Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 66
Filtrar
1.
J Affect Disord ; 183: 134-41, 2015 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26005207

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the recognition of anxiety in children and young people (CYP) in primary care. This study examined trends in the presentation, recognition and recording of anxiety and of anxiolytic and hypnotic prescriptions for CYP in primary care. METHOD: A population-based retrospective electronic cohort of individuals aged 6-18 years between 2003 and 2011 within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank primary care database was created. Incidence rates were calculated using person years at risk (PYAR) as a denominator accounting for deprivation, age and gender. RESULTS: We identified a cohort of 311,343 registered individuals providing a total of 1,546,489 person years of follow up. The incidence of anxiety symptoms more than tripled over the study period (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR)=3.55, 95% CI 2.65-4.77) whilst that of diagnosis has remained stable. Anxiolytic/hypnotic prescriptions for the cohort as a whole did not change significantly over time; however there was a significant increase in anxiolytic prescriptions for the 15-18 year age group (IRR 1.62, 95% CI 1.30-2.02). LIMITATIONS: There was a lack of reliable information regarding other interventions available or received at a primary, secondary or tertiary level such as psychological treatments. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a preference over time for the recording of general symptoms over diagnosis for anxiety in CYP. The increase in anxiolytic prescriptions for 15-18 year olds is discrepant with current prescribing guidelines. Specific guidance is required for the assessment and management of CYP presenting with anxiety to primary care, particularly older adolescents.


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Affect Disord ; 175: 168-74, 2015 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25618003

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Suicidality constitutes a major health concern in many countries. The aim of the present paper was to analyse 10 of its risk factors and their interdependence. METHODS: Data on suicidality, mental disorders and experience of childhood violence was collected from 8796 respondents in the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD). The CIDI was used to assess mental disorders. Individuals were randomly divided into two subgroups. In one, a Graphical Markov model to predict suicidality was constructed, in the second, predictors were cross-validated. RESULTS: Lifetime suicidality was predicted mainly by lifetime depression and early experiences of violence, with a pseudo R-square of 12.8%. In addition, alcohol disorders predicted suicidality, but played a minor role compared with the other risk factors in this sample. CONCLUSION: In addition to depression, early experience of violence constitutes an important risk factor of suicidality. LIMITATIONS: This is a cross-sectional and retrospective study assessing risk factors for suicidality, not for suicide itself.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Ideación Suicida , Violencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Alcoholismo/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Encephale ; 40(4): 338-44, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24726139

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The burden of health problems, including mental disorders, can be assessed in several ways such as through healthcare costs or loss of productivity. Their impact on daily activities as a whole has received much less attention, especially in France. Therefore, we undertook the analysis of the French general population data from the World Mental Health (WMH) surveys promoted by the World Health Organization (WHO) assessing the number of days out of role due to common mental and physical disorders. METHODS: Face-to-face interviews were carried out with 2894 respondents (45.9% pooled response rate). Presence of ten chronic physical disorders and nine mental disorders was assessed for each respondent along with information about the number of days in the past month each respondent reported being totally unable to work or carry out their other normal daily activities because of problems with either physical or mental health. Multiple regression analysis was used to estimate associations of specific conditions and comorbidities with days out of role, after controlling for basic socio-demographics. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred and thirty-six subjects reporting at least one core-symptom of a mental disorder underwent the whole assessment. The mean annual number of days out of role was high among those with at least one mental disorder (24.2±8.3). The population attributable risk proportion (PARP), i.e. the proportion of days out of role that would have been avoided if the considered disorder had remitted, was also estimated. Mental disorders as a whole accounted for 49.5% of the PARP. DISCUSSION: French data on days out of role from the WHO WMH surveys showed the high burden of mental illness in the general population. These results may have been underestimated, taking into account that subjects who were hospitalized at the time of recruitment, whose disorders might also account for a high proportion of days out of role, could not be assessed with our design. CONCLUSION: Common health conditions, especially mental disorders, make up a large proportion of the number of days out of role. Such data should be considered to design more efficient public health strategies.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Comorbilidad , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Francia , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Organización Mundial de la Salud
4.
Encephale ; 38(4): 296-303, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22980470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Suicide is a public health problem worldwide. The objective of this study is to analyse the prevalence and risk factors of suicide related outcomes (ideation, plan and attempt) using data from the ESEMeD-France project. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: This is a face-to-face household survey carried out in a probability representative sample of the adult general population of France. A total of 6796 subjects were interviewed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) developed framework of the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Based on evidence that reports of such potentially embarrassing behaviour are higher in self-administered than interviewer-administered surveys, these questions were printed in a self-administered booklet and referred to by letter. RESULTS: Lifetime prevalence of suicide ideation, plan and attempts were 12.4, 4.4 and 3.4% respectively. Risk of suicide-related outcomes was significantly higher among women and younger cohorts. Having a mental disorder was associated with an increased risk, especially in the case of psychiatric comorbidity. Mental disorders that are associated with an increase in suicidal attempts are anxiety disorders (except social phobia), major depressive episodes, oppositional defiant disorders, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders. The suicidal risk notably increases in conjunction with multiple mental disorders. In this study, employment and marital status do not appear to be a risk factor for suicidal behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of suicide-related outcomes is high when compared with other countries. Results identified groups with higher risk (women, young, subjects with a mental disorder and having a plan) in which suicide prevention could to be targeted. The results of this study suggest that to improve suicide prevention strategies it is necessary to perform an in-depth clinical evaluation of suicidal ideas and projects, and identify precisely psychiatric comorbidity to allow a more efficient treatment.


