Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment.

INTRODUCTION: Ligament balancing is essential to the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal method of alignment remains a controversial issue. The primary objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of TKA between functional and adjusted mechanical alignment techniques. The secondary objectives were to compare bone resection, robotic alignment, and radiological assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control series comparing TKA performed with functional alignment (FA) and adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Sixty-four FA subjects were matched with 64 aMA controls. These two groups were matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), surgeon, and type of frontal deformity. Both surgical procedures were performed using the MAKO® haptic robotic system. Functional scores (Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS)) were measured at the final postoperative follow-up. A radiographic evaluation was performed at the same time. RESULTS: Mean FJS were respectively 63.4 ± 25.1 [0-100] and 51.2 ± 31.8 [0-100] in FA versus aMA group (p = 0.034). Mean OKS were respectively 40.8 ± 6.3 [21-48] and 34.9 ± 11.8 [3-48] in FA versus aMA group (p = 0.027). Mean KSS were respectively 184.9 ± 17.0 [126-200] and 175.6 ± 23.1 [102-200] in FA versus aMA group (p = 0.02). The main residual symptom was "none" for 73.0% versus 57.8%, "instability" for 6.4% versus 21.9%, "Pain" for 19.1% versus 12.5%, and "effusion" for 1.6% and 7.8% respectively for FA and aMA group (p = 0.016). There were 4 complications in the FA group versus 5 in the aMA group (p > 0.999). Mean postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) robotic assessment were respectively 177.3° ± 2.0 [172-180] and 178.2° ± 2.0 [173-180] for FA and aMA group (p = 0.018). The median difference between HKA robotic and HKA radiological was -3.0° (IQR = 3.0; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: With greater residual deformity and without release, functional alignment showed a statistically significantly better short-term clinical outcome than adjusted mechanical alignment. This difference may not be clinically significant.

How the hip-spine relationship influences total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Motion in the spine, pelvis and hips which make up the spinopelvic femoral complex (SPFC) implies mechanical relationships that help maintain trunk balance and optimize hip functionThe aim of this study was to understand the physiology of the SPFC and evaluate the dysfunctions of the SPFC and their implications for total hip arthroplasty considering the hip-spine relationship. METHODS: A review of relevant and comprehensive studies on this subject is reported in order to highlight a pathophysiology that integrates the description of the evaluations of the spine-pelvic and hip parameters and recommendations for the kinematic planning of the THA procedure. The primary objective was to determine which type of hip-spine relationship has the highest risk for THA complications and to become proficient in selecting the priority surgical intervention when both the hip and spine are affected. Finally, this review attempted to assist hip surgeons with surgical technique, tools, implant selection, and goals of planning a THA that requires personalized kinematic alignment. Determine the influence of THA on these kinematics and the effect of stiffness of the lumbopelvic complex on the risk of THA failure. RESULTS: When a person sits, the pelvis goes into retroversion and the acetabulum opens forward. This frees the femoral head and neck to allow hip flexion. The opposite - pelvic anteversion - occurs when a person stands. When pelvic mobility is limited, the hip must increase its range of motion to accommodate these posture changes. Disturbances in spinal and pelvic kinematics lead to abnormal hip function, which may contribute to complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). CONCLUSION: A precise evaluation of the parameters governing the SPFC must be taken into account in order to best optimize the placement and choice of THA implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Radiological signs of femoroacetabular impingement are linked to pelvic version in asymptomatic subjects.

