Pediatric pain management.

Regional anesthesia has become an integral part of adult anesthesia. Although not routinely used in children because of the need for general anesthesia that is necessary to keep the patients from moving and cooperating with the operator, regional anesthesia has been gaining immense popularity in the last decade. Although there is not much objective evidence, large prospective databases and expert opinion have favored administering regional anesthesia in the asleep child safely because major neural damage has not been reported in children. This review discusses a comprehensive approach to acute pain management in infants, children, and adolescents using regional anesthesia.

Retrospective audit of the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients with a difficult airway.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of the ILA as a conduit for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients with a difficult airway. AIM: The primary goals of this retrospective audit were to assess the clinical performance of the ILA in pediatric patients with a difficult airway, expand on our initial favorable experience with this device, and collect pilot data for future prospective and comparison studies. METHODS: The charts of patients with a difficult airway in whom the ILA was used during a period of 1 year in a freestanding pediatric institution were reviewed following a practice change in the authors' institution favoring the ILA over the laryngeal mask airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation. RESULTS: Thirty-four pediatric patients had an ILA placed during the course of their airway management. Eight of the 34 patients in this cohort required emergent airway management. The median age was 47.1 (0.3-202.2) months and the median weight was 16.3 (3.9-86.0) kilograms. Three of the cases were unanticipated difficult airways and the remaining were anticipated difficult airways as a result of craniofacial syndromes (n = 21), cervical spine instability or immobility (n = 7), or airway hemorrhage (n = 3). Thirty-three of the 34 patients (97%) were intubated on the first attempt through the ILA, with the aid of a fiberoptic bronchoscope (n = 25), a Shikani Optical Stylet (n = 7), or blindly (n = 2). In one patient, blind tracheal intubation required a second attempt for successful intubation, making the overall success rate 100%. Oxygen desaturation was noted in 6 of the 34 cases. CONCLUSIONS: In a series of pediatric patients with difficult airways, the ILA was successfully used as a conduit for tracheal intubation in all patients. Visualization techniques may offer a greater degree of success in intubations through the ILA due to the potential for epiglottic down-folding in children.

A clinical evaluation of the intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation in children.

BACKGROUND: The air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA) (Cookgas LLC, Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL) is a supraglottic airway device available in pediatric sizes, with design features to facilitate passage of cuffed tracheal tubes when used to guide tracheal intubation. We designed this prospective observational study of the ILA to assess the ease of its placement in paralyzed pediatric patients, determine its position and alignment to the larynx using a fiberoptic bronchoscope, gauge its efficacy as a conduit for fiberoptic intubation with cuffed tracheal tubes, and evaluate the ability to remove the ILA without dislodgement of the tracheal tube after successful tracheal intubation. METHODS: One hundred healthy children, aged 6 months to 8 years, ASA physical status I to II, and scheduled for elective surgery requiring general endotracheal anesthesia were enrolled in this prospective study. Based on the manufacturer's guidelines, each patient received either a size 1.5 or 2.0 ILA according to their weight. The number of attempts for successful insertion, leak pressures, fiberoptic grade of view, number of attempts and time for tracheal intubation, time for ILA removal, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: ILA placement, fiberoptic tracheal intubation, and ILA removal were successful in all patients. The size 1.5 ILA cohort had significantly higher rates of epiglottic downfolding compared with the size 2.0 ILA cohort (P < 0.001), despite adequate ventilation variables. When comparing fiberoptic grade of view to weight, a moderate negative correlation was found (r = -0.41, P < 0.001), indicating that larger patients tended to have better fiberoptic grades of view. The size 1.5 ILA cohort had a significantly longer time to intubation (P = 0.04) compared with the size 2.0 ILA cohort. However, this difference may not be clinically significant because there was a large overlap of confidence bounds in the average times of the size 1.5 ILA (27.0 ± 13.0 seconds) and size 2.0 ILA cohorts (22.7 ± 6.9 seconds). When comparing weight to time to tracheal intubation, a weak correlation that was not statistically significant was found (r = -0.17, P = 0.09), showing that time to intubation did not differ significantly according to weight, despite higher fiberoptic grades in smaller patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ILA was easy to place and provided an effective conduit for tracheal intubation with cuffed tracheal tubes in children with normal airways. Additionally, removal of the ILA after successful intubation could be achieved quickly and without dislodgement of the tracheal tube. Because of the higher incidence of epiglottic downfolding in smaller patients, the use of fiberoptic bronchoscopy is recommended to assist with tracheal intubation through this device.