RESUMEN
Surgical helmet systems (SHSs) have been used to decrease iatrogenic contamination to prevent periprosthetic joint infections. However, the use of SHSs has been controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate iatrogenic contamination of traditional surgical attire (TSA), SHSs, and SHSs with delayed ventilation (SHS-DV) (helmet fan not turned on until surgeon gowned and gloved). A total of 180 orthopedic surgical procedures were prospectively enrolled and randomized into one of three cohorts. The TSA cohort included any orthopedic procedures, while the SHS and SHS-DV cohorts included arthroplasty procedures. Cultures were obtained from bilateral forearms, axillae, the sternum, and face shields for SHS groups. There were 60 surgeries in each group. The rate of positive cultures was calculated for each cohort and stratified by location and type of microorganism. The positive culture rates were 15% in the TSA, 25% in the SHS, 18% in the SHS-DV cohorts. The positive swab culture rates were 6% in the TSA, 7% in the SHS, and 4% in the SHS-DV cohorts. The positive culture rate was highest from the forearms in the TSA cohort (10%), the face shield in the SHS cohort (20%), and the chest in the SHS-DV cohort (7%). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most common bacteria cultured. The overall bacterial contamination rates were similar between the TSA and the SHS cohorts, with a lower rate in the SHS-DV cohort. Waiting to initiate airflow in SHSs and treating the shields as contaminated may reduce iatrogenic contamination. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):e753-e756.].
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Vestimenta Quirúrgica , Dispositivos de Protección de la Cabeza , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/prevención & control , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Due to its high sensitivity, low cost, accessibility, and ease of use, bone scintigraphy is used in orthopedic surgery for the diagnosis and management of varied pathology. It is commonly used for insufficiency fractures, metastatic neoplasia, staging and surveillance of sarcoma, and nonaccidental trauma. It augments diagnoses, including stress or occult fractures, musculoskeletal neoplasia or infection, and chronic regional pain syndrome, in patients presenting with normal results on radiographs. Bone scan images are resistant to metal-based implant artifact, allowing effective evaluation of failed total joint prostheses. Bone scintigraphy remains an underused tool in the evaluation and management of orthopedic patients. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(1):e14-e24.].
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Enfermedades Óseas/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Cintigrafía/métodosRESUMEN
Patients presenting with soft-tissue lumps and bumps are commonly encountered by both primary care physicians and orthopaedic surgeons. Though common, the initial evaluation and management of a soft-tissue mass can be challenging for many clinicians due to the considerable overlap in the presentation of benign and malignant tumors. Furthermore, a myriad of conditions, ranging from infection to trauma, can present with a soft-tissue mass. Subsequently, the correct diagnosis is often delayed or missed which may ultimately lead to inappropriate treatment. The propose of this article is to review the fundamental elements of a successful soft-tissue mass work-up and to provide the clinician with a systematic approach to the evaluation, diagnosis and management of the patient with a soft-tissue tumor.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Biopsia/métodos , Biopsia/tendencias , Carcinoma/patología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Incidencia , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos de Atención Primaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Sarcoma/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Obturator hip dislocations with an associated osteochondral fracture of the femoral head are uncommon. The treatment of these injuries is challenging and the functional outcomes are poor. Though the injury pattern has been described previously in literature, there are few published reports regarding treatment options. This case report illustrates a novel technique for fixation and stabilization for an unusual injury involving an obturator hip dislocation and an osteochondral impaction fracture of the femoral head. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-years old African American male, involved in a motor vehicle collision, sustained an obturator dislocation of the left hip with a large posterior osteochondral fracture of the femoral head. An emergency closed reduction procedure was performed followed by a computed tomography (CT) scan of the hip joint which demonstrated a large osteochondral defect (25 x 10 mm, depth: 5 mm) of the femoral head, visualized within the weight-bearing area. Surgical intervention was planned as a fracture of the femoral head with a defect deeper than four millimeters has been shown to be a risk factor for the development of post-traumatic arthritis, often with onset of symptoms within 5 years of the date of injury. Following surgical hip dislocation, the defect of the femoral head was reconstructed with implantation of a femoral head allograft and internal fixation. At the six months follow-up, the patient could ambulate with minimal pain and without assistive devices. Radiographs demonstrated maintenance of articular congruity with no evidence of implant failure, post-traumatic arthritis or avascular necrosis. CONCLUSION: Surgical hip dislocation and reconstruction using femoral head allograft used to treat obturator hip dislocations with concomitant femoral head impaction fractures can lead to satisfactory short term functional outcomes.