INTRODUCTION: With the recent interest in hip-spine relationship, the link between femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and the lumbar-pelvic-femoral complex (LPFC) appears decisive. The objectives of this study were (1) to compare the pelvic version, as well as (2) all the parameters of the LPFC between two populations of healthy subjects, comparing those with radiological signs of FAI to those without and finally, (3) to evaluate the LPFC parameters according to the type of FAI. HYPOTHESIS: Asymptomatic subjects with radiological signs of FAI had superior pelvic anteversion. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This retrospective study was based on a prospective cohort of 118 voluntary asymptomatic patients including 62 men (52.5%) with a mean age of 25.6 years±4.4 (19-39). The following parameters: pelvic version (PV), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), hip flexion, intrinsic (IER) and extrinsic (EER) extension reserve were measured using EOS imaging™ in the reference standing position and the lunge position. The radiological signs of FAI (cam, pincer, mixed) were identified on these acquisitions then separated into 2 groups. The first was the group presenting with one or more images of FAI (FAI+) and the second group with no images of FAI (FAI-). RESULTS: There were 143 hips in the FAI+ group compared to 93 hips in the FAI- group. There were 36.4% cams and 45% pincers. With an average of 9.08°±7.81 (-11.0; 27.0) versus 12.33°±8.94 (-5.0; 55.0), the PV was significantly lower (p=0.022) in the FAI+ group compared to the FAI- group. A post-hoc power analysis on the primary outcome (PV) confirmed sufficient power (1-ß=0.809). Compared to the FAI- group, the cam group presented a significantly lower IER and EER (respectively p=0.014 and p=0.047). The comparative analysis between the FAI- and pincer groups found a significant difference in PI (p=0.001), PV (p<0.001), IER (p=0.017) and hip flexion (p<0.001), SS in lunge position (p=0.031) and EER (p=0.039). CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic subjects with radiographic signs of FAI present with weak pelvic version when standing. This pelvic hyper-anteversion is mainly found in the event of a radiological pincer sign. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.

The influence of the sacral slope on pelvic kinematics and clinical manifestations in femoroacetabular impingement.

INTRODUCTION: The radiological study of the sagittal alignment of the spine in static and dynamic positions has allowed a better understanding of the clinical results of total hip prostheses. According to the Roussouly classification, the sacral slope in a standing position characterizes the patient with a stiff spine (less than 35̊) or a flexible spine (greater than 35̊). The objectives of this study were to compare, in a population of patients operated on for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), firstly, the kinematics of the lumbar-pelvic-femoral complex and secondly, the clinical presentation depending on whether the spine is stiff or flexible. HYPOTHESIS: Patients with stiff spines (SS<35̊) were "hip users" and had less ability to compensate for their hip pathology. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This prospective and comparative multicenter study was conducted with patients operated on arthroscopically for FAI between 2020 and 2021. All patients included received preoperative EOS imaging of the lower limbs and spine, in standing and seated positions. The following parameters were measured: pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), and sacral slope (SS), as well as dynamic parameters (intrinsic mobility of the hip: delta standing/sitting femoral sacral angle, and of the pelvis: delta standing/sitting sacral slope). The functional result was evaluated at 1 year. RESULTS: In the stiff spine group, 62 patients were included versus 138 in the flexible spine group. The mean follow-up was 15.1±3.3 months (9.2-24.3). Nineteen patients were lost to follow-up and there were 2 revisions for iterative arthroscopy. Intrinsic pelvic mobility and intrinsic hip mobility were 16̊±13.5 (-12; 44) and 44.5̊±28.5 (-9; 99) respectively in the stiff spine group. In the flexible spine group, these same measurements were 22̊±11.5 (-30; 45) and 29.7̊±22.7 (-33; 82) respectively. In the stiff spine group, the symptoms occurred at a significantly younger age: 28.3 years±9.5 (18-51) versus 31 years±8 (18-54) (p=0.017). DISCUSSION: The sacral slope is a determining factor in the kinematics of impingement and the appearance of symptoms. The sacral slope helps define the concept of a "hip user" in symptomatic FAI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) for talar body fractures: systematic review.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to systematically assess the available literature on the technique and results of arthroscopic reduction - internal fixation for displaced fractures of the talar body. METHODS: A systematic review was made of the available literature on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library database, including studies from January 1985 to July 2021. The literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. Surgical technique, perioperative management, clinical outcome scores, radiographic outcomes, and complication rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 37 articles reviewed, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies included reported on the results of 22 patients. No complications were observed in any of the patients treated. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies had too many weaknesses to allow the pooling of data or meta-analysis. However, percutaneous arthroscopic talar internal fixation appears to be a good option for uncomplicated displaced intra-articular talar fractures. Appropriately powered randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-ups are required to confirm the effectiveness of this technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, a systematic review of Level IV studies.

