HA-1-targeted T cell receptor (TCR) T cell therapy for recurrent leukemia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Relapse is the leading cause of death after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for leukemia. T cells engineered by gene transfer to express T cell receptors (TCR; TCR-T) specific for hematopoietic-restricted minor histocompatibility (H) antigens may provide a potent selective anti-leukemic effect post-HCT. We conducted a phase I clinical trial employing a novel TCR-T product targeting the minor H antigen HA-1 to treat or consolidate treatment of persistent or recurrent leukemia and myeloid neoplasms. The primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of administration of HA-1 TCR-T post-HCT. CD8+ and CD4+ T cells expressing the HA-1 TCR and a CD8-co-receptor were successfully manufactured from HA-1 disparate HCT donors. One or more infusions of HA-1 TCR-T following lymphodepleting chemotherapy were administered to nine HCT recipients who had developed disease recurrence post-HCT. TCR-T cells expanded and persisted in vivo after adoptive transfer. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Although the study was not designed to assess efficacy, four patients achieved or maintained complete remissions following lymphodepletion and HA-1 TCR-T, with one ongoing at >2 years. Single-cell RNA sequencing of relapsing/progressive leukemia after TCR-T therapy identified upregulated molecules associated with T cell dysfunction or cancer cell survival. HA-1 TCR-T therapy appears feasible and safe and shows preliminary signals of efficacy. This clinical trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03326921.

Trans-population graph-based coverage optimization of allogeneic cellular therapy.

Background: Pre-clinical development and in-human trials of 'off-the-shelf' immune effector cell therapy (IECT) are burgeoning. IECT offers many potential advantages over autologous products. The relevant HLA matching criteria vary from product to product and depend on the strategies employed to reduce the risk of GvHD or to improve allo-IEC persistence, as warranted by different clinical indications, disease kinetics, on-target/off-tumor effects, and therapeutic cell type (T cell subtype, NK, etc.). Objective: The optimal choice of candidate donors to maximize target patient population coverage and minimize cost and redundant effort in creating off-the-shelf IECT product banks is still an open problem. We propose here a solution to this problem, and test whether it would be more expensive to recruit additional donors or to prevent class I or class II HLA expression through gene editing. Study design: We developed an optimal coverage problem, combined with a graph-based algorithm to solve the donor selection problem under different, clinically plausible scenarios (having different HLA matching priorities). We then compared the efficiency of different optimization algorithms - a greedy solution, a linear programming (LP) solution, and integer linear programming (ILP) -- as well as random donor selection (average of 5 random trials) to show that an optimization can be performed at the entire population level. Results: The average additional population coverage per donor decrease with the number of donors, and varies with the scenario. The Greedy, LP and ILP algorithms consistently achieve the optimal coverage with far fewer donors than the random choice. In all cases, the number of randomly-selected donors required to achieve a desired coverage increases with increasing population. However, when optimal donors are selected, the number of donors required may counter-intuitively decrease with increasing population size. When comparing recruiting more donors vs gene editing, the latter was generally more expensive. When choosing donors and patients from different populations, the number of random donors required drastically increases, while the number of optimal donors does not change. Random donors fail to cover populations different from their original populations, while a small number of optimal donors from one population can cover a different population. Discussion: Graph-based coverage optimization algorithms can flexibly handle various HLA matching criteria and accommodate additional information such as KIR genotype, when such information becomes routinely available. These algorithms offer a more efficient way to develop off-the-shelf IECT product banks compared to random donor selection and offer some possibility of improved transparency and standardization in product design.

Expert consensus on microtransplant for acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients -report from the international microtransplant interest group.

Recent studies have shown that microtransplant (MST) could improve outcome of patients with elderly acute myeloid leukemia (EAML). To further standardize the MST therapy and improve outcomes in EAML patients, based on analysis of the literature on MST, especially MST with EAML from January 1st, 2011 to November 30th, 2022, the International Microtransplant Interest Group provides recommendations and considerations for MST in the treatment of EAML. Four major issues related to MST for treating EAML were addressed: therapeutic principle of MST (1), candidates for MST (2), induction chemotherapy regimens (3), and post-remission therapy based on MST (4). Others included donor screening, infusion of donor cells, laboratory examinations, and complications of treatment.

