Clinical experience with moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) in younger paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A: Two open-label studies.

INTRODUCTION: The pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) have been demonstrated in haemophilia A patients aged ≥6 years. AIM: These studies aimed to further describe moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) experience in paediatric patients (<12 years) with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C < 1%). METHODS: Two prospective, open-label studies enrolled patients aged <12 years: one study with 37 previously treated patients (PTPs) and another with 23 previously untreated patients (PUPs). All patients initially received 50 IU/kg of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) to evaluate either recovery alone, or with other PK parameters (6 to <12 years) before continuing treatment for 100 exposure days (EDs) or 24 months. RESULTS: At baseline, mean (±SD) recovery ranged between 1.32 ± 0.65 (PUPs aged <2 years) and 2.13 ± 0.82 (PTPs aged 6 to <12 years). The mean (±SD) half-life was 9.12 ± 1.94 hours in PTPs aged 6 to <12 years. No new safety signals were detected in either study, 2 transient lower titre inhibitors occurred in PTPs while 8 inhibitors (3 low and 5 high titre) were detected in PUPs. Most bleeding episodes resolved with one infusion (94% [893/954]). The annualised bleeding rate (ABR) in the PTP study was 27.5 and 4.2 for patients reporting an on-demand and routine prophylaxis regimen at baseline, respectively. In the PUP study, the overall ABR was 5.9. CONCLUSION: Moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) had expected PK findings (lower recovery in young children compared with older children) along with being safe and efficacious in a population of young severe haemophilia A patients.

Elucidation of Factor VIII Activity Pharmacokinetics: A Pooled Population Analysis in Patients With Hemophilia A Treated With Moroctocog Alfa.

This study investigated the disposition of coagulation factor VIII activity in 754 patients with moderate to severe hemophilia A following the administration of moroctocog alfa, a B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII. Data analyzed included patients aged 1 day to 73 years enrolled in 13 studies conducted over a period of 20 years in 25 countries. A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model with a baseline model described the pooled data well. Body size, age, inhibitors, race, and analytical assay were identified as significant predictors of factor VIII disposition. In addition, simulations of prophylactic dosing schedules in several pediatric cohorts showed large variability and suggest that younger patients would require higher weight-adjusted doses than adolescents to achieve target factor VIII trough activity when receiving every other day or twice weekly dosing.

Don't Do Different Things Do Things Differently! Drug Development in Rare Diseases.

Although definitions of rare disease vary, most acknowledge that there are small numbers of affected patients compared with other conditions. Small numbers of patients, overlapping involvement of investigators as researchers and caregivers, as well as close relationships between researchers and manufacturers require a different pattern of drug development. Regulatory guidances for rare diseases are available, as well as ones for specific rare diseases. Maintaining drug supply for rare diseases also demands innovative approaches.

Population pharmacokinetic modelling of factor IX activity after administration of recombinant factor IX in patients with haemophilia B.

PURPOSE: The aim is to develop a pharmacokinetic model for factor IX activity (FIX) after BeneFIX (nonacog alfa, rFIX) administration and assess potential covariates using all available clinical data collected during development. METHODS: The data set for model development combined observations from eight studies. Postdose FIX observations were adjusted by subtracting predose FIX if these were above the lower limit of quantification (BLQ) and all BLQ observations were removed. A population pharmacokinetic model was then developed with 4936 observations from 201 patients. Two additional studies (385 observations from 72 patients) became available and were used to evaluate the model. RESULTS: A two-compartment model, parameterized for clearance (CL), volume of distribution of the central (V1) and peripheral (V2) compartments, and intercompartmental clearance (Q), with an effect of weight on all parameters was the final model. Weight was incorporated as a power function with exponent estimates close to conventional allometric scaling. Including interoccasion variability (IOV) on CL and V1 showed decreases in the objective function. Investigations of a full block omega matrix lead to the retention of a correlation between V2 and Q. Age was not a significant covariate with weight already included in the model. Observations in the studies used for evaluation were found to be higher than simulated values immediately after dosing, as well as a week after dosing. The differences may be due perhaps to differences in the patients enrolled in the evaluation studies (all were adults) as well as the sample collection time after dosing (longer after dosing in the evaluation studies). CONCLUSIONS: FIX is appropriately modelled as a two-compartment model after rFIX administration. When weight is included, no additional effect of age is observed. Longer times of observation after dosing may be helpful in refining the model.

Industry Perspective of Drug Development for Pregnant/Breastfeeding Women.