A percutaneous ultrasound-guided iliotibial band release technique reduces surgical time and costs compared to an endoscopic technique.

PURPOSE: External snapping hip is caused by the iliotibial band snapping from the greater trochanter during hip movement. The aim of this study was to compare a technique of ultrasound-guided iliotibial band release versus a similar endoscopic technique. METHODS: An anatomical study was performed on 10 cadavers i.e. 20 hips. The same operator performed ultrasound-guided and endoscopic iliotibial band release on either side of each specimen. An independent operator performed an open control to verify the outcome measures. The primary outcome was iliotibial cutting percentage, defined as the ratio of the transversal cut distance and the width of the iliotibial at the most prominent portion of the great trochanter. Secondary outcomes included nerve injuries. The surgical time was assessed and disposable medical supplies costs were estimated. RESULTS: The average cutting percentage was 95% ± 8 by ultrasound, compared with 91% ± 11 by endoscopy (n.s.). No iatrogenic lesions were found, particularly nerve damage. The average duration of the ultrasound procedure was 12.3 minutes ± 6 compared to 21 minutes ± 10.7 for endoscopy (p=0.04), with a 3-fold decrease between the first and last procedure, regardless of the technique. The ultrasound procedure was 3 times less expensive in terms of disposable medical supplies (120.5€ versus 353.5€). CONCLUSION: This technique of ultrasound-guided iliotibial band release appears to be as effective and safe as a similar endoscopic technique. The surgical time is reasonable for a surgeon trained in ultrasound, with lower disposable supplies costs. A comparative clinical study is further needed to assess the actual benefits of each technique.

Less than 1.5cm shortening in clavicle midshaft fracture has long-term functional impact.

INTRODUCTION: Mediolateral shortening is a risk in treatment of clavicle shaft fracture, and can lead to scapular dyskinesis and shoulder dysfunction. Many studies advocated surgical treatment if shortening exceeds 15mm. HYPOTHESIS: Clavicle shaft shortening of less than 15mm has negative impact on shoulder function at more than 1 year's follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control comparative study was performed, with assessment by an independent observer. Clavicle length was measured on frontal radiographs showing both clavicles, and the ratio between the healthy and affected sides was calculated. Functional impact was assessed on Quick-DASH. Scapular dyskinesis was analyzed by global antepulsion on Kibler's classification. In total, 217 files were retrieved for a 6-year period. Clinical assessment was performed for 20 patients managed non-operatively and 20 patients managed by locking plate fixation, at a mean 37.5months' follow-up (range: 12-69months). RESULTS: Mean Quick-DASH score was significantly higher in the non-operated group: 11.363 [0-50] versus 2.045 [0-11.36] (p=0.0092). Pearson ρ correlation between percentage shortening and Quick-DASH score was -0.3956 [95% CI: -0.6295; -0.0959] (p=0.012). Clavicle length ratio differed significantly between groups: operated group, +2.2% [-5.1%; +17%] for 0.34cm; non-operated group, -8.28% [-17.3%; -0.7%] for 1.38cm (p<0.0001). Shoulder dyskinesis was significantly more frequent non-operated patients: 10 versus 3 (p=0.018). A threshold of 1.3cm shortening was found for functional impact. CONCLUSION: Restoring scapuloclavicular triangle length is an important aim in management of clavicular fracture. Surgery by locking plate fixation is therefore to be recommended in case of>8% radiological shortening (1.3cm) to avoid medium- and long-term complications in shoulder function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case-control study.