Fatigue in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors: Correlates, Care Team Communication, and Patient-Identified Mitigation Strategies.

With improved survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the number of individuals at risk for persistent or late effects is increasing. The importance of optimizing HCT survivor health and well-being is mounting. Fatigue is a common post-transplantation symptom that impairs quality of life, yet it remains poorly understood and inadequately addressed. Multiple challenges to addressing fatigue exist, including its multidimensional presentation, multiple (often concomitant) causes, patient-clinician communication barriers, and few highly effective, evidence-based interventions that can be readily implemented. To address these challenges, we sought to better describe the impact and potential causes of fatigue in the post-transplantation setting, fatigue-related communication with clinicians, and the most effective patient-identified mitigation strategies (PIMS) for fatigue. A total of 1703 adult HCT recipients from a single center completed a survey including the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36), PROMIS Fatigue, and other fatigue-related items between July 2017-June 2018. The survey was offered to recipients at their post-transplantation anniversary occurring during this interval. Two independent raters categorized free-text responses about fatigue PIMS. PROMIS Fatigue scores were dichotomized into low (≤55) or high (>55). Associations between high fatigue and participant characteristics and health outcomes were evaluated using the Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Student 2-sample t test for continuous variables. Among the 1660 respondents with evaluable fatigue scores, 67% underwent allogeneic HCT. The majority of these (n = 1588; 96%) had a malignancy, with hematologic malignancy the most common diagnostic category (n = 1555; 94%). The median time post-transplantation was 11 years (interquartile range, 4 to 20 years). PROMIS item responses indicate that 44% of patients were at least somewhat fatigued and 37% were at least somewhat bothered by it. The mean fatigue score was 50.2 ± 11; 591 patients (36%) had high fatigue, which was associated with worse SF-36 scores across all domains (General Health, Physical Functioning, Emotional Well-being/Mental Health, Social Functioning, Role Limitation due to Physical Health, Role Limitation due to Emotional Health, Vitality [eg, energy], and Bodily Pain). High fatigue also was associated with self-reported chronic graft-versus-host disease, anxiety, depression and sleep problems. Diagnosis of plasma cell disorder and receipt of an autologous transplant were associated with high fatigue (P = .001). Among the 553 individuals who received an autologous transplant, 226 (41%) had multiple myeloma. Compared with the autologous transplant recipients without myeloma group, those with multiple myeloma were significantly more likely to have high fatigue (109 of 226 [48%] versus 118 of 325 [36%]; P < .01). Twenty percent of the patients with high fatigue did not discuss it with their care team. Among the 89 different reasons provided for not discussing it, the most common was "thought they already knew the answer" (n = 21). The 370 survivors with high fatigue who identified at least 1 most effective PIMS generated a total of 639 PIMS. Although the PIMS for fatigue spanned a wide array of strategies, most PIMS were related to sleep/rest (n = 192; 30%) or exercise (n = 139; 22%). Although fatigue is associated with worse HCT survivor-reported outcomes, it is only sometimes discussed with care teams. Survivors identify specific strategies that are most effective. Given its prevalence and impact, clinicians should promote communication about fatigue, treat underlying causes, and recommend sleep/rest and exercise, recognizing that individualized approaches also may be beneficial.

Statistics, philosophy, and health: the SMAC 2021 webconference.

SMAC 2021 was a webconference organized in June 2021. The aim of this conference was to bring together data scientists, (bio)statisticians, philosophers, and any person interested in the questions of causality and Bayesian statistics, ranging from technical to philosophical aspects. This webconference consisted of keynote speakers and contributed speakers, and closed with a round-table organized in an unusual fashion. Indeed, organisers asked world renowned scientists to prepare two videos: a short video presenting a question of interest to them and a longer one presenting their point of view on the question. The first video served as a "teaser" for the conference and the second were presented during the conference as an introduction to the round-table. These videos and this round-table generated original scientific insights and discussion worthy of being shared with the community which we do by means of this paper.

