Glucagon prescribing and prevention of hospitalization for hypoglycemia in a large health system.

AIMS: To examine glucagon prescribing trends among patients at high risk of severe hypoglycemia and assess if a glucagon prescription is associated with lower rates of severe hypoglycemia requiring hospital care. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of electronic health records from a large integrated healthcare system between May 2019 and August 2021. We included adults (≥18 years) with type 1 diabetes or with type 2 diabetes treated with short-acting insulin and/or recent history of hypoglycemia-related emergency department visit or hospitalization. We calculated rates of glucagon prescribing overall and by patient characteristics. We then matched 1:1 those who were and were not prescribed glucagon and assessed subsequent hypoglycemia-related hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 9,200 high risk adults, 2063 (22.4%) were prescribed glucagon. Among patients more likely to be prescribed glucagon were those younger, female, White, living in urban areas, with prior severe hypoglycemia, and with a recent endocrinology specialist visit. In the matched cohort (N = 1707 per arm), 62 prescribed glucagon and 33 not prescribed glucagon were hospitalized for hypoglycemia (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.71, 95% CI 1.10-2.66; P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Glucagon prescribing was infrequent with significant racial and rural disparities. Patients with glucagon prescriptions did not have lower rates of hospitalization for hypoglycemia.

Gaps in glucagon fills among commercially insured patients receiving a glucagon prescription.

Glucagon is critically underutilized, and we explored whether this is due to inadequate glucagon prescribing or the patient's inability to fill prescriptions. Of 216 commercially insured, high-risk individuals with diabetes who were prescribed glucagon in our healthcare system, 142 (65.4%) had a claim indicating its fill within 30 days.

Effect of an Integrated Clinical Pharmacist on the Drivers of Provider Burnout in the Primary Care Setting.

PURPOSE: As the prevalence of provider burnout continues to increase, it is critical to identify interventions that may impact provider satisfaction, such as an integrated clinical pharmacist. This study aimed to assess the perceived effect of pharmacist integration on primary care provider satisfaction and drivers of provider burnout in the primary care setting. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey with 11 questions across 4 domains was distributed to primary care providers in a large integrated health system. RESULTS: Of 295 providers invited to take the survey, 119 responded (40% response rate). Most providers had worked with a pharmacist for at least 2 years and utilized them weekly or daily. At least 87% of provider respondents strongly agreed or somewhat agreed that the integrated clinical pharmacist reduced their workload by working directly with patients and non-provider staff, improved overall medication use, helped patients meet health goals and quality measures, and overall helped them to effectively manage their panel of patients. Providers found greater meaning in work through the presence of the clinical pharmacist, which allowed them more time to focus on professionally fulfilling aspects of their work and helped them feel less emotional exhaustion. Overall, 91% of providers were extremely satisfied with the clinical pharmacy service. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may be used to justify the expansion of clinical pharmacy services in primary care to practice areas experiencing problems with 4 specific drivers of provider burnout: workload and job demands, efficiency and resources, meaning in work, and social support and community at work.