Speech treatment improves dysarthria in multisystemic ataxia: a rater-blinded, controlled pilot-study in ARSACS.

We aimed to provide proof-of-principle evidence that intensive home-based speech treatment can improve dysarthria in complex multisystemic degenerative ataxias, exemplified by autosomal recessive spastic ataxia Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS). Feasibility and piloting efficacy of speech training specifically tailored to cerebellar dysarthria was examined through a 4-week program in seven patients with rater-blinded assessment of intelligibility (primary outcome) and naturalness and acoustic measures of speech (secondary outcomes) performed 4 weeks before, immediately prior to, and directly after training (intraindividual control design). Speech intelligibility and naturalness improved post treatment. This provides piloting evidence that ataxia-tailored speech treatment might be effective in degenerative cerebellar disease.

Coordination and timing deficits in speech and swallowing in autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS).

BACKGROUND: Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) is a rare early onset neurodegenerative disease that typically results in ataxia, upper motor neuron dysfunction and sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. Dysarthria and dysphagia are anecdotally described as key features of ARSACS but the nature, severity and impact of these deficits in ARSACS are not known. A comprehensive quantitative and qualitative characterization of speech and swallowing function will support diagnostics, provide insights into the underlying pathology, and guide day-to-day clinical management. METHODS: 11 consecutive non-Quebec ARSACS patients were recruited, and compared to healthy participants from several published and unpublished cohorts. A comprehensive behavioural assessment including objective acoustic analysis and expert perceptual ratings of motor speech, the Clinical Assessment of Dysphagia in Neurodegeneration (CADN), videofluoroscopy and standardized tests of dysarthria and swallowing related quality of life was conducted. RESULTS: Speech in this ARSACS cohort is characterized by pitch breaks, prosodic deficits including reduced rate and prolonged intervals, and articulatory deficits. The swallowing profile was characterized by delayed initiation of the swallowing reflex and late epiglottic closure. Four out of ten patients were observed aspirating thin liquids on videofluoroscopy. Patients report that they regularly cough or choke on thin liquids and solids during mealtimes. Swallowing and speech-related quality of life was worse than healthy controls on all domains except sleep. CONCLUSIONS: The dysphagia and dysarthria profile of this ARSACS cohort reflects impaired coordination and timing. Dysphagia contributes to a significant impairment in functional quality of life in ARSACS, and appears to manifest distinctly from other ARSACS dysfunctions such as ataxia or spasticity.

Validation and Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the SWAL-QOL.

The SWAL-QOL questionnaire is a common tool for evaluating patients' dysphagia-specific quality of life. A validated German version is not available. This study aimed to establish a German version of the SWAL-QOL (G-SWAL-QOL) using a standardized translation procedure and to systematically evaluate its psychometric properties. The original SWAL-QOL was translated into German following international translation guidelines. A pilot study (45 subjects) confirmed comprehensibility of the G-SWAL-QOL. A consecutive series of 158 subjects (103 patients with dysphagia; 55 healthy controls) was then recruited to assess validity and reliability of the G-SWAL-QOL. Construct validity was analyzed through a correlation analysis with both (i) the Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (ADI-D) and (ii) the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated to determine reliability. All questions of the G-SWAL-QOL were comprehensible, except one which was subsequently revised. Construct validity of the G-SWAL-QOL was demonstrated by moderate to high correlations with the ADI-D (Spearman's rho 0.36 - 0.88). The G-SWAL-QOL was able to differentiate between patients with dysphagia and healthy controls (p < 0.001) and was sensitive to disease severity measured by different food textures. Reliability of the G-SWAL-QOL was good to excellent for both internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.7 for all domains, except eating desire [α = 0.69]) and test-retest reliability (Spearman's rho ≥ 0.68 for all domains; ICC > 0.8 for all domains). The G-SWAL-QOL is a valid and reliable measuring tool for dysphagia-specific quality of life in German-speaking persons.

Speech and swallowing abnormalities in adults with POLG associated ataxia (POLG-A).

BACKGROUND: Mutations in the nuclear-encoded mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma (POLG) can result in a wide spectrum of neurological deficits. A common presentation is progressive ataxia (POLG-A) which includes impaired speech and swallowing. The nature, severity and impact of these deficits in POLG-A is not known. A comprehensive quantitative and qualitative characterization of dysarthria and dysphagia in this recurrent ataxia disorder will assist in diagnostics, provide insights into the underlying pathology, and establish the foundation for future therapy trials. METHODS: 14 consecutive patients with POLG (9 females, mean age=50.1y, SD=11.2) and 34 healthy controls were enrolled. Comprehensive assessments of motor speech and swallowing function, acoustic analysis of speech, videofluoroscopy and measures of quality of life were conducted. RESULTS: The speech profile of individuals with POLG-A was characterized by poor control of pitch and strain-strangled voice quality, reduced rate of speech and longer variable silences between words, and articulatory breakdown including imprecise consonants and vowel distortions. Swallowing deficits included slower initiation of the swallow reflex, poor control of bolus and late epiglottic closure. Speech and swallowing related quality of life was worse than healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: The dysarthria and dysphagia profiles in POLG-A are largely symptomatic of impaired timing, indicating a mainly spinocerebellar deficit. Dysarthria and dysphagia contribute to a significant impairment in functional quality of life, and progress distinctly from other POLG-A dysfunctions like ataxia or cognitive impairment. Our assessments establish meaningful patient focused outcome measures that will be suitable for use in natural history studies and clinical trials.

Antibiotic prescribing for acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) - guideline adherence in the German primary care setting: An analysis of routine data.

OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic overprescribing in primary care has major impacts on the development of antibiotic resistance. The objective of this study is to provide insight in antibiotics prescriptions for patients suffering from cough, acute bronchitis or community acquired pneumonia in primary care. METHODS: Data from 2009 to 2013 of electronic health records of 12,880 patients in Germany were obtained from a research database. The prescription of antibiotics for acute lower respiratory tract infections was compared to the national S3 guideline cough from the German Society of General Practitioners and Family Medicine. RESULTS: Antibiotics were prescribed in 41% of consultations. General practitioners' decision of whether or not to prescribe an antibiotic was congruent with the guideline in 52% of consultations and the antibiotic choice congruence was 51% of antibiotic prescriptions. Hence, a congruent prescribing decision and a prescription of recommendation was found in only 25% of antibiotic prescriptions. Split by diagnosis we found that around three quarters of antibiotics prescribed for cough (73%) and acute bronchitis (78%) were not congruent to the guidelines. In contrast to that around one quarter of antibiotics prescribed for community acquired pneumonia (28%) were not congruent to the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that there is a big gap between guideline recommendation and actual prescribing, in the decision to prescribe and the choice of antibiotic agent. This gap could be closed by periodic quality circles on antibiotic prescribing for GPs.