As part of drug development, drug companies conduct experiments to gather data about the potential toxicity of medications in pregnant and lactating animals. Increasingly, physiologically based pharmacokinetic models are developed to simulate drug concentrations in pregnant and lactating women. As these women are not usually included in clinical trials, targeted postapproval safety monitoring, registries, or clinical studies may be performed to gather safety and efficacy information about drug use in these special populations.

Once-weekly prophylactic treatment vs. on-demand treatment with nonacog alfa in patients with moderately severe to severe haemophilia B.

INTRODUCTION: Limited data are available on optimal prophylaxis regimens of factor IX (FIX) replacements for patients with haemophilia B. AIM: This multicentre, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-weekly prophylaxis with nonacog alfa compared with on-demand treatment in adolescent and adult patients. METHODS: Males aged 12-65 years with moderately severe to severe haemophilia B (FIX:C ≤ 2%) were eligible for enrolment. Patients received on-demand treatment for 26 weeks, followed by once-weekly prophylaxis of 100 IU kg(-1) for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the annualized bleeding rate (ABR). Secondary end points included response to on-demand treatment, the number of infusions used to treat bleeding events, and the incidence of less-than-expected therapeutic effect (LETE). FIX:C was measured on day 1 and at weeks 26 and 78. RESULTS: Mean (±SD) ABR was lower during prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment [3.6 (±4.6) vs. 32.9 (±17.4) events, respectively; P < 0.0001]. The majority (88.4%) of bleeding events had excellent or good responses upon the first infusion; 82.1% of events responded to the first infusion. No incident of LETE occurred. No thrombotic events or FIX inhibitors were reported. Eight of 17 FIX:C approximately 1 week after dosing were >2 IU dL(-1) (min-max of 2.13-10.39 IU dL(-1) ). CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly prophylaxis of 100 IU kg(-1) was associated with lower ABR compared with on-demand treatment in adolescents and adults with moderately severe to severe haemophilia B. Once-weekly prophylaxis was well tolerated, with a similar safety profile as that reported during the on-demand treatment period. Residual FIX:C may be supportive of effectiveness.

Multicentre, randomized, open-label study of on-demand treatment with two prophylaxis regimens of recombinant coagulation factor IX in haemophilia B subjects.

Few randomized studies have reported on the use of factor IX (FIX) for secondary prophylaxis in haemophilia B patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two secondary prophylaxis regimens of recombinant coagulation FIX, nonacog alfa, compared with on-demand therapy. Male subjects aged 6-65 years with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B (FIX:C ≤ 2, n = 50) and ≥12 bleeding episodes (including ≥6 haemarthroses episodes) within 12 months of study participation were enrolled in this multicentre, randomized, open-label, four-period crossover trial. The primary measure was the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of two prophylactic regimens vs. on-demand therapy. In the intent-to-treat group, mean ABR values were 35.1, 2.6 and 4.6 for the first on-demand period, the 50 IU kg(-1) twice-weekly period, and the 100 IU kg(-1) once-weekly period respectively. Differences in ABR between the first on-demand period and both prophylaxis regimens were significant (P < 0.0001); no significant differences were observed between prophylaxis regimens (P = 0.22). Seven serious adverse events occurred in five subjects, none related to study drug. Results demonstrated that secondary prophylaxis therapy with nonacog alfa 50 IU kg(-1) twice weekly or 100 IU kg(-1) once weekly reduced ABR by 89.4% relative to on-demand treatment. Both prophylaxis regimens demonstrated favourable safety profiles in subjects with haemophilia B.

Impact of different factors on the probability of clinical response in tigecycline-treated patients with intra-abdominal infections.

Patients with intra-abdominal infections differ with regard to the type of infection and the severity of illness. However, the impact of these factors, together with differences in drug exposure, on clinical response is not well understood. Using phase 2 and 3 data for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, the relative importance of tigecycline exposure, host factors, and disease factors, alone or in combination, for the probability of clinical response was examined. Patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections who received tigecycline intravenously as a 100-mg loading dose followed by 50 mg every 12 h for 5 to 14 days and who had adequate clinical, pharmacokinetic, and response data were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with clinical response. A final multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated six factors based on 123 patients to be predictive of clinical success: a weight of <94 kg (P = 0.026), the absence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in baseline cultures (P = 0.021), an APACHE II score of <13 (P = 0.029), non-Hispanic race (P = 0.005), complicated appendicitis or cholecystitis (P = 0.004), and a ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC (AUC/MIC ratio) of > or =3.1 (P = 0.003). The average model-predicted probability of clinical success when one unfavorable factor was present was 0.940. This probability was lower (0.855) when the AUC/MIC ratio was < 3.1 and the remaining five factors were set to the favorable condition. The average model-predicted probability of clinical success in the presence of two unfavorable factors was 0.594. These findings demonstrated the impact of individual and multiple factors on clinical response in the context of drug exposure.