Asunto(s)
Intención , Ideación Suicida , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Francia , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Muestreo , Autorrevelación , Suicidio/psicología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Intento de Suicidio/psicología , Adulto Joven
5.
Mol Psychiatry ; 16(12): 1234-46, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20938433

RESUMEN

Days out of role because of health problems are a major source of lost human capital. We examined the relative importance of commonly occurring physical and mental disorders in accounting for days out of role in 24 countries that participated in the World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Face-to-face interviews were carried out with 62 971 respondents (72.0% pooled response rate). Presence of ten chronic physical disorders and nine mental disorders was assessed for each respondent along with information about the number of days in the past month each respondent reported being totally unable to work or carry out their other normal daily activities because of problems with either physical or mental health. Multiple regression analysis was used to estimate associations of specific conditions and comorbidities with days out of role, controlling by basic socio-demographics (age, gender, employment status and country). Overall, 12.8% of respondents had some day totally out of role, with a median of 51.1 a year. The strongest individual-level effects (days out of role per year) were associated with neurological disorders (17.4), bipolar disorder (17.3) and post-traumatic stress disorder (15.2). The strongest population-level effect was associated with pain conditions, which accounted for 21.5% of all days out of role (population attributable risk proportion). The 19 conditions accounted for 62.2% of all days out of role. Common health conditions, including mental disorders, make up a large proportion of the number of days out of role across a wide range of countries and should be addressed to substantially increase overall productivity.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia
6.
Psychol Med ; 41(4): 873-86, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20553636

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The methodology commonly used to estimate disease burden, featuring ratings of severity of individual conditions, has been criticized for ignoring co-morbidity. A methodology that addresses this problem is proposed and illustrated here with data from the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Although the analysis is based on self-reports about one's own conditions in a community survey, the logic applies equally well to analysis of hypothetical vignettes describing co-morbid condition profiles. METHOD: Face-to-face interviews in 13 countries (six developing, nine developed; n=31 067; response rate=69.6%) assessed 10 classes of chronic physical and nine of mental conditions. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess overall perceived health. Multiple regression analysis with interactions for co-morbidity was used to estimate associations of conditions with VAS. Simulation was used to estimate condition-specific effects. RESULTS: The best-fitting model included condition main effects and interactions of types by numbers of conditions. Neurological conditions, insomnia and major depression were rated most severe. Adjustment for co-morbidity reduced condition-specific estimates with substantial between-condition variation (0.24-0.70 ratios of condition-specific estimates with and without adjustment for co-morbidity). The societal-level burden rankings were quite different from the individual-level rankings, with the highest societal-level rankings associated with conditions having high prevalence rather than high individual-level severity. CONCLUSIONS: Plausible estimates of disorder-specific effects on VAS can be obtained using methods that adjust for co-morbidity. These adjustments substantially influence condition-specific ratings.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Comorbilidad , Comparación Transcultural , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Femenino , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
7.
J Affect Disord ; 131(1-3): 330-8, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21183222

