Hemodialysis and biomarkers of myocardial infarction - a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: End-stage renal disease is associated with a high risk of cardiovascular disease. We compared the concentration and prognostic ability of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and I (hs-cTnI) and cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyC) among stable hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Patients were sampled before and after hemodialysis. We measured hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT and cMyC and used Cox regressions to assess the association between quartiles of concentrations and all-cause mortality and a combination of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 307 patients were included, 204 males, mean age 66 years (SD 14). Before dialysis, 299 (99 %) had a hs-cTnT concentration above the 99th percentile, compared to 188 (66 %) for cMyC and 35 (11 %) for hs-cTnI. Hs-cTnT (23 %, p<0.001) and hs-cTnI (15 %, p=0.049) but not cMyC (4 %, p=0.256) decreased during dialysis. Follow-up was a median of 924 days (492-957 days); patients in the 3rd and 4th quartiles of hs-cTnT (3rd:HR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.5-5.8, 4th:5.2, 2.7-9.8) and the 4th quartile of hs-cTnI (HR 3.8, 2.2-6.8) had an increased risk of mortality. Both were associated with an increased risk of the combined endpoint for patients in the 3rd and 4th quartiles. cMyC concentrations were not associated with risk of mortality or cardiovascular event. CONCLUSIONS: Hs-cTnT was above the 99th percentile in almost all patients. This was less frequent for hs-cTnI and cMyC. High cTn levels were associated with a 3-5-fold higher mortality. This association was not present for cMyC. These findings are important for management of hemodialysis patients.

Non-cardiac causes of troponin elevation.

With the increased sensitivity of the newest cardiac troponin assays, the risk of false positive cardiac troponin measurements has also increased. As summarised in this review, there are multiple possible causes of cardiac troponin release including several non-cardiac illnesses, particularly kidney disease. Further, there is a risk of analytical interference in which case repeated measurements with a different assay is a good tool. When there is a discrepancy between troponin measurement and clinical presentation of the patient, the clinician should consider the possibility of analytical interference.

Metabolomics of early myocardial ischemia.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosing myocardial infarction is difficult during the initial phase. As, acute myocardial ischemia is associated with changes in metabolic pathways, metabolomics may provide ways of identifying early stages of ischemia. We investigated the changes in metabolites after induced ischemia in humans using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). METHODS: We included patients undergoing elective coronary angiography showing normal coronary arteries. These were randomized into 4 groups and underwent coronary artery occlusion for 0, 30, 60 or 90 s. Blood was collected over the next 3 h and analyzed using NMR. We used 2-way ANOVA of time from baseline- and treatment group to find metabolites that changed significantly following the intervention and principal component analysis (PCA) to investigate changes between the 90 s ischemia- and control groups at 15 and 60 min after intervention. RESULTS: We included 34 patients. The most pronounced changes were observed in the lipid metabolism where 38 of 112 lipoprotein parameters (34%) showed a significant difference between the patients exposed to ischemia and the control group. There was a decrease in total plasma triglycerides over the first hour followed by a normalization. The principal component analysis showed a effects of the treatment after just 15 min. These effects were dominated by changes in high-density lipoprotein. An increase in lactic acid levels was detected surprisingly late, 1-2 h after the ischemia. CONCLUSION: We investigated the earliest changes in metabolites of patients undergoing brief myocardial ischemia and found that ischemia led to changes throughout the lipid metabolism as early as 15 min post-intervention.

Attainment of Target Antibiotic Levels by Oral Treatment of Left-Sided Infective Endocarditis: A POET Substudy.

BACKGROUND: In the POET (Partial Oral Endocarditis Treatment) trial, oral step-down therapy was noninferior to full-length intravenous antibiotic administration. The aim of the present study was to perform pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses for oral treatments of infective endocarditis to assess the probabilities of target attainment (PTAs). METHODS: Plasma concentrations of oral antibiotics were measured at day 1 and 5. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for the bacteria causing infective endocarditis (streptococci, staphylococci, or enterococci). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets were predefined according to literature using time above MIC or the ratio of area under the curve to MIC. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses were done for amoxicillin, dicloxacillin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, and rifampicin, and PTAs were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 236 patients participated in this POET substudy. For amoxicillin and linezolid, the PTAs were 88%-100%. For moxifloxacin and rifampicin, the PTAs were 71%-100%. Using a clinical breakpoint for staphylococci, the PTAs for dicloxacillin were 9%-17%.Seventy-four patients at day 1 and 65 patients at day 5 had available pharmacokinetic and MIC data for 2 oral antibiotics. Of those, 13 patients at day 1 and 14 patients at day 5 did only reach the target for 1 antibiotic. One patient did not reach target for any of the 2 antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: For the individual orally administered antibiotic, the majority reached the target level. Patients with sub-target levels were compensated by the administration of 2 different antibiotics. The findings support the efficacy of oral step-down antibiotic treatment in patients with infective endocarditis.

