Impact of variants of SARS-CoV-2 on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 can lead to several types of complications during pregnancy. Variant surges are associated with different severities of disease. Few studies have compared the clinical consequences of specific variants on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Our goal was to evaluate and compare disease severity in pregnant women and obstetrical or neonatal complications between variants of SARS-CoV-2 that have circulated in France over a two-year period (2020-2022). METHOD: This retrospective cohort study included all pregnant women with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (positive naso-pharyngeal RT-PCR test) from March 12, 2020 to January 31, 2022, in three tertiary maternal referral obstetric units in the Paris metropolitan area, France. We collected clinical and laboratory data for mothers and newborns from patients' medical records. Variant identification was either available following sequencing or extrapolated from epidemiological data. RESULTS: There were 234/501 (47%) Wild Type (WT), 127/501 (25%) Alpha, 98/501 (20%) Delta, and 42/501 (8%) Omicron. No significative difference was found regarding two composite adverse outcomes. There were significantly more hospitalizations for severe pneumopathy in Delta variant than WT, Alpha and Omicron respectively (63% vs 26%, 35% and 6%, p<0.001), more frequent oxygen administration (23% vs 12%, 10% and 5%, p = 0,001) and more symptomatic patients at the time of testing with Delta and WT (75% and 71%) versus Alpha and Omicron variants (55% and 66% respectively, p<0.01). Stillbirth tended to be associated with variants (p = 0.06): WT 1/231 (<1%) vs 4/126 (3%), 3/94 (3%), and 1/35 (3%) in Alpha, Delta and Omicron cases respectively. No other difference was found. CONCLUSION: Although the Delta variant was associated with more severe disease in pregnant women, we found no difference regarding neonatal and obstetrical outcomes. Neonatal and obstetrical specific severity may be due to mechanisms other than maternal ventilatory and general infection.

[Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of early-stage ovarian cancer: A systematic review of the literature]. / Place du ganglion sentinelle dans la prise en charge du cancer de l'ovaire de stade précoce : revue de la littérature.

The initial management of early-stage ovarian cancer consists of staging surgery including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The use of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure in this setting may decrease the morbidity associated with this surgery. The objective of this review was to evaluate the feasibility of the SLN procedure in ovarian cancer diagnosed at an early stage by comparing the different techniques used and their accuracy. A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov for articles in English or French about the SLN technique in ovarian cancer. Ten studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 179 patients. The main tracers used were Technetium-99m, indocyanine green, and patent blue, and the most common site of injection was the proper ovarian and unfundibulopelvic ligaments. The overall detection rate was 87.7%. Of the small number of cases of lymph node metastasis reported, the SLN procedure had a sensitivity of 90.9% and a negative predictive value of 98.8%. The sentinel node procedure appears to be feasible and safe and could be reliable in determining the lymph node status of patients with early-stage ovarian cancer.

[Epithelial ovarian cancers and minimally invasive cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review]. / Cancers épithéliaux de l'ovaire et chirurgie de cytoréduction par voie mini-invasive après chimiothérapie néoadjuvante : revue systématique de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is associated with high mortality and often managed first with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by debulking surgery. Laparoscopic surgery with or without robotic assistance (Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS)) may represent a beneficial option for these patients. The objective of this literature review is to clarify the place of MIS in the management of advanced EOC for selected patients. METHOD: Pubmed, Cochrane and Clinicaltrials.gov online databases were used for this review, to select English or French published articles. RESULTS: We selected 11 original articles published between 2015 and 2020, 6 of which compared MIS and laparotomy. Among these 11 studies, 8 were retrospective cohorts, 2 were phase II trials, and one was a case-control study. In total, there were 3721 patients, of which 854 (23%) were treated with MIS. The robotic assistance was used with 224 patients (26%) of those MIS patients. Looking specifically at MIS patients, the laparoconversion rate was 9.5%, the rate of complete resection (CC-0) was 83.4%. Finally, the MIS complication rate was 1% intraoperatively and 12% postoperatively. The rate of complete resection, postoperative complication, as well as overall survival (OS) were comparable between patients treated with MIS or laparotomy. One study found an improved disease-free survival (DFS) in MIS versus laparotomy (18 months versus 12 months; P=0.027). CONCLUSION: MIS seems feasible, effective, and reliable in comparison to laparotomy for the completion of cytoreductive surgery after NACT without compromising oncological safety. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the role of MIS in advanced EOC.

Systematic cavity shaving: modifications of breast cancer management and long-term local recurrence, a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The status of the surgical margins of lumpectomy is one of the most important determinants of local recurrence in breast cancer. Systematically practicing cavity margin resection is debated but may avoid surgical re-excision and allow the diagnosis of multifocality. METHODS: This multicentric retrospective study included 294 patients who underwent conservative management of breast cancer with 2-4 systematic cavity shavings. Clinico-biological characteristics of the patients were collected in order to establish whether surgical management was modified by systematic cavity shaving. Local recurrence rate with a long-term follow up of minimum 4 years was evaluated. RESULTS: Cavity shaving avoided the need for re-excision in 25% of cases and helped in the diagnosis of multifocality in 8% of cases. Resection volume was not associated with usefulness of the cavity shaving. No predictive factor of positive cavity shaving was found. The rate of local recurrence was 3.7% and appeared in a median time of 3 years and 8 month. Only one quarter of the patients with local recurrence had initially positive lumpectomy margins but negative cavity shaving. DISCUSSION: Systematic cavity shaving can change surgical management of conservative treatment. No specific target population for useful cavity shaving was found, such that we recommend utilising it systematically.