Humoral and Cellular Immune Response to Covid-19 Vaccination in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease on Immunosuppression.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) and its management with immunosuppressive therapies increase the susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, as well as progression to severe Coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19). Vaccination against COVID-19 is strongly recommended, but efficacy data are limited in this patient population. In this study, responses to COVID-19 vaccination were measured at 3 time points-after the initial vaccine series, before the third dose, and after the third dose-in adults with cGVHD receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Humoral response was measured by quantitative anti-spike antibody and neutralizing antibody levels. Anti-nucleocapsid antibody levels were measured to detect natural infection. T cell response was evaluated by a novel immunosequencing technique combined with immune repertoire profiling from cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples. Present or absent T cell responses were determined by the relative proportion of unique SARS-CoV-2-associated T cell receptor sequences ("breadth") plus clonal expansion of the response ("depth") compared with those in a reference population. Based on both neutralizing antibody and T cell responses, patients were categorized as vaccine responders (both detected), nonresponders (neither detected), or mixed (one but not both detected). Thirty-two patients were enrolled for the initial series, including 17 (53%) positive responders, 7 (22%) mixed responders, and 8 (25%) nonresponders. All but one patient categorized as mixed responders had humoral responses while lacking T cell responses. No statistical differences were observed in patient characteristics among the 3 groups of patients categorized by immune response, although sample sizes were limited. Significant positive correlations were observed between the robustness of cellular and humoral responses after the initial series. Among the 20 patients with paired samples (pre- and post-third dose), a third vaccination resulted in increased neutralizing antibody titers. cGVHD worsened in 10 patients (26%; 6 after the initial series and 4 after the third dose), necessitating escalation of immunosuppressive doses in 5 patients, although 4 had been tapering immunosuppression and 5 had already worsening cGVHD at the time of vaccination, and a clear association between COVID-19 vaccination and cGVHD could not be drawn. Among the patients with cGVHD on immunosuppressive therapy, 72% demonstrated a neutralizing antibody response after a 2-dose primary COVID-19 vaccination, two-thirds of whom also developed a T cell response; 25% had neither a humoral nor a T cell response. A third dose further amplified the antibody response.

Late Effects of Severe Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease on Quality of Life, Medical Comorbidities, and Survival.

Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is associated with high short-term morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The long-term effects after recovery from grade III-IV aGVHD are unknown. This study aimed to analyze late medical comorbidities, quality of life, nonrelapse mortality, and survival in patients treated for grade III-IV aGVHD. Chart review identified late effects, and patients were asked to complete annual surveys to collect patient-reported outcomes. Outcomes were compared between patients with grade 0-I aGVHD and grade III-IV aGVHD who underwent HCT between 2001 and 2019 and survived for at least 1 year post-transplantation. Patients with a history of grade III-IV aGVHD (n = 192) had significantly higher rates of late medical comorbidities (P < .001) and worse physical (P = .01) and mental (P = .04) functioning compared with patients with grade 0-I aGVHD (n = 615). Patients who survived for >1 year post-transplantation and had prior grade III-IV aGVHD also had worse 5-year overall survival (77.5% versus 83.6%; P = .006) and higher nonrelapse mortality (19.2% versus 10.6%; P < .001) compared with those with a history of grade 0-I aGVHD. No between-group difference was found in cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD. Patients who recover from severe aGVHD remain vulnerable to developing late comorbidities. These patients would likely benefit from continued monitoring and supportive care in an attempt to prevent late effects and improve survival.

Neuropathy and Muscle Cramps in Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors.

