Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dermatol Surg ; 49(4): 348-351, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36763900

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cumulative hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) use is linked to the development of nonmelanoma skin cancers. In August 2020, the U.S. FDA approved changes to the HCTZ drug label to indicate this. OBJECTIVE: To uncover what proportion of dermatologists are aware of this association and how often screening and counseling are performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional survey assessing risk awareness and counseling frequency and barriers was distributed among academic dermatologists. Chi-square tests compared resident and attending respondent data. RESULTS: A total of 83 respondents completed the questionnaire; most endorsed awareness of the association between HCTZ use and nonmelanoma skin cancer development before the survey, yet only 28.9% of respondents were aware of changes to the HCTZ drug label. A greater proportion of attendings than residents were aware of the association and drug label changes. The most reported barrier to counseling was the lack of specific screening guidelines for patients taking HCTZ. CONCLUSION: Concerted efforts should be made in residency training and continuing medical education to ensure dermatologists are aware of this well-established link. Specialty-specific efforts should be made to implement clear guidelines on best screening practices and optimized counseling strategies for patients taking HCTZ.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Hidroclorotiazida/efectos adversos , Dermatólogos , Estudios Transversales , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Cureus ; 13(5): e15148, 2021 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34178485

RESUMEN

An estimated 20% of all malignant cutaneous neoplasms are diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Chemotherapeutic wraps, or chemowraps, consist of application of topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 5% cream along with occlusive zinc oxide and a compressive bandage (e.g., Unna boot). This treatment modality is often used as a less invasive option compared to surgery, especially in the presence of numerous SCCs. Cryotherapy, the use of liquid nitrogen gas, can be utilized to obliterate pre-malignant and malignant skin lesions. In this report, we present four cases in which females between the ages of 65 and 80 with multiple lower extremity SCCs were treated with cryotherapy prior to each chemowrap application, resulting in favorable clinical tumor improvement. Our observations indicate that cryotherapy may enhance the effectiveness of chemowrap treatment when used before each application. To our knowledge, the use of cryotherapy to synergistically enhance the efficacy of chemowraps has not yet been reported. We hypothesize that cryotherapy induces edema and first strips the outer, hyperkeratotic layers of skin, which facilitates deeper penetration of the 5-FU cream from chemowraps. Chemowraps may also relieve the pain associated with cryotherapy. Therefore, dual cryotherapy and chemowrap treatment may be considered to maximize skin penetration, thus minimizing the extent of surgical intervention in patients with a significant number of SCC lesions.

3.
Telemed J E Health ; 25(7): 619-627, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30222518

RESUMEN

Background:Many patients with chronic skin diseases lack regular access to dermatologists in the United States and suffer poor clinical outcomes.Introduction:We performed a 12-month randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of an online, collaborative connected health (CCH) model for psoriasis management on access to specialty care.Materials and Methods:The 300 enrolled patients were randomized to online or in-person care. We compared distance traveled as well as transportation and in-office waiting time between the two groups and obtained patient and provider perspectives on CCH.Results:At baseline, no differences existed between the groups in difficulties obtaining specialty care. Over 12 months, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) distance traveled to and from appointments was 174.8 (±577.4) km/person for the in-person group and 2.2 (±14.2) km/person for the online group (p = 0.0003). The mean (SD) time spent on transportation and in-office waiting for in-person appointments was 4.0 (±4.5) h/person for the in-person group and 0.1 (±0.4) h/person for the online group (p = 0.0001). Patients found CCH to be safe, accessible, equitable, efficient, effective, and patient-centered. Providers found CCH to be useful for providing psoriasis care.Discussion:The CCH model resulted in significantly less distance traveled as well as transportation and in-office waiting time compared to in-person care. Both patients and providers were highly satisfied with CCH.Conclusions:The CCH model resulted in increased access to specialty care and enabled patient-centered, safe, and effective management of psoriasis patients.


Asunto(s)
Psoriasis/terapia , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Eficiencia Organizacional , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Visita a Consultorio Médico , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Telemedicina/normas , Factores de Tiempo , Transportes , Estados Unidos , Listas de Espera
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 1(6): e183062, 2018 10 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30646223

RESUMEN

Importance: Innovative, online models of specialty-care delivery are critical to improving patient access and outcomes. Objective: To determine whether an online, collaborative connected-health model results in equivalent clinical improvements in psoriasis compared with in-person care. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Psoriasis Teledermatology Trial is a 12-month, pragmatic, randomized clinical equivalency trial to evaluate the effect of an online model for psoriasis compared with in-person care. Participant recruitment and study visits took place at multicenter ambulatory clinics from February 2, 2015, to August 18, 2017. Participants were adults with psoriasis in Northern California, Southern California, and Colorado. The eligibility criteria were an age of 18 years or older, having physician-diagnosed psoriasis, access to the internet and a digital camera or mobile phone with a camera, and having a primary care physician. Analyses were on an intention-to-treat basis. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive online or in-person care (148 randomized to online care and 148 randomized to in-person care). The online model enabled patients and primary care physicians to access dermatologists online asynchronously. The dermatologists provided assessments, recommendations, education, and prescriptions online. The in-person group sought care in person. The frequency of online or in-person visits was determined by medical necessity. All participants were exposed to their respective interventions for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified primary outcome was the difference in improvement in the self-administered Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score between the online and in-person groups. Prespecified secondary outcomes included body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis and the patient global assessment score. Results: Of the 296 randomized participants, 147 were women, 149 were men, 187 were white, and the mean (SD) age was 49 (14) years. The adjusted difference between the online and in-person groups in the mean change in the self-administered PASI score during the 12-month study period was -0.27 (95% CI, -0.85 to 0.31). The difference in the mean change in BSA affected by psoriasis between the 2 groups was -0.05% (95% CI, -1.58% to 1.48%). Between-group differences in the PASI score and BSA were within prespecified equivalence margins, which demonstrated equivalence between the 2 interventions. The difference in the mean change in the patient global assessment score between the 2 groups was -0.11 (95% CI, -0.32 to 0.10), which exceeded the equivalence margin, with the online group displaying greater improvement. Conclusions and Relevance: The online, collaborative connected-health model was as effective as in-person management in improving clinical outcomes among patients with psoriasis. Innovative telehealth delivery models that emphasize collaboration, quality, and efficiency can be transformative to improving patient-centered outcomes in chronic diseases. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02358135.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Psoriasis/terapia , Telemedicina/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Psoriasis/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...