Influence of kinematics of the lumbopelvic complex in hip arthroplasty dislocation: from assessment to recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: In total hip arthroplasty (THA), misplacement of the implant can provide instability. Adequate orientation of the acetabular cup is a challenge due to variations in inter-individual anatomy and kinematics of the pelvis in everyday life. The aim of this study was to characterize the kinematic factors influencing the risk of dislocation in order to give recommendations for optimal placement of the cup. We hypothesized that the lack of pelvic adaptation would influence the risk of prosthetic instability and motivate adapted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with primary unilateral THA were included in a matched case-control study. Seventy-four patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) consisting of patients with postoperative THA dislocation (37 patients) and group 2 (G2), without episodes of dislocation within two years postoperatively (37 patients). In both groups, spino-pelvic parameters and cup orientation were measured in standing and sitting positions with EOS® X-ray imaging and compared to each other between 12 and 24 months post-operatively. RESULTS: No significant difference between the two groups was found for static parameters. In a sitting position, a lack of pelvic retroversion with a significant lower variation in sacral slope was observed in group 1 (8.0° ± 9.3 for G1 versus 14.7° ± 6.2 for G2, p < 0.01). Twenty-two (59%) patients with THA instability had sacral slope variations of less than 10° versus eight (21% of patients) with stable THA (p < 0.01). Cup orientation in the Lewinnek safe zone was not significantly different (59% vs 67%, p = 0.62), and the spino-pelvic parameters and cup orientation measured did not change between the standing and sitting positions. However, only 14 (37%) cups in G1 were in the functional safe zone versus 24 (67%) in G2 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Static parameters of the sagittal spinopelvic balance have a low predictive value for prosthetic instability. Dynamic analysis is essential. Kinematic parameters must be taken into account in determining the ideal position of the cup or stem. Stiffness with locked standing or sitting pelvis must be integrated in order to determine a personalized safe zone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (matched case-control study).

Image-based robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach allows a better orientation of the acetabular cup and a better restitution of the centre of rotation than a conventional procedure.

PURPOSE: The aim was to investigate the contribution of robotics assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) through direct anterior approach (DAA) in improving radiographic precision, functional results and complications. METHODS: This retrospective study compared 100 primary conventional THA (cTHA) to 50 primary robotic THA (rTHA) through DAA. All cups were placed with the objective of having no anterior overhang while respecting the safe zones (SZ). Radiographic analysis included cup inclination and anteversion, vertical and horizontal changes of the rotation centre (ΔVCOR, ΔHCOR), acetabular and femoral offset. SZ were 30-50° of inclination and 10-30° of anteversion. Outliers were defined as medial displacement of the COR > 5 mm, vertical displacement of the COR > 3 mm superiorly. Harris hip score (HHS) and complications were compared at one year of follow-up. RESULTS: The robotic cups were better oriented with 98% in the global SZ versus 68% in the cTHA group (p = 0.0002). The COR was on average better restored in the robotic group in both the horizontal and vertical planes (Δ HCOR = - 5.0 ± 5.0 vs - 3.4 ± 4.9, p = 0.03; Δ VCOR = 1.6 ± 3.3 vs 0.2 ± 2.7, p = 0.04). There were fewer outliers in the rTHA group concerning VCOR (28% versus 10%, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in HHS and complication rate at one year. CONCLUSION: The use of robotics for THA by DAA provided an advantage in controlling the orientation of the cup and the restoration of its rotation centre. Thanks to the 3D planning on CT scan, it allowed to respect the thresholds while avoiding the anterior overhangs.

