Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 48(7): 1282-1289, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35397929

RESUMEN

This retrospective study was aimed (i) at elucidating the correlation between fatty liver diagnoses based on the plain computed tomography (CT) value and those based on the attenuation coefficient (AC) value determined with the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) and (ii) at evaluating the diagnostic power of AC values. We included 125 patients who underwent blood tests, abdominal ultrasonography and abdominal CT at our department between April 2020 and March 2021. Hepatic fat infiltration was categorized as S0 (<5%), S1 (≥5 and 30<%), S2 (≥30 and <50%) or S3 (≥50%). The diagnostic ability of UGAP-determined AC was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the correlation between AC value and fatty liver grade by CT value. The coefficient of correlation (r) between the AC value and plain CT value was -0.6188, indicating a moderate relationship. For diagnosing grade ≥S1 (n = 44), the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.8541, sensitivity 84.1%, specificity 81.5% and cutoff value 0.676 dB/cm/MHz. In diagnosing grade ≥S2 (n = 35), the AUROC was 0.8603, sensitivity 88.6%, specificity 81.1% and cutoff value 0.694 dB/cm/MHz. In diagnosing grade = S3 (n = 18), the AUROC was 0.9016, sensitivity 94.5%, specificity 81.9% and cutoff value, 0.704 dB/cm/MHz. The AC value is useful in diagnosing fatty liver.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad , Hígado Graso , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Biopsia , Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/métodos , Hígado Graso/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA