditions were estimated to be as high as 50 % and 97 %, and 98 % and 93 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: FNAC is moderately effective in differentiating non-neoplastic from neoplastic disease and highly accurate in selecting malignant lesions from benign ones. Although the lack of FNAC sensitivity can occasionally be problematic, it still comprises a valuable tool in salivary gland surgery. HIPPOKRATIA 2022, 26 (1):25-31.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...