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Panic attacks are heterogeneous with regards to symptom profile. Subtypes of panic attacks have been proposed, of which the most investigated is respiratory panic attacks (RPA). Limited information exists about RPA in the general population. METHOD: The prevalence and correlates of RPA and non-respiratory panic attacks (NRPA) were examined in a subsample (n=8.796) of individuals participating in a cross-sectional survey of the adult general population of six European countries. Panic attacks, mental disorders, and chronic physical conditions were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) 3.0. Data on use of health services and disability were obtained. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of RPA was 6.77 and the 12-month prevalence was 2.26. No robust associations of RPA with sociodemographic characteristics, mental disorders or physical conditions were found as compared to NRPA. RPA were associated with increased use of health services but similar disability in comparison to NRPA. LIMITATIONS: Few direct data are available on the validity of the CIDI to assess RPA. Other definitions of RPA exist in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that there are very few differences between RPA and NRPA and do not support the need of subtyping panic attacks in current classification systems.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Pánico/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Bélgica/epidemiología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Trastorno de Pánico/clasificación , Trastorno de Pánico/fisiopatología , Trastorno de Pánico/psicología , Prevalencia , Trastornos Respiratorios/epidemiología , Trastornos Respiratorios/psicología , España/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
8.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 52(4): 205-17, 2010.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20503161

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about attitudes to seeking help from mental health care professionals. AIM: To investigate these attitudes and their correlates, and find out whether these attitudes are associated with the use of care services. METHOD: Data were derived from the European Study of Epidemiology of Mental Disorders, a survey that is representative of the adult population of six countries (n = 8,796). RESULTS: Almost a third of respondents were of the opinion that professional help was worse than or equivalent to no help at all, in relation to serious psychiatric problems. Females, respondents under the age of 65, with a higher income, living in Spain or Italy, with a mood disorder, and those who had previously sought mental health care, more often stated that they would seek professional help if beset by a serious mental health problem. All these groups, except for the younger than 65, also reported more often that they would feel comfortable discussing mental health problems with a professional or that they were receiving this kind of help. All these attitudes were associated with an increased chance that persons would use professional help if beset by mental health problems. CONCLUSION: Definite steps need to be taken to increase the visibility and credibility of the mental health services.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Opinión Pública , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Comparación Transcultural , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psiquiatría , Adulto Joven
9.
Psychol Med ; 40(9): 1495-505, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19939327

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prior research on whether marriage is equally beneficial to the mental health of men and women is inconsistent due to methodological variation. This study addresses some prior methodological limitations and investigates gender differences in the association of first marriage and being previously married, with subsequent first onset of a range of mental disorders. METHOD: Cross-sectional household surveys in 15 countries from the WHO World Mental Health survey initiative (n=34493), with structured diagnostic assessment of mental disorders using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0. Discrete-time survival analyses assessed the interaction of gender and marital status in the association with first onset of mood, anxiety and substance use disorders. RESULTS: Marriage (versus never married) was associated with reduced risk of first onset of most mental disorders in both genders; but for substance use disorders this reduced risk was stronger among women, and for depression and panic disorder it was confined to men. Being previously married (versus stably married) was associated with increased risk of all disorders in both genders; but for substance use disorders, this increased risk was stronger among women and for depression it was stronger among men. CONCLUSIONS: Marriage was associated with reduced risk of the first onset of most mental disorders in both men and women but there were gender differences in the associations between marital status and onset of depressive and substance use disorders. These differences may be related to gender differences in the experience of multiple role demands within marriage, especially those concerning parenting.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Estado Civil , Trastornos del Humor/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Análisis de Supervivencia
10.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 45(2): 153-63, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19381427

