[Quality in coloproctology training : How is coloproctology training qualitatively integrated into the national training catalogue?] / Qualität in der koloproktologischen Ausbildung : Wie lässt sich koloproktologische Ausbildung in den nationalen Ausbildungskatalogen qualitativ integrieren?

The incorporation of coloproctology as a part of the surgical training and further education of assistant and specialist physicians shows great differences between Germany, Austria and Switzerland. In this article the international and national possibilities before and after specialist medical training are described in detail. In Austria, an optional coloproctology module can already be chosen in the third year of surgical training. Coloproctology is a compulsory component during the complete surgical training in Germany but a lower number of operations are required. In the basic module in Switzerland coloproctology is compulsory but contained in the operation catalogue to a lesser extent, although it has to be explicitly chosen in the further specialist training. The mandatory training in coloproctology in Germany enables all surgical assistants to undergo training, even if it is less intensive. As a result of partially compulsory and partially optional modules in Switzerland, a lower proportion of trainees receive specific training but it is more detailed. The number of trainees who are trained in coloproctology is even smaller in Austria due to the coloproctological training being optional. In the German-speaking regions a variety of specialized courses and further education are available for assistants and surgeons to further deepen their knowledge, no matter which form of training they had. At the international level the European Board of Surgical Qualification (EBSQ) for coloproctology has been available since 1998 and for many European specialists is the only possibility for formal specialization. The quality of a coloproctology training and further education curriculum may vary with national and international factors; however, it is a parameter for high standards in coloproctology in routine daily work, for the numbers of young coloproctology surgeons and is associated with a sufficient research performance in this discipline.

Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation with suture mucopexy compared with suture mucopexy alone for the treatment of Grade III haemorrhoids: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

AIM: Novel minimally invasive techniques aimed to reposition the haemorrhoidal zone have been established for prolapsing haemorrhoids. We present a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of additional Doppler-guided ligation of submucosal haemorrhoidal arteries (DG-HAL) in patients with symptomatic Grade III haemorrhoids. The trial was registered as ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02372981. METHOD: All consecutive patients with symptomatic Grade III haemorrhoids were randomly allocated to one of the two study arms: (i) Group A, DG-HAL with mucopexy or (ii) Group B, mucopexy alone. End-points were postoperative pain, faecal incontinence, bleeding, residual prolapse and alterations of the vascularization of the anorectal vascular plexus. Vascularization of the anorectal vascular plexus was assessed by transperineal contrast enhanced ultrasound. Patients recorded their symptoms in a diary maintained for a month. RESULTS: Forty patients were recruited and randomized to the two study groups. Patients in Group A had less pain in the first two postoperative weeks. At the 12-month follow-up, two patients in Group A (10%) and one in Group B (5%) showed recurrent Grade III haemorrhoids (P = 0.274). No significant morphological changes were observed in the transperineal ultrasound findings between the preoperative assessment and the assessment at 1 and 6 months in either group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mucopexy techniques for treating prolapsing haemorrhoids are effective, but DG-HAL does not add significantly to the results achieved by mucopexy. Repositioning the haemorrhoidal zone is the key to success, and mucopexy should be placed at the sites of the largest visible prolapse.