High incidence of discrepancies in new Siemens assay - a comparison of cardiac troponin I assays.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac troponin (cTn) is the biochemical gold standard for diagnosing myocardial infarction (MI). We compared the Siemens ADVIA Centaur High-Sensitivity (hs-cTnI) assay with the Siemens Ultra assay (cTnI-U). METHODS: Over 3 months cTnI-U and hs-cTnI were measured simultaneously at Herlev-Gentofte Hospital. Acute myocardial injury was diagnosed using the 4th universal definition. Disputed cases were adjudicated using clinical data. We compared diagnostic accuracy using area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic. Outliers in between-assay differences were defined as a factor-5 difference and ≥1 measurement >40 ng/L. Patients with outlier differences were invited for re-sampling and tested with serial dilution and heterophilic blocking tubes. RESULTS: From the 18th January to the 20th April 2019, 4,369 samples on 2,658 patients were included. cTnI-U measured higher concentrations than hs-cTnI (mean 23%, -52-213%), resulting in a higher frequency of acute myocardial injury, 255 (9.6%) vs. 203 (7.6%), p<0.001. This remained significant after adjudication, 212 vs 197, p<0.001. AUC for the prediction of MI for was 0.963 for cTnI-U and 0.959 for hs-cTnI, p=0.001. Outlier differences were seen in 35 (1.2%) patients, primarily with elevated hs-cTnI (n=33, 94%). On two re-samplings (median 144 and 297 days since inclusion), 16 of 20 (80%) and 11 of 11 had sustained elevation of hs-cTnI. The samples showed no signs of heterophilic antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Using hs-cTnI resulted in a subset of patients with large, discrepant elevations in concentration. These patients still had elevated hs-cTnI 6-10 months post admission but no heterophilic antibodies.

Effect of Influenza Vaccination on Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Prospective Cohort Study of 46†000 Healthcare Workers.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess whether influenza vaccination has an impact on the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A cohort of 46 112 healthcare workers were tested for antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and filled in a survey on COVID-19 symptoms, hospitalization, and influenza vaccination. RESULTS: The risk ratio of hospitalization due to SARS-CoV-2 for influenza vaccinated compared with unvaccinated participants was 1.00 for the seasonal vaccination in 2019/2020 (confidence interval, .56-1.78, P = 1.00). Likewise, no clinical effect of influenza vaccination on development of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was found. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings indicate that influenza vaccination does not affect the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19.

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and reduced risk of reinfection through 6 months: a Danish observational cohort study of 44 000 healthcare workers.

OBJECTIVES: Antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) are a key factor in protecting against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We examined longitudinal changes in seroprevalence in healthcare workers (HCWs) in Copenhagen and the protective effect of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: In this prospective study, screening for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (ELISA) was offered to HCWs three times over 6 months. HCW characteristics were obtained by questionnaires. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04346186. RESULTS: From April to October 2020 we screened 44 698 HCWs, of whom 2811 were seropositive at least once. The seroprevalence increased from 4.0% (1501/37 452) to 7.4% (2022/27 457) during the period (p < 0.001) and was significantly higher than in non-HCWs. Frontline HCWs had a significantly increased risk of seropositivity compared to non-frontline HCWs, with risk ratios (RRs) at the three rounds of 1.49 (95%CI 1.34-1.65, p < 0.001), 1.52 (1.39-1.68, p < 0.001) and 1.50 (1.38-1.64, p < 0.001). The seroprevalence was 1.42- to 2.25-fold higher (p < 0.001) in HCWs from dedicated COVID-19 wards than in other frontline HCWs. Seropositive HCWs had an RR of 0.35 (0.15-0.85, p 0.012) of reinfection during the following 6 months, and 2115 out of 2248 (95%) of those who were seropositive during rounds one or two remained seropositive after 4-6 months. The 133 of 2248 participants (5.0%) who seroreverted were slightly older and reported fewer symptoms than other seropositive participants. CONCLUSIONS: HCWs remained at increased risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the 6-month period. Seropositivity against SARS-CoV-2 persisted for at least 6 months in the vast majority of HCWs and was associated with a significantly lower risk of reinfection.

Risk Factors for Being Seronegative following SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Large Cohort of Health Care Workers in Denmark.