Does acetabular robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty with femoral navigation improve clinical outcomes at 1-year post-operative? A case-matched propensity score study comparing 98 robotic-assisted versus 98 manual implantation hip arthroplasties.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the optimization of implant positioning, the clinical benefit of the use of robotic assistance during THA remains uncertain. In this case-control study (robotic versus manual technique) we made a retrospective short-term comparison of: (1) the functional results, (2) the complications, (3) and the influence of radiological symmetrization of the hips on the functional result. HYPOTHESIS: The use of a robotic arm improved the functional results of a THA. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A retrospective case-control study was performed, including patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis who underwent a robotic arm-assisted THA (THA-R). The controls (THA-C) were matched according to age, sex, body mass index and surgical approach. The Harris (HHS), Oxford (OHS) and Forgotten Joint (FJS) scores were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. At each review, complications were categorized into minor events, revision surgery with and without implant change. Radiographic analysis was performed on weight-bearing images of the pelvis 3 months postoperatively. The objective of the surgery was symmetrization of the THA in the contralateral healthy hip. For each measured parameter of the hip joint center of rotation (COR), global offset (GO) and articular leg length discrepancy (aLLD), the difference between the two sides corresponding to the delta symmetrization was compared. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included in the THA-R group and matched to 98 controls in the THA-C group. At 1 year postoperatively, the FJS and OHS scores were statistically higher in the THA-R group, respectively 82.1±22.3 [8.3; 100] and 40.8±8.8 [6; 48] vs. 71.2±27.8 [0; 100] and 38.1±9.7 [12; 48] in the THA-C group (p=0.004 and p=0.043). There was no difference in HHS (THA-R: 85.9±15.8 [31; 100] vs. THA-C: 85.8±13.3 [49-100] (p=0.962)). The implant revision rate at 1 year was significantly higher in the THA-C group (0% vs. 5.1% (p=0.025)). There was no difference in the reoperation without component exchange despite 3 dislocations (3.1%) in the THA-R group (5 (5.1%) vs. 9 (9.2%) (p=0.273)). The rate of abarticular pathologies (ilio-psoas irritation and greater trochanteric bursitis) was higher in the THA-C group (10 (10.8%) vs. 2 (2%) (p=0.016). Robotic acetabular assistance allowed a significantly better restitution of the horizontal position (THA-R: 1mm±4.8 [-11.7; 12.6] vs. THA-C: 4.1mm±7 [-29.6; 28] (p=0.0005)) and vertical COR (THA-R: 0.5mm±3.1 [-6; 8.3] vs. THA-C: 2mm±4.1 [-6; 14.6] (p=0.0068)). Navigated assistance of the femur did not significantly optimize the restitution of the Global Offset (THA-R: +2mm±6.4 [-16.4; 27.6] vs. THA-C: +0.5mm±7 .7 [-34; 30.2] (p=0.145)), or lower limb length (THA-R: +1.1mm±5 [-8.2; 13.5] vs. THA-C: +0.3mm±6 [-14.1; 22.5] (p=0.344). The FJS was statistically correlated with the restoration of the symmetry of the COR and the aLLD. A post-hoc power analysis confirmed sufficient potency (1-ß=0.85). CONCLUSION: Robotic acetabular assistance combined with femoral navigation improves clinical outcomes of THAs with fewer short-term complications. The precision of the positioning of the implants, optimized by the computer-assisted surgery system, is correlated with the missed joint score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective case-control study.

The impact of WALANT anesthesia and office-based settings on patient satisfaction after carpal tunnel release: A patient reported outcome study.