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevailing attitudes towards mental health help-seeking in Europe, their correlates, and whether these attitudes are associated with actual service use for mental health problems. METHOD: Data were derived from the European Study of Epidemiology of Mental Disorders, a survey representative of the adult population of six countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain (n = 8,796). The World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview was used to assess attitudes and DSM-IV diagnoses. The attitudes referred to beliefs that the respondents would seek professional help when faced with a serious emotional problem, would feel comfortable talking about personal problems with a professional, would not be embarrassed if friends knew about the professional help, and respondents' perceived effectiveness of mental health care. RESULTS: Almost a third of the respondents held the view that professional care was worse than or equal to no help when faced with serious emotional problems. Female gender, being younger than 65 years of age, high income, living in Spain or Italy, presence of mood disorder and previous service use were associated with at least two of the four assessed attitudes towards mental health help-seeking. All four attitudes were significantly associated with mental health care use, also after adjustment for previous service use. CONCLUSION: The low perceived effectiveness of professional care calls for serious action aiming to improve the visibility and credibility of the mental health care sector.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Comparación Transcultural , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Opinión Pública , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Psychol Med ; 38(11): 1659-69, 2008 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18485262

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physical morbidity is a potent risk factor for depression onset and clearly increases with age, yet prior research has often found depressive disorders to decrease with age. This study tests the possibility that the relationship between age and mental disorders differs as a function of physical co-morbidity. METHOD: Eighteen general population surveys were carried out among household-residing adults as part of the World Mental Health (WMH) surveys initiative (n=42 697). DSM-IV disorders were assessed using face-to-face interviews with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0). The effect of age was estimated for 12-month depressive and/or anxiety disorders with and without physical or pain co-morbidity, and for physical and/or pain conditions without mental co-morbidity. RESULTS: Depressive and anxiety disorders decreased with age, a result that cannot be explained by organic exclusion criteria. No significant difference was found in the relationship between mental disorders and age as a function of physical/pain co-morbidity. The majority of older persons have chronic physical or pain conditions without co-morbid mental disorders; by contrast, the majority of those with mental disorders have physical/pain co-morbidity, particularly among the older age groups. CONCLUSIONS: CIDI-diagnosed depressive and anxiety disorders in the general population decrease with age, despite greatly increasing physical morbidity with age. Physical morbidity among persons with mental disorder is the norm, particularly in older populations. Health professionals, including mental health professionals, need to address barriers to the management of physical co-morbidity among those with mental disorders.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Comorbilidad , Comparación Transcultural , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales
12.
Encephale ; 33(1): 65-74, 2007.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17457296

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Today in France, little empirical data on the use of psychotherapy is available. This paper presents an empirical study of psychotherapeutic practices, from the patient's point of view. We will present results regarding frequency of psychotherapies, patients' characteristics, associations between different kinds of therapy, where they take place, and the reasons given for beginning psychotherapy. METHODOLOGY: Data is based on a general and mental health survey conducted by MGEN(1) foundation among 6,500 persons, as well as on general population data collected by the BVA survey institute. RESULTS: Depending on the population studied, between 5 to 11.5% of people have had psychotherapy sessions at least once in their lifetime. Women born at the beginning of the sixties and men born at the beginning of the fifties are those who consulted the most. The vast majority of these psychotherapies are individual, in private practice. They often last more than one year, with a frequency of once per week or more. Thirty percent declare that they have undergone several psychotherapies. The reasons for consultation reported by users are mainly depression or anxiety. There are significant differences between genders for the reasons for consultation, women being concerned by depression, problems with sleep and food, and men being concerned by obsessive thoughts and addiction (alcohol, tobacco). People undergoing psychotherapy give an average of 2.5 reasons for this psychotherapy, and only 28% gave only one reason. A relationship exists between the number of consecutive treatments and the number of reasons given for undergoing psychotherapy. More than 25% of the psychotherapies last less than 6 months. "Intensive psychotherapy" (at least 6 months and a frequency of 2 to 3 times per month) concern 5.9% of the whole population studied, and represent 51.4% of all psychotherapies. People are quite satisfied by their psychotherapy; 90% are satisfied with the results and 60% believe that their condition has been much improved in a durable manner. 16.6% were unsatisfied with the results. There is (in women only) an association between satisfaction and intensity of treatment; satisfaction is lower in those women undergoing intensive psychotherapy; 77. 7% of users have also used some sort of drugs for the problem (80.6% of women and 69.9% of men) with psychotropic drugs most frequently used: 70.8% of the psychotherapy users had taken such drugs for their problem (women 72.9%, men 65.4%). CONCLUSION: In France, psychotherapies are playing an important role and it is necessary to study these techniques better in order to give them the place they deserve in the French mental health policy.