Although autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation are used to treat hematologic diseases, they are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The goal of this cross-sectional study was to describe the incidence, characteristics, severity and clinical correlates of neuropathy and muscle cramps, as self-reported by hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors. We included all respondents to a survey conducted July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. Surveys were completed online or on-paper according to participants' preferences; they received one reminder if no survey was received 1 month after distribution. Statistics are primarily descriptive comparing subgroups of patients. Of 4641 potentially eligible patients, 1745 responded and are included in the analysis. Participants (615 [35%] autologous, 1130 [65%] allogeneic) were a median age of 64.1 years (interquartile range [IQR] 55.2-70.8) and surveyed at a median of 11 years (IQR 4-21) after their most recent transplantation. Neuropathy symptoms were reported by 65% of autologous recipients, 66% of allogeneic transplant recipients with current chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD), and 45% of allogeneic recipients who never developed chronic GVHD. Muscle cramps were reported by 56% of autologous recipients, and 52% of allogeneic recipients and were rated as "very painful" by nearly half of patients who experienced them. These results suggest that neuropathy symptoms and muscle cramps are much more prevalent among survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation than previously recognized. Better approaches for prevention and treatment of these bothersome complications are needed.

Long-term patient-reported neurocognitive outcomes in adult survivors of hematopoietic cell transplant.

Survivors of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) are at risk for neurocognitive impairments, which can negatively affect quality of life. Given limited studies, we aimed to describe the neurocognitive outcomes in a cohort of long-term adult HCT survivors. Eligible survivors (age ≥21 years at HCT and alive ≥2 years following HCT) completed a 60-question survey of neurocognitive function and quality of life, which included the Neuro-Quality of Life Cognitive Function Short Form (Neuro-QoL) and the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Neurocognitive Questionnaire (NCQ). Analyses of risk factors included univariate comparisons and multivariable logistic regression. Survivors (n = 1861, 47.7% female, 65.6% allogeneic HCT) were surveyed at a median age of 64.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56.8-70.5) and a median 12.0 years (IQR, 6.0-21.0) from HCT. Survivors reported average Neuro-QoL scores (50.0 allogeneic; 49.2 autologous survivors) compared with an expected mean of 50 in the general population. On the NCQ, 17.4% to 31.2% of survivors reported impairments (Z-score >1.28) in task efficiency, memory, emotional regulation, or organization, compared with an expected 10% in the general population (all P < .01). In multivariable regression analyses, impaired Neuro-QoL (T-score <40) was independently associated with hearing issues (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-3.10) and sleep impairment (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 2.80-6.94) among allogeneic survivors, with comparable associations in autologous survivors. Overall, long-term adult HCT survivors reported average cognitive quality of life compared with the general population. Subsets of survivors with hearing issues and sleep impairments were more likely to report lower quality of life and impaired neurocognitive function, which may facilitate targeted monitoring or interventions following HCT.

Outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation among non-English- compared to English-speaking recipients.

Multiple studies have documented that racial/ethnic minority patients are less likely to undergo hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the United States (US), and if they do, they often have worse outcomes. No studies to our knowledge have compared the outcomes of English-speakers to non-English speakers undergoing HCT in the US. To test our hypothesis that non-English speakers have worse outcomes than English speakers after HCT, all transplants performed between 2015 and 2019 at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, WA, USA were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to test our hypothesis, adjusting for significant clinical covariates. Out of 2051 patients, 106 (5%) were documented to be non-English speakers. Mortality for non-English speakers was not different than English speakers (adjusted HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.63-1.63, p = 0.95). When the analysis was limited to the allogeneic population, the results were similar to the total population (adjusted HR 1.10, 0.64-1.88, p = 0.73). The risk of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was higher in the non-English speaking subset: adjusted OR 2.01, 95% CI, 1.02-3.98, p = 0.04. These data suggest that non-English speakers have similar survival compared to English speakers following HCT although they have more acute GVHD.