HYPOTHESIS: Wide awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) and office-based procedures are used in hand surgery. There are limited literature data on patient satisfaction when comparing methods of anesthesia and location of surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-surgeon study with patient reported satisfaction in three groups. We compared patient impressions of anesthesia type; WALANT vs locoregional anesthesia plus sedation. We also compared satisfaction in three surgery settings; office surgery vs hospital ambulatory minor procedure room vs main operating room. Group 1 office surgery patients had ultrasound guided surgery with WALANT. Group 2 main operating room surgery patients also had ultrasound guided surgery with WALANT. Group 3 main operating room patients had endoscopic surgery with sedation and a tourniquet. Each group had 30 patients with a minimum follow up of 2 months. We measured overall satisfaction, satisfaction with the organization of care, satisfaction with the administration of anesthesia, and satisfaction with the quality of anesthesia. We also collected secondary data on the resolution of the neuropathic symptoms. RESULTS: Procedures performed in an office-based setting showed higher rates of patient satisfaction when compared to the ambulatory day surgery setting. WALANT anesthesia also showed significantly higher rates of patient satisfaction on a numerical analog scale when compared to sedation based on, irrespective of the surgical setting. All patients had resolution of their neuropathic symptoms regardless of the technique performed. CONCLUSION: We found that carpal tunnel releases performed in an office-based setting produces superior patient satisfaction. WALANT anesthesia also provides improved patient satisfaction when compared to sedation and monitoring techniques, irrespective of the surgical setting and location. Carpal tunnel release with WALANT in an office-based setting is better for patient comfort and satisfaction, with no evidence of lesser clinical outcomes at a short term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Varus stem positioning does not affect long-term functional outcome in cementless anatomical total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Varus positioning is the most common femoral malposition in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We compared the long-term outcomes of an anatomical cementless femoral stem positioned in varus versus neutral alignment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed for all patients receiving a cementless anatomical femoral stem in THA for osteoarthritis between 1998 and 2008. Exclusion criteria were complex cases, incomplete data or follow-up < 1 year. Primary outcome was survival rate with complications and secondary outcomes were clinical scores, thigh pain, radiological score, cortical hypertrophy and filling rate. RESULTS: Of the 283 included patients, 127 stems were classified as varus and 156 neutral. Mean follow-up was 10 years. Femoral stem size was smaller in the varus group (4.1 vs. 4.4, p = 0.047). A stem-filling rate < 80% was more frequent in the varus group (p < 0.001). The long-term survival rate without any revision procedure was 94.8% ± 2.3% (95%CI 88.4-98.7) in the varus group and 94.1% ± 2.0% (95%CI 91.3-99.1) in the neutral group (p = 0.55). There was no difference in clinical scores, thigh pain or complication occurrence between groups. The Engh-Massin score was lower in the varus group (p < 0.01) and cortical hypertrophy was higher (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A varus alignment of a cementless anatomic femoral stem does not affect survivorship, clinical outcomes or complication rate on an average follow-up of 10 years, despite increasing stress-shielding rates.

Impact of extracellular matrix and collagen network properties on the cervical intervertebral disc response to physiological loads: A parametric study.

Current intervertebral disc finite element models are hard to validate since they describe multi-physical phenomena and contain a huge number of material properties. This work aims to simplify numerical validation/identification studies by prioritizing the sensitivity of intervertebral disc behavior to mechanical properties. A 3D fiber-reinforced hyperelastic model of a C6-C7 intervertebral disc is used to carry out the parametric study. 10 parameters describing the extracellular matrix and the collagen network behaviors are included in the parametric study. The influence of varying these parameters on the disc response is estimated during physiological movements of the head, including compression, lateral bending, flexion, and axial rotation. The obtained results highlight the high sensitivity of the disc behavior to the stiffness of the annulus fibrosus extracellular matrix for all the studied loads with a relative increase in the disc apparent stiffness by 67% for compression and by 57% for axial rotation when the annulus stiffness increases from 0.4 to 2 MPa. It is also shown that varying collagen network orientation, stiffness, and stiffening in the studied configuration range have a noticeable effect on rotational motions with a relative apparent stiffness difference reaching 6.8%, 10%, and 22%, respectively, in lateral bending. However, the collagen orientation does not affect disc response to axial load.

Surgical videos on the internet: Is this a reliable pedagogical tool in residency training?