Asunto(s)
Seguro de Salud , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia
13.
J Affect Disord ; 101(1-3): 27-34, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17074395

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Precise knowledge of the epidemiology of suicidality provides necessary information for designing prevention programs. The aims of the present study were to investigate the prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideas and attempts in the general population of Europe. METHODS: The European Study on the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMED) is a cross-sectional household survey carried out in a probability representative sample of non-institutionalised adults (aged 18 years or older) of six European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain). The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0) was administered to 21,425 individuals. RESULTS: Lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation was 7.8% and of suicidal attempts 1.3%. Being women, younger and divorced or widowed were associated with a higher prevalence of suicide ideation and attempts. Psychiatric diagnoses were strongly related to suicidality. Among them, major depressive episode (Rate ratio 2.9 for lifetime ideas and 4.8 for lifetime attempts), dysthymia (RR 2.0 and 1.6), GAD (RR 1.8 and 2.3 for lifetime), PTSD (RR 1.9 and 2.0) and alcohol dependence (RR 1.7 and 2.5) were the most important. Population attributable risks for lifetime suicidal attempt was 28% for major depression. LIMITATIONS: Information about suicidal ideas and attempts was self reported, psychiatric diagnoses were made using fully structured lay interviews rather than clinician-administered interviews. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of meaningful country variation in prevalence, risk factors for suicidality are consistent in the European countries. Population prevention programmes should focus on early diagnosis and treatment of major depression and alcohol abuse and in those individuals with recent appearance of suicidal ideas.


Asunto(s)
Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Alcoholismo/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Comparación Transcultural , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Trastorno Distímico/diagnóstico , Trastorno Distímico/epidemiología , Trastorno Distímico/psicología , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estadística como Asunto , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Suicidio/psicología , Intento de Suicidio/prevención & control , Intento de Suicidio/psicología , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Suicidio
14.
BMC Public Health ; 5: 104, 2005 Oct 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16212666

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Providing care for mental health problems concerns General Practitioners (GPs), Private Psychiatrists (PrPs) and Public Psychiatrists (PuPs). As patient distribution and patterns of practice among these professionals are not well known, a survey was planned prior to a re-organisation of mental health services in an area close to Paris METHODS: All GPs (n = 492), PrPs (n = 82) and PuPs (n = 78) in the South-Yvelines area in France were informed of the implementation of a local mental health program. Practitioners interested in taking part were invited to include prospectively all patients with mental health problem they saw over an 8-day period and to complete a 6-month retrospective questionnaire on their mental health practice. 180 GPs (36.6%), 45 PrPs (54.9%) and 63 PuPs (84.0%) responded. RESULTS: GPs and PrPs were very similar but very different from PuPs for the proportion of patients with anxious or depressive disorders (70% v. 65% v. 38%, p < .001), psychotic disorders (5% v. 7% v. 30%, p < .001), previous psychiatric hospitalization (22% v. 26 v. 61%, p < .001) and receiving disability allowance (16% v. 18% v. 52%, p < .001). GPs had fewer patients with long-standing psychiatric disorders than PrPs and PuPs (52%, 64% v. 63%, p < .001). Time-lapse between consultations was longest for GPs, intermediate for PuPs and shortest for PrPs (36 days v. 26 v. 18, p < .001). Access to care had been delayed longer for Psychiatrists (PrPs, PuPs) than for GPs (61% v. 53% v. 25%, p < .001). GPs and PuPs frequently felt a need for collaboration for their patients, PrPs rarely (42% v. 61%. v. 10%, p < .001). Satisfaction with mental health practice was low for all categories of physicians (42.6% encountered difficulties hospitalizing patients and 61.4% had patients they would prefer not to cater for). GPs more often reported unsatisfactory relationships with mental health professionals than did PrPs and PuPs (54% v. 15% v. 8%, p < .001). CONCLUSION: GP patients with mental health problems are very similar to patients of private psychiatrists; there is a lack of the collaboration felt to be necessary, because of psychiatrists' workload, and because GPs have specific needs in this respect. The "Yvelines-Sud Mental Health Network" has been created to enhance collaboration.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Trastornos Mentales , Psiquiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Conducta Cooperativa , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/normas , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/clasificación , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Práctica Privada/normas , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Encephale ; 31(2): 182-94, 2005.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15959445