Naive T-Cell Depletion to Prevent Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

PURPOSE: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) causes morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Naive T cells (TN) cause severe GVHD in murine models. We evaluated chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and other outcomes in three phase II clinical trials of TN-depletion of peripheral blood stem-cell (PBSC) grafts. METHODS: One hundred thirty-eight patients with acute leukemia received TN-depleted PBSC from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors following conditioning with high- or intermediate-dose total-body irradiation and chemotherapy. GVHD prophylaxis was with tacrolimus, with or without methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. Subjects received CD34-selected PBSC and a defined dose of memory T cells depleted of TN. Median follow-up was 4 years. The primary outcome of the analysis of cumulative data from the three trials was cGVHD. RESULTS: cGVHD was very infrequent and mild (3-year cumulative incidence total, 7% [95% CI, 2 to 11]; moderate, 1% [95% CI, 0 to 2]; severe, 0%). Grade III and IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) occurred in 4% (95% CI, 1 to 8) and 0%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II aGVHD, which was mostly stage 1 upper gastrointestinal GVHD, was 71% (95% CI, 64 to 79). Recipients of matched related donor and matched unrelated donor grafts had similar rates of grade III aGVHD (5% [95% CI, 0 to 9] and 4% [95% CI, 0 to 9]) and cGVHD (7% [95% CI, 2 to 13] and 6% [95% CI, 0 to 12]). Overall survival, cGVHD-free, relapse-free survival, relapse, and nonrelapse mortality were, respectively, 77% (95% CI, 71 to 85), 68% (95% CI, 61 to 76), 23% (95% CI, 16 to 30), and 8% (95% CI, 3 to 13) at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Depletion of TN from PBSC allografts results in very low incidences of severe acute and any cGVHD, without apparent excess risks of relapse or nonrelapse mortality, distinguishing this novel graft engineering strategy from other hematopoietic cell transplantation approaches.

Precision medicine: Statistical methods for estimating adaptive treatment strategies.

SERIES EDITORS' NOTE: The beauty of science is that all the important things are unpredictable. Freeman Dyson In the typescript which follows, Moodie and Krakow tackle the topical issue of precision medicine and statistical methods for estimating adaptive treatment strategies. This may be the most difficult typescript in our series so far for non-statisticians to understand. It even has equations! But please bear with the authors and give it a chance. One needs not to understand the equations to get the thrust of the strategy.Precision medicine as we discuss elsewhere, is misnamed. In statistics and mathematics precision refers to getting the same answer again and again. It does not mean getting the correct answer, the term for which is accuracy, not precision. However, precision is the current buzz word so there's no point trying to get this straight. When we think about precision we need to consider two elements, reproducibility and replicability. Reproducibility means you give me your data and computer code and I come to the same conclusion you did. Replicability is another matter. I try to replicate your experiment and hopefully reach the same conclusion. In medicine, replicability is obviously more important than reproducibility but things which cannot be reproduced are unlikely to be replicated.As the authors discuss, one can think about precision medicine as one does a family vacation. A best vacation depends on several co-variates: where you live, your prior travel experiences, advice from family and friends, online reviews, Wikitravel, cost, your travel budget, if you have kids and many other co-variates. Consequently, there is unlikely to be a best vacation for everyone. Yours might be a week at the Ritz Carlton Cancun with dinner at Careyes and ours, a week at the Pfister Hotel in Milwaukee with dinner at Mader's German Restaurant (bring simvastatin). Similarly, it is unlikely there is a best therapy of acute myeloid leukemia, a best donor, a best conditioning regimen, a best posttransplant immune suppressive regimen etc. and certainly no best combination of these co-variates for your patient.The question Moodie and Krakow tackle is how we can determine the best therapy or combination of therapies for someone receiving a haematopoietic cell transplant. Although the default answer is typically: randomized clinical trials are the gold standard, these inform us of the outcome of a cohort of subjects, not individuals. In many instances, although a new therapy may be shown to be better than an old one in a controlled randomized trial the benefit is not uniformly distributed. Some subjects in the experimental cohort may do worse with the new therapy compared with controls, others better. The question is who are the winners and losers? We cannot do a controlled randomized trial of one person. Moodie and Krakow discuss statistical tools to help us sort this out.Again, please do not be put off by the equations; forgetaboutit. The overriding message is not so complex, and important. We are always standing by on twitter @BMTStats to help. But don't confuse us with Match.com. And, by the way, Freeman Dyson was a professor at the Institute for Advanced Studies at Princeton but never got his PhD.Robert Peter Gale, Imperial College London, and Mei-Jie Zhang, Medical College of Wisconsin, Center for International Blood and Marrow Research (CIBMTR).