Population pharmacokinetics of tigecycline in healthy volunteers.

Tigecycline, a novel glycylcycline, possesses broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. A structural population pharmacokinetic model for tigecycline was developed based on data pooled from 5 phase I studies. Intravenous tigecycline was administered as single (12.5-300 mg) or multiple (25-100 mg) doses every 12 hours for up to 10 days. Three-compartment models with zero-order input and first-order elimination separately described the single- or multiple-dose full-profile data. Additional models were evaluated using a subset of the phase I data mimicking the phase II/III trial sparse-sampling scheme and dosage. A 2-compartment model best described the reduced phase I data following single or multiple doses and provided reliably accurate estimates of tigecycline AUC(0-12). This modeling supported phase II/III population pharmacokinetic model development to further determine individual patient tigecycline exposures for safety and efficacy analyses.

Population pharmacokinetics of tigecycline in patients with complicated intra-abdominal or skin and skin structure infections.

Tigecycline, a first-in-class expanded glycylcycline antimicrobial agent, has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) and complicated intra-abdominal (cIAI) infections. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for tigecycline was developed for patients with cSSSI or cIAI enrolled in two phase 2 clinical trials, and the influence of selected demographic factors and clinical laboratory measures was investigated. Tigecycline was administered as an intravenous loading dose followed by a 0.5- or 1-h infusion every 12 h for up to 14 days. Blood samples were collected the day before or the day of hospital discharge for the determination of serum tigecycline concentrations. Patient covariates were evaluated using stepwise forward (alpha = 0.05) and backward (alpha = 0.001) procedures. The predictive performance of the model was assessed separately using pooled data from either two phase 3 studies for patients with cSSSI or two phase 3 studies for patients with cIAI. A two-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination adequately described the steady-state tigecycline concentration-time data. Tigecycline clearance was shown to increase with increasing weight, increasing creatinine clearance, and male gender (P < 0.001). The final model provided a relatively unbiased fit to each data set. Individual predicted values of the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) were generally unbiased (median prediction error, -1.60% to -3.78%) and were similarly precise (median absolute prediction error, <4%) when compared across data sets. The population PK model provided the basis to obtain individual estimates of steady-state AUC(0-12) in later exposure-response analyses of tigecycline safety and efficacy in patients with cSSSI or cIAI.

Use of pharmacokinetics in the coagulation factor treatment of patients with haemophilia.

Dosing decisions for replacement coagulation factors in patients with haemophilia should be made on an individual patient basis, with the required dose dependent on factors including the clinical situation, the severity of the factor deficiency, and the location and extent of bleeding. Moreover, there is considerable variability in the pharmacokinetics of coagulation products that needs to be considered; in particular, with both factor (F) IX and FVIII products, there is considerable inter-patient variability in in vivo recovery and terminal half-life values. In the present report, we provide a practical guide to calculating and applying pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to the optimal dosing of coagulation products. We discuss the conduct of a pharmacokinetic study in an individual patient, how to calculate pharmacokinetic values from raw data and clinical situations where an individual pharmacokinetic study is helpful. We highlight the importance of considering an individual pharmacokinetic study in all patients starting a new coagulation product.

Pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin, an antibody-targeted chemotherapy agent for the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse.

The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, St. Davids, PA) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin is an antibody-chemotherapeutic conjugate characterized as antibody-targeted chemotherapy, consisting of an engineered human anti-CD33 antibody (hP67.6) linked to a potent cytotoxic agent, N-acetyl-gamma calicheamicin DMH. The pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin was evaluated in 59 adult AML patients in first relapse, enrolled in a phase II study. Plasma was collected following each dose at specified times, and the pharmacokinetics was characterized by measures of hP67.6, total calicheamicin derivatives, and unconjugated calicheamicin derivatives. After administration of the first 9 mg/m2 dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin, the pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- SD) of hP67.6 following the first dose were as follows: peak plasma concentration, 2.86 +/- 1.35 mg/L; AUC, 123 +/- 105 mg x h/L; t 1/2, 72.4 +/- 42.0 hours; and clearance, 0.265 +/- 0.229L/h. Increased concentrations were observed after the second dose and are believed to be due to a decrease in clearance by CD33-positive blast cells, a result of the reduced tumor burden following the first dose. The concentration profiles of calicheamicin followed the same time course as hP67.6, evidence that calicheamicin remained conjugated to the antibody and delivered to leukemic cells. No relationship was found between plasma concentration and response at the recommended dose. The pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin has been characterized in AML patients receiving doses at the proposed therapeutic level.

