Refined balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension - reference center experience.

Introduction: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), characterized by thromboembolic changes affecting the pulmonary bed, leads to ventricular function deterioration and premature death. The introduction of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has significantly improved the prognosis of CTEPH patients. Aim: The authors of this article decided to summarize the experience of the BPA program, conducted between 2014 and 2022, at the reference center. Material and methods: Among 111 CTEPH patients, 55 were included in the analysis. A total of 226 sessions were performed, with a significant percentage of intravascular imaging and pressure catheter use. Results: Mean pulmonary pressure decreased significantly from 42 (22-66) to 26.5 mm Hg (11-54) (p < 0.05). Pulmonary vascular resistance and natriuretic peptide concentration decreased from 6.67 (1.66-14) to 3.295 Wood units (1.09-11.11), respectively, and from 1934 (60-16963) to 296 (21-9901) ng/ml (p < 0.05). There was also an improvement in the functional class (WHO) from 2.85 ±0.61 to 2.15 ±0.62 and an increase in the 6-minute walking distance from 300 ±131 to 367 ±154 m (p < 0.05). There were no in-hospital deaths or within 30 days of the procedure. Arterial damage occurred during nine sessions (n = 9/226, 4%), while 0.9% (n = 2/226) were complicated by acute right ventricular failure. Post-reperfusion pulmonary edema (RPE 0 - none) was observed in almost 90% of the sessions, grade 1 to 3 RPE occurred in 10.2%, and grade 4 RPE was not noted. Conclusions: BPA programs conducted in experienced centers are a safe and effective treatment option for inoperable CTEPH patients.

Initial results of investigator initiated international database on catheter directed therapy of acute pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Catheter directed therapies (CDT) are widely used in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). A multicenter registry was organized to evaluate their application in real life and to determine efficacy and safety of these procedures. Local experience of participating centers in percutaneous techniques for PE treatment was assessed. METHODS: An internet-based registry was designed to collect clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory data of consecutive PE patients treated with CDT in participating centers between 2017 and 2022. RESULTS: Under analysis were 145 consecutive patients with acute PE, aged 61 ± 15 years, treated with CDT in 7 centers: 50 (34.5%) patients with high-risk PE (HRPE), and 95 (65.5%) patients with intermediate-high risk PE (IHRPE). 100 (69%) patients were treated with dedicated devices, in 45 (31%) subjects a pigtail catheter was used. Total PE or CDT related in-hospital mortality in HRPE reached 14% (7 patients), while in IHRPE 3.2% (3 patients) (p = 0.032). 50% of PE or CDT related deaths occurred in patients treated with a pigtail catheter. All-cause mortality in 145 patients was 9.7%, and it was higher in HRPE than in IHRPE (18% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.019). The use of pigtail catheters compared to dedicated systems was associated with higher mortality (20% vs. 5%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter directed therapies is a real option of treating PE. It was used as primary therapy also in patients without contraindication for thrombolysis suggesting that clinical practice does not always follow current PE guidelines. Patients treated with dedicated CDT systems had a higher survival rate than subjects treated with pigtail catheters.

Very distal transradial approach (VITRO) for coronary interventions.

INTRODUCTION: Radial access is a standard approach for coronary interventions. However, it carries some risk of local or long-term complications such as hematoma or radial artery occlusion. AIM: To assess the feasibility of a very distal left and right transradial approach (VITRO) for coronary interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three hundred and twenty consecutive patients were submitted to diagnostic or therapeutic coronary interventions. In 102 patients the distal radial artery was not palpable or the pulse was too weak. In 218 selected patients (142 male, 76 female, age: 69 ±11 years) we decided to perform a distal transradial approach. RESULTS: The VITRO access was suitable in 195 patients with a success rate of 89.4%. In 9 patients arterial puncture failed, while in 14 others despite successful arterial puncture the wire could not be advanced towards the forearm part of the radial artery. Not only elective diagnostic angiographies were performed with VITRO but also urgent ad hoc coronary interventions in subjects with unstable angina or NSTEMI (48 subjects; 24.3%). Moreover, this very distal approach allowed 11 rotablations and 11 FFR/iFR examinations to be performed in 22 patients. No major bleeding, requiring prolonged hospital stay, surgery or transfusion occurred. One patient on oral anticoagulation with DAPT had conservatively managed minor forearm bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Very distal radial artery access is feasible, safe and comfortable in 60% of patients referred for elective or urgent coronary arteries angiography, or coronary interventions.

Safety of FFR-guided revascularisation deferral in Anatomically prognostiC diseasE (FACE: CARDIOGROUP V STUDY): A prospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: FFR-guided coronary intervention is recommended for patients with intermediate stenoses. However, concerns exist with this approach in anatomically prognostic disease. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre study, we consecutively enrolled patients found to have FFR negative lesions in anatomically significant sites: left main; proximal LAD; last remaining patent vessel; and multiple vessels with concomitant impaired left ventricular systolic function (EF < 40%). As per recommendation, revascularisation was deferred, and patients included into a registry. The primary endpoint was MACE (death, myocardial infarction and unplanned target lesion revascularization). Secondary endpoints were the above individual components. Subgroup analyses were performed for clinical presentation (stable vs. ACS), localization of lesion (ostial vs. non ostial) and renal function. RESULTS: The registry included 292 patients with 297 deferred stenoses. After 1-year, the primary endpoint occurred in 5% of patients, mainly driven by TLR (2.7%). Cardiovascular death occurred in 0.8% and AMI in 0.8%. During a follow-up of 22.2 ±â€¯11 months, MACE occurred in 11.6%. Cardiovascular death occurred in 1.8% and AMI in 2.1%. After multivariate analysis, impaired renal function (OR 1.99; CI 95% 1.74-5.41; p = 0.046) and ostial disease (OR 2.88; CI 95% 1.04-7.38; p = 0.041) were found to be predictors of MACE. Impaired renal function also predicted TLR (OR 2.43; CI 95% 1.17-5.02; p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: FFR-guided revascularisation deferral is safe in the majority of anatomically prognostic disease. However, further evaluation is required in the risk stratification of those patients with ostial disease and renal disease. Registered on ClinicalTrials, NCT02590926.