Granulocyte transfusions in critically ill children with prolonged neutropenia: side effects and survival rates from a single-center analysis.

UNLABELLED: Granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients have been used for over 40 years, although effectiveness, indications, and both patient and donor safety remain debated. This single-center study assessed the side effects, clinical course, and survival of granulocyte transfusions in critically ill pediatric patients, with underlying hemato-oncological disorders, prolonged neutropenia, and proven or suspected severe infection. Donor-specific side effects and influence of donor-specific characteristics on patient outcome were also investigated. A median of 4.02 × 10(10) cells was collected from 39 healthy donors for 118 granulocyte concentrates. Donors reported no significant side effects. Complications for patients were frequent but mostly minor and included vomiting, hypotension, and dyspnea. In one episode of life-threatening dyspnea, association with the granulocyte transfusion could not be ruled out. Overall survival on day 100 was 61.9 %. Patients received a median of 0.13 × 10(10) cells per kg body weight. Doses above this median were associated with a significantly better survival. Lower patient weight and age-/sex-adjusted weight were also associated with better survival. CONCLUSION: Granulocyte mobilization and collection is a safe practice. Transfusions are well tolerated in critically ill patients. Patient weight and transfused cells per kg bodyweight are major determinants of survival in pediatric patients. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients have been used for over 40 years • The effectiveness of the technique remains controversial • Patient and donor safety remain debated • New mobilization protocols generate higher yields of granulocytes What is new: • Granulocyte collection can safely be performed • Granulocytes can safely be administered to patients • Lower patient weight and age-/sex-adjusted weight are associated with better survival rates • Patients receiving above 0.13 × 10 (10) cells per kg body weight had an excellent outcome • Further standardized, prospective studies are warranted.

An increased alveolar CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + T-regulatory cell ratio in acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with increased 30-day mortality.

PURPOSE: Cell therapy may become an option for lung injury treatment. However, no data are available on the alveolar presence and time course of CD4+ CD25 + Foxp3 + T-regulatory lymphocyte cells (Tregs) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Accordingly, we (1) measured the ratio of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + Tregs to all (CD4+) lymphocytes in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of ARDS patients and of control subjects without lung disease and (2) assessed their impact on 30-day mortality. METHODS: In a prospective study, the ratios of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + T-regulatory cells to all CD4+ cells were measured (FACS) within 24 h of the patients' ICU referral in the BAL and in the blood of 47 patients with ARDS (32 males, 15 females; mean age 44 years ±13) as well as in 8 controls undergoing elective abdominal surgery (5 men, 3 women; mean age 49 years ±4). BAL concentrations of several cytokines were also measured in ARDS patients. RESULTS: Tregs were detected in the BAL of control subjects and ARDS patients. However, the mean ratio of Tregs to all CD4+ lymphocytes was threefold greater in ARDS non-survivors (16.5%; p = 0.025) and almost twofold greater in ARDS survivors (9.0%; p = 0.015) compared to controls (5.9%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed the ratio of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + T-regulatory lymphocytes to all CD4+ lymphocytes in the BAL to be an important and independent prognostic factor for 30-day survival (HR 6.5; 95% CI, 1.7-25; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: An increased T-regulatory cell ratio in the admission BAL of patients with ARDS is an important and independent risk factor for 30-day mortality.

Intraoperative adjunctive stem cell treatment in patients with critical limb ischemia using a novel point-of-care device.

INTRODUCTION: In a prospective trial we tested whether adjunctive intraoperative stem cell treatment in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) can be performed safely in combination with bypass surgery and/or interventional treatment. The end point of our study was the safety and integrity of a novel point-of-care system used in patients with CLI. METHODS: We included only patients with CLI and tissue loss according to Rutherford categories 4-6. The Harvest Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate System consists of an automated, microprocessor-controlled dedicated centrifuge with decanting capability and the accessory BMAC Pack for processing a patient's bone marrow aspirate (BMA). The centrifuge is portable and enables BMA to be rapidly processed in the operating room to provide an autologous concentrate of nucleated cells for immediate injection. The surgeon aspirated 120 ml BMA from the iliac crest. RESULTS: Eight consecutive patients were treated according to the study protocol. The mean follow-up period was 9.2 months (range 2-18). Stem cells were always injected during the final revascularization attempt. One minor amputation and two major amputations were required. In five of eight patients there was a discrete increase in the ankle-brachial index post-stem cell treatment. The dose of stem cells after centrifugation was 17.2 (range 13.8-54.2)x10E6 CD34-positive cells and 7.8 (range 1.8-35.9)x10E6 CD133-positive cells. The injected dose of VEGFR-2-coexpressing stem cells was 0.5-5.7x10E4. CONCLUSION: We were able to show that the buffy coat preparation using a point-of-care system is a simple and fast method to enrich stem cells from BMAs. This automated system gives high recovery rates and good reproducibility.