RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: While value-based learning health systems may address challenges associated with the integrative delivery of therapeutic lifestyle management in usual care, the extent to which they have been evaluated in real-world settings have remained limited. METHODS: To explore the feasibility and user-experiences, associated with the first-year implementation of a preventative Learning Health System (LHS), consecutive patients were evaluated following referral from primary and/or specialty care providers from the Halton and Greater Toronto Area in Ontario, Canada, between December 2020 and December 2021. The integration of a LHS into medical care was facilitated using a digital e-learning platform, and consisted of exercise, lifestyle, and disease-management counselling. The dynamic monitoring of user-data allowed patients and providers to modify goals, treatment plans, and care-delivery in real-time in accordance with patient engagement, weekly exercise, and risk-factor targets. All program costs were covered by the public-payer health care system using a physician fee-for-service payment model. Descriptive statistics evaluated attendance to prescheduled visits, drop-out rates, changes in self-reported weekly Metabolic Expenditure Task-Minutes (MET-MINUTES), perceived changes in health knowledge, lifestyle behaviours, health status, satisfaction with care, and programmatic costs. RESULTS: 378 of 437 patients (86.5%) enrolled in the 6-month program; The average age of patients was 61.2 ± 12.2, 156 (41.3%) of which were female and 140 (37.0%) with established coronary disease. After 1 year, 15.6% dropped out of the program. On average, weekly MET-MINUTES rose by 191.1 throughout the program (95% CI [331.82, 57.96], P=0.007), with increases most prominent among sedentary populations. Participants reported significant improvements in perceived health status and health knowledge, at a total health-care delivery cost of $517.70 per patient for a completed program. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an integrative preventative learning health system was feasible, with high patient engagement and favourable user-experiences. Further research is required to compare health outcomes against usual care.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic use in nursing homes is often inappropriate, in terms of overuse and misuse, and it can be linked to adverse events and antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) can optimize antibiotic use by minimizing unnecessary prescriptions, treatment cost, and the overall spread of antimicrobial resistance. Nursing home providers and residents are candidates for ASP implementation, yet guidelines for implementation are limited. OBJECTIVE: To support nursing home providers with the selection and adoption of ASP interventions. DESIGN AND SETTING: A multiphase modified Delphi method to assess 15 ASP interventions across criteria addressing scientific merit, feasibility, impact, accountability, and importance. This study included surveys supplemented with a 1-day consensus meeting. PARTICIPANTS: A 16-member multidisciplinary panel of experts and resident representatives. RESULTS: From highest to lowest, 6 interventions were prioritized by the panel: (1) guidelines for empiric prescribing, (2) audit and feedback, (3) communication tools, (4) short-course antibiotic therapy, (5) scheduled antibiotic reassessment, and (6) clinical decision support systems. Several interventions were not endorsed: antibiograms, educational interventions, formulary review, and automatic substitution. A lack of nursing home resources was noted, which could impede multifaceted interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing home providers should consider 6 key interventions for ASPs. Such interventions may be feasible for nursing home settings and impactful for improving antibiotic use; however, scientific merit supporting each is variable. A multifaceted approach may be necessary for long-term improvement but difficult to implement.