INTRODUCTION: Several open access platforms are currently available to help facilitate this online learning; however, whether the platforms are generalized or specialized, peers do not evaluate videos, and they may teach unverified techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of each website's content using a specific measurement, analyzing the pedagogical quality of Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) arthroscopic videos on YouTube versus VuMedi. METHODS: A prospective study analyzing 20 arthroscopy videos of arthroscopic FAI surgery on two hosting platforms online: 10 on the generalist platform YouTube and 10 on a specialized platform VuMedi. RESULTS: The average length of the YouTube videos was 503 ± 355.02 s (198-1430). The average number of views for the YouTube videos was 56,114.6 ± 116,832.61 (1149-383,694). The average length of the VuMedi videos was 797.5 ± 522.5 s (185-1927). The average number of views for the VuMedi video was 10,404.7 ± 10,071.2 (1625-37,115) The average LAP-VEGaS scores of the YouTube and VuMedi videos were 8.2 ± 3.47 (3-15) and 11.95 ± 2.64 (6-15), respectively (p < 0.0005). DISCUSSION: The use of a specialized website makes it possible to obtain educational videos of better quality. Health professionals need to be aware of this when using it as a resource for learning. Therefore, it should be in the interest of educational institutions to participate in the sharing of videos on this platform or to create their own platform to improve the quality of the information provided and the overall pedagogical experience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided ulnar nerve release technique compared to open technique: A cadaveric study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of a novel percutaneous ultrasound-guided technique for release of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow when compared to standard open release Methods: One single surgeon performed an ultrasound-guided percutaneous release of the cubital tunnel on a group of five cadaveric elbows and open release on five others. All procedures were timed, and incision lengths were recorded. Meticulous anatomic dissection was then performed to assess the complete release of the carpal tunnel and iatrogenic injuries. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of complete release and iatrogenic injury, whereas Operative time was significantly shorter for the US-guided technique. Incomplete releases of the nerve were found only during the first two trials in each group, while the third, fourth, and fifth trials showed a complete ulnar nerve release in both series, highlighting a fast learning curve for both techniques. All of this through a significantly smaller incision in the US-guided technique. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the similar effects of these two techniques in terms of complete release of the ulnar nerve, with no clear superiority of one over the other in terms of morbidity rate. Both have a fast learning curve for an ultrasound-trained surgeon, with the US-guided technique being a less traumatic and quicker alternative procedure.

Clinical results at 10 years of minimum follow-up with the ABG 2 hip arthroplasty, matched with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.

INTRODUCTION: The current study aimed as a primary goal is to assess the results of a ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing hip system matched with ABG (Anatomic Benoist Girard) 2 components in terms of survivorship. Secondary objectives addressed specifically ceramic-related complications as well as specific patterns at the bone-implant interface. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective bicentric continuous series involving 147 patients (95 males vs. 52 females) who underwent ABG 2 arthroplasties with CoC bearings. One hundred and twenty-five hips were closely followed-up at a mean period of 11.3 years. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: With a mean follow-up of 11.3 years, nine cases (5.7%) underwent revision surgery, four caused by acetabular aseptic loosening, three by deep infections, one ceramic head fracture, and one femoro-acetabular impingement. The global survivorship was 92.2% at 12.7 years. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) mean scores increased post-operatively from 50.1 up to 96.1 points (p < 0.001). All stems featured patterns of radiological osseous integration onto the hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated zones. No radiological wear or osteolysis of ceramic bearings was demonstrated however, five patients reported hip squeaking using this bearing. This study demonstrated excellent results at mid-term follow-up in patients younger than 70 years of age using cementless ABG 2 components coupled with CoC bearings with no increase in complication rate.

Sagittal Balance Using Position and Orientation of Each Vertebra in an Asymptomatic Population.