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: ESEMeD is the first international epidemiological study using a random sampling method that has allowed the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in France to be measured with precision and compared directly with that observed in other European countries. OBJECTIVES: 1) To determine the 12 month and lifetime prevalence of mood -disorders, anxiety disorders and alcohol-related disorders. 2) To estimate the comorbidity between these disorders. 3) To evaluate potential demographic risk factors for these disorders. METHODS: This was a transversal survey carried out between 2001 and 2003 of non-institutionalised subjects aged 18 or over in the general population of Germany (n = 3,555), Belgium (n = 2,419), Spain (n = 5,473), France (n = 2,894), the Netherlands (n = 2,372) and Italy (n = 4,712). In France, the sampling source was a randomly generated list of telephone numbers. Subjects were interviewed at home by professional interviewers. The WMH-CIDI questionnaire was used. RESULTS: The participation rate was 46% for France and 61% for all six countries combined. The 12 month and lifetime prevalence rates observed were respectively 6.0% and 21,4% for major depressive episodes, 1.6% and 7.9% for dysthymia, 2.1% and 6.0% for the generalised -anxiety disorders, 1.2% and 3.0% for panic disorders, 0.6% and 1.8% for agoraphobia, 2.2% and 3.9% for post-traumatic stress disorder, 1.7% and 4.7% for social phobia, 4.7% and 11,6% for specific phobia, 0.5% and 4.1% for alcohol abuse and 0.3% and 1.6% for alcohol dependence. Mood disorders and anxiety disorders were significantly more frequent in women, whilst alcohol-related disorders were more frequent in men. The prevalence of all three types of disorder was lower in elderly subjects and in those living in a rural environment. Mood disorders and alcohol-related disorders were more frequent in individuals living alone and mood disorders more frequent in those without paid employment. 38% of subjects with mood disorder also presented an anxiety disorder or an alcohol-related disorder. The comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders was more frequent in women, younger subjects and those living alone. The comorbidity rate in subjects with anxiety disorders was 26% and did not differ between genders. For alcohol-related disorders, there was a striking difference in comorbidity rate between men and women: 26% in the former and 67% in the latter. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the high prevalence of mood disorders, anxiety disorders and alcohol-related disorders in France and demonstrates a high degree of comorbidity between them. For this reason, it is important to evaluate and take into account potential comorbidity in the management of individuals with psychiatric disorders.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/etnología , Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Comorbilidad , Demografía , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo
16.
Encephale ; 31(2): 195-206, 2005.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15959446

