Effect of acetaminophen and fluvastatin on post-dose symptoms following infusion of zoledronic acid.

UNLABELLED: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy of acetaminophen or fluvastatin in preventing post-dose symptoms (increases in body temperature or use of rescue medication) following a single infusion of the intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZOL). Acetaminophen, but not fluvastatin, significantly reduced the incidence and severity of post-dose symptoms. INTRODUCTION: Transient symptoms including myalgia and pyrexia have been reported post-infusion of IV bisphosphonates, typically starting the day after infusion and resolving within several days. The cause is unknown but may be related to transient cytokine elevations. Statins' potential to block release of these cytokines has been hypothesized. This study was aimed to evaluate efficacy of acetaminophen and fluvastatin in preventing/reducing post-dose symptoms following ZOL 5 mg infusion. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of efficacy of acetaminophen or fluvastatin in preventing increases in body temperature or use of rescue medication (ibuprofen) following a single ZOL infusion. Bisphosphonate-naive postmenopausal women with low bone mass (N = 793) were randomized into three treatment groups and given 650 mg acetaminophen or 80 mg fluvastatin or placebo 45 min before ZOL infusion. The acetaminophen group continued taking 650 mg acetaminophen every 6 h over the next 3 days, and the other two groups took matching placebo according to the same schedule. Subjects recorded body temperature, symptoms in a diary. Inflammatory cytokines and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured at baseline, 24, and 72 h in a study subset. RESULTS: Acetaminophen four times/day significantly reduced the incidence and severity of post-dose symptoms following ZOL infusion. Single-dose fluvastatin 80 mg prior to ZOL infusion did not prevent/reduce post-dose symptoms. Cytokine levels increased by 24 h and returned towards baseline by 72 h, similar to the pattern for post-infusion symptoms. CRP levels increased from baseline to 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Acetaminophen four times/day for 3 days significantly reduced the incidence and severity of post-dose symptoms following ZOL infusion.

Effects of benazepril and hydrochlorothiazide, given alone and in low- and high-dose combinations, on blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of several combinations of benazepril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and hydrochlorothiazide, as compared with placebo, in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension. DESIGN: A 6-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel study conducted at 24 centers. A placebo run-in period of 1 to 4 weeks preceded the double-blind phase. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Male and female outpatients, aged 18 years and older, were eligible to participate if their sitting diastolic blood pressure was between 95 and 114 mm Hg at the last two consecutive visits during the placebo phase. Among the 334 patients who entered the double-blind phase, 17% were aged 65 years or older and 26% were black. Eleven patients withdrew because of adverse experiences, including two patients receiving placebo. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received placebo; benazepril, 20 mg; hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg; or combination therapy with benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 5/6.25 mg, 10/12.5 mg, 20/25 mg, 20/6.25 mg, or 5/25 mg, once daily for 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean change from baseline in sitting diastolic blood pressure at end point (last postrandomization measurement carried forward) in the double-blind phase. Combination therapy with benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 20/25 mg, was compared with benazepril, 20 mg alone, and hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg alone. Sitting systolic blood pressure and the effect of race and age on treatment efficacy were also evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, all benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide combinations produced statistically significant reductions from baseline in sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressures at study end point. In the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 20/25 mg, group, the adjusted mean changes in sitting diastolic blood pressure at end point were statistically significantly greater than those in the monotherapy treatment groups (benazepril, 20 mg, P < or = .05; hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg, P < or = .001) alone. All therapies were generally well tolerated. Decreases in mean serum potassium level with hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy were reduced or eliminated with combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Benazepril in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, including a low-dose combination of 5/6.25 mg, is effective in reducing sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

A comparison of once-daily atenolol and metoprolol using office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

The authors compared the relative safety and efficacy of changing treatment from once-daily atenolol to metoprolol in patients with essential hypertension. A parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted in two phases: a 4-week baseline single-blind phase using atenolol 50 mg, followed by a 4-week randomized double-blind treatment phase using either atenolol 50 mg or metoprolol 100 mg administered once daily at noontime. Patients with well-controlled hypertension already prescribed 50 mg of atenolol (with or without the addition of a diuretic) for control of hypertension were selected for participation from the outpatient hypertension clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Seated blood pressure (BP) and pulse were obtained during the baseline phase and during the randomized treatment phase. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring was performed once during the baseline phase and once during the randomized treatment phase, near the end of each 4-week period. There were no within- and between-treatment differences in office systolic and diastolic BP. There was a slight increase in pulse (average = 5.2 beats/minute; P = .02) for those participants treated with metoprolol. For within-treatment groups, the ambulatory BP data showed no significant differences in systolic and diastolic BPs, except for an increase in morning diastolic BP for those randomized to metoprolol (average = 6.2 mm Hg; P = .01). For between-treatment groups, the metoprolol arm had a higher morning systolic BP (P = .01), a higher morning diastolic BP (P = .03), and a higher nighttime heart rate (P = .01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)