RESUMEN
Humerus is a common site for malignant tumors. Advances in adjuvant therapies and reconstructive methods provide salvage of the upper limb with improved outcomes. Reports of limb salvage with total humeral replacement in extensive humeral tumors are sparse. We undertook a retrospective study of 20 patients who underwent total humeral endoprosthetic replacement as limb salvage following excision of extensile malignant tumor from 1990 to 2011. With an average followup of 42.9, functional and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Ten patients were still alive at the time of review. Mean estimated blood loss was 1131 mL and duration of surgery was 314 minutes. Deep infection was encountered in one patient requiring debridement while mechanical loosening of ulnar component was identified in one patient. Subluxation of prosthetic humeral head was noted in 3 patients. Mean active shoulder abduction was 12.5° and active flexion was 15°. Incompetence of abduction mechanism was the major determinant of poor active functional outcome. Mean elbow flexion was 103.5° with 30.5° flexion contracture in 10 patients with good and useful hand function. Average MSTS score was 71.5%. Total humeral replacement is a reliable treatment option in restoring mechanical stability and reasonable functional results without compromising patient survival, with low complication rate.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Synovial hemangioma is a developmental hamartoma of vascular tissue within the synovium; no cases involving the shoulder girdle have been described in the literature. Synovial chondromatosis is a benign condition in which synovial cells undergo metaplasia into hyaline cartilage and is also thought to infrequently affect the shoulder region. CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old female presented with left shoulder pain of 7-year duration. Magnetic resonance image displayed a 2.5 cm × 2.5 cm lesion in the anterior glenohumeral joint, with hypointense T1- and hyperintense T2-weighted signal and peripheral and septal enhancement. Arthroscopic biopsy of the synovial-appearing mass led to a histologic diagnosis of synovial hemangioma. Successful embolization was performed, and repeat arthroscopy then revealed a white consolidated mass at the subscapularis recess. After en bloc excision, histologic evaluation was consistent with synovial chondromatosis. At 6 months, she denied any pain or limitation in her shoulder. CONCLUSION: Synovial hemangioma has never before been reported to involve the shoulder region. Histologically, engorged inflammatory vessels secondary to a mass effect are identical to a hemangioma. The clinician should be aware that synovial chondromatosis or other masses may compress synovial vessels and histologically mimic a hemangioma.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with a minimum 2-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive LLIF is performed through a lateral, retroperitoneal, transpsoas approach. This procedure is characterized by the use of a tubular retractor to minimize tissue damage and real-time neuromonitoring to ensure safe passage through the psoas muscle. To date, advantages of minimal invasive LLIF, compared with open procedures, has been limited to early postoperative outcomes and complications, with the longest mean follow-up duration of 22 months. METHODS: A total of 118 patients who underwent minimally invasive LLIF with a minimum of 2 years follow-up were included in this study. Clinical outcomes were determined by using Visual Analog Score for the degree of pain (trunk or lower extremity), and Oswestry Disability Index and Short Form-12 scoring methods for patient function. Radiographic evaluations included (i) disk height; (ii) segmental coronal angulation; (iii) segmental lordotic angulation; (iv) Cobb angle; (v) cage subsidence; and (vi) fusion status. Data were statistically tested using either paired Students t test or Wilcoxon matched-pair test. Significance level was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: We found that (i) the Visual Analog Score for pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and the physical components summary, but not the mental components summary of Short Form-12 improved significantly at the follow-up; (ii) disk height, coronal angulation, and lordotic angulation at each level and the Cobb angle were restored at the statistically significant extent; (iii) successful fusion was achieved in 209 levels (88%); and (iv) transient thigh pain was the most frequent complication seen in 36% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the efficacy of minimally invasive LLIF in improvements of clinical and radiographic features.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Electromiografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Músculos Psoas/cirugía , Radiografía , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