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The use of psychotropic drugs is high in France and has increased over the last two decades. To date, no national study evaluating psychotropic drug use in the context of the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders has been performed. Such data has now been generated in the ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 study, which has allowed comparison of the situation in France with that in five other European countries (Germany, Belgium, Spain, the Netherlands and Italy). OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe the declared use of psychotropic drugs (globally and by therapeutic class) in order to evaluate annual prevalence, treatment duration and demographic factors associated with use. 2) To estimate the proportion of subjects with an anxiety disorder, mood disorder or alcohol-related disorder (abuse or dependence) that have been appropriately treated with an antidepressant or anxiolytic drug. 3) to evaluate the proportion of psychotropic drug users who fulfil diagnostic criteria for these three classes of psychiatric disorder. METHODS: This was a transversal survey carried out between 2001 and 2003 of non-institutionalised subjects aged 18 or over in the general population of Germany (n = 3,555), Belgium (n = 2,419), Spain (n = 5,473), France (n = 2,894), the Netherlands (n = 2,372) and Italy (n = 4,712). In France, the sampling source used was a randomly generated list of telephone numbers. Subjects were interviewed at home by professional interviewers. The WMH-CIDI questionnaire was used. RESULTS: In France, 21% of subjects interviewed (n = 580) had taken at least one psychotropic drug during the year. For 19%, this was an anxiolytic or hypnotic (AX-HY), for 6.0% an antidepressant (AD), for 0.8% an antipsychotic (AP) and for 0.4% a mood regulating drug (TY). The distribution of users of AX-HY according to treatment duration was the following: 44% (1 to 15 days), 13% (16 to 30 days), 14% (1 to 3 months), 6.7% (3 to 6 months) and 23% (> 6 months). For users of ADs, the distribution was: 21% (1 to 15 days), 7.8% (16 to 30 days), 18% (1 to 3 months), 12% (3 to 6 months) and 42% (> 6 months). For subjects fulfilling diagnostic criteria for a mood disorder in the previous year or over their lifetime, 43% and 29% respectively had taken an AX-HY in the last twelve months and 29% and 16% an AD. For those who fulfilled diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder in the previous year or over their lifetime, the use of an AX-HY, in the last twelve months, concerned 43% and 30% of subjects respectively, whilst that of AD concerned 16% and 14%. For previous year or lifetime alcohol-related disorders, AX-HY use, in the last twelve months, concerned 63% and 22% of subjects respectively and use of ADs 9.3% and 7.2%. Amongst users of AX-HY in the last twelve months, a previous year or lifetime diagnosis of mood disorders was made for 16% and 39% of subjects respectively. Amongst users of ADs, the respective prevalence was 31% and 64%. A twelve-month and lifetime diagnosis of anxiety disorders was identified in 22% and 37% of users of AX-HY and among 27% and 50% of users of AD respectively. A twelve-month and lifetime diagnosis of alcohol-related disorders was found in 2.5% and 6.6% of users of AX-HY and among 1.1% and 7.8% of users of AD respectively. 68% of users of AX-HY had fulfilled none of these diagnostic criteria in the previous 12 months and 46% had never fulfilled them in their lifetime. With respect to AD users, the proportion who did not meet these diagnostic criteria in the previous 12 months was 56%, compared to 20% over their lifetime. Comparison of the French data from the study with those of the entire European sample showed that the annual prevalence of AX-HY and AD use was higher in France with mean treatment durations that were shorter. For antipsychotics and mood regulators, no clear differences were observed between France and the six countries of the study taken together. DISCUSSION: Over the last two decades, use of AX-HY seems to have decreased in France, even though it remains higher than that observed in the other European countries participating in this study. This high use can be explained in part by the observation that, in around half the cases, it corresponds to occasional use. In contrast, the use of antidepressants has increased. In subjects with recent mood disorders or anxiety disorders, the use of AX-HY remains higher than that of antidepressants. Finally among users of AX-HY, only half of them had presented a mood disorder, anxiety disorder or alcohol use disorder during their lifetime, whereas this proportion rose to 80% for users of antidepressants.