Most individuals seroconvert after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but being seronegative is observed in 1 to 9%. We aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with being seronegative following PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. In a prospective cohort study, we screened health care workers (HCW) in the Capital Region of Denmark for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We performed three rounds of screening from April to October 2020 using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method targeting SARS-CoV-2 total antibodies. Data on all participants' PCR for SARS-CoV-2 RNA were captured from national registries. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were applied to investigate the probability of being seronegative and the related risk factors, respectively. Of 36,583 HCW, 866 (2.4%) had a positive PCR before or during the study period. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 866 HCW was 42 (31 to 53) years, and 666 (77%) were female. After a median of 132 (range, 35 to 180) days, 21 (2.4%) of 866 were seronegative. In a multivariable model, independent risk factors for being seronegative were self-reported asymptomatic or mild infection hazard ratio (HR) of 6.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6 to 17; P < 0.001) and body mass index (BMI) of ≥30, HR 3.1 (95% CI, 1.1 to 8.8; P = 0.039). Only a few (2.4%) HCW were not seropositive. Asymptomatic or mild infection as well as a BMI above 30 were associated with being seronegative. Since the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 reduces the risk of reinfection, efforts to protect HCW with risk factors for being seronegative may be needed in future COVID-19 surges. IMPORTANCE Most individuals seroconvert after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but negative serology is observed in 1 to 9%. We found that asymptomatic or mild infection as well as a BMI above 30 were associated with being seronegative. Since the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 reduces the risk of reinfection, efforts to protect HCW with risk factors for being seronegative may be needed in future COVID-19 surges.

Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide levels before and after hemodialysis predict long-term prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) is a strong prognostic biomarker in cardiovascular disease but there is limited data for its use among patients undergoing dialysis. METHODS: This was a cohort study of patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis from two Danish centers. Blood sampling and echocardiography were performed before and after a dialysis session. We calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristics for diagnosing heart failure and Cox regressions for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of the 306 patients, 284 (93%) had MR-proANP measurements both before and after dialysis. Median concentration was 642 pmol/L (IQR 419-858) before and 351 pmol/L (IQR 197-537) after dialysis, a mean decrease of 330 pmol/L (43%, CI 296-364, P < 0.001). MR-proANP concentration both before and after dialysis was negatively correlated to left ventricular ejection fraction with no difference in predictive ability for heart failure, AUC before and after dialysis were 0.60 (CI 0.50-0.70) and 0.61 (CI 0.51-0.71) (P = 0.40). Median follow-up was 32 months (IQR 31-33), during which 99 patients (32%) had a cardiovascular event and 110 (36%) died. A doubling of MR-proANP concentration was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.6 (CI 1.3-1.9) before and 1.7 (CI 1.4-2.0) after dialysis for mortality and a HR of 1.5 (CI 1.2-1.9) before and 1.4 (CI 1.2-1.7) after dialysis for cardiovascular events (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The MR-proANP concentration is elevated among patients undergoing hemodialysis and decreases during dialysis. MR-proANP concentration both before, after and intra-dialysis change strongly predicted cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.

Comparison of 16 Serological SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in 16 Clinical Laboratories.

Serological assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are needed to support clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigations. Recently, assays for large-scale detection of total antibodies (Ab), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and IgM against SARS-CoV-2 antigens have been developed, but there are limited data on the diagnostic accuracy of these assays. This study was a Danish national collaboration and evaluated 15 commercial and one in-house anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays in 16 laboratories. Sensitivity was evaluated using 150 samples from individuals with asymptomatic, mild, or moderate COVID-19, nonhospitalized or hospitalized, confirmed by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT); samples were collected 13 to 73 days either from symptom onset or from positive NAAT (patients without symptoms). Specificity and cross-reactivity were evaluated in samples collected prior to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic from >586 blood donors and patients with autoimmune diseases, cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus infections, and acute viral infections. A specificity of ≥99% was achieved by all total-Ab and IgG assays except one, DiaSorin Liaison XL IgG (97.2%). Sensitivities in descending order were Wantai ELISA total Ab (96.7%), CUH-NOVO in-house ELISA total Ab (96.0%), Ortho Vitros total Ab (95.3%), YHLO iFlash IgG (94.0%), Ortho Vitros IgG (93.3%), Siemens Atellica total Ab (93.2%), Roche Elecsys total Ab (92.7%), Abbott Architect IgG (90.0%), Abbott Alinity IgG (median 88.0%), DiaSorin Liaison XL IgG (median 84.6%), Siemens Vista total Ab (81.0%), Euroimmun/ELISA IgG (78.0%), and Snibe Maglumi IgG (median 78.0%). However, confidence intervals overlapped for several assays. The IgM results were variable, with the Wantai IgM ELISA showing the highest sensitivity (82.7%) and specificity (99%). The rate of seropositivity increased with time from symptom onset and symptom severity.