⤠Pathologic fracture of the proximal part of the femur resulting from metastatic disease causes severe pain and an inability to walk. Surgical stabilization can be challenging because of bone loss resulting from the underlying metastatic lesions, the potential for major blood loss, and the poor health of the patient.⤠The goal of surgical treatment is the creation of a stable construct to allow early weight-bearing.⤠Pathologic femoral neck fractures secondary to metastases are best managed with arthroplasty.⤠The treatment of intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures is more controversial. Surgical stabilization may be performed with cephalomedullary nailing or arthroplasty. The choice of implant and operative technique is dependent on careful consideration of multiple factors, including the patient's life span, the type of tumor, the perceived response to other therapies, the need for adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy, the location and number of metastatic lesions, and the degree of bone involvement.⤠While the potential for complications is high, surgical stabilization of the proximal part of the femur decreases pain and improves function.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Neoplasias Femorales/cirugía , Fracturas Espontáneas/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Fracturas del Fémur/patología , Neoplasias Femorales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Femorales/patología , Fracturas Espontáneas/etiología , Fracturas Espontáneas/patología , HumanosRESUMEN
Lumbosacral interbody fusion may be indicated to treat degenerative disc disease at L5-S1, instability or spondylolisthesis at that level, and severe neural foraminal stenosis resulting from loss of disc space height. In addition, L5-S1 interbody fusion may provide anterior support to a long posterior fusion construct and help offset the stresses experienced by the distal-most screws. There are 3 well-established techniques for L5-S1 interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Each of these has advantages and pitfalls. A more recently described axial transsacral technique, utilizing the presacral corridor, may represent a minimally invasive approach to obtaining lumbosacral interbody arthrodesis. Biomechanical studies demonstrate that the stiffness of the axial rod is comparable to existing fixation devices, suggesting that, biomechanically, it may be a good implant for obtaining lumbosacral interbody fusion. Clinical studies have demonstrated good early results with the use of the axial transsacral approach in obtaining lumbosacral interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, and below long posterior fusion constructs. The technique is exacting and complications can be major, including rectal perforation and fistula, loss of correction, and pseudarthrosis.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral , Región Lumbosacra/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral , Tornillos Óseos , Humanos , Región Lumbosacra/patología , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Espondilolistesis/diagnóstico , Espondilolistesis/cirugíaRESUMEN
Metastatic acetabular disease can be severely painful and may result in loss of mobility. Initial management may consist of diphosphonates, narcotic analgesics, radiation therapy, protected weight bearing, cementoplasty, and radiofrequency ablation. Patients with disease affecting large weight-bearing regions of the acetabulum and with impending failure of the hip joint are unlikely to gain much relief from nonsurgical treatment and interventional procedures. The profound osteopenia of the acetabulum, limited healing potential of the fracture, and projected patient life span and function necessitate surgical techniques that provide immediate stable fixation to reduce pain and restore ambulatory function. Current reconstructive procedures, including cemented total hip arthroplasty, the saddle or periacetabular endoprosthesis, and porous tantalum implants, are based on the quality of remaining acetabular bone as well as the patient's level of function and general health. Well-executed acetabular reconstructions can provide durable hip joints with good pain relief and function.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Acetábulo/patología , Algoritmos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Biopsia con Aguja , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XAsunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Desbridamiento/métodos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Reoperación/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Significance of the thrombophilic abnormalities in development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been studies with total hip arthroplasty and acute traumatic spinal cord injury. However, their role as risk factors for VTE in elective spinal surgery remains to be determined. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To determine the role of thrombophilic abnormalities in the development of pulmonary embolism (PE) following elective spine surgery. METHODS: Case and control groups were created in patients who had undergone elective spinal surgery for degenerative conditions. The PE group comprised 12 patients whose post-operative course was complicated by development of PE. The control group included 12 patients with an uneventful post-operative course. Demographic data including age, gender and surgical procedures were matched between the PE group and the control group. Both groups were evaluated for thrombophilic and hypofibrinolytic risk factors at 3 months post-operatively or later. Blood tests were performed to measure fasting serum homocysteine, antithrombin III, and protein C. Molecular genetic testing was conducted for detection of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G/4G, and prothrombin 3 UTR gene mutations. RESULTS: Heterozygous mutation (G20201A) of prothrombin was detected in two patients (16.7%) in the PE group, whereas no such mutation was noted in the control group. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G/4G homozygous mutation was seen in three in the PE group and two in the control group. Of homocysteine, antithrombin III and protein C, only one patient in each group showed abnormal levels of homocysteine. In total, there half of the patients in the PE group had at least one thrombophilic abnormality, whereas three (25%) patients showed such abnormality in the control group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the involvement of thrombophilic abnormalities, especially the heterozygous G20201A mutation, in the development of PE in patients undergoing elective spinal surgery.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To present the technique, radiographic, and clinical outcomes of a series of patients who underwent a novel method for revision L5-S1 interbody fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pseudoarthrosis at L5-S1 is a relatively common problem after long fusion to the sacrum. Revision approach to L5-S1 for cage or graft removal by anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, or transforaminal interbody fusion is challenging and potentially dangerous which makes salvage by a posterior reamed transacral technique appealing. METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic pseudoarthrosis at L5-S1, who underwent posterior reamed fluoroscopically guided fusion were identified over a 3-year period. Operative notes, medical records, preoperative and postoperative plain radiographs, computed tomography scans, Visual Analog Scores (VAS) (lower extremity and low back) preoperatively, and at most recent follow-up were studied. RESULTS: Ten patients (age, 53±2.8 y) with prior lumbar spinal operations (mean, 3.5±0.6) met the inclusion criteria. Prior procedures at L5-S1 were anterior lumbar interbody fusion (n=4), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (n=3), and posterolateral fusion (n=3). Mean Meyerding grade was 1.41 (range, 0-4). Reaming was performed between the S1 and S2 (n=9) or S2 and S3 (n=1) nerve roots and allowed fragmentation/removal of polyetheretherketone interbody grafts (n=3) or femoral ring allografts (n=3). Transacral Harms cage (n=8) or autograft (n=1) was passed through the reamed channel or a carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone directly into the interspace (n=1). VAS scores lower extremity (P=0.003) and low back (P=0.001) were improved at a mean follow-up of 13.5±3.6 months. No neurologic sequelae occurred and solid fusion was achieved in 9/10 (90%). CONCLUSIONS: We report a series of patients who underwent a novel revision technique for symptomatic lumbosacral pseudoarthrosis. Despite the small numbers in this cohort, a salvage technique is presented that permitted fusion as confirmed by computed tomography scan and improved VAS scores in the majority of patients. The data suggest that this technique should be considered as an alternative to the revision anterior or posterior approaches to L5-S1 and merits further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Seudoartrosis/cirugía , Sacro/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seudoartrosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagen , Sacro/lesiones , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of surgical experience on the efficiency of lumbar discectomy in open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is limited knowledge about the efficiency of discectomy among surgeons. As a first study, we are evaluating the effect of surgical experience on it. METHODS: Manual and powered discectomies were randomized and performed by 3 attending spine surgeons and 2 clinical spine fellows. Each discectomy procedure was analyzed for the area of complete endplate preparation, total elapsed time, and number of instrument passes. The surface area of discectomy at each endplate was measured utilizing digital imaging and the appropriate software. For the purpose of the analysis, the superior and the inferior endplates were divided into ipsilateral and contralateral halves, and each half was further divided into ventral and dorsal quadrants. Each quadrant was analyzed in a blinded manner by 2 observers. RESULTS: A total of 40 discectomies were performed on 9 fresh-frozen cadaveric torsos between the levels T12 and S1. A powered discectomy device was used in levels 9 and 11 by the attendings. Manual discectomy was performed in 11 levels by the spine fellows and 9 by the spine attendings. No significant difference was observed between the spine fellows and spine attendings when the manual instruments were used (P = 0.924). However, the spine attending surgeon group had a significantly increased total area of discectomy compared with the fellows (P = 0.003). No significant difference was observed between the groups when instrument passes or the total elapsed time were compared either utilizing the manual or the powered technique. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a satisfactory discectomy may be performed by surgeons with relatively less surgical experience in the transforaminal approach using a powered discectomy device.
