Acute kidney injury secondary to urinary tract infection in kidney transplant recipients.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is a common, yet poorly investigated, complication of urinary tract infections (UTI) and urosepsis. A retrospective comparative analysis was performed, recruiting 101 KTRs with urosepsis, 100 KTRs with UTI, and 100 KTRs without history of UTI or sepsis. The incidences of AKI in the urosepsis and UTI groups were 75.2% and 41%, respectively. The urosepsis group has also presented with a significantly higher prevalence of AKI stage 2 and 3 than the UTI group. The rates of recovery from AKI stages 1, 2 and 3, were 75,6%, 55% and 26.1%, respectively. Factors independently associated with renal recovery from AKI were: AKI severity grade (AKI stage 2 with OR = 0.25 and AKI stage 3 with OR = 0.1), transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) (OR = 0.22), and the use of steroid bolus in the acute phase of treatment (OR = 4). The septic status (urosepsis vs UTI) did not influence the rates of renal recovery from AKI after adjustment for the remaining variables. The dominant cause of RBC transfusions in the whole population was upper GI-bleeding. In multivariable analyses, the occurrence of AKI was also independently associated with a greater decline of eGFR at 1-year post-discharge and with a greater risk of graft loss. In KTRs with both urosepsis and UTI, the occurrence of AKI portends poor transplantation outcomes. The local transfusion policy, modulation of immunosuppression and stress ulcer prophylaxis (which is not routinely administered in KTRs) in the acute setting may be modifiable factors that significantly impact long-term transplantation outcomes.

The impact of location and patency of the arteriovenous fistula on quality of life of kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) may remain patent after kidney transplantation (KTx), contributing to maladaptive cardiac remodeling. The flow in AVFs is associated with the diameter of its vessels and thus with the AVF location. The main objective of this study is to assess the influence of AVF location and its patency on the self-reported quality of life (QOL) of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with past history of hemodialysis. METHODS: To gain clinical data, during a scheduled visit, 353 KTRs were asked to fill out an anonymous questionnaire. From this group, 284 respondents were found eligible for analysis. The outcome was defined as prevalence of symptoms and health status, measured with the Left Ventricular Dysfunction-36 (LVD-36) Questionnaire in symptomatic patients. RESULTS: The hemodialysis patients (n = 243) were divided into two groups according to AVF location, i.e., DAVF - distally located AVF - (n = 174) and PAVF - proximally located AVF - (n = 69). The proportion of patients with heart failure (HF) was higher in PAVF group (24% vs. 12%, p = 0.0482). In the multivariable regression, PAVF, serum creatinine levels, and the presence of HF or coronary artery disease (CAD) remained independent predictors of lower functional capacity. Among patients with heart disease, the presence of active AVF was independently associated with worse functional outcome (higher LVD-36 scores). CONCLUSIONS: The influence of persistent PAVF in KTRs seems to be unfavorable, especially when coexisting with CAD or HF. Abbreviations: AVF arteriovenous fistula; BMI body mass index; CAD coronary artery disease; D-AVF distally-located arteriovenous fistula; EC exercise capacity; HD hemodialysis; HF heart failure; KTx kidney transplantation; KTR kidney transplant recipient; LVD-36 Left Ventricle Disfunction - 36; LVEF left ventricle ejection fraction; LVH left ventricle hypertrophy; NYHA New York Heart Association; P-AVF proximally located arteriovenous fistula; PD peritoneal dialysis; PRO patient-reported outcomes; QOL quality of life.