Impact of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of the components of gemtuzumab ozogamicin and to assess the possible influence of age and gender on the values. DESIGN: Phase II, multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, parallel study SETTING: Hospitals and outpatient oncology clinics. PATIENTS: Fifty-eight patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse participated. Demographic data included 29 men and 29 women; 34 were younger than 60 years of age (mean age 53+/-16 yrs). INTERVENTION: Patients received gemtuzumab ozogamicin as a single 2-hour infusion of 9 mg/m2. Serial plasma samples were collected over 10 days after the beginning of the infusion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of components of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (hP67.6 antibody, total and unconjugated calicheamicin derivatives) were measured by validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental methods and comparisons between groups were made by analysis of variance. No significant differences were seen between men and women or between those over 60 and those less than 60 years of age in maximum concentration, time to maximum concentration, area under the curve, clearance, or volume of distribution for components of gemtuzumab ozogamicin. CONCLUSION: No differences occur in the pharmacokinetics of the components of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (hP67.6 or calicheamicin) based on gender or age.

Evaluating possible pharmacokinetic interactions between tobramycin, piperacillin, and a combination of piperacillin and tazobactam in patients with various degrees of renal impairment.

A study was performed to further investigate the apparent instability of tobramycin when coadministered with piperacillin/tazobactam in subjects with renal impairment. Twenty-six otherwise healthy volunteers between 23 and 74 years of age were studied. Eight subjects had moderate renal impairment, 10 had mild renal impairment, and 8 had normal renal function. Each subject received single doses of piperacillin/tazobactam and tobramycin alone as well as combined doses in a randomized, three-way crossover design. The subjects with normal renal function also received combined doses of piperacillin and tobramycin. Considerable care was taken to protect against in vitro inactivation of plasma and urine samples after collection. No systematic changes in pharmacokinetic parameters were observed. It is concluded that piperacillin, either alone or with tazobactam, did not change the pharmacokinetics of tobramycin in subjects with renal impairment. The apparent in vivo inactivation of tobramycin in the presence of piperacillin or piperacillin/tazobactam reported by others may be an artifact of ex vivo inactivation.

The pharmacokinetics of etanercept in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacokinetics of etanercept when administered by subcutaneous injection in single doses to healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-six healthy volunteers between 19 and 50 years of age received single doses of etanercept 25 mg by subcutaneous injection into the abdomen. Serial serum samples were collected for 21 days. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with a quantitation limit of 0.3 ng/mL was used to measure the drug concentrations. RESULTS: Etanercept was well tolerated by healthy volunteers. A one-compartment model was found to best describe the concentration-time data and was used to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters. Etanercept is slowly absorbed from the site of injection with a time of peak concentration (+/- SD) of 51 +/- 14 hours; peak concentration was 1.46 +/- 0.72 mg/L. The AUC was 235 +/-98 mg x h/L, apparent clearance was 132 +/- 85 mL/h, apparent volume of distribution was 12 +/- 6 L, and the half-life was 68 +/- 19 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept was slowly absorbed and slowly eliminated after subcutaneous administration. Dosing at the recommended rate of 25 mg twice weekly would be expected to result in concentrations of approximately 3 mg/L. Intersubject variability for apparent clearance in healthy volunteers was 64%.

Chiral bioequivalence: effect of absorption rate on racemic etodolac.