Azithromycin Use and Increased Cancer Risk among Patients with Bronchiolitis Obliterans after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Azithromycin exposure during the early phase of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been associated with an increased incidence of hematologic relapse. We assessed the impact of azithromycin exposure on the occurrence of relapse or new subsequent neoplasm (SN) in patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after HCT who are commonly treated with azithromycin alone or in combination with other agents. In a retrospective study of patients with BOS from 2 large allograft centers, the effect of azithromycin exposure on the risk of relapse or SN was estimated from a Cox model with a time-dependent variable for treatment initiation. The Cox model was adjusted on time-fixed covariates measured at cohort entry, selected for their potential prognostic value. Similar models were used to assess the exposure effect on the cause-specific hazard of relapse, SN, and death free of those events. Sensitivity analyses were performed using propensity score matching. Among 316 patients, 227 (71.8%) were exposed to azithromycin after BOS diagnosis. The corresponding adjusted hazard ratio (HR) in patients exposed to azithromycin versus unexposed was 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 2.55) for relapse or SN, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.37 to 1.83) for relapse, and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.01 to 3.99) for SN. Patients exposed to azithromycin had a significantly lower cause-specific hazard of death free of neoplasm and relapse (adjusted HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.89). In conclusion, exposure to azithromycin after BOS after HCT was associated with an increased risk of SN but not relapse.

Phase I/II multisite trial of optimally dosed clofarabine and low-dose TBI for hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Clofarabine is an immunosuppressive purine nucleoside analog that may have better anti-leukemic activity than fludarabine. We performed a prospective phase I/II multisite trial of clofarabine with 2 Gy total body irradiation as non-myeloablative conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults with acute myeloid leukemia who were unfit for more intense regimens. Our main objective was to improve the 6-month relapse rate following non-myeloablative conditioning, while maintaining historic rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and engraftment. Forty-four patients, 53 to 74 (median: 69) years, were treated with clofarabine at 150 to 250 mg/m2 , of whom 36 were treated at the maximum protocol-specified dose. One patient developed multifactorial acute kidney injury and another developed multiorgan failure, but no other grade 3 to 5 non-hematologic toxicities were observed. All patients fully engrafted. The 6-month relapse rate was 16% (95% CI, 5%-27%) among all patients and 14% (95% CI, 3%-26%) among high-risk patients treated at the maximum dose, meeting the pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint. Overall survival was 55% (95% CI, 40%-70%) and leukemia-free survival was 52% (95% CI, 37%-67%) at 2 years. Compared to a historical high-risk cohort treated with the combination of fludarabine at 90 mg/m2 and 2 Gy TBI, protocol patients treated with the clofarabine-TBI regimen had lower rates of overall mortality (HR of 0.50, 95% CI, 0.28-0.91), disease progression or death (HR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.27-0.85), and morphologic relapse (HR 0.30, 95% CI, 0.13-0.69), and comparable NRM (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.36-2.00). The combination of clofarabine with TBI warrants further investigation in patients with high-risk AML.

Current state of nonengrafting donor leukocyte infusion (focus on microtransplantation for acute myeloid leukemia).

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Microtransplantation (or micro-stem cell transplantation, MST) is one permutation of alloreactive immunotherapy increasingly studied in clinical trials. It is most commonly applied to patients with myeloid malignancies who are not suitable candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. This review highlights the past 2 years of work on stem/progenitor cell products in the field of nonengrafting donor leukocyte infusion (NE-DLI), with a focus on applications of MST in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). RECENT FINDINGS: Assessing the utility of MST is hampered by lack of randomized controlled trials and by variability in donor selection algorithms, treatment timing, and unknown factors. The inherent complexity of the bidirectional alloreactive reactions, implicating many cell types, makes it challenging to move beyond correlative, population-level biology toward mechanistic explanations for MST's actions in any given patient-donor pair. Yet there are indicators that by stimulating a recipient-vs.-tumor effect, MST might substantially improve complete remission rates in AML and that it might find a role in postremission therapy. SUMMARY: The mechanistic underpinnings of MST are gradually being disentangled and its clinical development remains in early stages.