Asunto(s)
Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Bélgica/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Demografía , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Prevalencia , Distribución por Sexo , España/epidemiología
17.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 53(1): 69-75, 2005 Feb.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15888991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aims of our study were to examine the factors associated with cervical screening in women whose tests are supported by a national health insurance scheme, the Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale. METHODS: A self-administered postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 10,000 adults aged 20 to 60 years old living in France and insured with the Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale. Response rate was 66.5% (N=6,518). RESULTS: Of the 3,741 women aged 20 to 60 years old, 88.5% have had at least one cervical smear. Mean age for the first cervical smear was 29.3 years (95% CI: 29.0-29.6). Preventive practices (mammogram, cervical smear and fecal occult-blood testing) were strongly related. The predictive factors for cervical smear during the past three years included: age between 30 and 49 years, marital status (married, separated or divorced), the socioeconomic status (unskilled workers reported cervical smears less often than women from other socioeconomic status). Consulting a gynaecologist in the past twelve months increased 9-fold the probability of having a cervical smear and 2-fold when consulting a general practitioner compared to women who consulted neither a gynecologist nor a general practitioner. CONCLUSIONS: In a population whose tests were supported by a national health scheme, the socioeconomic status was one of the determinants of Pap smear.


Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Adulto , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
18.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl ; (420): 28-37, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15128385

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Comorbidity patterns of 12-month mood, anxiety and alcohol disorders and socio-demographic factors associated with comorbidity were studied among the general population of six European countries. METHOD: Data were derived from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD), a cross-sectional psychiatric epidemiological study in a representative sample of adults aged 18 years or older in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. The diagnostic instrument used was the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI). Data are based on 21 425 completed interviews. RESULTS: In general, high associations were found within the separate anxiety disorders and between mood and anxiety disorders. Lowest comorbidity associations were found for specific phobia and alcohol abuse-the disorders with the least functional disabilities. Comorbidity patterns were consistent cross-nationally. Associated factors for comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders were female gender, younger age, lower educational level, higher degree of urbanicity, not living with a partner and unemployment. Only younger people were at greater risk for comorbidity of alcohol disorder with mood, anxiety disorders or both. CONCLUSION: High levels of comorbidity are found in the general population. Comorbidity is more common in specific groups. To reduce psychiatric burden, early intervention in populations with a primary disorder is important to prevent comorbidity.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Cooperación Internacional , Trastornos del Humor/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Demografía , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Psicología
19.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl ; (420): 8-20, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15128383

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The European Study of Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project was designed to evaluate the prevalence, the impact and the treatment patterns in Europe. This paper presents an overview of the methods implemented in the project. METHOD: ESEMeD is a cross-sectional study in a representative sample of 21 425 adults, 18 or older, from the general population of Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) was administered by home interviews from January 2001 to August 2003 using Computer Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI) technology. Data quality was controlled to ensure reliability and validity of the information obtained. RESULTS: Response rate varied from 78.6% in Spain to 45.9% in France. Less than 4% of the individuals had errors in the checking procedures performed. CONCLUSION: The sampling methodologies, comprehensive psychiatric instruments and quality control procedures used have rendered the ESEMeD database a unique and important source of information about the prevalence, the disability burden and unmet medical needs of mental disorders within Europe.


Asunto(s)
Métodos Epidemiológicos , Cooperación Internacional , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Muestreo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Costo de Enfermedad , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl ; (420): 21-7, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15128384

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the 12-month and lifetime prevalence rates of mood, anxiety and alcohol disorders in six European countries. METHOD: A representative random sample of non-institutionalized inhabitants from Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain aged 18 or older (n = 21425) were interviewed between January 2001 and August 2003. DSM-IV disorders were assessed by lay interviewers using a revised version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI). RESULTS: Fourteen per cent reported a lifetime history of any mood disorder, 13.6% any anxiety disorder and 5.2% a lifetime history of any alcohol disorder. More than 6% reported any anxiety disorder, 4.2% any mood disorder, and 1.0% any alcohol disorder in the last year. Major depression and specific phobia were the most common single mental disorders. Women were twice as likely to suffer 12-month mood and anxiety disorders as men, while men were more likely to suffer alcohol abuse disorders. CONCLUSION: ESEMeD is the first study to highlight the magnitude of mental disorders in the six European countries studied. Mental disorders were frequent, more common in female, unemployed, disabled persons, or persons who were never married or previously married. Younger persons were also more likely to have mental disorders, indicating an early age of onset for mood, anxiety and alcohol disorders.


Asunto(s)
Cooperación Internacional , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Demografía , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Humor/epidemiología , Prevalencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...