BACKGROUND: For many racemic drugs, bioequivalence assessment based on isomer-nonspecific assays is appropriate because enantiomeric area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) exposure ratios are close to unity. Use of nonspecific methods in cases in which the ratio is substantially greater or less than 1, however, may obscure real therapeutic differences among formulations, especially if the enantiomers exhibit differing pharmacological potencies. OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of absorption rate on etodolac bioequivalence as measured by total [(R,S)-] and (S)-etodolac. DESIGN: Single dose, 3-period, crossover, pharmacokinetic study in 24 healthy volunteers in which the administration rate of etodolac was varied. METHODS: Participants received etodolac 400mg in solution, given as a single dose over 1 minute or as divided doses over 30 and 90 minutes. Unresolved and enantiomer concentrations of etodolac were measured by a validated HPLC assay. The enantiomer ratio was similarly measured by HPLC. RESULTS: Bioequivalence parameters derived for both unresolved and (S)etodolac indicate that peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax) was not bioequivalent. By delaying absorption, bioequivalence was lost. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these data demonstrate that bioequivalence between 2 products of etodolac based on enantiomerically nonspecific criteria alone may not generalise to the pharmacologically relevant (S)-enantiomer. This suggests that enantiospecific assays are necessary for bioequivalence assessments.

Pharmacokinetics of etodolac in patients with stable juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

This was a single-center, open-label, single-dose pharmacokinetic study of etodolac in pediatric and adolescent patients with stable juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Eleven male and female patients with JRA (8.1 to 14.8 years of age, weighing 26.4 to 59.5 kg) received a single oral dose of etodolac (200, 300, or 400 mg based on body weight). Clinical laboratory measurements, measurement of vital signs, and physical examinations were performed to monitor safety. Concentrations of etodolac were determined in plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection with a limit of quantitation of 0.2 mg/L and were analyzed using a noncompartmental pharmacokinetic method. Pharmacokinetic parameters observed were consistent in magnitude and degree of variability with data from healthy adult subjects receiving a single 400- or 600-mg dose of etodolac. Although the mean fraction of unbound drug in patients with JRA was higher than in healthy adults, the oral clearance was independent of age. No serious adverse events occurred during this study. Etodolac yielded consistent pharmacokinetic values among stratified dose subgroups. Single doses of all etodolac treatments were well tolerated in both pediatric and adolescent patients.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic action of etodolac in patients after oral surgery.

The objective of this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of etodolac and the pharmacodynamic response of pain in patients following oral surgery who had received 200 or 400 mg of etodolac immediate release (IR), 400 or 1200 mg of etodolac extended release (ER), or a placebo. Etodolac concentrations in 441 plasma samples from 187 patients were analyzed for population pharmacokinetics using the NONMEM program. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order absorption described the observed data. For etodolac IR, the population mean (%CV) estimates were 3.01 L/h (5.3%) for clearance, 13.6 L (6.8%) for volume of distribution, and 2.31 h-1 (33%) for ka. Respective values for etodolac ER were 3.68 L/h (11%) for clearance, 24.3 L (22%) for volume of distribution, and 0.172 h-1 (24%) for ka. These values generally agreed with previously reported values in healthy adults. Pharmacodynamic assessments included collection of a four-level categorical rating of pain intensity for up to 24 hours after treatment. Pain intensity difference scores were temporally related to etodolac concentrations and were described using an indirect response model. Mean (%CV) pharmacodynamic parameters were IC50 of 14.0 mg/L (9.5%), kout of 1.62 h-1 (13%), FR of 0.56 (8.2%), and Hill coefficients that ranged from 1.26 to 3.34 units. A single 1200 mg dose of etodolac ER given once daily was shown to provide substantial efficacy for 13 hours after dose, modest effect through 24 hours, and a more sustained duration of action than the IR dosage form.

Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous amiodarone and comparison with two-stage pharmacokinetic analysis.

The disposition of amiodarone, an antiarrhythmic agent was evaluated after a single intravenous infusion (5 mg/kg over 15 minutes) in patients of various ages and with various degrees of renal function and left ventricular function. The plasma concentration-time data were obtained from three clinical studies with similar protocols. The data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM) to estimate the population pharmacokinetic parameters of amiodarone and to determine the significant demographic covariates affecting these parameters. The pharmacokinetic parameters of amiodarone (weight-corrected) also were calculated using two-stage analysis and were compared with the results obtained from the mixed-effects analysis. The population plasma concentration-time profile of amiodarone was best described by a four-compartment model. Demographic covariates (i.e., creatinine clearance and ejection fraction) did not improve the final pharmacostatistical model significantly. The results from the two-stage analysis showed no significant relationship between amiodarone pharmacokinetic parameters and age, gender, renal function, or ejection fraction. The results from one study, however, demonstrated that advanced age (> or = 65 years) resulted in reduced amiodarone clearance coupled with a prolonged elimination half-life. No such correlation was detected with NONMEM analysis, which may be partly attributable to the small number of elderly patients. Overall, the results from NONMEM analysis validated the results obtained from the two-stage analysis.