The Challenges of Informed Consent in High-Stakes, Randomized Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review.

Importance. Oncology trials often entail high-stakes interventions where potential for morbidity and fatal side effects, and for life-prolongation or cure, intensify bioethical issues surrounding informed consent. These challenges are compounded in multistage randomized trials, which are prevalent in oncology. Objective. We sought to elucidate the major barriers to informed consent in high-stakes oncology trials in general and the best consent practices for multistage randomized trials. Evidence Review. We queried PubMed for original studies published from January 1, 1990, to April 5, 2018, that focused on readability, quality, complexity or length of consent documents, motivation and sickness level of participants, or interventions and enhancements that influence informed consent for high-stakes oncologic interventions. Exclusion criteria included articles focused on populations outside industrialized countries, minors or other vulnerable populations, physician preferences, cancer screening and prevention, or recruitment strategies. Additional articles were identified through comprehensive bibliographic review. Findings. Twenty-seven articles were retained; 19 enrolled participants and 8 examined samples of consent documents. Methodologic quality was variable. This body of literature identified certain challenges that can be readily remedied. For example, the average length of the consent forms has increased 10-fold from 1987 to 2010, and patient understanding was shown to be inversely proportional to page count; shortening forms, or providing a concise summary as mandated by the revised Common Rule, might help. However, barriers to understanding that stem from deeply ingrained and flawed sociocultural perceptions of medical research seem more difficult to surmount. Although no studies specifically addressed problems posed by multiple sequential randomizations (such as change in risk-benefit ratio due to time-varying treatment responses or organ toxicities), the findings are likely applicable and especially relevant in that context. Concrete suggestions for improvement are proposed.

Rates and Risk Factors for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptomatology among Adult Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients and Their Informal Caregivers.

Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) can cause significant distress in patients and their informal caregivers. Despite advances in reduced-intensity conditioning and supportive care, few recent studies have reported rates of clinically significant post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology. Goals of the current study were to examine rates of PTSD and distress in patients and caregivers and to identify sociodemographic and clinical risk factors for PTSD. As part of an annual survivorship survey, 2157 HCT recipients and their caregivers were mailed self-report measures of PTSD and distress. Patients also completed self-report measures of sociodemographic information (eg, age, sex, employment status). Clinical variables (eg, time since transplant, transplant type) were captured in the transplant database. A total of 691 recipients (56% age 60 or above at the time of survey, 47% women, median 10.1 years post-HCT) and 333 caregivers provided PTSD data and were included in the current analyses. More caregivers reported PTSD (6.6%) than patients (3.3%; P = .02). Patients or caregivers who had PTSD reported significantly higher distress related to uncertainty, family strain, medical demands, finances, identity, and health burden (P < .0001) compared with those without PTSD. Patient but not caregiver PTSD was associated with more recent transplant (P = .01 and P = .16, respectively). Rates of PTSD are relatively low in long-term survivors of HCT and their caregivers. Nevertheless, results are consistent with other studies of cancer caregiving suggesting that caregivers often experience greater distress than patients. Timely referral to psychosocial services should be offered to both HCT recipients and caregivers reporting symptoms of PTSD.

A cure-rate model for Q-learning: Estimating an adaptive immunosuppressant treatment strategy for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant patients.

Cancers treated by transplantation are often curative, but immunosuppressive drugs are required to prevent and (if needed) to treat graft-versus-host disease. Estimation of an optimal adaptive treatment strategy when treatment at either one of two stages of treatment may lead to a cure has not yet been considered. Using a sample of 9563 patients treated for blood and bone cancers by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation drawn from the Center for Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we provide a case study of a novel approach to Q-learning for survival data in the presence of a potentially curative treatment, and demonstrate the results differ substantially from an implementation of Q-learning that fails to account for the cure-rate.