STUDY DESIGN: A monocentric, retrospective radiographic study with 99 asymptomatic volunteers. OBJECTIVE: The authors performed the postural analysis commonly scheduled when evaluating sagittal balance in a vertebra-by-vertebra manner by enrolling an asymptomatic population. They measured the position and angulation of each vertebra to reveal those for which the spatial positioning could be relevant during spinal surgeries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several recent publications detailed the sagittal alignment parameters and focus on global analysis parameters. Some patients with identical commonly evaluated spinal parameters have exhibited very different profiles, with notable differences in vertebral positions and orientations. Therefore, a fine segmental analysis of position of each vertebra could be interest to gain understanding of spine alignment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors obtained full-spine EOS x-rays of 99 volunteers in the standard free-standing position. We used a validated three-dimensional reconstruction technique to extract current spinal parameters and the positions and angulations of all vertebrae and lumbar discs. Particular attention was paid to the positions and angulations of the apical and transitional vertebrae in the general population and in subgroups according to pelvic incidence (PI). RESULTS: T1 was the most common transitional cervicothoracic vertebra (in 89.9% of subjects) and was oriented downwards by an average of 22.0° (SD=7.3°, minimum=2.3°, maximum=40.1°). The thoracic apex trio of T5 (22.2%), T6 (28.3%), and T7 (36.4%) were equally found. The transitional thoracolumbar vertebrae were L1 (39.4%) and T12 (33.3%). The lumbar apex was usually the L3-L4 disc (36.4%). T1 seemed to be the transitional vertebra (90%) irrespective of the PI. For the other relevant vertebrae, the greater the PI, the more cranial the vertebra. CONCLUSIONS: We performed a detailed three-dimensional assessment of overall spinal balance using positional and rotational parameters. The positions and orientations of all vertebrae were specified, particularly the apical and transitional vertebrae. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Do Modular Dual Mobility Cups Offer a Reliable Benefit? Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up of 102 Cups.

BACKGROUND: Among various options suggested to prevent hip instability after total hip replacement, the MDM-tritanium (modular dual mobility) cup features a cobalt-chrome liner (CoCr) positioned in a titanium acetabular shell and matched with a mobile insert in highly cross-linked annealed X3 polyethylene. The purpose of this study aimed to confirm whether there was no significant release of ions (Co and Cr) or higher occurrence of dislocation or even cases of aseptic loosening of the cementless shell with the use of MDM-tritanium cups at minimum of 5-year follow-up. METHODS: The clinical study was carried out on a homogeneous consecutive and nonselective series with 102 MDM cups (98 patients) implanted in 2 centers. This MDM-tritanium cup had been systematically used for surgical revisions (70% of cases) or for patients with major hip dysplasia or in elderly patients with poor bone quality. A biological assessment of ion releases has been performed in a specific cohort of 39 cases that had an internal ceramic head. RESULTS: None of the following complications was observed: no case of immunoallergic event, no aseptic loosening, and the dislocation rate was 4.9% involving only the difficult primary and revision cases. The clinical results were encouraging, with 89.7 points for Harris Hip Score, 41.16 points/48 for the OHS-12. The Agora Roentgenographic Assessment (ARA) radiologic score was graded "excellent" in 94.4%. The MDM-tritanium survivorship with revision for any cause in 102 cups at 7.95 years was 92.7%. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of our first 102 cases, there were no immunoallergic complications-contrary to what was initially feared with the CoCr bearing-titanium pair-and no postoperative instability, including for complex primary and revisions total hip replacements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Individual Cohort Study: 2B.

Arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomies: a systematic review of surgical technique and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the technique, results and complications of arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomies either on native hips or total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A systematic review was performed using 3 databases: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library from January 2000 to December 2018 in accordance with the PRISMA procedure. The literature search, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Surgical technique, clinical outcomes, recurrences and complication rate were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 115 articles reviewed, 20 articles concerned native hips and 8 articles THA. 3 levels of release were described. For native hips, the recurrence rate was higher for central compartment than peripheral or lesser trochanter releases. Complication rates were similar for hip arthroscopy but remained low in all series. Loss of strength was evaluated mainly using the MRC muscle scale. Most studies noted strength recovery. MRI analysis of muscle atrophy was greater for lesser trochanter than for central compartment release but unrelated to loss of strength. The complication rate was low for tenotomy after THA, heterotopic ossification being the most common complication. CONCLUSIONS: Central compartment releases lead to the highest rate of recurrence due to incomplete release. Peripheral releases have a potential risk of vascular injury. The lesser trochanteric approach has the disadvantage of not having direct access to the joint. The main difficulty with THA lies in the diagnosis of cup/iliopsoas impingement. Diagnostic tests with infiltration should be made before iliopsoas release to prevent its failure. Cup protrusion of over 8mm is a potential indication for acetabular revision.