Asunto(s)
Discectomía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral , Cadáver , Discectomía/instrumentación , Discectomía/métodos , Becas , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/ultraestructura , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Ortopedia , Competencia Profesional , Posición Prona , Distribución Aleatoria , Método Simple Ciego , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Two-stage reimplantation, with interval antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer, is the preferred treatment of prosthetic knee joint infections. In medically compromised hosts with prior failed surgeries, the outcomes are poor. Articulating spacers in such patients render the knee unstable; static spacers have risks of dislocation and extensor mechanism injury. We examined 58 infected total knee arthroplasties with extensive bone and soft tissue loss, treated with resection arthroplasty and intramedullary tibiofemoral rod and antibiotic-laden cement spacer. Thirty-seven patients underwent delayed reimplantation. Most patients (83.8%) were free from recurrent infection at mean follow-up of 29.4 months. Reinfection occurred in 16.2%, which required debridement. Twenty-one patients with poor operative risks remained with the spacer for 11.4 months. All patients, during spacer phase, had brace-free ambulation with simulated tibiofemoral fusion, without bone loss or loss of limb length.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/instrumentación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Cementos para Huesos , Clavos Ortopédicos , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Desbridamiento , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Fijadores Internos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/microbiología , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Radiografía , Recurrencia , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: A discectomy study on human cadaveric lumbar spine. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of manual versus powered discectomies using a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To achieve fusion, removal of nucleus tissue and endplate cartilage is essential for preparation of the interbody space. Quantitatively, it has been established that maximal structural graft or implant coverage of the endplates are of critical importance for fusion and subsidence prevention. METHODS: Twenty levels underwent conventional manual discectomy (group 1) and 20 underwent powered discectomy (group 2) by 3 attending spine surgeons and 2 spine fellows. Each discectomy procedure was analyzed for time and number of instrument passes. Postoperatively, each level was measured grossly and digitally for percentage of appropriate discectomy and endplate preparation. For analysis, the superior and inferior endplate surfaces were divided into ipsilateral and contralateral halves, and ventral and dorsal halves. Each quadrant was then analyzed separately. RESULTS: A total of 40 discectomies on 9 fresh-frozen cadaver torsos between T12-L1 and L5-S1 were performed in this study. Within each quadrant, the discectomized area was greater in group 2 than in group 1. The largest difference was observed on the contralateral ventral quadrant, group 1 (38.2%) and group 2 (52.4%), respectively (P = 0.012). Average procedure time was also significantly less in group 2 versus group 1 (P = 0.009). Group 2 had an overall increased discectomy and appropriately prepared endplates (46.8%) compared with group 1 (36.3%) (P = 0.025). Significantly fewer instrument passes were seen in group 2 versus group 1 (P < 0.001). Two iatrogenic endplate fractures were observed in group 1 and 1 in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to a significantly superior discectomy efficacy, the group 2 had significantly fewer instrument passes and shorter procedure times. In vivo studies are required to further evaluate the differences and cost benefit of this innovative tool.
Asunto(s)
Discectomía/instrumentación , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Cadáver , Discectomía/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Radiografía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Acetabular reconstruction after resection of advanced periacetabular metastatic lesion is a complex undertaking. Harrington (J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1981;63-653) described a reconstructive technique in class III- and IV-type resections using threaded Steinmann pins and acrylic cement. This technique, although effective for pain relief and restoration of function, is traditionally considered when patient's life expectancy is short because of its questionable durability. A 17-year follow-up of our patient with plasma cell cytoma of the ilium and acetabulum, treated with a modification of the above technique after intralesional curettage, showed no mechanical failure or loosening. This suggests that the construct can be durable where there is no recurrence of disease and can also be a valuable asset in selected nontumor cases in adjunct to contemporary techniques.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/instrumentación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Clavos Ortopédicos , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Prótesis de Cadera , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas/cirugía , Artralgia/prevención & control , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Ilion/diagnóstico por imagen , Ilion/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Recuperación de la Función , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Degenerative lumbar scoliosis is a coronal deviation of the spine that is prevalent in the elderly population. Although the etiology is unclear, it is associated with progressive and asymmetric degeneration of the disc, facet joints, and other structural spinal elements typically leading to neural element compression. Clinical presentation varies and is frequently associated with axial back pain and neurogenic claudication. Indications for treatment include pain, neurogenic symptoms, and progressive cosmetic deformity. Non-operative treatment includes physical conditioning and exercise, pharmacological agents for pain control, and use of orthotics and invasive modalities like epidural and facet injections. Operative treatment should be contemplated after multi-factorial and multidisciplinary evaluation of the risks and the benefits. Options include decompression, instrumented stabilization with posterior or anterior fusion, correction of deformity, or a combination of these that are tailored to each patient. Incidence of perioperative complications is substantial and must be considered when deciding appropriate operative treatment. The primary goal of surgical treatment is to provide pain relief and to improve the quality of life with minimum risk of complications.