The attitude of kidney transplant recipients towards elective arteriovenous fistula ligation.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are a source of various complications. Among previously hemodialyzed kidney transplant recipients (KTxR), the AVF may persist over time. The patients' decisions whether to ligate the functioning AVF may be prompted by many factors. Our knowledge of benefits concerning the procedure as well as patients' attitude towards it is scarce. AIM: Evaluation of the patients' opinion on the persistent AVF ligation after a successful kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous survey was carried out among 301 previously hemodialyzed KTxR. The patients were recruited during scheduled visits in the Transplantation Outpatient Unit. All subjects completed an anonymous questionnaire including questions about their attitude towards the matter in question. RESULTS: 69 patients (22.9%) have considered AVF closure. The most common causes for such attitude were esthetic reasons (n = 29) and concerns about heart health (n = 13). Among those 69 subjects, 18 have presented with symptomatic AVF due to multiple symptoms. Symptomatic AVFs were localized on the forearm in 14 out of 18 cases. As many as 116 (38.5%) cases have never wanted to ligate the AVF and 116 (38.5%) subjects did not have a clear opinion. In our study we report 158 (52.5%) cases of non-functioning AVFs. The main reason for the above was spontaneous AVF thrombosis (121 cases). Only 24 subjects reported to rely on the physician-provided information about the AVF management. CONCLUSIONS: One fourth of KTRs have ever considered AVF ligation. There is a distinct need for educating patients on the possibilities of post-transplantation AVF management.

Systemic Inflammatory Markers Predict Detrimental Outcome of Urosepsis in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Urosepsis is a frequent cause of hospitalization among kidney transplant recipients (KTxR). Systemic inflammatory markers may reflect disease severity; nevertheless, their predictive value has not been evaluated in KTxRs. AIMS: We sought to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of blood-derived systemic inflammatory markers during urosepsis in KTxR. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 80 transplant recipients who were hospitalized between 2014 and 2017 due to urosepsis and followed for at least 1 year. Multiple parameters were calculated from medical records. The study endpoint was defined as death, graft loss, or a more than double serum creatinine level compared with baseline. RESULTS: Seventeen patients reached an endpoint and presented at admission significantly lower total serum protein [g/dL] (5.0 ± 0.6 vs 6.0 ± 0.7) and higher urea [mg/dL] (161, 118-218 vs 80, 56-125), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (20.0, 12.5-48.3 vs 12.9, 7.0-20.1), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (447, 203-706 vs 231, 160-357), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) (8.5, 5.6-10.4 vs 5.3, 2.9-8.5), and maximal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (6, 4-7 vs 3, 3-5). Among blood markers, NLR showed the strongest correlation with C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, creatinine, urea, and maximal SOFA score. The NLR cut-off value >15 predicted endpoint occurrence with 59% specificity and 75% sensitivity (area under the curve [AUC] 0.67, P = .038). The combined impact of NLR, urea, and total serum protein increased the prognostic precision (sensitivity 85% and specificity 84%, AUC = 0.88, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The combined impact of NLR, urea, and total serum protein identifies KTxR who are at risk of a bad outcome after urosepsis and require more meticulous care.

Frailty and cognitive impairment are predictive of takotsubo syndrome following pacemaker implantation.

BACKGROUND: Pacemaker (PM) implantation may cause acute emotional distress leading to takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Frailty and cognitive impairment are known to influence outcomes after surgical procedures. It is unclear whether they may also predispose to TTS following PM implantation. METHODS: We identified nine cases (81 ± 6 years) of TTS following PM implantation that took place between 2013 and 2017 in one high volume implantation center. TTS was diagnosed based on typical echocardiographic appearance with resolution over time and (in cases where deemed necessary) normal coronary angiography. The TTS cases were compared with 30 consecutive cases of PM implantation (75 ± 9 years), which were not complicated by TTS (control group). Frailty was assessed using retrospective Risk Analysis Index (RAI-A). Pacing parameters were analyzed during PM implantation and after 1 month. RESULTS: Cognitive impairment was more prevalent (67% vs 10%, P = .0005), and RAI-A index was significantly higher in the TTS group compared to the control group (26 ± 13.7 vs 13.1 ± 9.8, P = .008). Perioperative right ventricular threshold was significantly higher in patients with TTS comparing to controls (0.99 ± 0.43 V vs 0.74 ± 0.20 V, P = .04). The magnitude of decrease in right ventricular threshold between implantation and 1 month follow-up was greater in TTS patients compared to controls (-0.41 ± 0.29 V vs -0.15 ± 0.38 V, P = .049). CONCLUSIONS: TTS is a rare complication of PM implantation. Patients with cognitive impairment and frailty are at risk of TTS. Right ventricular pacing threshold is acutely affected by TTS and improves over time.